Hi everybody,
first of all: this question is going to be unclear, because I'm
lack of the "buzz word" I would like to ask about, sorry for this
in advance.
I try to describe the problem, where I stuck and hope somebody
could think just a step further. Just a hint where to read about
the
On 03.11.2015 11:22, Johannes Pfau wrote:
I guess it's to be compatible with the latest DMD, LDC and GDC. GDC
currently only provides the 2.066.1 frontend.
A bit offtopic - will the situation change with ddmd accepted? I mean
the situation with different frontend version in different
i have seen many PR's and also Forum entries that deal with the
problem of newer features of the compiler not being able and then
patching or working around that to support older compiler
versions.
since it is really easy to keep up with compiler versions and
even switch
(and not many
Is there a reason why std.algorithm.iteration.filter() doesn't
propagate bidirectional access?
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 08:41:11 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Is there a reason why std.algorithm.iteration.filter() doesn't
propagate bidirectional access?
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm_iteration.html#filterBidirectional
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 08:23:20 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> "Programming in D" book (the revision of 2015-10-24)
Oooh! That smells very fresh. :)
:)
> In my case, the container class can't become empty. Even if
it contains
> one single element, in this case the example should return
Am Tue, 03 Nov 2015 08:08:26 +
schrieb yawniek :
> i have seen many PR's and also Forum entries that deal with the
> problem of newer features of the compiler not being able and then
> patching or working around that to support older compiler
> versions.
>
> since it is
On 11/02/2015 11:59 PM, Alex wrote:
> "Programming in D" book (the revision of 2015-10-24)
Oooh! That smells very fresh. :)
> In my case, the container class can't become empty. Even if it contains
> one single element, in this case the example should return true for
> begin == end, it is not
... and yes, each P's M's are meant to be the same, as the
associated M's in the B's class to the P. If you understand, what
I mean ;)
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 07:30:44 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Am Tue, 3 Nov 2015 09:16:47 +1000
schrieb Manu via Digitalmars-d :
I have a samples directory which it would be theoretically
possible to run and see that they don't crash as part of a
test run.
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 08:36:46 UTC, Joakim wrote:
There's a Dreamcast emulator for Android/ARM:
https://github.com/reicast/reicast-emulator
You could run it inside the Android emulator on Travis: :)
http://docs.travis-ci.com/user/languages/android/
I'm sure their servers can handle
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 03:26:47 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, 2 November 2015 at 15:00:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 11/02/2015 09:43 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 2 November 2015 at 14:43:00 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 2 November 2015 at 14:33:44 UTC, Andrei
On Tuesday, November 03, 2015 07:35:40 Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 06:14:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
> wrote:
> > You should pretty much never use __FILE__ or __LINE__ as
> > template arguments unless you actually need to. The reason is
> > that it will end
https://www.thurrott.com/mobile/7541/google-doesnt-quite-deny-chrome-os-android-story
Paulo and I looked into the future and predicted this in June:
Paulo: "Eventually Google will realize [Chromebooks] are as
useful as WebOS and will merge them with Android."
http://dconf.org/2016/venue.html
We're pleased to announce that DConf 2016 will take place in Heimathafen
Neukölln, the crucible of modern Berliner Volkstheater ("People's
Theater"). We should feel right at home amid the energy, provocative
contrasts, and colorful creativity on
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 14:52:19 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 14:47:14 UTC, Namal wrote:
I remember it is possible to get the index for each element in
the foreach loop, but I forgot how to do it. Can you help me
out please. Thx.
for many of them it is as
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15281
Issue ID: 15281
Summary: std\experimental\allocator\package.d not included in
build script
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: Windows
Status:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 15:10:43 UTC, wobbles wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 15:06:00 UTC, Namal wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 14:52:19 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 14:47:14 UTC, Namal wrote:
[...]
for many of them it is as simple as:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 15:06:00 UTC, Namal wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 14:52:19 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 14:47:14 UTC, Namal wrote:
I remember it is possible to get the index for each element
in the foreach loop, but I forgot how to do it. Can
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15274
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On 3 November 2015 at 12:57, drug via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 03.11.2015 14:11, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
>> On 3 November 2015 at 11:35, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
>> > wrote:
>>
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15280
--- Comment #1 from Sobirari Muhomori ---
One const method looks enough in your case:
List tail() const
{
assert(root);
auto n = root.next;
return List(n);
}
--
On 03.11.2015 15:50, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Well, how would that work? :-)
What you've probably misheard is half of a phrase. Moving to towards
ddmd is not to be confused with moving towards a shared 'frontend'
codebase, and is the first half of the correct sentence. The
On 3/11/2015 7:52 PM, drug wrote:
On 03.11.2015 11:22, Johannes Pfau wrote:
I guess it's to be compatible with the latest DMD, LDC and GDC. GDC
currently only provides the 2.066.1 frontend.
A bit offtopic - will the situation change with ddmd accepted? I mean
the situation with different
On Monday, 2 November 2015 at 15:33:54 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
And that's for writing code. With regards to reading, it's been
pointed out multiple times that beginners will struggle with
template contraints on function signatures. It'll be the case
much more often if every function and struct
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7517
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||initrd...@gmail.com
---
On 11/02/2015 09:33 PM, Iakh wrote:
-
Naive:21.46 TickDuration(132842482)
SIMD: 1.161 TickDuration(7188211)
(was)SIMD: 3.04 TickDuration(18920182)
C:1 TickDuration(6189222)
Looks like the current memchr is well optimized. Not much blood
On 03.11.2015 14:11, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 3 November 2015 at 11:35, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
On 3/11/2015 7:52 PM, drug wrote:
On 03.11.2015 11:22, Johannes Pfau wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 08:37:22 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Am I the only one who ever writes `int[]` or `Struct[]` in a
function signature?
Probably not, but I write very little code that operates on
arrays rather than ranges. If I do, it's usually in a short
program or script where I'm
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 08:08:28 UTC, yawniek wrote:
i have seen many PR's and also Forum entries that deal with the
problem of newer features of the compiler not being able and
then patching or working around that to support older compiler
versions.
For end-users it is always good to
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 10:17:42 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 09:06:57 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Android and iOS are gunning for laptops next, with their
recently announced Pixel C and iPad Pro, I'm sure desktops
will soon follow. When those two platforms went after
On 3 November 2015 at 11:35, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 3/11/2015 7:52 PM, drug wrote:
>
>> On 03.11.2015 11:22, Johannes Pfau wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I guess it's to be compatible with the latest DMD, LDC and GDC. GDC
>>> currently only provides the
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 09:06:57 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Android and iOS are gunning for laptops next, with their
recently announced Pixel C and iPad Pro, I'm sure desktops will
soon follow. When those two platforms went after Windows
Mobile/Phone, they burned it to the ground:
On 2015-11-03 10:06, Joakim wrote:
as Swift is still iOS-only
Swift was available on OS X from day one. When Swift 2.0 was released it
was open sourced and made available on Linux as well.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2015-11-03 15:28, Joakim wrote:
Since when is OS X a mobile platform? ;)
Fair enough.
That was _announced_ with Swift 2.0, but my google searches show it has
neither been open sourced nor made available for linux yet.
Hmm. Didn't know that.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 15:10:43 UTC, wobbles wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 15:06:00 UTC, Namal wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 14:52:19 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 14:47:14 UTC, Namal wrote:
I remember it is possible to get the index for each
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 15:10:43 UTC, wobbles wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 15:06:00 UTC, Namal wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 14:52:19 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 14:47:14 UTC, Namal wrote:
I remember it is possible to get the index for each
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 15:29:31 UTC, Namal wrote:
writefln("Count is: %s", arr
.filter!(a => a==true)
.sum);
// Note: std.algorithm.sum is the same as
// std.algorithm.reduce!((a,b)=a+b);
Shouldn't you be using walkLength instead of sum, since you are
counting the left over
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1587
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On 11/03/2015 09:35 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
https://goo.gl/r24Izw
Some of them are D1 only; I'll make an executive decision about those soon.
After speaking to Don I am closing D1-only Phobos bugs with "wontfix".
If anyone wants to work on specific bugs, please reopen. Thanks! --
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1772
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1721
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1937
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1998
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||and...@erdani.com
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 16:55:44 UTC, wobbles wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 15:42:16 UTC, Edwin van Leeuwen
wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 15:29:31 UTC, Namal wrote:
writefln("Count is: %s", arr
.filter!(a => a==true)
.sum);
// Note: std.algorithm.sum is the same as
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=973
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3764
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||and...@erdani.com
e.g. https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3561 and many with a
smaller ID.
Andrei
This:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 04:08:09 UTC, TheFlyingFiddle
wrote:
__gshared char[4] lookup = ['a', 't', 'g', 'c];
Has the same efficiency gain as immutable, so it looks like a
thread-local vs global difference and the extra cost is going
through the thread-local lookup.
Thanks
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1953
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15272
--- Comment #16 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to stable at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/633c50a4ffd3980502eaacecf7c743e7051925a3
fix Issue 15272 -
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3725
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||and...@erdani.com
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3741
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1926
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3019
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2993
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 14:35:08 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
https://goo.gl/r24Izw
Some of them are D1 only; I'll make an executive decision about
those soon. Some of them have been fixed or obviated by recent
improvements. And finally the bulk of them need a little work
each to
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1752
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1077
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #4
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1512
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Tuesday, 15 September 2015 at 11:40:58 UTC, Raphaël Jakse
wrote:
http://dlang-fr.org/cours/programmer-en-d/
Hello,
I just want to notify that the translation moved to a new URL :
http://d.unix.cat/
The reason is that dlang-fr.org expired, and as the website was a
complete failure due to
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1583
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3764
Jack Stouffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@jackstouffer.com
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2467
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 15:42:16 UTC, Edwin van Leeuwen
wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 15:29:31 UTC, Namal wrote:
writefln("Count is: %s", arr
.filter!(a => a==true)
.sum);
// Note: std.algorithm.sum is the same as
// std.algorithm.reduce!((a,b)=a+b);
Shouldn't you be
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1960
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1966
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2585
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2898
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #2
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3248
--- Comment #15 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
Anyone working on this?
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2163
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2160
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2447
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||and...@erdani.com
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15272
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3561
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||and...@erdani.com
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15102
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12254
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
On Saturday, 31 October 2015 at 14:37:23 UTC, rumbu wrote:
On Friday, 30 October 2015 at 10:35:03 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
I'm writing a talk for codemesh on the use of D in finance.
Any other thoughts?
For finance stuff - missing a floating point decimal data type.
Things like 1.1 + 2.2 =
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12254
--- Comment #10 from Andrej Mitrovic ---
> you can't filter through closed pulls where you can tell whether a pull was
> closed because it was merged, or it was closed but not merged.
I think this one is still true.
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 22:36:21 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
That's fine. D's slices do that all the time: arr[0..3] and
arr[3..$] seem to share index 3 but it is not the case: The
first slice does not use it but the second one does.
Ok... great! This is what I worried about...
Aside: If
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12935
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 19:42:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I wrote this: http://wiki.dlang.org/Starting_as_a_Contributor,
is it what you need it to be? -- Andrei
"Then, github detects the new code and offers assistance to
create a pull request with just a couple of clicks."
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 19:42:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I wrote this: http://wiki.dlang.org/Starting_as_a_Contributor,
is it what you need it to be? -- Andrei
There's also these:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Building_DMD
http://wiki.dlang.org/Pull_Requests
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2993
--- Comment #5 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
(In reply to hsteoh from comment #4)
> Vague?
>
> I thought it's pretty clear what this bug is asking for: fix the
> implementation of getopt so that it doesn't require the use of
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3764
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/d085228a43f9d81fbd2a52a55a069a2e222af153
fix issue 3764
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3764
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Monday, 10 March 2014 at 06:40:49 UTC, Kenji Hara wrote:
2014-03-10 6:31 GMT+09:00 Timon Gehr :
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP57
Thoughts?
From the "Semantics" section:
For static foreach statements, break and continue are
supported and
treated like for foreach
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3561
--- Comment #5 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
I'm unclear what to do on enhancement requests that contain small ideas like
this. If this were a PR, I'd consider it. But as things are, we need a champion
to take this to a PR.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3561
--- Comment #7 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx ---
Precisely. D has enough machinery to be able to factor out the common logic of
applying a unary function over a static array, dynamic array, matrix, etc.,
there's no need to complicate the implementation
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3862
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan M Davis ---
(In reply to Vladimir Panteleev from comment #6)
> For example, copying a file into the subdirectory if the destination path is
> a directory is something that would, IMO, violate
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3862
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2993
--- Comment #6 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx ---
More complex programs may employ dispatch from the main program to subprograms
that do option parsing on their own. (I've written such programs before.) But
this is a rare use case, and even then I still
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4113
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3862
--- Comment #5 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
ping @Jonathan :o)
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2993
--- Comment #4 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx ---
Vague?
I thought it's pretty clear what this bug is asking for: fix the implementation
of getopt so that it doesn't require the use of globals. (Of course, whether
or not this is worth the effort is a
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3862
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo