You violate the ABI, try to use delegates instead of functions.
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 00:47:20 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 03/18/2015 01:13 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Yes. Has for a while.
We're really hanging out for the 32bit COFF libs to ship with
DMD.
Well, someone should add a build target to
岩倉 澪:
However, if enum implies allocation at the usage point for
strings,
There are two ways to see if something allocates: there is a
compiler switch, and an annotation:
void foo() @nogc {
// Your code here
}
If the compiler doesn't have a bug it will complain if you put
something
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14304
Daniel Kozak kozz...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |regression
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14178
--- Comment #1 from Guillaume Chatelet chatelet.guilla...@gmail.com ---
FYI, I'm working on this one right now.
--
On Tuesday, 17 March 2015 at 20:50:51 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
Go is only a CSP-like, it isn't CSP. cf Python-CSP and PyCSP,
not to
mention JCSP and GPars.
I'm not really sure whether this can be put exactly that way.
On a machine with 4 GB RAM you can spawn about 80.000
goroutines (aka green
What about using a JVM with green threads support or Quasar,
wouldn't it be more comparable?
--
Paulo
Long text, contents of common interest in the last section :-)
Thanks for the hints, Paulo. Quasar looks interesting. The
current number one actor implementation for the JVM is Akka
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14301
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 20:50 +, Bienlein via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Go is only a CSP-like, it isn't CSP. cf Python-CSP and PyCSP,
not to
mention JCSP and GPars.
I'm not really sure whether this can be put exactly that way. On
a machine with 4 GB RAM you can spawn about 80.000
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 06:24:38 UTC, Zach the Mystic
wrote:
I'm starting to think that refcounting is precisely the
opposite of ownership, useful only for when its *impossible* to
track ownership easily. Otherwise why would you need a refcount?
It is not the language's problem. If
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14301
--- Comment #5 from Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv ---
std.algorithm.iteration.Cache is private
Ah, I have missed that. Yes, renaming can be an option in that case.
However it does not really address the core issue - adding any new public
symbol to
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14301
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com ---
Yeah, I know. Let's do what we can for now.
--
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 07:58:58 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
But is it document somewhere by spec? Or it is just an
optimalization
which could be remove at some point?
I cannot find it in the specification, but it is guaranteed. It's
a benefit we get from the immutability of strings.
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 08:45:53 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
I have no idea what your point is. Lexer complexity matters
for every tool that needs to lex D code.
Language complexity matters for tools. Lexer complexity is only
download and build, it doesn't matter what is the lexer,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14301
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Dicebot from comment #1)
I don't see what can be done here to be honest. This is inherent flaw of D
module system - adding new symbols to Phobos/druntime will break
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 15:30 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 3/17/15 1:50 PM, Bienlein wrote:
Go is only a CSP-like, it isn't CSP. cf Python-CSP and PyCSP, not to
mention JCSP and GPars.
I'm not really sure whether this can be put exactly that way. On a
machine
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14303
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14303
--- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/ebe07a3f34518e4bbde410f61572b468ac7e8f4e
fix issue 14303
Just go to project Properties, Builders, de-select DUB Build and
add any another build option or script you need.
On Tuesday, 17 March 2015 at 23:54:06 UTC, Manu wrote:
I just checked out DDT, and I noticed it seems to use DUB... _
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 22:49 +, deadalnix via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 March 2015 at 22:30:37 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/17/15 1:50 PM, Bienlein wrote:
Go is only a CSP-like, it isn't CSP. cf Python-CSP and PyCSP,
not to
mention JCSP and GPars.
I'm not
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 08:58 +, Bienlein via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
Thanks for the hints, Paulo. Quasar looks interesting. The
current number one actor implementation for the JVM is Akka
(akka.io). It was earlier built on Hawtdispatch
Possibly, but there are others that get a lot of
On Monday, March 16, 2015 22:27:36 Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d wrote:
The following program compiles fine:
interface I
{}
class B : I
{}
class C : B
{
int i;
}
void main()
{
auto c = new C;
auto i = cast(I)c;// compiles
auto b = cast(B)c;// compiles
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:25:00 -0700
Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com
wrote:
On 03/17/2015 11:21 AM, 岩倉 澪 wrote:
I often hear it advised to avoid using enum with arrays because they
will allocate at the usage point, but does this also apply to
strings?
On Tuesday, 17 March 2015 at 18:14:48 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
How long is the ref returned by getFoo even valid? Maybe it
refers to memory
that gets freed on the next line. The compiler can't know.
The problem is not specific to variables, any reference type has
that issue.
Hi,
I've been lurking around in the forums for quite a long time now,
but only recently tried D for a bit more than some trivial
experimentation. Though the documentation of external libraries
and the tooling itself is far from a commercial solution in
quality, I understand that it's a
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14304
Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@dawg.eu
--- Comment #1 from
On Tuesday, 17 March 2015 at 14:14:59 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Yes, but only a very little bit. How much code could you
delete from a D lexer if they were removed?
The compiler lexer can be of arbitrary complexity, because it's
already written. If you write a compiler, you just grab the
Kagamin wrote in message news:pltiewdojqrmgxrwh...@forum.dlang.org...
The compiler lexer can be of arbitrary complexity, because it's already
written. If you write a compiler, you just grab the ready lexer and use
it, you don't need to count lines. The problem is with other, non-compiler
A priori I do not believe the claim made here: a GPars task is
submitted
to a thread pool, which is exactly what the goroutines are.
Thus the
number of Java threads is not a bound on the number of GPars
tasks. Any
bounds will be provided by the Fork/Join pool.
Here is a GPars sample from
clip
Bearophile,
You said that Unfortunately this thinking is going out of
style for good reasons. I am confused (sorry, I am at
work, and didn't have time to watch the 1+ hour video you
linked to - maybe some clues were there)!
I often find myself feeling a bit like Elazar. Not long
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 01:52:00 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 March 2015 at 21:00:11 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 March 2015 at 19:00:06 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
In addition, further development of the ability to call D
from R or Python* or Julia (or vice-versa) would also
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 19:11:36 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 17:31:17 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 15/03/2015 14:10, Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?=
schue...@gmx.net wrote:
Here's the new version of my scope proposal:
http://wiki.dlang.org/User:Schuetzm/scope2
It's
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14301
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com ---
FWIW, introduced in https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1364
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14304
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
which dmd version?
I'm using DMD64 D Compiler v2.066.0 with DUB version 0.9.22 and
I've got the following dependencies in my dub.json:
dependencies: { vibe-d: ~0.7.19, temple: ~0.7.3 }
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=259
--- Comment #57 from Lionello Lunesu lio+bugzi...@lunesu.com ---
(In reply to Andrei Alexandrescu from comment #56)
What's left to do about this?
I need to finish some of the static code analysis that I have been adding so we
get less false
On Sunday, 8 March 2015 at 18:20:07 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Ok, great. I just tried it on Windows and get this here:
I've pushed support for DMD bootstrapping, so if you need to
build master now, build latest Digger from source. I'll make a
binary release after 2.067 is out.
Elazar Leibovich:
I personally, would have no idea what this piece of code is
doing upon first sight. I'll have to look at the documentation
of
at least two functions to understand that, and I'll have to
think carefully about what and who would throw in case of an
error.
Something like
CraigDillabaugh:
You said that Unfortunately this thinking is going out of
style for good reasons. I am confused (sorry, I am at work,
and didn't have time to watch the 1+ hour video you linked to -
I said unfortunately because it's another reason for us to
refactor and change our coding
On Friday, 13 March 2015 at 17:31:09 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
For example the expression (assuming s is e.g. a string)
File(/tmp/a).byChunk(4096).joiner.startsWith(s)
opens a file, progressively reads chunks of 4KB, stitches them
together at no cost, compares against a prefix until
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14300
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 12:11:52 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Elazar Leibovich:
I personally, would have no idea what this piece of code is
doing upon first sight. I'll have to look at the documentation
of
at least two functions to understand that, and I'll have to
think carefully about
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 12:45:50 UTC, CraigDillabaugh
wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 12:11:52 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Elazar Leibovich:
I personally, would have no idea what this piece of code is
doing upon first sight. I'll have to look at the
documentation of
at least two
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 08:13:37 UTC, István Zólyomi wrote:
Hi,
I've been lurking around in the forums for quite a long time
now, but only recently tried D for a bit more than some trivial
experimentation. Though the documentation of external libraries
and the tooling itself is far
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 12:45:50 UTC, CraigDillabaugh
wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 12:11:52 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Elazar Leibovich:
I personally, would have no idea what this piece of code is
doing upon first sight. I'll have to look at the
documentation of
at least two
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 09:28:35 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 06:24:38 UTC, Zach the Mystic
wrote:
I'm starting to think that refcounting is precisely the
opposite of ownership, useful only for when its *impossible*
to track ownership easily. Otherwise why would
Hello, as in the title. How can I call D functions from C++ (If
my main() is in a c++ file).
Thanks alot!
On Tuesday, 17 March 2015 at 21:16:38 UTC, Carl Sturtivant wrote:
Characterizing the problem as Go versus D is framing it to
D's disadvantage. Broadly speaking Go is one thing D is many
things.
The whole difficulty with D encountered by a person choosing
which of (e.g.) Go and D to use
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 14:20:19 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 14:17:13 UTC, Namal wrote:
Hello, as in the title. How can I call D functions from C++
(If my main() is in a c++ file).
Thanks alot!
D:
extern(C++) void SomeDFunction()
{
doSomething();
}
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 14:20:19 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 14:17:13 UTC, Namal wrote:
Hello, as in the title. How can I call D functions from C++
(If my main() is in a c++ file).
Thanks alot!
D:
extern(C++) void SomeDFunction()
{
doSomething();
}
Hi, can something like this (I borrowed the C pre-processor idea) be
done with variadic mixins?
#define log(variadic-arg) sys-log(%s:%s + variadic-arg[0], __FILE__,
__LINE__, variadic-arg[1..$]);
I read that mixins can only be used for declarations, and this here is
a function call. So
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14296
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Nick Sabalausky from comment #0)
This used to work with the RDMD packaged in DMD v2.064.2, but fails starting
with RDMD 2.065.0.
It didn't exactly work as one would
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:35:03 +0100
Robert M. Münch via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
Hi, can something like this (I borrowed the C pre-processor idea) be
done with variadic mixins?
#define log(variadic-arg) sys-log(%s:%s + variadic-arg[0],
__FILE__,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14298
Ali Cehreli acehr...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9249
Ali Cehreli acehr...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luk.wrzo...@gmail.com
---
alright, thanks alot. Now I have.
test.d
import std.stdio;
extern (C++) int foo(int i, int j, int k)
{
writefln(i = %s, i);
writefln(j = %s, j);
writefln(k = %s, k);
return 1;
}
and main.cpp
int foo(int i, int j, int k);
int main()
{
foo(1,2,3);
}
Can you help me show how
trying to build Deadcode with git HEAD reveals strange bug that i can't
reproduce on smaller codebase:
(some irrelevant error in `gui.style.types.CSSScale.opBinary`)
Error: template instance gui.style.types.CSSScale.opBinary!= error
instantiating
what is interesting about this bug that is was
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 02:00:40 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
Unfortunately there is little documentation (though I'm working
on that). I only use Linux but I would be happy if someone that
knows Windows would find that it works there.
Work machine's firewall isn't letting me run
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14305
Issue ID: 14305
Summary: DMD incorrectly interprets -of and -od with -lib
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14296
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||14305
--
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 14:17:13 UTC, Namal wrote:
Hello, as in the title. How can I call D functions from C++ (If
my main() is in a c++ file).
Thanks alot!
http://dlang.org/cpp_interface.html
http://dlang.org/interfaceToC.html
There is also D.learn ;)
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14301
Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 14:17:13 UTC, Namal wrote:
Hello, as in the title. How can I call D functions from C++ (If
my main() is in a c++ file).
Thanks alot!
D:
extern(C++) void SomeDFunction()
{
doSomething();
}
C++:
void SomeDFunction();
void main()
{
SomeDFunction();
}
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 07:45:54PM +1100, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Kagamin wrote in message news:pltiewdojqrmgxrwh...@forum.dlang.org...
The compiler lexer can be of arbitrary complexity, because it's
already written. If you write a compiler, you just grab the ready
lexer and
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 14:50:21 UTC, Namal wrote:
Can you help me show how to compile and link it together
please, thank you.
Try C example first:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/qppmeeakboxjzuuwr...@forum.dlang.org
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 13:27:54 UTC, CraigDillabaugh
wrote:
clip
Bearophile,
You said that Unfortunately this thinking is going out of
style for good reasons. I am confused (sorry, I am at
work, and didn't have time to watch the 1+ hour video you
linked to - maybe some clues were
On 2015-03-18 05:49, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Thanks. I should have double checked but trusted dstep which
seems to have gotten confused by these ones. Its a great time
saver generally though.
Please report any issues with DStep to [1].
[1] http://github.com/jacob-carlborg/dstep/issues
--
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 13:44:39 UTC, István Zólyomi wrote:
which dmd version?
I'm using DMD64 D Compiler v2.066.0 with DUB version 0.9.22 and
I've got the following dependencies in my dub.json:
dependencies: { vibe-d: ~0.7.19, temple: ~0.7.3 }
It might not solve your problem but i
On 2015-03-17 08:15, Walter Bright wrote:
When Voldemort types are returned, they must be by auto. The user isn't
supposed to know what the return type is, just how to use it.
I still don't like that there's no good way to describe the API. It's
not possible to put a name (that can be used
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 14:50:21 UTC, Namal wrote:
Can you help me show how to compile and link it together
please, thank you.
What platform are you on, windows, linux, osx? What c++ compiler
do you use? msvc, clang, gcc?
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 15:51:28 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 14:40:48 UTC, krzaq wrote:
I'm pretty sure the OP wanted to call D functions from C++,
not C++ functions from D.
If you look very closely you will notice that my example does
exactly what the
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 14:40:48 UTC, krzaq wrote:
I'm pretty sure the OP wanted to call D functions from C++, not
C++ functions from D.
If you look very closely you will notice that my example does
exactly what the OP wanted.
Windows, 32-Bit, DLL:
export extern(C) struct1 struct1(){
struct1 x;
return(x);
}
export extern(C) auto struct2(){
struct1 x;
return(x);
}
struct1 is visible in the DLL, struct2 is not visible in the DLL.
--
Robert M. Münch
http://www.saphirion.com
smarter | better | faster
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14297
bb.t...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14306
Issue ID: 14306
Summary: Wrong codegen with -inline for generic lambdas
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 07:57:39 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
You violate the ABI, try to use delegates instead of functions.
I'm sorry,I don't understand what you mean.
I'm sorry to disrupt the conversation, but I feel like I should
weigh in since I'm a user the original critic felt D should be
attracting. I'm a CS undergrad doing my graduation project in D,
and the only other languages I worked with seriously were Python
and Java(For personal projects and
On 2015-03-16 04:25, deadalnix wrote:
Compiling an hello world is almost instantaneous as far as I experienced
it. I do think it is interesting for you to share your setup so we can
understand what is going on and avoid for another newbie to have the
same experience.
It's most likely linking
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 05:38:40 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/17/2015 06:13 PM, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
DMD gave me an error message for the following declarations:
double mgl_rnd (...);
double mgl_rnd_ (...);
Are you sure those are the right signatures? I don't think
those functions
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14306
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 16:14:28 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-03-18 05:49, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Thanks. I should have double checked but trusted dstep which
seems to have gotten confused by these ones. Its a great time
saver generally though.
Please report any issues with
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 13:01:50 UTC, Oren Tirosh wrote:
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 19:11:36 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 17:31:17 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 15/03/2015 14:10, Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?=
schue...@gmx.net wrote:
Here's the new version of my
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 03:45:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
The bad news: the Phobos documentation sux.
The good news: we can make things a lot better by just filling
in blanks. For example, picking a function largely at random:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_uni.html#sicmp
There is no
I have three modules a.d, b.d, and c.d:
file a.d:```
module i.a;
import i.c, i.b;
final class A {
public:
void foo() {
a.transmogrify();
}
S!void a;
}
```
--
file b.d:```
module i.b;
import i.a, i.c;
class B {
public:
S!void b;
}
```
--
file c.d:```
module
On 03/18/2015 09:02 AM, Maeriden wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 07:57:39 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
You violate the ABI, try to use delegates instead of functions.
I'm sorry,I don't understand what you mean.
The types that you cast to are not correct. In D, callable member
function
On 03/04/2015 05:54 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Finally, this is the first stable release with binary downloads for all
major platforms:
Nice, out of curiosity. How did you build the releases for all the
platforms?
On 03/18/2015 11:03 AM, Dmitri Makarov wrote:
When these modules compiled separately, I assume, both a.o and b.o
contain a definition of i.c.S!void.S.transmogrify() instance.
That is very likely but I played with different three files for a while
and failed to see that.
how is the symbol
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 01:23:26PM -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 01:18:41PM -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 3/18/2015 12:42 PM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
But why, therefore, is it so hard to get movement on it?
I don't know why, so
On 3/17/15 5:45 PM, weaselcat wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 00:34:06 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote in message
news:me9s2m$308v$1...@digitalmars.com...
It pains me to no end to see energy going in all the wrong places.
Just now I was reviewing some code using
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14307
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ddoc
--
On Friday, 13 March 2015 at 04:49:38 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Google does abandon significant projects now and then, such as
this one:
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html
In fairness pretty much everything that was on google-code has
moved, mostly
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 15:13:24 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 02:00:40 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
Unfortunately there is little documentation (though I'm
working on that). I only use Linux but I would be happy if
someone that knows Windows would find that it works there.
I'm fed up with this problem. It is actively hurting us every day.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14307
Anyone want to take this on? Shouldn't be particularly difficult.
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 11:53:06 UTC, Elazar Leibovich
wrote:
On Friday, 13 March 2015 at 17:31:09 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
For example the expression (assuming s is e.g. a string)
File(/tmp/a).byChunk(4096).joiner.startsWith(s)
opens a file, progressively reads chunks of 4KB,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14307
Jonathan M Davis issues.dl...@jmdavisprog.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 18:18:19 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 03/04/2015 05:54 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Finally, this is the first stable release with binary
downloads for all
major platforms:
Nice, out of curiosity. How did you build the releases for all
the platforms?
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14304
Issue ID: 14304
Summary: dmd: interpret.c:6724: void setValue(VarDeclaration*,
Expression*): Assertion `(vd-storage_class
(0x1000LL | 0x20LL)) ?
On Tuesday, 17 March 2015 at 14:01:18 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/17/15 7:18 AM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
On Monday, 16 March 2015 at 21:38:22 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Release Candidate for 2.067.0
http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2.x/2.067.0/
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/
You can
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 22:32:05 +, Trent Forkert via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
The only sensible way to use multiple languages in the same
project is to use the same build system for them. Anything else
is way too fragile and hackish.
Arbitrary, contrived example (though not
On 3/18/15 4:54 PM, David Gileadi wrote:
On 3/18/15 4:48 PM, jkpl wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 23:41:41 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/18/2015 5:45 AM, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
You said that Unfortunately this thinking is going out of style
for good
reasons. I am confused (sorry, I
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
