On 4/6/2015 10:08 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
w0rp wrote in message news:zynuvcoprfgplvboq...@forum.dlang.org...
I spotted a typo in the schedule. Daniel Murphy's talk says Motivation for
converting the project to C++. That should say to D.
My secret plan is to convert it back to C++ after
Yes it is.
takeNone() take a char from a string.
So you are going to append a char (with code 5) on the next line.
If you replace that line with:
s ~= 65;
it will print A. (65 is ascii code for letter 'A')
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 02:24:00 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
Hi,
Is it OK?
-
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 06:37:50 UTC, Jonathan wrote:
static if (is(T == V))
Are static ifs always checked outside of runtime? Is it
possible for a static if condition to be undeterminable outside
of runtime, or would such a condition throw a compiler error?
'static if' is always run
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14419
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
--- Comment
On Monday, 6 April 2015 at 23:51:17 UTC, Adam Hawkins wrote:
Hello everyone, this is my first post on the forum. I've been
investigating the language for the past few weeks. I was able
to complete my first useful program thanks to very helpful
people in #d on IRC . The experience made me very
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 01:12:20 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
The thing I liked, coming from languages like R and Ruby, was
that I could write D code in the most convenient, least
efficient manner possible and still get good enough performance
that it wouldn't matter. I find D to be easier to
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 04:05:38 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 03:17:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP76
I am against this. It can lead to silent irreversible data
corruption.
I can see the value in both.
With something like Objective
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 05:51:33 UTC, yazd wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 05:49:48 UTC, yazd wrote:
I got this to work with:
```
import std.stdio, std.file, std.csv, std.range;
void main()
{
std.file.write(test.csv, 0,1,abc\n2,3,def);
scope(exit)
On Sunday, 5 April 2015 at 12:50:52 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Sunday, 5 April 2015 at 12:22:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Unless LDC does some D specific WPO magic I am not aware of
this is not what your original statement was about.
llvm does normal WPO in a sense that compiled code is not
opaque.
On Monday, 6 April 2015 at 11:29:20 UTC, Sergei Nosov wrote:
On Sunday, 5 April 2015 at 00:22:35 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
It seems to me that different projects might benefit from
different compilation strategies. It might just be a case of
unit tests alongside production code vs in separate
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14350
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/6833d64a4f3ab2fb7af979ddf9ab1558dd369606
fix Issue 14350 -
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14350
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14420
Issue ID: 14420
Summary: partial template ordering with specialization and
different arities seems broken
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 07:42:02 UTC, w0rp wrote:
Maybe autodecoding could throw an Error (No 'new' allowed) when
debug mode is on, and use replacement characters in release
mode. I haven't thought it through, but that's an idea.
No no no, terrible idea. This means your program will pass
On Monday, 6 April 2015 at 18:17:31 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On the other hand, many features in the language could be
implementation as macro in object.d, reducing language
complexity.
Mixin has some severe limitation when you want to pass symbols
that are not accessible down the road (the
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 03:17:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP76
Deprecation can be reported by checking version:
version(EnableNothrowAutodecoding)
alias autodecode=autodecodeImpl;
else
@deprecated(compile with -version=EnableNothrowAutodecoding)
alias
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 03:17:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP76
I have doubts about it similar to Vladimir. Main problem is that
I have no idea what actually happens if replacement characters
appear in some unicode text my program processes. So far I have
that
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14420
--- Comment #1 from Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org ---
i'm expecting the same (with second instantiates non-specialized template,
which it does currently).
--
On Mon, 06 Apr 2015 23:51:16 +, Adam Hawkins wrote:
I've been reading the forums here so I can see that there is a focus on
improving the marketing for the language and growing the community. I
see most of the effort is geared towards C++ programmers, but have you
considered looking at us
static if (is(T == V))
Are static ifs always checked outside of runtime? Is it possible
for a static if condition to be undeterminable outside of
runtime, or would such a condition throw a compiler error?
On 7 April 2015 at 07:08, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
w0rp wrote in message news:zynuvcoprfgplvboq...@forum.dlang.org...
I spotted a typo in the schedule. Daniel Murphy's talk says Motivation
for converting the project to C++. That should say to D.
My
On 3/31/2015 12:32 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm looking at the dlang.org statistics and am seeing the top pages looked at
are: download.html, changelog.html, and phobos/. The first two are nice, but
http://dlang.org/phobos/ is in serious need of completion - many modules don't
have a brief
On 2015-04-07 01:51, Adam Hawkins wrote:
Only trade off in the Ruby case is metaprogramming.
You can do metaprogramming in D, it's just a bit different compared to Ruby.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2015-04-07 02:29, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 00:15:51 UTC, w0rp wrote:
[...]and runtime templates. The last two haven't been written yet.
Really? Runtime templates aren't even hard to implement
vibe.d has a template system. It's based on Jade, which seems to be
thank you.
and i read the code a little, and found that matching engine using stream-
like interface to work with data, so it wouldn't be very hard to use
ranges instead of strings. and for real regexps (those without
backtracking) range seems to doesn't even require random access.
Vladimir Panteleev:
std.conv doesn't return NaN if you try to convert banana to a
double.
I have suggested to add a nothrow function like maybeTo that
returns a Nullable result.
Bye,
bearophile
Depends on how you fill aTUs.
import std.stdio, std.parallelism;
auto names = [ Adam Hawkins, Peter Esselius ];
foreach(name; taskPool.parallel(names)) {
writeln(name);
}
There is a convenience function in std.parallelism that allows
you to write the following instead for your foreach loop:
foreach (name;
For example if you slice the original string, it will be
preserved in memory. That's why parsers keep parsed substrings by
duplicating them - this can result in smaller memory footprint.
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 15:35:15 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 3 April 2015 at 12:10, Andrea Fontana via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
It would be great to have dmd on embedded platforms.
We have GDC supporting ARM, MIPS, PPC, S390, etc... LDC
supporting
ARM... what more
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 08:49:58 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Yes it is.
takeNone() take a char from a string.
So you are going to append a char (with code 5) on the next
line.
If you replace that line with:
s ~= 65;
it will print A. (65 is ascii code for letter 'A')
Thanks. I am
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 09:04:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/7/2015 1:19 AM, Dicebot wrote:
I have doubts about it similar to Vladimir. Main problem is
that I have no idea
what actually happens if replacement characters appear in some
unicode text my
program processes.
It's much like
On 4/7/2015 2:10 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 09:04:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/7/2015 1:19 AM, Dicebot wrote:
I have doubts about it similar to Vladimir. Main problem is that I have no idea
what actually happens if replacement characters appear in some
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 22:44:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
It's the end of Q1. Walter and I reviewed our vision document.
We're staying the course with one important addition: switching
to ddmd, hopefully with 2.068.
http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2015H1
Andrei
vibe.d is a
Many thanks for the feedback yazd! I've tested the approach with
a large csv file and it works fine. Unfortunately csvReader seems
very convenient but it is no speed daemon. To my dismay it was
much slower (about 4x) than a simple approach I am using in
Python, which is essentially equivalent
On 4/7/2015 1:19 AM, Dicebot wrote:
I have doubts about it similar to Vladimir. Main problem is that I have no idea
what actually happens if replacement characters appear in some unicode text my
program processes.
It's much like floating point NaN values, which are 'sticky'.
So far I have
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 09:44:11 UTC, gjansen wrote:
Many thanks for the feedback yazd! I've tested the approach
with a large csv file and it works fine. Unfortunately
csvReader seems very convenient but it is no speed daemon. To
my dismay it was much slower (about 4x) than a simple
On 2015-04-07 10:33, John Colvin wrote:
(parentheses are optional for all function calls),
Optional for all function calls taking no arguments. Note that in Ruby
parentheses are optional for function calls taking arguments as well.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 07:50:40 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 07:42:02 UTC, w0rp wrote:
Maybe autodecoding could throw an Error (No 'new' allowed)
when debug mode is on, and use replacement characters in
release mode. I haven't thought it through, but that's
On 04/07/2015 08:28 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
vibe.d has a template system. It's based on Jade, which seems to be
based on Haml.
There is also a runtime template system,
http://code.dlang.org/packages/mustache-d.
See https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/gdcproject for an example.
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 09:21:52 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/7/2015 2:10 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 09:04:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/7/2015 1:19 AM, Dicebot wrote:
I have doubts about it similar to Vladimir. Main problem is
that I have no idea
what
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14421
Issue ID: 14421
Summary: Variadic args array force on heap
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority:
Hi, I think I have a bug report for DerelictGL3, but cannot find
the related Forum
( http://dblog.aldacron.net/forum/index.php ), is it still in the
process of being moved ?
Regards, ParticlePeter
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 10:48:38 UTC, ParticlePeter wrote:
Hi, I think I have a bug report for DerelictGL3, but cannot
find the related Forum
( http://dblog.aldacron.net/forum/index.php ), is it still in
the process of being moved ?
Regards, ParticlePeter
Post it there:
dmd -O (2.066.1) and gdc -O3 (4.9.2)
But... as I tried to convey, I was comparing apples to oranges. I
have now rewritten the D test simply using split(',') instead of
csvReader, to be more similar to the python test, and it runs
about 2x faster in D with dmd and about 4x faster with gdc
On 04/06/2015 11:09 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
We actually have a JSON parser meant to replace std.json that should be
very high performance. You can try it out now using dub:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/std_data_json
It also includes a stream parser for the highest performance
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 03:17:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP76
The DIP lists the benefits but does not mention any cons.
A con that I can see is that it is violating the 'fail fast'
principle. By silently replacing data the developer will be
presented with a
On Monday, 6 April 2015 at 21:40:28 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
So if some configuration is portable and you want to create
something
really fine grained you could offer that directory as an
alternative roaming config dir (returning null or
~/.config on Linux).
Though it's unusual for an average
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14422
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
---
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 08:28:08 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
And I have never been speaking about normal WPO, only about
one specific to D semantics.
AFAIK, hypothetical D-specific optimizations were never
implemented (like elision of pure calls and optimization of
immutable data). But they work
The D features which interest me the most are those supporting
contract-based programming. I want to experiment with that and I
know no other production ready language which has this level of
support, except the original gangsta Eiffel but the only
supported Eiffel compiler is proprietary and
Hi All,
The next Berlin D Meetup will be happening as always on the third
Friday of the month, April the 17th at 19:30. The venue will be
Berlin Co-Op (http://co-up.de/)
on the 3rd floor. Mihails Strasuns will be doing a presentation
titled Highway to D2. After the presentation we will have
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 13:11:01 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 12:51:45 UTC, Delirius wrote:
I know no other production ready language which has this
level of support, except the original gangsta Eiffel but the
only
Ada2012? Some languages use require and
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 12:51:45 UTC, Delirius wrote:
The D features which interest me the most are those supporting
contract-based programming. I want to experiment with that and
I know no other production ready language which has this level
of support, except the original gangsta Eiffel
EDIT: mis-formatted previous snippet
import std.algorithm, std.stdio, std.range, std.conv;
void main()
{
stdin
.byLine
.filter!(s = !s.empty s.front != '#’) // Filter with
this lambda function
.map!(s = s.to!double) // Map the strings to doubles
.array //
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14420
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:21:50AM -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 4/7/2015 2:10 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
[...]
I think the correct solution to that is to kill auto-decoding :) Then
all decoding is explicit, and since it is explicit, it is trivial to
allow specifying the
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14413
--- Comment #2 from Sönke Ludwig slud...@outerproduct.org ---
Do you know if that been a concious decision or is it just an artefact of the
implementation? I don't think it makes much sense as it is. Personally I always
use /** */ style comments, but
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 01:28:03 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
I'm watching your progress closely. I think we are ready to get
D properly on micro controllers and you are really testing,
exploring it even.
Johannes made some very important additions for regarding this.
It might already be
On Monday, 6 April 2015 at 18:00:46 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Why is that? The use case is to provide a set of convenience
extension methods to a basic interface. Say, given:
This is not the only use case, another (maybe even more common)
use is to allow pipeline programming.
Example from
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 12:51:45 UTC, Delirius wrote:
I know no other production ready language which has this level
of support, except the original gangsta Eiffel but the only
Ada2012? Some languages use require and ensure or a similar
notion in the body of a function for pre/post
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 11:36:54 UTC, gjansen wrote:
dmd -O (2.066.1) and gdc -O3 (4.9.2)
But... as I tried to convey, I was comparing apples to oranges.
I have now rewritten the D test simply using split(',') instead
of csvReader, to be more similar to the python test, and it
runs about
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14413
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Sönke Ludwig from comment #0)
---
/// This function is here to aid in making your
/// software do cool stuff.
void foo() {}
---
It's equivalent with:
---
/**
This function is
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 11:16:56 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-04-07 10:33, John Colvin wrote:
(parentheses are optional for all function calls),
Optional for all function calls taking no arguments. Note that
in Ruby parentheses are optional for function calls taking
arguments as
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 08:33:58 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
@property isn't really about parentheses-less calls
(parentheses are optional for all function calls), it's more
for this sort of thing:
[snip]
@property void val(int v)
{
a_ = (a_ flagMask) (v ~flagMask);
}
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 14:20:58 UTC, Jens Bauer wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 08:33:58 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
@property isn't really about parentheses-less calls
(parentheses are optional for all function calls), it's more
for this sort of thing:
[snip]
@property void val(int v)
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 09:10:32AM +, Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[...]
I think the correct solution to that is to kill auto-decoding :) Then
all decoding is explicit, and since it is explicit, it is trivial to
allow specifying the desired behavior upon encountering invalid
Hi all!
I started to work on cent/ucent support in LDC (and possible in
upstream DMD). Here is the current state:
1) The pull request
https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/pull/891/files implements
cent/ucent based on the upcoming major LDC release (branch
merge-2.067).
It is usable but
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 09:03:19 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
For example if you slice the original string, it will be
preserved in memory. That's why parsers keep parsed substrings
by duplicating them - this can result in smaller memory
footprint.
H... Will you be able to give me an example
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 08:58:31 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
Depends on how you fill aTUs.
Ok, I will bite... ;-)
I have the wText string which could be 20 mgs or so, I start
finding pieces of data like this,
wText = wText[std.string.find(wText,/ut) + 5 .. $];
so, everything before /ut,
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 15:11:39 UTC, tcak wrote:
I have data in memory, and I want a function to take a part of
data for processing only. It will only read and won't change.
char[] importantData;
With Immutable,
void dataProcessor( string giveMeAllYourData ){}
dataProcessor( cast(
On 4/6/15 4:51 PM, Adam Hawkins wrote:
Hello everyone, this is my first post on the forum. I've been
investigating the language for the past few weeks. I was able to
complete my first useful program thanks to very helpful people in #d on
IRC . The experience made me very interested in the
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14419
--- Comment #15 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org ---
(In reply to yebblies from comment #14)
(In reply to Martin Nowak from comment #9)
If you really think we should fix this, then a time limit for CTFE execution
might be feasible.
An
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14419
--- Comment #16 from Jens Bauer jens-bugzi...@gpio.dk ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #15)
So then you just need to decide what is a suitable iteration limit,
short.max? ushort.max?
If it's just to make sure that we're not stuck forever,
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 16:39:39 UTC, Jens Bauer wrote:
:C - :D
Even better (includes the meaning of '=' in place of 'when'):
=C - =D
Hi!
Excuse me if this is obvious, but I can't recall coming across
anything similar and a quick search returns nothing relevant:
struct Foo {
}
struct FooWrapper {
alias x_ this;
private Foo* x_; // doesn't work, as x_ is private
}
Basically, I want x_ to never be visible, except
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 08:25:02 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
See, the problem with this approach is that you can trivially
get out of 1GB of memory with DMD even when compiling single
module, all you need is to do enough compile-time magic.
Separate compilation here delays the issue but does not
If you're just looking at the data, use const. immutable becomes
more important if it is shared across threads or stored for later.
Functions that accept const will work with almost anything you
pass to it.
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 14:46:52 UTC, cym13 wrote:
EDIT: mis-formatted previous snippet
import std.algorithm, std.stdio, std.range, std.conv;
void main()
{
stdin
.byLine
.filter!(s = !s.empty s.front != '#’) // Filter
with this lambda function
.map!(s =
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14413
--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Sönke Ludwig from comment #2)
Do you know if that been a concious decision or is it just an artefact of
the implementation? I don't think it makes much sense as it is. Personally I
I have data in memory, and I want a function to take a part of
data for processing only. It will only read and won't change.
char[] importantData;
With Immutable,
void dataProcessor( string giveMeAllYourData ){}
dataProcessor( cast( immutable )( importantData[5 .. 14] ) );
With Const,
I'm trying to add some compile-time function generation to dmd,
but wasn't sure exactly how to click all the little legos
together.
Is there any documentation or reference for the DMD AST? Or maybe
some examples somewhere of what an AST may look like for a given
function?
As a last resort,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14413
--- Comment #4 from Sönke Ludwig slud...@outerproduct.org ---
Just that concatenation as paragraphs instead of concatenation as lines
precludes the use of this documentation style:
/// This is the summary, possibly going
/// over multiple lines.
///
Anyone up to this? The issues of the previous discussion [1] have all
been addressed now more or less, so the package is ready for a more
thorough review.
Code: https://github.com/s-ludwig/std_data_json
Docs: http://s-ludwig.github.io/std_data_json/
[1]:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 16:29:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I noticed a bug in one of the examples:
assert(Adam Hawkins == myName());
should be:
assert(Adam Hawkins == myName());
-It already is. :)
By the way; the reason to switch from C to D can be put *very*
simple:
:C - :D
tcak:
void dataProcessor( string giveMeAllYourData ){}
dataProcessor( cast( immutable )( importantData[5 .. 14] ) );
With Const,
void dataProcessor( in char[] giveMeAllYourData ){}
dataProcessor( cast( const )( importantData[5 .. 14] ) );
Don't cast to const/immutable unless you have a
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 06:28:49 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
vibe.d has a template system. It's based on Jade, which seems
to be based on Haml.
Aye, though it is compile time rather than runtime which hurts
the edit/run cycle - you have to recompile, redeploy (maybe), and
restart just to
On 4/6/2015 4:51 PM, Adam Hawkins wrote:
Hello everyone, this is my first post on the forum. I've been investigating the
language for the past few weeks. I was able to complete my first useful program
thanks to very helpful people in #d on IRC . The experience made me very
interested in the
On 2015-04-07 18:06, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Aye, though it is compile time rather than runtime which hurts the
edit/run cycle - you have to recompile, redeploy (maybe), and restart
just to see a quick text change.
Oh, right, that was what he meant with runtime :)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 4/7/2015 5:04 AM, Abdulhaq wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 03:17:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP76
The DIP lists the benefits but does not mention any cons.
A con that I can see is that it is violating the 'fail fast' principle. By
silently replacing data the
I haven't been active on the newsgroups lately, so lose track of what's going on. Has
anything happened?
Just now I tried to commit to the bindings project on dsource, but got an error
POST request on '/projects/bindings/!svn/me' failed: 500 Internal Server Error
Has it been doing this for a
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14419
--- Comment #17 from Jens Bauer jens-bugzi...@gpio.dk ---
(In reply to Jens Bauer from comment #16)
As a fail-safe, an unsigned 32-bit counter could be used as an 'absolutely
maximum limit'.
... and if the 32-bit counter wraps, then an error
Done
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 10:50:35 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 10:48:38 UTC, ParticlePeter wrote:
Hi, I think I have a bug report for DerelictGL3, but cannot
find the related Forum
( http://dblog.aldacron.net/forum/index.php ), is it still in
the process of being
On 4/7/2015 9:28 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
I noticed a bug in one of the examples:
assert(Adam Hawkins == myName());
er, the example is:
assert(Adam Hawkins = myName());
should be:
assert(Adam Hawkins == myName());
On Monday, 6 April 2015 at 03:19:03 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On that note, anyone willing to help create and ODBC host via
Derelict or will I be doing something like that?
I don't understand this sentence. :/
Andrei, if vibed will include in DMD distribution, would it's
mean that common libs (like json) will be merged with DMD? I
think it would very rational step.
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 09:21:52 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/7/2015 2:10 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I think the correct solution to that is to kill auto-decoding
:) Then all
decoding is explicit, and since it is explicit, it is trivial
to allow
specifying the desired behavior upon
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 17:25:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
The current D associative array algorithm
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/blob/master/src/rt/aaA.d
uses an array of buckets with a linked list attached to the
buckets to resolve collisions.
Linked lists
On 4/7/15 2:16 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 08:58:57 UTC, ixid wrote:
Or to be more consistent with UFCS:
foreach (name; names.parallel) {
name.writeln;
}
no.please
wat
On 03/25/2015 10:38 PM, weaselcat wrote:
Anyone know if there's been any comparisons of different
heapSizeFactor values? Primarly, compared to the default 2, 1.5 or 1.618.
has anyone working on the GC actually done any comparisons of the new
options?
Yes, we compared different values and 2
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
