On 7/28/21 12:07 AM, zjh wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 06:37:56 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
### Background
I have translated `Programming in D` in chinese. Here [用d编程]
(https://fqbqrr.blog.csdn.net/article/details/104605383)
Impressive! :) Is that abbreviated or all of it?
Ali
On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 10:58:58 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 06:37:56 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
* Joseph Rushton Wakeling representing Frequenz
I know Joseph, but haven't heard of Frequenz. Can't find them
on https://dlang.org/orgs-using-d.html. Is there any
On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 06:37:56 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
* Joseph Rushton Wakeling representing Frequenz
I know Joseph, but haven't heard of Frequenz. Can't find them on
https://dlang.org/orgs-using-d.html. Is there any news to be
announced?
-- Bastiaan.
On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 06:37:56 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
### Background
I have translated `Programming in D` in chinese. Here
[用d编程](https://fqbqrr.blog.csdn.net/article/details/104605383)
### Background
At the end of 2018, the DLF began hosting quarterly meetings with
representatives from companies using D in production. The
motivation was to provide the companies with a means to directly
communicate their headaches, issues, and ideas to the D
maintainers. Their success is D's
On Tuesday, 29 June 2021 at 21:35:56 UTC, matheus wrote:
Was the meeting recorded? Where can we watch?
Matheus.
No, it was not recorded. And no, we aren't going to start
recording them.
Was the meeting recorded? Where can we watch?
Matheus.
On Saturday, 26 June 2021 at 10:15:41 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The monthly DLF meeting this month took place on June 25.
[...]
Thank you for the update!
Please consider to talk at one of the next meetings about
a special but regular sponsoring membership for DLF.
Goal: To get a strong and
On Saturday, 26 June 2021 at 10:15:41 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The monthly DLF meeting this month took place on June 25.
Thank you for the summary. It seems like there are interesting
things happening :)
On Saturday, 26 June 2021 at 10:15:41 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The monthly DLF meeting this month took place on June 25. It
Full of expectation, hoping D is better and better.
The monthly DLF meeting this month took place on June 25. It
lasted a little over an hour-and-a-half. We discussed a number of
topics which, as always, led to notes for further discussion in
future meetings.
Walter, Atila, Andrei, Razvan, Max, and I attended (no I did not
leave out Ali by
On Thursday, 10 June 2021 at 10:55:50 UTC, sighoya wrote:
That doesn't mean tracing GC is bad, I'm still skeptical that
arc + cycle detection is better than tracing in general for
true high level languages.
For truly high level languages garbage collection probably is the
best, if you design
On Thursday, 10 June 2021 at 10:55:50 UTC, sighoya wrote:
On Saturday, 5 June 2021 at 09:14:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
The current GC strategy is a dead end. No GC makes the
language too much of a C++ with no real edge. D needs to offer
something other languages do not, to offset the
On Thursday, 10 June 2021 at 10:55:50 UTC, sighoya wrote:
I think the switch to arc with cycle detection as opt out (like
in python) is the right direction, it fits more to a system
level language making use of destructors more often.
Rewriting cyclic code to acyclic code is easier than
On Saturday, 5 June 2021 at 09:14:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
The current GC strategy is a dead end. No GC makes the language
too much of a C++ with no real edge. D needs to offer something
other languages do not, to offset the cost of learning the
language complexities.
I think the
On Monday, 7 June 2021 at 18:37:54 UTC, sai wrote:
My use case of writing GUI apps for desktop - presence of GC
does not matter for me at all. In fact its great for me.
Hopefully D will not stop covering these use cases.
Great, I am interested in highly interactive apps (games, sound
On Monday, 7 June 2021 at 23:04:12 UTC, Norm wrote:
On Saturday, 5 June 2021 at 08:58:47 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 21:35:43 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 19:56:06 UTC, sighoya wrote:
This uniformization sounds too good to be true. I think most
people
On Saturday, 5 June 2021 at 08:58:47 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 21:35:43 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 19:56:06 UTC, sighoya wrote:
This uniformization sounds too good to be true. I think most
people think that, but it's simply not true. malloc/free is
On Monday, 7 June 2021 at 18:37:54 UTC, sai wrote:
Hopefully D will not stop covering these use cases.
I know all the web-apps folks who wants to serve
100 requests per second will not like GC, I guess.
Absolutely not, D must continue with automatic memory management
and I
On Saturday, 5 June 2021 at 09:58:23 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
You mean the wait-for-everything-to-stop-scan-everything
approach will remain?
What is the area that D is trying to cover though?
Somebody should write a memo on that.
My use case of writing GUI apps for desktop -
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 19:31:57 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 18:34:32 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
You might be surprised, but it's actually not up to you what
topic fits or not.
I said GC-phobia is irrational, I did not say any criticism of
it is.
Obviously GC is good for
On Saturday, 5 June 2021 at 09:47:11 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
I get your point, but I still think GC will remain mainly
because of the area D is trying to cover.
You mean the wait-for-everything-to-stop-scan-everything approach
will remain?
What is the area that D is trying to cover though?
On Saturday, 5 June 2021 at 08:51:07 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 18:34:32 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
[...]
This is the announce forum, so it is kinda misplaced, but we
are all contributing to this so... :)
[...]
I get your point, but I still think GC will remain
On Saturday, 5 June 2021 at 08:58:47 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Meanwhile kids, the future generation of developers, keeps
adopting the hardware and programming languages listed above,
D isn't useful for teaching kids programming. Wy too
complicated. Most Arduino users, who build useful
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 21:35:43 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 19:56:06 UTC, sighoya wrote:
This uniformization sounds too good to be true. I think most
people think that, but it's simply not true. malloc/free is
incompatible to garbage collection.
This is true and even
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 18:34:32 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
You might be surprised, but it's actually not up to you what
topic fits or not.
This is the announce forum, so it is kinda misplaced, but we are
all contributing to this so... :)
Obviously GC is good for some things and not good at
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 21:35:43 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
D certainly has the power to do so but the question is if there
is any will power in this community. Nothing has happened for
almost 20 years.
I guess importC will make changes even more unlikely. Absorbing C
is nice, but it has the
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 19:56:06 UTC, sighoya wrote:
This uniformization sounds too good to be true. I think most
people think that, but it's simply not true. malloc/free is
incompatible to garbage collection.
This is true and even druntime has a malloc/free option for the
GC. However,
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 12:44:07 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 00:14:11 UTC, zjh wrote:
On Thursday, 3 June 2021 at 23:48:16 UTC, zjh wrote:
[...]
As a small language, if you want to succeed.There is no way
out except to be the best.
Otherwise, why don't I use C++?
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 19:31:57 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
Because of this Phobos must take the lowest common denominator
approach (malloc/free) in order to be able to accommodate all
the different needs.
This uniformization sounds too good to be true. I think most
people think that, but it's
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 18:34:32 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
You might be surprised, but it's actually not up to you what
topic fits or not.
I said GC-phobia is irrational, I did not say any criticism of
it is.
Obviously GC is good for some things and not good at all for
other things.
What
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 13:32:37 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 12:44:07 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
GC won't go away tho. What might happen is more flexibility.
The GC-phobia is irrational.
The topic doesn't fit in this thread, but it isn't irrational.
You have to
On Wednesday, 2 June 2021 at 14:02:29 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 June 2021 at 11:10:36 UTC, Dukc wrote:
Phobos v2 is an official plan? That was news for me! Any
chance to get a glimpse of what's planned for it?
The overall goal is that it doesn't replace the current Phobos,
On Thursday, 3 June 2021 at 23:48:16 UTC, zjh wrote:
D does not owns the advantages of GC , but all the
disadvantages of GC .Why not discard it?
This is not a realistic or helpful suggestion. You're proposing
to get rid of current users of the language - many of whom like
that there's a GC
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 14:07:38 UTC, drug wrote:
I use GC when developing an algorithm to solve my problem.
After I has implemented the algorithm I can redesign it to
avoid GC (if needed). It works pretty nice in my case at least.
Because initially I concentrate on my domain problem and
04.06.2021 16:32, Ola Fosheim Grøstad пишет:
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 12:44:07 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
GC won't go away tho. What might happen is more flexibility. The
GC-phobia is irrational.
The topic doesn't fit in this thread, but it isn't irrational.
You have to wait for all
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 13:32:37 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 12:44:07 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
GC won't go away tho. What might happen is more flexibility.
The GC-phobia is irrational.
The topic doesn't fit in this thread, but it isn't irrational.
The most
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 12:44:07 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
GC won't go away tho. What might happen is more flexibility.
The GC-phobia is irrational.
The topic doesn't fit in this thread, but it isn't irrational.
You have to wait for all participating threads to be ready to
collect, so it
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 00:14:11 UTC, zjh wrote:
On Thursday, 3 June 2021 at 23:48:16 UTC, zjh wrote:
[...]
As a small language, if you want to succeed.There is no way out
except to be the best.
Otherwise, why don't I use C++?
[...]
GC won't go away tho. What might happen is more
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 11:41:49 UTC, sighoya wrote:
Yet another GC vs NoGC thread :sigh:
Routine determines success or failure.
Yet another GC vs NoGC thread :sigh:
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 00:39:41 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 00:14:11 UTC, zjh wrote:
Zim: the grammar is ugly.
Zim? Is that what they speak in Zimbabwe?
Zig.
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 00:14:11 UTC, zjh wrote:
Zim: the grammar is ugly.
Zim? Is that what they speak in Zimbabwe?
On Thursday, 3 June 2021 at 23:48:16 UTC, zjh wrote:
OK, how do you position "d"?
As a small language, if you want to succeed.There is no way out
except to be the best.
Otherwise, why don't I use C++?
rust,go,zim.I dislike them.
Rust: slow compilation, weak template function.
Go: there is
On Thursday, 3 June 2021 at 23:47:07 UTC, zjh wrote:
The GC of D is a burden.in the speaking of AA.
D does not owns the advantages of GC , but all the
disadvantages of GC .Why not discard it?
Yes, for Phobos v2 one of the primary goals should be to not
being forced to rely on GC. Phobos
OK, how do you position "d"?
What kind of programmers do you want to attract?
beginner?pythoner?scripter?
How to attract them and why and what feature attact them?
What slogan of "d", Can d occupy a bigger market?
Does d still occupy the field of system programming
The GC of D is a burden.in
On Thursday, 3 June 2021 at 22:40:50 UTC, JN wrote:
On Saturday, 29 May 2021 at 00:30:38 UTC, zjh wrote:
On Saturday, 29 May 2021 at 00:26:54 UTC, zjh wrote:
OK, how do you position "d"?
What kind of programmers do you want to attract?
beginner?pythoner?scripter?
How to attract them and why
On Saturday, 29 May 2021 at 00:30:38 UTC, zjh wrote:
On Saturday, 29 May 2021 at 00:26:54 UTC, zjh wrote:
Good,maybe we can raise our sounding slogan "Better C++" again!
There are too many talents in C++
We must attract them.
Only them can make d great!Because they are library writer.
They
On Wednesday, 2 June 2021 at 11:10:36 UTC, Dukc wrote:
Phobos v2 is an official plan? That was news for me! Any chance
to get a glimpse of what's planned for it?
The overall goal is that it doesn't replace the current Phobos,
but sits alongside it. Changed/improved/new functionality goes in
On Friday, 28 May 2021 at 14:56:08 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
For example, major long-term goals are memory safety (e.g.,
specific bugs, fully enabling DIP 1000 support) and Phobos v2.
Phobos v2 is an official plan? That was news for me! Any chance
to get a glimpse of what's planned for it?
On Saturday, 29 May 2021 at 00:30:38 UTC, zjh wrote:
Good,maybe we can raise our sounding slogan "Better C++" again!
If I'm a marketer of `rust`, I'll say `rust` is `abnormal
C++`.would you like a try?
If I were a marketing person of D, I would say `d` is a `Better
c++`.will you try?
We can
On Saturday, 29 May 2021 at 00:26:54 UTC, zjh wrote:
Good,maybe we can raise our sounding slogan "Better C++" again!
There are too many talents in C++
We must attract them.
Only them can make d great!Because they are library writer. They
can make d great.
On Friday, 28 May 2021 at 14:56:08 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
We've ...
Good,maybe we can raise our sounding slogan "Better C++" again!
On Friday, 28 May 2021 at 14:56:08 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
We've just completed our monthly meeting for the month of May
2021. One decision we made is to start providing summaries of
the topics discussed. Hence this forum post.
[...]
Splendid! Communication is king
On Friday, 28 May 2021 at 14:56:08 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
We've just completed our monthly meeting for the month of May
2021. One decision we made is to start providing summaries of
the topics discussed. Hence this forum post.
The participants: Walter, Atila, Andrei, Razvan, Max, and me.
We've just completed our monthly meeting for the month of May
2021. One decision we made is to start providing summaries of the
topics discussed. Hence this forum post.
The participants: Walter, Atila, Andrei, Razvan, Max, and me.
### Goals & Tasks
The primary topic on our agenda for this
On Thursday, 14 January 2021 at 14:23:28 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Thursday, 14 January 2021 at 13:24:55 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/wdsgkozpnhegqkcwe...@forum.dlang.org
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 09:09:36 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
BTW, is timestamps vs SHA-1 hashing
On Thursday, 14 January 2021 at 13:24:55 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/wdsgkozpnhegqkcwe...@forum.dlang.org
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 09:09:36 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
BTW, is timestamps vs SHA-1 hashing really the most pressing
issue with Dub?
Not really, no.
, they are also generously
funding two positions for ecosystem work under the D Language
Foundation. And they've put up a bounty for a new DUB feature.
Read all about it here:
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/08/30/symmetry-investments-and-the-d-language-foundation-are-hiring/
As an alternative
Foundation. And
they've put up a bounty for a new DUB feature. Read all about it here:
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/08/30/symmetry-investments-and-the-d-language-foundation-are-hiring/
One other thing that hashing enables is caching builds. So if you build,
then change a file, then build again
On Sunday, 30 August 2020 at 14:13:36 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Looking for a full-time or part-time gig? Not only is Symmetry
Investments hiring D programmers, they are also generously
funding two positions for ecosystem work under the D Language
Foundation. And they've put up a bounty
On Wednesday, 2 September 2020 at 12:50:35 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 9/1/20 2:38 PM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 13:28:07 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 9/1/20 5:38 AM, Stefan Koch wrote:
[...]
I have to agree with Jacob -- what common situation is
On 9/1/20 2:38 PM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 13:28:07 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 9/1/20 5:38 AM, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 09:09:36 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
BTW, is timestamps vs SHA-1 hashing really the most pressing issue
On Sunday, 30 August 2020 at 14:13:36 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Looking for a full-time or part-time gig? Not only is Symmetry
Investments hiring D programmers, they are also generously
funding two positions for ecosystem work under the D Language
Foundation. And they've put up a bounty
On 9/2/20 1:21 PM, drug wrote:
On 9/2/20 1:18 PM, drug wrote:
it will be seldom operation. Another way is to having several hashes
simultaneously and select one of them depending on option value.
I meant having several hashes in dub cache. Then if the user changes the
hash algorithm dub
On 9/2/20 1:18 PM, drug wrote:
it will be seldom operation. Another way is to having several hashes
simultaneously and select one of them depending on option value.
I meant having several hashes in dub cache. Then if the user changes the
hash algorithm dub checks calculated hashes against
On 9/2/20 12:53 PM, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote:
I understand your idea to make this configurable, but this will
introduce more complexity than necessary because then
$HOME/.dub/packages will have build artifacts based on both SHA1 and
SHA256, and so dub will need to support mixed mode
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 16:45:55 UTC, drug wrote:
On 9/1/20 7:34 PM, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 12:59:00 UTC, Mathias LANG
wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 09:09:36 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
[...]
Agreed. A server approach would probably
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 13:28:07 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 9/1/20 5:38 AM, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 09:09:36 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
BTW, is timestamps vs SHA-1 hashing really the most pressing
issue with Dub?
We think that not recompiling
? Not only is Symmetry
Investments hiring D programmers, they are also generously funding
two positions for ecosystem work under the D Language Foundation.
And they've put up a bounty for a new DUB feature. Read all about it
here:
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/08/30/symmetry-investments-and-the-d
, they are also
generously funding two positions for ecosystem work under the
D Language Foundation. And they've put up a bounty for a new
DUB feature. Read all about it here:
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/08/30/symmetry-investments-and-the-d-language-foundation-are-hiring/
As an alternative
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 13:30:33 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 13:28:07 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 9/1/20 5:38 AM, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 09:09:36 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
BTW, is timestamps vs SHA-1 hashing really the
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 13:28:07 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 9/1/20 5:38 AM, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 09:09:36 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
BTW, is timestamps vs SHA-1 hashing really the most pressing
issue with Dub?
We think that not recompiling
On 9/1/20 5:38 AM, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 09:09:36 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
BTW, is timestamps vs SHA-1 hashing really the most pressing issue
with Dub?
We think that not recompiling certain modules which have not changed
will improve our build times.
And the
under the D Language
Foundation. And they've put up a bounty for a new DUB feature.
Read all about it here:
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/08/30/symmetry-investments-and-the-d-language-foundation-are-hiring/
As an alternative to use SHA-1 hashing. There's the option to
have a daemon running
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 11:53:25 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
you scale things up, but there are fast noncryptographic
hashes. Some are like 10-500x faster than SHA1:
More like 10-50x...
On Monday, 31 August 2020 at 21:24:53 UTC, starcanopy wrote:
I think the majority opinion is that sha1 is fine for
non-security purposes like monitoring files for changes to
obviate superfluous work in a build system;
Not a big fan of using hashes, since collisions do arise when you
scale
under the D Language
Foundation. And they've put up a bounty for a new DUB feature.
Read all about it here:
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/08/30/symmetry-investments-and-the-d-language-foundation-are-hiring/
As an alternative to use SHA-1 hashing. There's the option to
have a daemon running
On Sunday, 30 August 2020 at 14:13:36 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Looking for a full-time or part-time gig? Not only is Symmetry
Investments hiring D programmers, they are also generously
funding two positions for ecosystem work under the D Language
Foundation. And they've put up a bounty
Language
Foundation. And they've put up a bounty for a new DUB feature.
Read all about it here:
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/08/30/symmetry-investments-and-the-d-language-foundation-are-hiring/
SHA-1 hashing throughout
Why not SHA-256?
I think the majority opinion is that sha1 is fine for
non
On Sunday, 30 August 2020 at 14:13:36 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Looking for a full-time or part-time gig? Not only is Symmetry
Investments hiring D programmers, they are also generously
funding two positions for ecosystem work under the D Language
Foundation. And they've put up a bounty
On Sunday, 30 August 2020 at 14:13:36 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Looking for a full-time or part-time gig? Not only is Symmetry
Investments hiring D programmers, they are also generously
funding two positions for ecosystem work under the D Language
Foundation. And they've put up a bounty
Language
Foundation. And they've put up a bounty for a new DUB feature.
Read all about it here:
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/08/30/symmetry-investments-and-the-d-language-foundation-are-hiring/
Fantastic! Thanks Symmetry!
Epic, this is a gamechanger!
On Sunday, 30 August 2020 at 14:13:36 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Looking for a full-time or part-time gig? Not only is Symmetry
Investments hiring D programmers, they are also generously
funding two positions for ecosystem work under the D Language
Foundation. And they've put up a bounty
permanent position
This is huge! Thank you Symmetry!
— Bastiaan.
Looking for a full-time or part-time gig? Not only is Symmetry
Investments hiring D programmers, they are also generously
funding two positions for ecosystem work under the D Language
Foundation. And they've put up a bounty for a new DUB feature.
Read all about it here:
https://dlang.org
On Friday, 4 October 2019 at 10:22:56 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The latest post on the blog details some new funding
initiatives from the D Language Foundation. This includes
putting some of the HR Fund to use and seeding the first two of
a set of forthcoming Bugzilla bounties.
https
On Friday, 4 October 2019 at 10:22:56 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The latest post on the blog details some new funding
initiatives from the D Language Foundation. This includes
putting some of the HR Fund to use and seeding the first two of
a set of forthcoming Bugzilla bounties.
https
The latest post on the blog details some new funding initiatives
from the D Language Foundation. This includes putting some of the
HR Fund to use and seeding the first two of a set of forthcoming
Bugzilla bounties.
https://dlang.org/blog/2019/10/04/d-language-foundation-funding-new-platforms
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 09:42:11 UTC, rumbu wrote:
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 07:22:42 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 12:36:24 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 12:00:42 UTC, Seb wrote:
Yeah, the idea is that 5$ a month isn't much (~ one coffee
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 07:22:42 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 12:36:24 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 12:00:42 UTC, Seb wrote:
Yeah, the idea is that 5$ a month isn't much (~ one coffee in
most countries), but if 500 people donate one coffee a
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 07:22:42 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 12:36:24 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 12:00:42 UTC, Seb wrote:
Yeah, the idea is that 5$ a month isn't much (~ one coffee in
most countries), but if 500 people donate one coffee a
On 03/19/2018 12:31 AM, Tony wrote:
I believe they only mentioned the time
factor, but it is also labor intensive to manually pour the water.
Yup [nod, nod]. That's why decades ago they invented machines to pour
the hot water over the coffee for us ;) It even heats up the water, too!
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 12:36:24 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 12:00:42 UTC, Seb wrote:
Yeah, the idea is that 5$ a month isn't much (~ one coffee in
most countries), but if 500 people donate one coffee a month,
you get the entire coffee machine with a warp engine :)
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 03:12:52 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
(And McDonalds $1/large thing seems to have gone away, I think
it was just a temporary promotion. At least around here, anyway
(Cleveland area, in the US)).
Still doing it in the Northern California McDonalds near
On 03/18/2018 04:18 PM, Tony wrote:
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 12:36:24 UTC, Meta wrote:
Sorry to derail, but I had to ask: where does 1 coffee (even extra
large) cost $5 USD? Let me know so I know to never move there.
I have seen regular coffee at $4.50 and as high as $5.50 in the USA
On Sunday, 18 March 2018 at 20:18:45 UTC, Tony wrote:
I have seen regular coffee at $4.50 and as high as $5.50 in the
USA (and not always a large),
I believe they currently have a $5.50 pour over, but this undated
third-party hosted menu for Voltaire Coffee House in San Jose, CA
shows
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 12:36:24 UTC, Meta wrote:
Sorry to derail, but I had to ask: where does 1 coffee (even
extra large) cost $5 USD? Let me know so I know to never move
there.
I have seen regular coffee at $4.50 and as high as $5.50 in the
USA (and not always a large), but in
On Sunday, 18 March 2018 at 13:23:08 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 17:08:28 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 17:06:00 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 14:13:10 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
At the current exchange
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 17:08:28 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 17:06:00 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 14:13:10 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
At the current exchange rate, a venti-sized cup of drip
coffee at Starbucks in Korea is
301 - 400 of 523 matches
Mail list logo
