On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 5:50 PM Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.094.0 release, ♥ to the
> 49 contributors.
>
> This is the first release to be built with LDC on all platforms,
> so we'd welcome some
't even go to the definition of D functions in D code
reliably ;)
There is so much more work in VisualD than people can easily see at first
glance.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:55 PM rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 09/07/2020 1
Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 July 2020 at 00:03:02 UTC, Manu wrote:
> >
> > Not really. VisualD is objectively the most functional and
> > competent
> > IDE/Debugger solution, BY FAR.
> > It's not an opinion, it
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:15 PM aberba via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 July 2020 at 01:26:55 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:00 PM JN via Digitalmars-d-announce <
> > digitalmars-d-annou
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 7:05 PM Greatsam4sure via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 July 2020 at 01:26:55 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:00 PM JN via Digitalmars-d-announce <
> > digitalmars-d-annou
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:00 PM JN via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, 4 July 2020 at 13:00:16 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
> > See
> > https://rainers.github.io/visuald/visuald/VersionHistory.html
> > for the complete list of changes.
> >
> >
This is huge!
Congrats on the super cool milestone with a bunch of really great new stuff.
Thanks so much for your tireless work Rainer!
I wouldn't be here without all your effort on this.
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 11:05 PM Rainer Schuetze via Digitalmars-d-announce <
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:15 AM 9il via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Monday, 30 March 2020 at 12:23:03 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
> > On Monday, 30 March 2020 at 06:33:13 UTC, 9il wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >
> > Thanks, I like 'em.
> >
> > I noticed that the
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:05 AM Akim Demaille via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 1 January 2020 at 09:47:11 UTC, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >[...]
> > If you would like to contribute, please reach out to us via
> > bison-patc...@gnu.org, or help-bi...@gnu.org.
>
> Hi,
>
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:40 AM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/10/2020 2:48 PM, Manu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:35 PM Walter Bright via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> >>
> >> On 1/7/2020 6:31 PM, Manu wrote:
>
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:35 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/7/2020 6:31 PM, Manu wrote:
> > It will still do that, either now... or later. So, why wait?
>
> Because customers have their own schedules.
Customers update their compilers according
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 12:20 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/6/2020 10:17 PM, Manu wrote:
> > Well it was a preview for an unaccepted DIP, so it could have been
> > withdrawn. I guess I have increased confidence now, but it still seems
> &
On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 2:15 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/3/2020 3:41 AM, Manu wrote:
> > We've already had this -preview for quite a while; I have enabled it
> > in an experimental context, but I don't tend to write and deploy code
> >
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 8:35 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/2/2020 11:31 PM, Manu wrote:
> > Okay, although I don't really understand; if we have accepted the
> > feature, but we don't enable the feature... then nobody will use it,
> > and
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 9:20 AM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/2/2020 4:17 AM, Manu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 7:45 PM Walter Bright via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> >>
> >> On 1/2/2020 12:01 AM, Manu wrote:
>
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 7:45 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/2/2020 12:01 AM, Manu wrote:
> > Quick quick, we need a PR to issue deprecation messages for those
> > invalid read/writes! :)
>
> It's already been merged!
>
> https://github.com
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 4:45 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/1/2020 9:53 PM, Manu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 3:40 PM Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> DIP 1024, "Shared Atomics",
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 3:40 PM Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> DIP 1024, "Shared Atomics", was accepted without comment.
>
> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1024.md
This has been a long time coming!
On Tue., 5 Nov. 2019, 11:35 pm John Chapman via Digitalmars-d-announce, <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 6 November 2019 at 01:16:00 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 5:14 PM Manu wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 5,
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 5:14 PM Manu wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:20 PM John Chapman via Digitalmars-d-announce
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 19:05:10 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > > Incidentally, in your sample above there, `a` and `b` are not
>
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:20 PM John Chapman via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 19:05:10 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > Incidentally, in your sample above there, `a` and `b` are not
> > shared... why not just write: `cas(, null, b);` ?? If source
> >
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 11:55 PM John Chapman via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 06:44:29 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > On Mon., 4 Nov. 2019, 2:05 am John Chapman via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce, < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com>
> >
On Mon., 4 Nov. 2019, 2:05 am John Chapman via Digitalmars-d-announce, <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, 3 November 2019 at 13:35:36 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> > Glad to announce D 2.089.0, ♥ to the 44 contributors.
> >
> > This release comes with corrected extern(C)
On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 8:20 AM Murilo via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 3 November 2019 at 06:33:48 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> > On Sunday, 3 November 2019 at 00:51:38 UTC, Murilo wrote:
> >> Hi guys. I'm eager to attend the next DConf, which is why I'm
> >> already planning
On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 9:05 AM jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 7 September 2019 at 07:16:36 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > What's the story with string though; the second line (linking
> > back to the C++ reference) of the doco isn't
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 3:50 AM jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 5 September 2019 at 20:55:15 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > Interesting... you can see in the code, there are doco comments
> > everywhere, but the docs are empt
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:30 AM jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 3 September 2019 at 14:02:43 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > Those are a big deal. From a marketing perspective, those are
> > gold IMO.
>
> If these are as big a deal as people seem to think, the
>
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 4:51 AM Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:48 AM Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue., 3 Sep. 2019, 1:00 am Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce,
> > wrote:
> >>
> >
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 1:30 AM a11e99z via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 26 June 2019 at 02:35:53 UTC, Bart wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 25 June 2019 at 19:47:40 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
>
> Before I told about problems with VD on my laptop.
> Most of time I use desktop with
On Tue., 3 Sep. 2019, 1:00 am Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce, <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> Glad to announce D 2.088.0, ♥ to the 58 contributors.
>
> This release comes with a new getLocation trait, a getAvailableDiskSpace
> in std.file, removal and deprecation of lots
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 12:10 AM Rainer Schuetze via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
>
>
> On 23/06/2019 19:58, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > today a new version of Visual D has been released. Its main new features are
> >
> > - additional installer available that includes DMD and LDC
> >
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:25 PM Ali Çehreli via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> I will be presenting a comparison of D and C++. RSVP so that we know how
> much food to order:
>
>https://www.meetup.com/ACCU-Bay-Area/events/263679081/
>
> It will not be streamed live but some people want to
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 2:00 PM Ola Fosheim Grøstad via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Monday, 27 May 2019 at 20:14:26 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > Computers haven't had only one thread for almost 20 years. Even
> > mobile
> > phones have 8 cores!
> > This leads me b
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 1:05 AM Ola Fosheim Grøstad via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Monday, 27 May 2019 at 05:31:29 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > How does the API's threadsafety mechanisms work? How does it
> > scale to my 64-core PC? How does it schedule the work? etc...
>
&
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 10:25 PM Ola Fosheim Grøstad via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Monday, 27 May 2019 at 05:01:36 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > Performance is a symptom of architecture, and architecture *is*
> > the early stage.
>
> I expected that answer, but the
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 8:50 PM Ola Fosheim Grøstad via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Monday, 27 May 2019 at 03:35:48 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
> (Abscissa) wrote:
> > suggestion that Robert could get this going an order of
> > magnitude faster without too terribly much trouble. Luckily,
> >
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 6:35 PM Ola Fosheim Grøstad via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Monday, 27 May 2019 at 00:33:45 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
> (Abscissa) wrote:
> > flat-out wrong) to say about game programming. People hear the
> > word "game", associate it with "insignificant" and promptly
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 4:10 AM NaN via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 25 May 2019 at 23:23:31 UTC, Ethan wrote:
> > On Sunday, 19 May 2019 at 21:01:33 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
> >>
> >> Browsers are actually doing quite well with simple 2D graphics
> >> today.
> >
> > Browsers
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 5:34 PM H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 05:11:06PM -0700, Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce
> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 3:33 PM H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce
> > wrote:
> > >
> >
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 3:40 PM Ola Fosheim Grøstad via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 22 May 2019 at 21:18:58 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > I couldn't possibly agree less; I think cool kids would design
> > literally all computer software like a game engine, if
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 3:33 PM H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 02:18:58PM -0700, Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce
> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 10:20 AM Ola Fosheim Grøstad via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> [...]
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 10:20 AM Ola Fosheim Grøstad via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 22 May 2019 at 17:01:39 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > You can make a UI run realtime ;)
> > I mean, there are video games that render a complete screen
> > full of
> >
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:55 PM Robert M. Münch via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 2019-05-21 16:51:43 +, Manu said:
>
> >> The screencast shows a responsive 40x40 grid. Layouting the grid takes
> >> about 230ms, drawing it about 10ms.
> >
> >
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 2:05 PM Robert M. Münch via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> Hi, we are currently build up our new technology stack and for this
> create a 2D GUI framework.
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/iu988snx2lqockb/Bildschirmaufnahme%202019-05-19%20um%2022.32.46.mov?dl=0
>
>
> The
On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 1:40 AM Rainer Schuetze via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
>
>
> On 09/04/2019 22:34, Crayo List wrote:
> > On Sunday, 7 April 2019 at 19:41:43 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> the new release of Visual D has just been uploaded. Some major
> >>
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 12:00 PM kinke via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> Glad to announce the first beta for LDC 1.15:
>
> * Based on D 2.085.0.
> * Support for LLVM 8.0. The prebuilt packages ship with LLVM
> 8.0.0-rc4 and include the Khronos SPIRV-LLVM-Translator, so that
> dcompute can now
On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 10:25 AM Martin Nowak via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> Glad to announce D 2.085.0, ♥ to the 49 contributors.
>
> This release comes with context-aware assertion messages, lower GC
> memory usage, a precise GC, support to link custom GCs, lots of
> Objective-C
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 9:30 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 2/25/2019 7:17 PM, Manu wrote:
> > break my DIP
>
> The review process is not about "why not add this feature" , but "why should
> we
> have this feature".
>
>
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:10 PM Olivier FAURE via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Monday, 25 February 2019 at 16:00:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
> wrote:
> > Thorough feedback has been given, likely more so than for any
> > other submission. A summary for the recommended steps to take
> > can
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 12:20 PM Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 2/25/19 2:41 PM, bachmeier wrote:
> > On Monday, 25 February 2019 at 19:24:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> >
> >> From the process document:
> >>
> >> “the DIP Manager or the Language Maintainers may allow
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 6:35 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> I agree with your point that C++ const can be used in a lot more places than D
> const. Absolutely true.
>
> Missing from the post, however, is an explanation of what value C++ const
> semantics have. How does it:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 4:25 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> Thanks for letting me know you're abandoning the rvalue ref DIP.
It's not an "rvalue ref" DIP (which I think has confused a lot of
people), it's an rvalue *by-ref* DIP.
In my head, an "rvalue ref" DIP is
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 4:40 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> The problem with C++ const is it only goes one level, i.e. what I call
> "head-const". If you pass a T to a const parameter, anything T references
> remains mutable. It's more of a suggestion than anything
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 1:25 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 2/24/2019 1:02 PM, Manu wrote:
> > I mean like, my DIP was almost violently rejected,
>
> I thought it was clear what was needed to be done with it,
To be fair, initial criticism was 75% just
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 2:50 AM Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> Walter and Andrei have requested the Final Review round be
> dropped for DIP 1018, "The Copy Constructor", and have given it
> their formal approval. They consider copy constructors a critical
> feature for the
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 7:35 PM Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/30/19 10:05 PM, Manu wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 6:40 PM Nicholas Wilson via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> >> You should clarify that ;)
> >
> >
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 7:05 PM Nicholas Wilson via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 31 January 2019 at 02:10:05 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:05 PM Andrei Alexandrescu via
> >> fun(my_short); // implicit type conversions (ie, shor
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 6:40 PM Nicholas Wilson via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 at 18:29:37 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 9:20 AM Neia Neutuladh via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce
> > wrote:
> >> The result
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:40 PM 12345swordy via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 at 18:29:37 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 9:20 AM Neia Neutuladh via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On W
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 9:20 AM Neia Neutuladh via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 09:15:36 -0800, Manu wrote:
> > Why are you so stuck on this case? The DIP is about accepting rvalues,
> > not lvalues...
> > Calling with 'p', an lvalue, is
On Tue., 29 Jan. 2019, 10:25 pm Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
> On 1/29/2019 3:45 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> > I am talking about this:
> >
> > int[] a = cast(int[]) alloc.allocate(100 * int.sizeof);
> > if (alloc.reallocate(a, 200 *
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 9:25 AM Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/24/19 2:18 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
> > Walter and Andrei have declined to accept DIP 1016, "ref T accepts
> > r-values", on the grounds that it has two fundamental flaws that would
> > open holes in the
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:20 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/25/2019 7:44 PM, Manu wrote:
> > I never said anything about 'rvalue references',
>
> The DIP mentions them several times in the "forum threads" section. I see you
> want to d
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 12:00 PM Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/28/19 1:00 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> > On 1/24/19 3:01 PM, kinke wrote:
> >> On Thursday, 24 January 2019 at 09:49:14 UTC, Manu wrote:
> >>> We discussed
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 7:44 PM Manu wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 4:00 AM Walter Bright via
> Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> >
> > The DIP should not invent its own syntax
>
> I removed it, and replaced it with simpler code (that I think is
> exception-correc
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 4:00 AM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/24/2019 11:53 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> > That the conflation of pass by reference to avoid copying and mutation is
> > not
> > only deliberate but also mitigated by @disable.
>
> The first oddity about
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 6:50 PM Neia Neutuladh via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:14:56 -0800, Manu wrote:
> > Removing the `void` stuff end expanding such that the declaration +
> > initialisation is at the appropriate moments; any function can
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 4:20 PM Neia Neutuladh via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 23:08:52 +, kinke wrote:
>
> > On Friday, 25 January 2019 at 19:08:55 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> >> On 1/25/2019 2:57 AM, kinke wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, 24 January 2019 at 23:59:30 UTC,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 11:35 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> No, it is not rejected in principle. Finding serious errors in it on the eve
> of
> approval is disappointing, and is not auspicious for being in a hurry to
> approve it.
I'm very clearly NOT in a hurry here.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 6:35 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/24/2019 4:31 PM, 12345swordy wrote:
> > And wait for another 180+ days for a fix? Come on dude, can you understand
> > the
> > frustration being display here?
>
> Of course it's frustrating. On the other
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 6:35 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/24/2019 4:31 PM, 12345swordy wrote:
> > And wait for another 180+ days for a fix? Come on dude, can you understand
> > the
> > frustration being display here?
>
> Of course it's frustrating. On the other
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 3:50 PM Rubn via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 24 January 2019 at 23:18:11 UTC, kinke wrote:
> > Proposed `out` semantics:
> > ---
> > void increment(out long value) { ++value; }
> > increment(out value);
> > ---
> >
> > vs. pointer version with current
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 3:45 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/24/2019 1:31 AM, Manu wrote:
> > This process is pretty unsatisfying, because it ships off to a
> > black-box committee, who were apparently able to misunderstand the
> > s
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 1:05 PM kinke via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 24 January 2019 at 09:04:41 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, 24 January 2019 at 07:18:58 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> >> The second problem is the use of := (which the DIP Author
> >> defines as
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 12:05 PM kinke via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 24 January 2019 at 09:49:14 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > We discussed and concluded that one mechanism to mitigate this
> > issue
> > was already readily available, and it's just tha
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 1:25 AM Nicholas Wilson via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 24 January 2019 at 07:18:58 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> > Walter and Andrei have declined to accept DIP 1016, "ref T
> > accepts r-values", on the grounds that it has two fundamental
> > flaws that
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:30 AM Neia Neutuladh via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> I wrote a post about language-agnostic (or, more accurately, cross-
> language) build tools, primarily using D as an example and Dub as a
> benchmark.
>
> Spoiler: dub wins in speed, simplicity, dependency
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 2:30 AM Petar via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Monday, 3 December 2018 at 10:04:48 UTC, M.M. wrote:
> > On Sunday, 2 December 2018 at 21:23:31 UTC, Manu wrote:
> >> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 8:05 AM Rainer Schuetze via
> >> Digi
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 8:05 AM Rainer Schuetze via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have made a new release of Visual D available. Some highlights of
> version 0.48.0:
>
> * installer and binaries now digitally signed by the "D Language Foundation"
> * experimental: option to enable
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 8:00 PM Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 15 November 2018 at 19:18:27 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > I'm not sure how VisualStudio (read: MSBuild) should behave
> > differently than make?
> > It's not like the build scri
Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:25 AM Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 07:54:56 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > And all builds are release builds... what good is a debug
> > build? DMD
> > is unbelievably slow in debug. If it wasn't
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:30 PM blahness via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 13 November 2018 at 05:59:52 UTC, Manu wrote:
> >
> > Nice work.
> >
> > Oh wow, this is pretty rough!
> > ```
>
On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 5:55 AM blahness via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Not sure how interested people here will be with this but I've
> ported https://github.com/fogleman/nes from Go to D [1]. I should
> point out that I'm not the author of the original Go version.
>
> The
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:55 AM Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 08:29:28 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:10 AM Joakim via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thursday, 8
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:10 AM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 11/7/2018 11:41 PM, Manu wrote:
> > I'm on an i7 with 8 threads and plenty of ram... although threads are
> > useless, since DMD only uses one ;)
>
> So does every other compiler.
>
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:10 AM Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 07:54:56 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:30 PM Vladimir Panteleev via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thursday,
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 11:55 PM Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 07:41:58 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:30 PM Joakim via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thursday, 8
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:30 PM Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 06:08:20 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
> wrote:
> > It was definitely about 4 seconds not too long ago, a few years
> > at most.
>
> No, it's still 4 seconds.
>
> digger --offline
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:30 PM Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 04:16:44 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM Vladimir Panteleev via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce
> > wrote:
> >> [...]
> >
> >
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:10 PM Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 04:16:44 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > ...what!? DMD takes me... (compiling) ... 1 minute 40 seconds
> > to build! And because DMD does all-files-at-once compilatio
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> This is a tool + article I wrote in February, but never got
> around to finishing / publishing until today.
>
> https://blog.thecybershadow.net/2018/02/07/dmdprof/
>
> Hopefully someone will find it useful.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 8:18 PM Manu wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 8:16 PM Manu wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM Vladimir Panteleev via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> > >
> > > This is a tool + article I wrote in Februar
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 8:16 PM Manu wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM Vladimir Panteleev via
> Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> >
> > This is a tool + article I wrote in February, but never got
> > around to finishing / publishing until today.
> >
> &g
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 9:30 AM Oleg via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> Thanks for your work!
>
> > Example
> > ===
> > ///
> > @safe pure nothrow @nogc
> > unittest
> > {
> > import mir.exception;
> > import mir.format;
> > try throw new
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 6:00 AM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 22.10.18 12:26, Timon Gehr wrote:
> > ---
> > module borked;
> >
> > void atomicIncrement(int* p)@system{
> > import core.atomic;
> > atomicOp!("+=",int,int)(*cast(shared(int)*)p,1);
> > }
> >
> > struct
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 4:50 AM Stanislav Blinov via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 00:22:19 UTC, Manu wrote:
>
> > No no, they're repeated, not scattered, because I seem to have
> > to keep repeating it over and over, because nobody is reading
>
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 3:30 AM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 22.10.18 02:54, Manu wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 5:40 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 21.10.18 21:04, Manu wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Oct 2
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 2:30 AM Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 10/22/2018 1:34 AM, Manu wrote:
> > I posted it, twice... 2 messages, back to back, and you're responding
> > to this one, and not that one. I'll post it again...
>
>
> Posting it ov
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 2:21 AM ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 22.10.18 10:39, Simen Kjærås wrote:
> > On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 22:03:00 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
> [...]
> > It's invalid only if Atomic.badboy exists.
>
> I don't agree. I prefer the stronger @trusted. As far as I know,
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 3:05 PM ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> It took me a while to understand Manu's idea for `shared`, and I suspect
> that it was/is the same for others. At the same time, Manu seems
> bewildered about the objections. I'm going to try and summarize the
1 - 100 of 3283 matches
Mail list logo
