https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16550
--- Comment #4 from Walter Bright ---
I also cannot find any documentation on extractRe() and extractIm(). I googled
for "ldc extractre extractim" and there were no results.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16550
--- Comment #3 from Walter Bright ---
The example does not compile with gdc.
--
Maybe interesting (hoping it is not too redundant with the links
here)
https://github.com/zhaopuming/awesome-d
Vincent
Dne 16.11.2016 v 04:17 rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
On 16/11/2016 3:41 AM, Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Dne 15.11.2016 v 14:23 AB via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 11:28:16 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 10:31:23
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16558
--- Comment #9 from Walter Bright ---
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1693
--
On Monday, 14 November 2016 at 19:49:26 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Please join us at DConf 2017, the conference of the D
programming language in Berlin, Germany, May 4-6 2017.
We're happy to announce that the D Language Foundation is
cooperating again with Sociomantic to organize DConf
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16693
Issue ID: 16693
Summary: Update DConf 2017 announcement on dlang.org
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
On 16/11/2016 4:58 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 23:34:34 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 16:20:53 AB via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:00:48 UTC, kink wrote:
> It's not just the linker. You need the libs as well (static >
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 23:34:34 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 16:20:53 AB via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:00:48 UTC, kink wrote:
> It's not just the linker. You need the libs as well (static
> and dynamic ones), and not just the
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16692
Issue ID: 16692
Summary: New debug experience: possible to execute pure
functions during expression evaluation?
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16691
Issue ID: 16691
Summary: New debug experience: hovering over a string function
argument doesn't display the string
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS:
On 16/11/2016 3:41 AM, Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Dne 15.11.2016 v 14:23 AB via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 11:28:16 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 10:31:23 UTC, AB wrote:
Are there plans to write a homebrew 64-bit linker for DMD?
It seems that /usr/bin/dman is currently used by deepin-manual.
Is there anyway to get around this?
Link to the screenshot:
https://1drv.ms/i/s!AtF769jLRRhO61Of6g3ZIBl8uZAk
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16690
Issue ID: 16690
Summary: New debug experience: "Children could not be
evaluated" popup with zero length slices (ie, null
ptr)
Product: D
Version: D2
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 15:23:29 UTC, Adrian Matoga wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 11:13:54 UTC, Jot wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 09:39:09 UTC, Adrian Matoga
wrote:
On Friday, 11 November 2016 at 09:47:21 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
I used text files and LaTeX
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 15:23:29 UTC, Adrian Matoga wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 11:13:54 UTC, Jot wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 09:39:09 UTC, Adrian Matoga
wrote:
On Friday, 11 November 2016 at 09:47:21 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
I used text files and LaTeX
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 22:50:49 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 01:35:42 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
However there is a a bug inside the code that does
bounds-checking for array assignment.
In rare cases it can trigger a out-bounds-error on newly
created arrays.
On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 16:20:53 AB via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:00:48 UTC, kink wrote:
> > It's not just the linker. You need the libs as well (static and
> > dynamic ones), and not just the WinSDK ones, but the MSVCRT
> > ones too.
>
> I was under the
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 01:35:42 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
However there is a a bug inside the code that does
bounds-checking for array assignment.
In rare cases it can trigger a out-bounds-error on newly
created arrays.
This raise all kind of red flags to me. What are the design
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 19:02:29 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo
wrote:
Nice, Stefan. I always come back to this thread to see your
progress. Thanks for making it easy to follow it.
I agree.
On 11/15/16 1:56 PM, unDEFER wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 18:23:16 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
1. I'm sure it's not "magic" but likely something you are missing.
2. Nobody here can help you without a working demonstration. i.e.,
this isn't a known issue, and others have used the
On 11/15/16 3:05 PM, Kapps wrote:
Keep in mind, this is only slow for such a large amount of calls.
If you're calling this only a hundred times a second, then who cares if
it's slower. After all, with GDC we were looking at 1 billion calls in
21 seconds. That's 47,000 calls per *millisecond*.
On Monday, 14 November 2016 at 17:43:37 UTC, WhatMeWorry wrote:
I was reading this fasciniating article:
https://davesdprogramming.wordpress.com/2013/05/06/low-lock-singletons/
And to quote a section of it:
-
static MySingleton get() {
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 01:35:42 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Two more bullet points cross the border from unsupported to
supported.
Nice, Stefan. I always come back to this thread to see your
progress. Thanks for making it easy to follow it.
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 18:23:16 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
1. I'm sure it's not "magic" but likely something you are
missing.
2. Nobody here can help you without a working demonstration.
i.e., this isn't a known issue, and others have used the
concurrency subsystem without such
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4577
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
On 11/15/16 1:13 PM, unDEFER wrote:
Now I'm sending "hello"-message from child thread in the loop every
iteration, and the last message again working.
What the magic??? The send-subsystem "becomes rotten" if don't use it???
1. I'm sure it's not "magic" but likely something you are missing.
2.
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 18:11:38 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
Yous should post this into Learn news group not in General. And
it would be better if you provided full (not)working example.
If the problem will appears again I will try to make short not
working example..
and I guess you
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:57:44 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:53:42 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:50:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
p you dont get the point.
The point is when an IDE message leads you to this:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 18:12:32 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
Without more complete code, it's difficult to say what is
happening.
-Steve
Code is big. I of course can return to the question when the code
will available on the git. But now it is not available.
Now I'm sending "hello"-message from child thread in the loop
every iteration, and the last message again working.
What the magic??? The send-subsystem "becomes rotten" if don't
use it???
On 11/15/16 11:36 AM, unDEFER wrote:
Hello!
In my thread I'm sending the Tid of the thread to the parent to inform
it about finishing:
send(tid, thisTid);
The parent thread has the next code to receive it and handle:
receiveTimeout( dur!"hnsecs"(1),
(Tid tid)
Dne 15.11.2016 v 17:36 unDEFER via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
Hello!
In my thread I'm sending the Tid of the thread to the parent to inform
it about finishing:
send(tid, thisTid);
The parent thread has the next code to receive it and handle:
receiveTimeout( dur!"hnsecs"(1),
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 17:31:04 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
I don't really use emacs, and (thought I admit I'm not 100%
certain), I don't think much of what I use launches (or at
least needs to launch) separate commands for each keypress
(sounds like bad software engineering to me,
On 11/15/2016 03:33 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 14 November 2016 at 16:59:56 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
the ONLY time I ever have speed issues
"Speed issues" is one thing. Having most operations be INSTANT is
another. It MASSIVELY transforms your workflow; UIs where each key
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 17:23:56 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
I mean "too small at reasonable prices".
If you keep your photos/movies/music/backups/installers/etc. on
spinning rust (where they belong), and aren't living in poverty,
it's not. A 250GB Samsung 850 EVO is under $100,
On 11/15/2016 06:33 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On 11/12/2016 12:34 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Not sure if this is common knowledge already, but it was new for me. If
you click the edit button at the top of a pull request on GitHub, you
now get a drop down to change the base branch to which the request
On 11/15/2016 03:33 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 14 November 2016 at 16:59:56 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
SSDs are still far too small.
Hmm...
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016/08/seagate-unveils-60tb-ssd-the-worlds-largest-hard-drive/
I mean "too small at reasonable
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:59:49 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On 11/15/2016 06:46 PM, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:39:22 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
[ ]
But I'd sincerely advise against any ad-hoc solution that is
built
into DMD itself.
It seems I did not clearly state
On 11/15/16 4:43 AM, RazvanN wrote:
The find function which receives an input haystack and a needle returns
the haystack advanced to the first occurrence of the needle. For normal
ranges this is fine, but for
sorted ranges (aka SortedRange) it is a bit odd. For example:
find(assumeSorted[1, 2,
On 11/15/2016 06:46 PM, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:39:22 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> [ ]
>> But I'd sincerely advise against any ad-hoc solution that is built
>> into DMD itself.
>
> It seems I did not clearly state this.
> I mean to provide the general plumbing that
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:53:42 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:50:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
p you dont get the point.
The point is when an IDE message leads you to this:
http://imgur.com/a/6zLHU
I really don't get it.
What is actionable about that
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:50:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
p you dont get the point.
The point is when an IDE message leads you to this:
http://imgur.com/a/6zLHU
I really don't get it.
What is actionable about that metric ?
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:38:39 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:28:30 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 14:45:29 UTC, Stefan Koch
wrote:
Hi Guys,
I was wondering how much interest in static analysis exists
in this community .
DMD
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:39:22 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
[ ]
But I'd sincerely advise against any ad-hoc solution that is
built into DMD itself.
It seems I did not clearly state this.
I mean to provide the general plumbing that is needed for the
dmd-fe,
to utilize it for static
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:20:53 UTC, AB wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:00:48 UTC, kink wrote:
It's not just the linker. You need the libs as well (static
and dynamic ones), and not just the WinSDK ones, but the
MSVCRT ones too.
I was under the impression that DMD for
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:20:53 UTC, AB wrote:
Hopefully, future releases of DMD will fix this inconsistency
by requiring Visual Studio for 32-bit D programs as well.
You already do, if you compile with -m32mscoff.
On 11/15/2016 04:57 PM, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 14:45:29 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I was wondering how much interest in static analysis exists in this
>> community .
>> DMD already has rudimentary support for these kinds of things.
I'd put it in a
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:28:30 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 14:45:29 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hi Guys,
I was wondering how much interest in static analysis exists in
this community .
DMD already has rudimentary support for these kinds of things.
cyclic
Hello!
In my thread I'm sending the Tid of the thread to the parent to
inform it about finishing:
send(tid, thisTid);
The parent thread has the next code to receive it and handle:
receiveTimeout( dur!"hnsecs"(1),
(Tid tid)
{//the message from child thread
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 14:45:29 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hi Guys,
I was wondering how much interest in static analysis exists in
this community .
DMD already has rudimentary support for these kinds of things.
cyclic complexity
NPath complexity
Halstead complexity
3 nice fields of
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:00:48 UTC, kink wrote:
It's not just the linker. You need the libs as well (static and
dynamic ones), and not just the WinSDK ones, but the MSVCRT
ones too.
I was under the impression that DMD for Windows was (meant to be)
self-sufficient. I must have been
On 11/15/16 5:51 AM, Adrian Matoga wrote:
On Monday, 14 November 2016 at 19:49:26 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
We're happy to announce that the D Language Foundation is cooperating
again with Sociomantic to organize DConf 2017 in Berlin for the second
time. Same location, same dates, but of
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 15:33:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 15:28:14 UTC, ketmar wrote:
if it will be independent utility -- yes. dmdfe part -- no.
It would relay on the parser of the dmdfe, and parts of dmd's
semantic analysis.
DMD will be much nicer
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 13:23:38 UTC, AB wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 11:28:16 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 10:31:23 UTC, AB wrote:
Are there plans to write a homebrew 64-bit linker for DMD?
There are already ld from mingw and lld from llvm team.
Hello,
Sorry if this is FAQ, or any other way stupid question, e.t.c.
I have to configure vibe.d tlsstream to verify remote certificate.
Please correct me if I'm wrong -- here is part of my code to
request certificate verification:
auto sslctx = createTLSContext(TLSContextKind.client);
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16688
--- Comment #1 from ki...@gmx.net ---
LDC already detects it. The registry keys to be looked into (supporting both VS
and the Build Tools alone) can be found here:
https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/blob/master/vcbuild/msvcEnv.bat
--
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 09:50:40 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 09:43:27 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
The find function which receives an input haystack and a
needle returns the haystack advanced to the first occurrence
of the needle. For normal ranges this is fine, but for
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 15:28:14 UTC, ketmar wrote:
if it will be independent utility -- yes. dmdfe part -- no.
It would relay on the parser of the dmdfe, and parts of dmd's
semantic analysis.
DMD will be much nicer to work with the facility envision.
As I see it there is little
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4851
--- Comment #10 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/783d15bfa0e55d753999e7cc38236763c6b95092
enhancement issue 4851: add choice function to
if it will be independent utility -- yes. dmdfe part -- no.
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 11:13:54 UTC, Jot wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 09:39:09 UTC, Adrian Matoga
wrote:
On Friday, 11 November 2016 at 09:47:21 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
I used text files and LaTeX in the past, it works with
everything
textfile -> process -> LaTeX
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16689
Issue ID: 16689
Summary: Errors in instantiated mixin templates should show
instantiation point
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 14:45:29 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hi Guys,
I was wondering how much interest in static analysis exists in
this community .
DMD already has rudimentary support for these kinds of things.
Whoops I accidentally pressed enter too soon.
I am currently working on
Hi Guys,
I was wondering how much interest in static analysis exists in
this community .
DMD already has rudimentary support for these kinds of things.
Dne 15.11.2016 v 14:23 AB via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 11:28:16 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 10:31:23 UTC, AB wrote:
Are there plans to write a homebrew 64-bit linker for DMD?
There are already ld from mingw and lld from llvm team.
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 11:28:16 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 10:31:23 UTC, AB wrote:
Are there plans to write a homebrew 64-bit linker for DMD?
There are already ld from mingw and lld from llvm team.
Why aren't they used and distributed in DMD for Windows by
On 14.11.2016 21:26, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 14.11.2016 00:32, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
A Foo[] can be stored in a Foo, because it doesn't need the size. But
yes, as soon as you start needing Appender functions, then the compiler
chokes.
It is a forward reference bug, but still a bug IMO.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4577
Nick Treleaven changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@geany.org
--- Comment
On 11/12/2016 12:34 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> Not sure if this is common knowledge already, but it was new for me. If
> you click the edit button at the top of a pull request on GitHub, you
> now get a drop down to change the base branch to which the request will
> be pulled. Really handy for PRs
On 11/13/2016 10:40 AM, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Saturday, 12 November 2016 at 10:26:53 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I have written a small utility called dmd-ast-tool.
>> It can be used to quickly generate boilerplate code for dmd-ast-visitors.
>> Originally it was only written for my
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 10:31:23 UTC, AB wrote:
Are there plans to write a homebrew 64-bit linker for DMD?
There are already ld from mingw and lld from llvm team.
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 09:39:09 UTC, Adrian Matoga wrote:
On Friday, 11 November 2016 at 09:47:21 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
I used text files and LaTeX in the past, it works with
everything
textfile -> process -> LaTeX -> pdf
This.
Another (a bit lower-level) option would
On Monday, 14 November 2016 at 19:49:26 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Please join us at DConf 2017, the conference of the D
programming language in Berlin, Germany, May 4-6 2017.
http://dconf.org/2017/index.html
Great!
On Monday, 14 November 2016 at 19:49:26 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We're happy to announce that the D Language Foundation is
cooperating again with Sociomantic to organize DConf 2017 in
Berlin for the second time. Same location, same dates, but of
course a whole new experience!
(...)
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16682
Dicebot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pub...@dicebot.lv
--- Comment
On 11/11/2016 09:36 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> On 11/11/2016 08:30 AM, Dicebot wrote:
>> On Friday, 11 November 2016 at 13:21:40 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>> Run the new dmd. If it fails, either fix your code or go temporarily
>>> go back to the old dmd until you can fix your code.
>>
>> D
On 11/12/2016 02:20 PM, Basile B. wrote:
> On Monday, 31 October 2016 at 01:27:08 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
>> Glad to announce D 2.072.0.
>>
>> http://dlang.org/download.html
>>
>> This is the release ships with the latest version of dub (v1.1.0), comes
>> with lots of phobos additions and native
On Monday, 14 November 2016 at 10:20:48 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Monday, 14 November 2016 at 09:51:39 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Now there is
http://landinghub.visualstudio.com/visual-cpp-build-tools,
perhaps we should be encouraging using that instead?
It's still 3gb, so one might want to delete
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16686
Alexander Milushev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zunk...@gmail.com
15.11.2016 12:50, RazvanN пишет:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 09:43:27 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
The find function which receives an input haystack and a needle
returns the haystack advanced to the first occurrence of the needle.
For normal ranges this is fine, but for
sorted ranges (aka
On 11/15/2016 01:50 AM, drug wrote:
15.11.2016 12:48, drug пишет:
15.11.2016 12:43, RazvanN пишет:
The find function which receives an input haystack and a needle returns
the haystack advanced to the first occurrence of the needle. For normal
ranges this is fine, but for
sorted ranges (aka
15.11.2016 12:48, drug пишет:
15.11.2016 12:43, RazvanN пишет:
The find function which receives an input haystack and a needle returns
the haystack advanced to the first occurrence of the needle. For normal
ranges this is fine, but for
sorted ranges (aka SortedRange) it is a bit odd. For
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 09:43:27 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
The find function which receives an input haystack and a needle
returns the haystack advanced to the first occurrence of the
needle. For normal ranges this is fine, but for
sorted ranges (aka SortedRange) it is a bit odd. For
15.11.2016 12:43, RazvanN пишет:
The find function which receives an input haystack and a needle returns
the haystack advanced to the first occurrence of the needle. For normal
ranges this is fine, but for
sorted ranges (aka SortedRange) it is a bit odd. For example:
find(assumeSorted[1, 2, 4,
The find function which receives an input haystack and a needle
returns the haystack advanced to the first occurrence of the
needle. For normal ranges this is fine, but for
sorted ranges (aka SortedRange) it is a bit odd. For example:
find(assumeSorted[1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7], 4) would return [4, 5,
On Friday, 11 November 2016 at 09:47:21 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
I used text files and LaTeX in the past, it works with
everything
textfile -> process -> LaTeX -> pdf
This.
Another (a bit lower-level) option would be to produce a
PostScript file and pass it to (e)ps2pdf.
On 11/14/2016 12:26 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
Error with DMD, works with my front end.
What are the steps to use your front end instead of dmd's? Is the
awesome combo of Timon front-end plus ldc back-end possible?
Ali
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 09:02:08 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 08:33:26 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
UIs where each key press launches a command (e.g. magit,
background builds...)
emacs?
Yep.
Also doesn't dmdfe spend most of its time in semantic analysis?
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 08:33:26 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
UIs where each key press launches a command (e.g. magit,
background builds...)
emacs?
Also doesn't dmdfe spend most of its time in semantic analysis?
You can't possibly optimize that with IO.
On Monday, 14 November 2016 at 13:44:29 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
That's a true issue imho also. I had the same problem. Both my
machine at work and at home have their windows system partition
on a smallish SSD.
You can move stuff from the system drive with symbolic links;
e.g.
On Monday, 14 November 2016 at 16:59:56 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
SSDs are still far too small.
Hmm...
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016/08/seagate-unveils-60tb-ssd-the-worlds-largest-hard-drive/
the ONLY time I ever have speed issues
"Speed issues" is one thing. Having most
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12492
Ali Cehreli changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acehr...@yahoo.com
---
On Monday, 14 November 2016 at 19:49:26 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Please join us at DConf 2017, the conference of the D
programming language in Berlin, Germany, May 4-6 2017.
Great news for all living in D and programming in D :-)
Please take care to enable early registration now:
94 matches
Mail list logo