On Friday, 22 September 2017 at 17:11:56 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
Should we add `a * b` to ndslice for 1d vectors?
Discussion at https://github.com/libmir/mir-algorithm/issues/91
If it is for element-wise product, then possibly yes.
If it is for dot product (as suggested by the github
On Thursday, 15 September 2016 at 17:32:16 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 September 2016 at 14:40:24 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Wait, but I just showed how with vanilla ddoc you can
immediately use mathjax to do better than adrdox. No need for
any pre/postprocessing or
On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 at 12:12:30 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 at 11:58:53 UTC, tn wrote:
On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 15:34:47 UTC, Seb wrote:
http://blog.mir.dlang.io/random/2016/08/22/transformed-density-rejection-sampling.html
What are the columns "mu time" and
On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 15:34:47 UTC, Seb wrote:
http://blog.mir.dlang.io/random/2016/08/22/transformed-density-rejection-sampling.html
What are the columns "mu time" and "sigma^2 time" of the
benchmark table in the Sampling subsection?
On Tuesday, 26 April 2016 at 18:45:09 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 04/26/2016 02:29 PM, TheGag96 wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 April 2016 at 14:33:42 UTC, tn wrote:
Maybe the name of the function should then be "writes" and/or
"writesln" (instead of "print"), so that it can at least be
found
On Tuesday, 26 April 2016 at 12:52:13 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 04/26/2016 08:18 AM, cym13 wrote:
The first questions I expect are "when should I use print and
when use
writeln?" for they share a common role with common features.
"When you want spaces between arguments and when you
On Thursday, 25 February 2016 at 18:19:56 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
I don't know of an algorithm for generating random permutations
that isn't in-place (or O(N) storage), but I'm not an expert on
the topic so maybe one does exist.
These might be relevant:
On Saturday, 6 February 2016 at 13:06:37 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Could you please add two simple calculations? Assuming uniform
random distribution of data, compute the average number of
swaps as a weighted average of orderings. Also, show the number
of lines (one test or one swap per
On Friday, 5 February 2016 at 21:42:41 UTC, Xinok wrote:
On Friday, 5 February 2016 at 15:13:56 UTC, tn wrote:
On Thursday, 4 February 2016 at 20:30:57 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
At most 6 comparisons, <=3 swaps, idempotent (optimal number
of swaps):
...
Inspired by this, I made four other
On Saturday, 6 February 2016 at 01:46:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 02/04/2016 03:30 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
At most 6 comparisons, <=3 swaps, idempotent (optimal number
of swaps):
Oh, also: could you let that bad boy run and let it find
anything that does idempotent partition in 6
On Thursday, 4 February 2016 at 20:30:57 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
At most 6 comparisons, <=3 swaps, idempotent (optimal number of
swaps):
...
Inspired by this, I made four other versions of the function that
are shorter but make more swaps (at most 4, 6, 7 and 8 swaps
respectively). Each
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 01:11:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 01/20/2016 04:22 PM, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
2. The index of minimum or maximum element, mostly using plain
array as
a range. I write "a.length - a.minPos.length", and it looks
completely
unintuitive. Additionally, when
On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 19:46:33 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On 14.01.2016 16:29, tn wrote:
I don't use my browser in full screen mode, but the useless
white
margins are still there. With the horizontal-split mode the
line length
of the message is less than 60 characters. Compared to that, I
On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 12:31:51 UTC, w0rp wrote:
I love this redesign.
Anyone who complains about not taking up the full width of the
screen is wrong. If lines stretch on eternally, they become
harder to scan with your eyes. It's a well known effect which
has been studied and
On Tuesday, 8 December 2015 at 15:25:28 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I'm working on the complexity algebra and of course trying to
simplify my life :o). One good simplification would be to get
rid of log(polynomial_sum) terms such as:
log(n + m)
log(n^^3 + n1^^2 + n2)
etc.
Do any of
On Tuesday, 8 December 2015 at 16:25:50 UTC, tn wrote:
... and that m is more than polynomially larger than s. ...
Should of course be "larger than n".
On Friday, 4 December 2015 at 03:37:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 12/3/15 10:29 PM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Friday, 4 December 2015 at 02:21:12 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/03/2015 09:10 PM, Idan Arye wrote:
The complexities of the operations is a property of the data
On Friday, 4 December 2015 at 09:57:48 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Friday, 4 December 2015 at 09:51:05 UTC, tn wrote:
"I just want to insert an element. I don't care how long it
takes. Why do I need to specify that it should be linear?"
In my opinion, there should be "constantInsert",
On Friday, 4 December 2015 at 14:08:08 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 12/04/2015 04:51 AM, tn wrote:
"I just want to insert an element. I don't care how long it
takes. Why
do I need to specify that it should be linear?"
Oh but you do care.
I don't, if I have a small container of
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 20:35:31 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/26/15 12:30 PM, Dicebot wrote:
We couldn't merge it into std.experimental before because you
have
stated that even std.experimental modules shouldn't have a
breaking
changes normally. It was 2 reviews ago.
Now you
On Friday, 26 September 2014 at 06:29:21 UTC, Dragos Carp wrote:
Though you could use prerelease and/or build suffixes (1.2.3-0w
/ 1.2.3+0w).
These are very close to what I would like to see.
Though, if I understand correctly, build suffix wouldn't work, as
for example 1.2.3+0w and 1.2.3+1w
On Tuesday, 23 September 2014 at 06:22:27 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 22/09/14 23:04, tn wrote:
What is the recommended way of versioning bindings? If the
binding of
the target library 1.2.3 is versioned as 1.2.3 and a bug is
fixed in the
binding (no change in the target library), how
On Monday, 22 September 2014 at 09:33:52 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
If you can think of any potentially important and especially
backwards-incompatible changes/additions, please mention them
(ideally as GitHub tickets), so that we can include them before
the 1.0.0 release.
What is the
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 10:27:02 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
- GDC's homepage is now getting a UI update.
Staging area for the new look is found here:
http://staging.dgnu.org
I think the old logo was better. The new one looks weird, like it
was unfinished.
24 matches
Mail list logo
