What do people think of adding an argument to DMD to add library
search paths? Currently the only way I know how to do this would
be via linker-specific flags, i.e.
GCC: -L-L/usr/lib
MSVC: -L-libpath:C:\mylibs
OPTLINK: -L+C:\mylibs\
NOTE: the optlink version only works if no .def file is
On Saturday, 3 February 2018 at 13:52:17 UTC, blahness wrote:
Hi everyone,
Not sure how interested people here will be with this but I've
ported https://github.com/fogleman/nes from Go to D [1]. I
should point out that I'm not the author of the original Go
version.
The emulator code itself
Very cool stuff, thanks for sharing.
On Monday, 15 January 2018 at 19:34:23 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 01/15/2018 10:58 AM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
> On Sunday, 10 October 2010 at 12:28:32 UTC, Justin Johansson
wrote:
> I'm getting "nostalgia" from all the math terminology :)
Just the date of the post you're responding to is
On Sunday, 10 October 2010 at 12:28:32 UTC, Justin Johansson
wrote:
Specifically I have a problem in trying to implement
a functional language translator in D. My target language
has a rather non-conventional type system, in which,
superficially at least, types can be described as being
On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 16:50:21 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 16:13:39 UTC, Seb wrote:
2) We start to run into random failures lately, e.g.
https://github.com/braddr/d-tester/issues/63
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/7569#issuecomment-356992048
Seem like issues
On Friday, 15 December 2017 at 08:13:25 UTC, aberba wrote:
I'm going to do a writeup on the state of D in Web Development,
APIs and Services for 2017. I need the perspective of the
community too along with my personal experience. Please help
out. More details the better.
0. Since when did
Trying to run the dmd test suite on windows, looks like Digital
Mars "make" doesn't work with the Makefile, I tried Gnu Make 3.81
but no luck with that either. Anyone know which version of make
it is supposed to work with on windows? Is it supposed to work
on windows at all?
On Thursday, 14 December 2017 at 16:40:33 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
I think what Dgame meant was:
https://dlang.org/phobos-prerelease/std_typecons#scoped. For
the built-in scoped classes, the keyword is 'scope', not
'scoped': https://dlang.org/spec/class.html#auto.
So you can have
On Thursday, 14 December 2017 at 14:45:51 UTC, Dgame wrote:
Strongly reminds me of scoped
Declaring a variable as `scoped` prevents that variable from
escaping the scope it is declared in. This restriction allows
the compiler certain optimizations, such as allocating classes on
the stack,
Thought I would share this little nugget. It's a simple module
to enable "classes by value". A good demonstration of the power
of "alias this". I had originally implemented this using
"opDispatch" and only after I was done did I realize I could have
made my life much simpler if I had gone
On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 at 19:33:30 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 10/10/17 3:20 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On windows I was able to compile the following using both
dmd.2.075.1 and dmd.2.076.1
From what I understand, you shouldn't be able to access
private fields/methods like
On windows I was able to compile the following using both
dmd.2.075.1 and dmd.2.076.1
From what I understand, you shouldn't be able to access private
fields/methods like this...am I missing something? I find it
hard to believe that a bug of this magnitudue could have been
introduced and not
On Monday, 2 October 2017 at 07:48:54 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
Andrei suggests we take a closer look at alternatives to DIP
1011 (extern(delegate)) that can be implemented in a library.
In the past I've failed to come up with anything good, however,
my last attempt seemed to be less
Andrei suggests we take a closer look at alternatives to DIP 1011
(extern(delegate)) that can be implemented in a library. In the
past I've failed to come up with anything good, however, my last
attempt seemed to be less horrible than before. I'm inviting
anyone to view/modify my feeble
On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 22:37:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2017 16:57:09 solidstate1991 via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 16:22:37 UTC, Jonathan M
Davis
wrote:
> [...]
What about DIP45, or making export an attribute? That would
https://wiki.dlang.org/DIP88
I'd like to see DIP88 (Named Parameters) revived. Was this
proposal rejected or is it just stale and needs a refresh? Named
parameters can be implemented in a library, however, in my
opinion they are useful enough to warrant a clean syntax with
language
On Saturday, 23 September 2017 at 23:13:33 UTC, Jerry wrote:
Is there any reason why custom attributes aren't allowed for
function parameters? It'd be useful for my situation to give
the parameter some more information. Seems it is allowed in
some other languages that have attributes, so was
On Sunday, 17 September 2017 at 21:36:51 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Sunday, 17 September 2017 at 18:30:51 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
This is something I didn't realize happened (I remember
discussing it a while back). Awesome work whoever did it, and
works great!
Yeah we even had a short post
On Friday, 15 September 2017 at 15:45:56 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Friday, 15 September 2017 at 14:45:01 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
Note that instead of introducing the "lazy" modifier here, we
could just modify static imports to be lazy which would mean
no new syntax and every benefits from
On Friday, 15 September 2017 at 14:45:01 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
...
Wanted to add that I believe we could also make "selective
imports" lazy, either be default or possibly by adding a modifier
like "lazy" if non-lazy imports are still useful.
lazy import std.stdio : File;
lazy import
DIP 1005 proposes a solution to prevent loading in modules that
don't need to be loaded, thereby decreasing the overall compile
time. Here's an example taken from the DIP:
with (import std.stdio) void process(File input) ;
with (import std.range) struct Buffered(Range) if
(isInputRange!Range)
On Tuesday, 5 September 2017 at 18:12:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
...the GPL does not in any way restrict users. Using GPL code
means you promise *not* to impose restrictions...
Reading things like this is much more humorous when you have a
solid background in logic and contradiction. As for
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 16:10:11 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Hi,
A few years ago I forked the Deimos X11 bindings[1] repo to add
dub support. Since then my repo[2] has received bug fixes and
as such it's being used in many projects. (Also, in the
following years dub support was added
On Friday, 1 September 2017 at 19:49:46 UTC, bitwise wrote:
If I have the mangled name of a module-scoped D template
function as a string, is there a way to check for it's presence
in the symbol table, and retrieve the function pointer at
runtime?
Example:
`
module mine;
class Test { }
`
On Tuesday, 29 August 2017 at 05:10:25 UTC, bitwise wrote:
I needed some C# style events, so I rolled my own. Long story
short, the result was unsatisfactory.
Library based events are inadequate for basically the same
reasons as library based properties (often suggested/attempted
in C++).
On Saturday, 26 August 2017 at 06:31:11 UTC, user1234 wrote:
On Friday, 25 August 2017 at 19:20:15 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
On Friday, 25 August 2017 at 13:15:35 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
On Friday, 25 August 2017 at 13:03:11 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
I can do:
dmd -ci prog.d -Isomelib
On Friday, 25 August 2017 at 13:15:35 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
On Friday, 25 August 2017 at 13:03:11 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
I can do:
dmd -ci prog.d -Isomelib -Ianotherlib
I love it, thanks for doing this!
Thanks, I think this is a really nice feature. I've uploaded my
build so that
On Friday, 25 August 2017 at 01:50:00 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Thursday, 24 August 2017 at 17:37:12 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
On Thursday, 24 August 2017 at 16:49:08 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Thursday, 24 August 2017 at 16:32:32 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
[...]
rdmd is really bad in terms
+, Jonathan Marler
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Wanted to get peoples thoughts on this. The idea is to
have a way to tell the compiler (probably with a command
line option) that you'd like to "compile imported modules".
[...]
Isn't this what rdmd already does?
T
That is one thing
On Thursday, 24 August 2017 at 18:12:03 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 06:00:15PM +, Jonathan Marler via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thursday, 24 August 2017 at 17:49:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> Uh, no. This will definitely break separate compilation,
> and some
On Thursday, 24 August 2017 at 17:49:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Uh, no. This will definitely break separate compilation, and
some people will be very unhappy about that.
I couldn't think of a case that it would break. Can you share
the cases you thought of?
On Thursday, 24 August 2017 at 16:49:08 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Thursday, 24 August 2017 at 16:32:32 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
On Thursday, 24 August 2017 at 15:56:32 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 03:53:05PM +, Jonathan Marler via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Wanted to get peoples
On Thursday, 24 August 2017 at 15:56:32 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 03:53:05PM +, Jonathan Marler via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Wanted to get peoples thoughts on this. The idea is to have a
way to tell the compiler (probably with a command line option)
that you'd like
Wanted to get peoples thoughts on this. The idea is to have a
way to tell the compiler (probably with a command line option)
that you'd like to "compile imported modules". Say you have a
program "prog" that depends on modules "foo" and "bar".
import foo;
import bar;
Compilation
On Tuesday, 15 August 2017 at 20:17:40 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 08/15/2017 08:55 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
C++17 will have this feature:
https://tech.io/playgrounds/2205/7-features-of-c17-that-will-simplify-your-code/init-statement-for-ifswitch
What do you think about it, can we have something
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 16:13:28 UTC, Swoorup Joshi wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 15:31:08 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 07/19/2017 03:30 PM, sontung wrote:
So I was thinking of some sort of syntax like this:
if(int i = someFunc(); i >= 0)
{
// use i
}
Thoughts
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 15:39:02 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/19/17 9:30 AM, sontung wrote:
So I was thinking of a way of extending if statements that
have declarations. The following being as example of the
current use of if statements with declarations:
if(int*
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 13:30:56 UTC, sontung wrote:
So I was thinking of a way of extending if statements that have
declarations. The following being as example of the current use
of if statements with declarations:
if(int* weDontPollute = someFunc())
{
// use
On Monday, 17 July 2017 at 16:08:30 UTC, Zaheer Ahmed wrote:
When Compiling kernel.d with makefile I get
Error: -o no longer supported, use -of or -od
and my Makefile Commands to do this is following.
DMDPARAMS = -m32
//...some objects
%.o: %.d
dmd $(DMDPARAMS) -o $@ -c $<
dmd
On Sunday, 16 July 2017 at 11:45:09 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Friday, 14 July 2017 at 10:43:05 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1011 is titled "extern(delegate)".
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1011.md
All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP
should occur
On Friday, 14 July 2017 at 17:02:37 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
...The dance with making an ABI wrapper can be left to compiler
proper.
This proposal doesn't make ABI wrappers, it changes the ABI of
the function itself.
On Friday, 14 July 2017 at 12:52:56 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/14/17 6:43 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1011 is titled "extern(delegate)".
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1011.md
All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP
should occur in this thread.
On Saturday, 8 July 2017 at 10:15:39 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
C compilers (and by extension C++ compilers) usually have an
extension which allows a function to be marked as one that
never returns. The point of this is it enables improved data
flow analysis and better code being generated.
On Saturday, 1 July 2017 at 20:53:07 UTC, Cym13 wrote:
On Saturday, 1 July 2017 at 19:19:09 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Friday, 30 June 2017 at 21:40:05 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
[...]
There's also mermaid. They have a live editor here:
https://knsv.github.io/mermaid/live_editor/
On Friday, 30 June 2017 at 21:40:05 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Currently we have a nice table at
https://dlang.org/spec/const3.html#implicit_conversions
documenting how implicit conversions work across qualifiers.
While complete and informative, it doesn't quickly give an
intuition.
A
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 06:19:07 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
Perhaps?
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm_iteration.html#.joiner
Thank you.
I'm using the phobos "chain" function to iterate over a set of
string arrays. However, one of the variables is actually an
array of structs that each contain a string array. So I use
"map" to get a range of string arrays, but "chain" expects each
variable to be a string array, not a range of
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote:
the gcc tree:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html
Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :)
I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now,
where commenters are asking questions about D.
Terrific news,
On Friday, 16 June 2017 at 03:57:17 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 16 June 2017 at 03:26:28 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
[...]
The real WTF is that it returns a string in the first place. It
should return a struct.
[...]
PR Here: https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/5490
Currently
On Friday, 16 June 2017 at 03:57:17 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 16 June 2017 at 03:26:28 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
If you have a better idea on how to implement the bitfields
template that would be great.
The real WTF is that it returns a string in the first place. It
should
On Thursday, 15 June 2017 at 22:59:23 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 15 June 2017 at 22:36:56 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
Doesn't work with eponymous templates, like std.traits.Flag.
For example, make this code work:
That uses `.stringof` which means it is useless for anything
On Thursday, 15 June 2017 at 21:54:44 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 15 June 2017 at 21:26:38 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
The common use case is when you'd like to mixin a type when it
is passed to a template.
That's also the most common wrong case. If it is passed to a
template, you
On Thursday, 15 June 2017 at 20:34:39 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 15 June 2017 at 19:15:55 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
I've found that the fullyQualifiedName template in std.traits
is a good tool for creating mixin code, however, it doesn't
always work.
Why is it useful? I suggest
I've found that the fullyQualifiedName template in std.traits is
a good tool for creating mixin code, however, it doesn't always
work.
-
import std.traits;
struct GlobalFoo
{
int x;
}
// WORKS
mixin(fullyQualifiedName!GlobalFoo ~ " globalFoo;");
unittest
{
static struct Foo
On Sunday, 11 June 2017 at 19:17:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Phobos' posix.mak offers the ability to only run unittests for
one module:
make std/range/primitives.test BUILD=debug -j8
... or package:
make std/range.test BUILD=debug -j8
It runs module tests in parallel and everything.
On Sunday, 28 May 2017 at 15:07:55 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 28.05.2017 17:04, Jonathan Marler wrote:
Is there a way to get an alias to a symbol relative to the
current location? I'm looking for a general solution but I'll
show an example to demonstrate one use case.
Say we want to access
Is there a way to get an alias to a symbol relative to the
current location? I'm looking for a general solution but I'll
show an example to demonstrate one use case.
Say we want to access the alias to the current function symbol.
Obviously we can use the name of the current function, i.e.
On Monday, 15 May 2017 at 23:10:00 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 05/15/2017 11:56 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
your proposal would require every function to use the same ABI
as it's
delegate counterpart, which includes the code to unwind the
stack if the
context pointer was passed in there or any
On Monday, 15 May 2017 at 21:06:57 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 05/15/2017 10:34 PM, kinke wrote:
If you just want to append an extra context arg by passing it
as last
actual arg, it'll end up in the stack sooner or later, and
that, I
guess, is where bad things may happen by just pushing an
On Monday, 15 May 2017 at 17:06:34 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 05/15/2017 05:44 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
Not sure if members in this conversation were aware of my DIP
to address
this issue:
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/61
The DIP uses a different approach to solve this same problem.
It
On Monday, 15 May 2017 at 12:27:10 UTC, kinke wrote:
On Monday, 15 May 2017 at 10:41:55 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
TL;DR: Changing the ABI of delegates so that the context
pointer is passed last would make functions implicitly
convertible to delegates, no?
In the discussion of issue 17156 [1],
On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 23:06:00 UTC, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev]
wrote:
The common thing between modules and the other aggregate types
(classes, interfaces, unions and structs) is that members of
the former behave as if they were static members of the later.
The difference, of course, is that
On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 12:41:19 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 4/30/17 7:59 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Sunday, 30 April 2017 at 23:44:32 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 4/30/17 7:35 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
Any reason why "alias this" doesn't work at the module
level? If I
On Sunday, 30 April 2017 at 23:44:32 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 4/30/17 7:35 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
Any reason why "alias this" doesn't work at the module level?
If I
recall correctly, a module is really just a "class" under the
hood, but
when I tried to use it I got:
Error:
Any reason why "alias this" doesn't work at the module level? If
I recall correctly, a module is really just a "class" under the
hood, but when I tried to use it I got:
Error: alias this can only be a member of aggregate, not module
I was reading the ddmd code and 2 thoughts came to mind:
1. ddmd is much simpler than I imagined.
2. how has the front end not been integrated into the standard
library?
Is someone working on this? I had some ideas on how this could
be done.
On Monday, 24 April 2017 at 19:19:27 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Monday, 24 April 2017 at 15:47:14 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
I've added a DIP for this
(https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/61).
At first I first thought that all we needed was to add
semantics to take the address of a UFCS-style call,
On Monday, 24 April 2017 at 15:47:14 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Sunday, 23 April 2017 at 17:13:31 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
[...]
I've added a DIP for this
(https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/61).
At first I first thought that all we needed was to add
semantics to take the address of a
On Monday, 24 April 2017 at 14:41:44 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Monday, 24 April 2017 at 12:59:55 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
Have you considered using the LLVM jit compiler for CTFE? We
already have an LLVM front end. This would mean that CTFE
would depend on LLVM, which is a large dependency,
On Sunday, 23 April 2017 at 17:13:31 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 23 April 2017 at 17:07:51 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Sunday, 23 April 2017 at 17:00:59 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
2/ Why not just a member function ?
For the same reason that UFCS exists. You can't add "member
functions"
On Thursday, 20 April 2017 at 12:56:11 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hi Guys,
I just begun work on the x86 jit backend.
Because right now I am at a stage where further design
decisions need to be made and those decisions need to be
informed by how a _fast_ jit-compatible x86-codegen is
On Saturday, 22 April 2017 at 21:24:33 UTC, Chainingsolid wrote:
I couldn't figure out how to make a udp socket bound to a port
of my choosing on the local machine, to use for listening for
incoming connections.
I assume you meant "incoming datagrams" and not "incoming
connections".
import
On Sunday, 23 April 2017 at 11:17:37 UTC, Mafi wrote:
Hi there,
every time I want to use output-ranges again they seem to be
broken in a different way (e.g. value/reference semantics).
This time it is char types and encoding.
[...]
Use sformat:
import std.format, std.stdio;
void main() {
On Sunday, 23 April 2017 at 17:00:59 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
2/ Why not just a member function ?
For the same reason that UFCS exists. You can't add "member
functions" to external library types.
This feels like a natural extension to existing semantics. It
doesn't require new syntax and serves as a solution to some
issues when working with delegates.
Say some API wants a delegate like this: void delegate(string arg)
With this feature, you could take a function like this:
void
On Wednesday, 19 April 2017 at 12:03:47 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 April 2017 at 11:59:51 UTC, Jonas Drewsen
wrote:
What about supporting an optional prefix inside the {} like:
int year = 2017;
format($"The date is {%04d year}");
so if there is a % immediately following the {
On Tuesday, 18 April 2017 at 08:50:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/15/2017 4:51 PM, cym13 wrote:
Removing imports is a good point, the first concrete one to be
mentionned. I'm
not sure it matters that much though as I think those imports
are generic enough
that I believe they would be
On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 20:52:21 UTC, Lurker wrote:
Everything looks good except this one line:
On Sunday, 9 April 2017 at 03:26:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
throw new E(string);
I don't like it for 2 reasons:
a) E e = new E(string); throw e;
Should be *exactly* the same as
On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 13:00:52 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-04-09 05:26, Walter Bright wrote:
My previous version did not survive implementation. Here's the
revised
version. I have submitted it as a DIP, and there's a trial
implementation up:
What exactly does the user have to do
On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 18:57:13 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 16:18:20 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
An interesting benefit. However, I don't think this is the
ideal way to support such a use case.
If I was doing it myself, I'd probably do an interface / final
On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 04:32:20 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 9 April 2017 at 14:47:39 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
Does anyone know why Socket and Address in phobos were created
as classes instead of structs?
It is probably just the historical evolution, but I find it
pretty
On Sunday, 9 April 2017 at 15:04:29 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 09/04/2017 3:56 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Sunday, 9 April 2017 at 14:49:14 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Don't think too hard, times have changed since std.socket was
written.
It certainly isn't designed for high
On Sunday, 9 April 2017 at 14:49:14 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
Don't think too hard, times have changed since std.socket was
written.
It certainly isn't designed for high performance hence e.g.
libasync.
What an odd response... You don't think I should ask questions
about why decisions
Does anyone know why Socket and Address in phobos were created as
classes instead of structs?
My guess is that making Socket a class prevents socket handle
leaks because you can clean up the handle in the destructor when
the memory gets freed if no one closes it. Is this the reason it
is a
On Friday, 24 February 2017 at 03:45:35 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 02/23/2017 09:43 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
I can't figure out how to make use of the full capacity of
buffers that
are allocated by readln. Take the example code from the
documentation:
// Read lines
I can't figure out how to make use of the full capacity of
buffers that are allocated by readln. Take the example code from
the documentation:
// Read lines from $(D stdin) and count words
void main()
{
char[] buf;
size_t words = 0;
while (!stdin.eof)
other scenarios easier
Please name a single one.
__FILE_FULL_PATH__ should be deprecated if __DIR__ is added. It
has all the advantages I listed in original post.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Jonathan Marler via
Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
On Monday, 9 J
On Monday, 9 January 2017 at 17:47:27 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
* smaller binaries (no need to store redundant path information
in __FILE_FULL_PATH__ when __DIR__ + __FILE__ is enough)
__DIR__ + __FILE__ is not equivalent to __FILE_FULL_PATH__.
__FILE__ really has no restriction, it could be
It looks like an Appender field of a struct doesn't work when its
element type is the containing struct, i.e.
struct Foo
{
Appender!(Foo[]) fooAppender;
}
My guess is the problem is that the Appender needs to know how
big "Foo" is since it would be storing each element by value, but
since
On Wednesday, 26 October 2016 at 09:53:35 UTC, Jeff Thompson
wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 October 2016 at 07:57:57 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 October 2016 at 07:14:30 UTC, Jeff Thompson
wrote:
dmd
-I/commit_b3bf5c7725c98ee3e49dfc4e47318162f138fe94/version/
main.d
dmd
On Tuesday, 25 October 2016 at 06:47:14 UTC, Jeff Thompson wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 October 2016 at 00:42:59 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
[...]
A variant of this is where the version name is the Git commit
hash. Instead of "version1" and "version2" it is:
On Tuesday, 11 October 2016 at 16:59:56 UTC, vino wrote:
Hi All,
Need your help, on the below request.
Requirement:
Server:
2 socket listening to 2 different ports with one main program
Socket1 Port1 (Used for receiving user request(user data))
Socket2 Port2 (Used for system
On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 at 19:02:02 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 at 18:41:02 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2016-10-05 19:14, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
Agreed - I have exactly the same problem with "version",
which is also
really common for, well, to hold a version
On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 at 18:41:02 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2016-10-05 19:14, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
Agreed - I have exactly the same problem with "version", which
is also
really common for, well, to hold a version number of a
component. Body
is annoying too.
But, can keywords
On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 at 17:17:32 UTC, default0 wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 at 17:14:04 UTC, Matthias Klumpp
wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 at 16:57:42 UTC, Rory McGuire
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:32 PM, angel via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
On Sunday, 2 October 2016 at 03:36:31 UTC, Manu wrote:
This comes up a lot.
As far as I know, it's not solved. What shall we do?
I feel like a simple solution would be to have the compiler
emit a _mixin.d file populated with all the mixin
expansions beside the .obj files, and have the
On Tuesday, 27 September 2016 at 13:48:39 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 9/22/16 4:16 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Thursday, 22 September 2016 at 20:09:41 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
Before package.d support, you could not do any importing of
packages.
You could only import
On Sunday, 25 September 2016 at 07:30:49 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 09:23:38 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On 09/24/2016 10:14 AM, Basile B. wrote:
When the file is specified, Shouldn't #line create a new
module ?
[...]
Currently this is not allowed, but what's the value
On Monday, 26 September 2016 at 18:49:58 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 09/26/2016 08:07 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
My dmd compiler gets an Access Violation when compiling this
code:
public template TemplateWrapper(T)
{
alias ToAlias = T;
Should probably be `alias TemplateWrapper =
101 - 200 of 456 matches
Mail list logo
