Re: State of issues.dlang.org

2016-11-02 Thread ketmar via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 2 November 2016 at 23:01:42 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote: Upgrading is on my todo list. I'll try to get to it soon. thank you for investigating the possibility. post preview is a great feature! ;-)

Re: State of issues.dlang.org

2016-11-02 Thread Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
On 11/2/2016 4:01 PM, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d wrote: Upgrading is on my todo list. I'll try to get to it soon. Thank you, Brad. Your support of Bugzilla is critically important.

Re: State of issues.dlang.org

2016-11-02 Thread Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d
On 11/2/16 2:44 PM, Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Wednesday, 2 November 2016 at 12:34:04 UTC, Wyatt wrote: This was added in Bugzilla 5.0. We're just running 4.4.2 on issues.d.o. Unfortunately, I'm not sure how easy it is to upgrade... I believe Brad is using the Debian

Re: State of issues.dlang.org

2016-11-02 Thread Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 2 November 2016 at 12:34:04 UTC, Wyatt wrote: This was added in Bugzilla 5.0. We're just running 4.4.2 on issues.d.o. Unfortunately, I'm not sure how easy it is to upgrade... I believe Brad is using the Debian packaged version, so we'll get it whenever it reaches whatever

Re: State of issues.dlang.org

2016-11-02 Thread Wyatt via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 2 November 2016 at 11:00:58 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote: One thing I miss is the ability to preview posts on Bugzilla, This was added in Bugzilla 5.0. We're just running 4.4.2 on issues.d.o. Unfortunately, I'm not sure how easy it is to upgrade... -Wyatt

Re: State of issues.dlang.org

2016-11-02 Thread Nick Treleaven via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 25 October 2016 at 13:04:22 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote: On 10/25/2016 05:17 AM, Jacob wrote: There's no editing one's comments so I often see people making multiple posts to themselves to add more information or to correct themselves. That's just a minor issue. I don't think that's

Re: State of issues.dlang.org

2016-10-30 Thread Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d
Am Sat, 29 Oct 2016 17:12:54 + schrieb Jacob : > That doesn't make the point any less valid. If something is broke > you fix it or replace it. I agree with Vladimir and cannot really understand your urge to completely replace it. As long as people don't abuse their

Re: State of issues.dlang.org

2016-10-29 Thread ketmar via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 29 October 2016 at 17:14:20 UTC, Jacob wrote: Let me rephrase that then, no one does anything about the issues. you are plainly wrong. this is as right as your "noone does anything". it is especially fun considering that "ag0aep6g" often provides clarifications and further

Re: State of issues.dlang.org

2016-10-29 Thread ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d
On 10/29/2016 07:14 PM, Jacob wrote: On Tuesday, 25 October 2016 at 13:04:22 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote: On 10/25/2016 05:17 AM, Jacob wrote: I think you're mistaken in thinking that no one looks at issues. I usually at least glance over newly filed ones, and often check if they're valid. Let me

Re: State of issues.dlang.org

2016-10-29 Thread Jacob via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 25 October 2016 at 13:04:22 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote: On 10/25/2016 05:17 AM, Jacob wrote: I think you're mistaken in thinking that no one looks at issues. I usually at least glance over newly filed ones, and often check if they're valid. Let me rephrase that then, no one does

Re: State of issues.dlang.org

2016-10-29 Thread Jacob via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 25 October 2016 at 12:48:48 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: I don't think its state is much worse than that of a typical bugtracker for projects of this scale. What projects are those? For ones of similar size at the very least all issues get tagged. There are a bunch of issues

Re: State of issues.dlang.org

2016-10-25 Thread ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d
On 10/25/2016 05:17 AM, Jacob wrote: I sort of feel that issues.dlang.org is an unmaintained mess. Anyone has access to it every aspect of editing anyone else's issue, so anyone could be added really without any oversight. Yet there's very little vandalism going on, aside from the occasional

Re: State of issues.dlang.org

2016-10-25 Thread Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 25 October 2016 at 03:17:02 UTC, Jacob wrote: I sort of feel that issues.dlang.org is an unmaintained mess. I don't think its state is much worse than that of a typical bugtracker for projects of this scale. Anyways for the site itself, it seems to be lacking features. It is

Re: State of issues.dlang.org

2016-10-25 Thread Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 25 October 2016 at 03:17:02 UTC, Jacob wrote: ... 1. The vast, vast majority of problems attributed to collaboration software are actually the fault of a lack of communication skills. This situation is no different. Changing the software will not fix any problems in organization

State of issues.dlang.org

2016-10-24 Thread Jacob via Digitalmars-d
I sort of feel that issues.dlang.org is an unmaintained mess. Anyone has access to it every aspect of editing anyone else's issue, so anyone could be added really without any oversight. There's no editing one's comments so I often see people making multiple posts to themselves to add more