On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 10:50:24 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Well… I can't argue with what you find interesting. Memory
throughput and pipeline bubbles are the key bottlenecks these
days.
And just to stress this point: if you code is spending 50% of the
time waiting for memory
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 10:09:33 UTC, Chris wrote:
Well, maybe that's exactly what the designers of C did, they
didn't slavishly follow the convention that the result of the
computation is notated to the right. Maybe they thought, 'Uh,
actually, wouldn't it be handier to see
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 00:57:32 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I am very happy! :)
It will be available on many other distribution channels like
Amazon in a few days as well but the following is the link that
pays me the most royalty:
[...]
Awesome! Ordered! ;)
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 13:02:50 UTC, Chris wrote:
Yes, I forgot, it does. But why not `x++`? I never understood
why. As if most people were too stpid to grasp the concept
that `x++` is the same as `x += 1` (which is intellectually as
'challenging' as `x++`, by the way).
I don't
On 18-Aug-2015 15:37, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I think stability of the DMD backend is a goal of much higher value than
the performance of the code it emits. DMD is never going to match the
code generation quality of LLVM and GCC, which have had many, many
man-years invested in them. Working on
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 11:42:54 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Has the argument that tpye-to-the-right is easier for
beginners has ever been proven?
It is much easier to read when you have longer types. Old
languages tended to have not so long types (libraries and
programs were
On 08/19/2015 09:40 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
But I do think that that whole deal about partial ordering is just
bizarre. If == is true, = and = should always be true and vice versa.
Similarly, if any of them are false, all three of them should be false.
If you want to do something else, then
On 08/19/2015 04:04 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 01:12:33AM +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I just saw this link come by my desktop and I thought it was an
interesting read because D does a lot of these things too, and avoids
some of them:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14935
ag0ae...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ag0ae...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14935
--- Comment #3 from ag0ae...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Ryuichi OHORI from comment #2)
The version I used is 2.067.
Works for me with 2.067, too. What error are you getting?
--
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 00:57:32 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I am very happy! :)
Ordered Thank You Ali.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14932
Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||spec
--
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 12:01:35 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 08/19/2015 09:40 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
But I do think that that whole deal about partial ordering is
just
bizarre. If == is true, = and = should always be true and
vice versa.
Similarly, if any of them are false, all
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14663
--- Comment #8 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/c011a559128e0c069140df4f7b3afd670403b081
fix Issue 14663 - shared
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14663
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
I just got an idea:
What about providing a top-level package.d in std?
import std;
// use potentially everything in Phobos:
// with having to care about which import to use
- This would make complete working tutorials even smaller
- And newbies could easier experiment will all the
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 09:54:33 UTC, SimonN wrote:
Hi,
in a release-like build, I'm using the tharsis profiler, which
is a
frame-based profiler. Zone is a RAII struct that measures how
long its own
lifetime is.
with (Zone(my_profiler, zone name to appear in output)) {
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14896
Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14935
Issue ID: 14935
Summary: [Operator Overloading] Wrong description on
overloading a[]
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
URL: http://dlang.org/
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14935
--- Comment #2 from Ryuichi OHORI r.97...@gmail.com ---
The version I used is 2.067.
If this is a change it must be listed on ChangeLog anyway, but I couldn't find
it.
The document goes 'opIndex' for about an year, since this commit:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 11:42:54 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 10:09:33 UTC, Chris wrote:
Well, maybe that's exactly what the designers of C did, they
didn't slavishly follow the convention that the result of the
computation is notated to the right.
On 19-Aug-2015 15:53, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-08-19 00:55, Walter Bright wrote:
Exactly. That's why people just want to type -O and it optimizes.
So why not just -pgo that does that you described above?
+1 for -pgo to use trace.log in the same folder that way running
-profile
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 13:45:32 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
The parsing overhead on my machine is somewhere between 0.5 and
1 second.
I recall that Andrei has mentioned plans on further DMD
optimizations that will delay lexing and/or parsing of templates
until they are referenced. Only
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 00:57:32 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I am very happy! :)
It will be available on many other distribution channels like
Amazon in a few days as well but the following is the link that
pays me the most royalty:
https://www.createspace.com/5618128
This revision
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14935
ag0ae...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On 2015-08-19 15:00, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
+1 for -pgo to use trace.log in the same folder that way running
-profile folowed by -pgo will just work (tm).
I was thinking something the compiler would handle everything
automatically in one command with the -pgo flag present. If necessary,
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 12:03:08 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 08/19/2015 02:01 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 08/19/2015 09:40 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
If == is true, = and = should always be true and vice versa.
Similarly, if any of them are false, all three of them should
be false.
On 2015-08-19 00:55, Walter Bright wrote:
Exactly. That's why people just want to type -O and it optimizes.
So why not just -pgo that does that you described above?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 08/19/2015 02:01 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 08/19/2015 09:40 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
If == is true, = and = should always be true and vice versa.
Similarly, if any of them are false, all three of them should be false.
Missed this. No, that is not how it should work, but I guess it's
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 12:01:41 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
Just switch your editor to RTL mode, haha.
Indeed. Except the variable name is caught in the middle of the
type and the assignment.
I've started to carefully align my variable names at ~ row 40 in
my C++ code.
On 08/18/2015 12:21 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
- JSONValue should offer a byToken range, which offers the contents of
the value one token at a time. For example, [ 1, 2, 3 ] offers the '['
token followed by three numeric tokens with the respective values
followed by the ']' token.
What
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14896
ag0ae...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ag0ae...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14935
--- Comment #4 from Ryuichi OHORI r.97...@gmail.com ---
Ah, it seems I mis-minimized my code using older ones in http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/
Here is an example 2.065 doesn't compile:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/fork/d52a0e0a2163
I'm not sure but I was getting
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 13:32:03 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
I just got an idea:
What about providing a top-level package.d in std?
Further, it would be a powerful showcase for the semantically
aware D user-experience, enabled by its unique parsing
performance.
The parsing overhead on
On 8/17/15 6:44 PM, anonymous wrote:
On Monday, 17 August 2015 at 22:32:10 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
On Monday, 17 August 2015 at 21:27:47 UTC, Meta wrote:
[...]
At that point, couldn't you just use static if inside the body of the
template instead of using template constraints?
No. Consider
On Tuesday, 18 August 2015 at 10:45:49 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
So if you're comparing code generated by dmd/gdc/ldc, and
notice something that dmd could do better at (1, 2 or 3),
please let me know. Often this sort of thing is low hanging
fruit that is fairly easily inserted into the back
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 00:57:32 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
It will be available on many other distribution channels like
Amazon in a few days as well but the following is the link that
pays me the most royalty:
https://www.createspace.com/5618128
Ali, congratulations on releasing
On 8/18/15 1:51 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
On Monday, 17 August 2015 at 19:38:21 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 8/17/15 3:27 PM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Consider the following code
void* mem = malloc(500);
GC.addRange(mem, 500);
mem = realloc(mem, 512); // assume the pointer didn't change
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14925
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/3f8b910e2c2834d2f87a543dc39692fe03a69c92
Fix issue 14925 --
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12748
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice, pull
http://forum.dlang.org/post/mmntkn$9ta$1...@digitalmars.com ?
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14934
--- Comment #2 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu ---
Maybe there could be a dead-lock in acquiring the GC lock in a critical region.
Need to recheck that.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14934
Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 14:45:31 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
In the case where the pointer changes, you are in trouble. The
original memory is now free, which means it can be overwritten
by something else (either the C heap or some other thread that
reallocates it). Then if your
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 15:53:27 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 00:57:32 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
[...]
Ali, congratulations on releasing such a complete book on D! I
know this took you an immense effort, as these things always
do, but the results speak
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14934
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 12:32:32 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 12:01:41 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
Just switch your editor to RTL mode, haha.
Indeed. Except the variable name is caught in the middle of the
type and the assignment.
Well, if you have three
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14936
Issue ID: 14936
Summary: Dividing by a power of 2 slow on 32bit
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
On 18 August 2015 at 12:45, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Martin ran some benchmarks recently that showed that ddmd compiled with
dmd was about 30% slower than when compiled with gdc/ldc. This seems to be
fairly typical.
I'm interested in ways to reduce
On 8/19/2015 7:34 AM, anonymous wrote:
I have a about 30 lines of numerical code (using real) where the gap is about
200%-300% between ldc/gdc and dmd (linux x86_64). In fact dmd -O etc is at the
level of ldc/gdc without any optimizations and dmd without -0 is even slower.
With double instead of
On 8/19/2015 9:53 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14936
(Consider this my contribution to your low hanging fruit)
Thanks!
On 8/19/15 8:42 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 08/18/2015 12:21 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
- JSONValue should offer a byToken range, which offers the contents of
the value one token at a time. For example, [ 1, 2, 3 ] offers the '['
token followed by three numeric tokens with the respective
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 17:25:13 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Apple is invested in LLVM. For other thing you mention,
WebAssembly is an AST representation, which is both dumb and do
not look like anything like LLVM IR.
I saw more similarity between wasm and SPIR-V than LLVM, but it
On 2015-08-18 12:45, Walter Bright wrote:
Martin ran some benchmarks recently that showed that ddmd compiled with
dmd was about 30% slower than when compiled with gdc/ldc. This seems to
be fairly typical.
Not sure how the compilers behave in this case but what about
devirtualization? Since I
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 09:26:43 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 08:22:58 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
Also DMD's backend strives to stay fast _and_ generate fine
machine code. Getting within 10% of GCC/LLVM and being fast is
IMHO both possible and
On 2015-08-18 23:43, Walter Bright wrote:
I wonder how many people actually use the llvm profile guided
optimizations. I suspect very, very few.
In Xcode there's a checkbox for PGO in the build configuration. Should
be just as easy to enable as any other build setting.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2015-08-19 19:29, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Forgot about those. The invariant is that byToken should return a
sequence of tokens that, when parsed, produces the originating object.
That should be possible without the comma tokens in this case?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2015-08-19 16:05, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
I'd be surprised if it didn't, but you can always check the disassembly.
If for some reason either the compiler doesn't remove it (it never
removes classes btw but not sure about structs) or the linker
doesn't discard it you can try -gcsections ( or
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14936
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||performance
On 8/18/2015 5:57 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I am very happy! :)
It will be available on many other distribution channels like Amazon in a few
days as well but the following is the link that pays me the most royalty:
https://www.createspace.com/5618128
This revision has many corrections and
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 18:41:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/19/2015 11:03 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Not sure how the compilers behave in this case but what about
devirtualization?
Since I think most developers compile their D programs with
all files at once
there should be pretty
On 8/19/2015 11:03 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Not sure how the compilers behave in this case but what about devirtualization?
Since I think most developers compile their D programs with all files at once
there should be pretty good opportunities to do devirtualization.
It's true that if
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 18:26:45 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 17:25:13 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Apple is invested in LLVM. For other thing you mention,
WebAssembly is an AST representation, which is both dumb and
do not look like anything like LLVM IR.
I saw more
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14937
Issue ID: 14937
Summary: Slow code compared to ldc/gdc on calculation with real
variables
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 17:30:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/19/2015 7:34 AM, anonymous wrote:
I have a about 30 lines of numerical code (using real) where
the gap is about
200%-300% between ldc/gdc and dmd (linux x86_64). In fact dmd
-O etc is at the
level of ldc/gdc without any
What is HDF5, and why should you use it ?
http://www.hdfgroup.org/why_hdf/
(My summary):
- very large data sets, very fast access requirements, and
complex datasets
- share data across variety of platforms
- many open-source and commercial tools that understand HDF
- self-describing
On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 12:39:11 UTC, qznc wrote:
Looks like I will give a talk about D to our local Functional
Programming User Group in August. Feel free to join, if you can
be in Karlsruhe, Germany:
On 8/19/15 1:59 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-08-19 19:29, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Forgot about those. The invariant is that byToken should return a
sequence of tokens that, when parsed, produces the originating object.
That should be possible without the comma tokens in this case?
I was wondering if there was a way to dump the contents of the
heap to a file.
If the heap is guaranteed to be in one contiguous chunk, then all
I would need is:
- The start address of the heap
- The current size of the heap
If it is not in one contiguous chunk, then it might be a little
On 8/18/15 8:57 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I am very happy! :)
[snip]
As you should. This is a great achievement. Congratulations! -- Andrei
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 18:47:21 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 18:41:07 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 8/19/2015 11:03 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Not sure how the compilers behave in this case but what about
devirtualization?
Since I think most developers compile
On 19 August 2015 at 21:00, deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 18:47:21 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 18:41:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/19/2015 11:03 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Not sure how the
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14937
--- Comment #1 from secondaryacco...@web.de ---
Created attachment 1543
-- https://issues.dlang.org/attachment.cgi?id=1543action=edit
compressed benchmark input file
reduced benchmark input file to pass size limit.
--
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 11:22:09 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On 18-Aug-2015 15:37, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I think stability of the DMD backend is a goal of much higher
value than
the performance of the code it emits. DMD is never going to
match the
code generation quality of LLVM
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 19:05:09 UTC, Lewis wrote:
I was wondering if there was a way to dump the contents of the
heap to a file.
If the heap is guaranteed to be in one contiguous chunk, then
all I would need is:
- The start address of the heap
- The current size of the heap
If it
Consider this code:
```
struct Test
{
string to;
void test()
{
import core.time;
auto value = [to: to]; // Error: can't have associative array
of void
}
}
void main() {}
```
In 2.068.0 compilation fails. Works in 2.065 and 2.067.1.
On 8/19/2015 12:39 PM, anonymous wrote:
The problem are not the 30 lines + white space but the input file used in my
benchmark. The whole benchmark programm has 115 lines including empty lines and
braces. The input file is 4.8 MB large.
Anyway the raw asm generated by the different compiler may
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 21:32:17 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 21:26:34 UTC, sigod wrote:
Consider this code:
Not a regression per se - core.time just introduced a new `to`
function that is conflicting with your variable name because
you imported
On 08/18/2015 12:45 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Martin ran some benchmarks recently that showed that ddmd compiled with
dmd was about 30% slower than when compiled with gdc/ldc. This seems to
be fairly typical.
I'm interested in ways to reduce that gap.
There are 3 broad kinds of optimizations
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 23:18:04 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 08/20/2015 01:06 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 22:33:23 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
It's a bug in local imports. This is the ticket:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10378
Seems to fit into existing
On 8/13/2015 6:12 AM, Dicebot wrote:
Right now this works:
``D
struct Std
{
public import std.stdio;
}
void main()
{
Std.writeln(Nice!);
}
```
I want to use it as an import hygiene idiom but not entirely sure if this
behavior can be relied upon (or it is just a side effect of imports
On 08/20/2015 01:25 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
I want to use it as an import hygiene idiom but not entirely sure if this
behavior can be relied upon (or it is just a side effect of imports being
implemented as aliases currently).
It has nothing to do with aliases.
Imports work the same way as
On 08/20/2015 12:04 AM, Dicebot wrote:
And yes, this is indeed regression but of a kind unavoidable with D
module system so there isn't anything that can be done here but
adjusting your code, sadly.
It's a bug.
On 08/18/2015 05:57 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
the following is the link that pays me the most
royalty:
https://www.createspace.com/5618128
It's available on Amazon as well and it already comes with a discount!
WAT? :)
On 08/19/2015 11:26 PM, sigod wrote:
Consider this code:
```
struct Test
{
string to;
void test()
{
import core.time;
auto value = [to: to]; // Error: can't have associative array
of void
}
}
void main() {}
```
In 2.068.0 compilation fails. Works in
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 23:29:26 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 08/20/2015 01:20 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 23:18:04 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 08/20/2015 01:06 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 22:33:23 UTC, Timon Gehr
wrote:
It's a bug in local
Should this be done? How?
I sent a pull request for the std.net.curl docs. They all talk
about assigning the results of web requests to strings, but at
least on my setup this does not work (cannot assign char[] to
string). I was trying to walk someone else through using this
and it was
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10378
timon.g...@gmx.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch
--- Comment #12 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14912
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||performance
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 22:33:23 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
It's a bug in local imports. This is the ticket:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10378
Seems to fit into existing shadowing semantics. If this is a bug
we may need a new spec.
On 08/20/2015 01:06 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 22:33:23 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
It's a bug in local imports. This is the ticket:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10378
Seems to fit into existing shadowing semantics.
There's no precedent for symbols shadowed by
On 08/20/2015 01:20 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 23:18:04 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 08/20/2015 01:06 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 22:33:23 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
It's a bug in local imports. This is the ticket:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 20:54:39 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 11:22:09 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On 18-Aug-2015 15:37, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
[...]
How about stress-testing with some simple fuzzer:
1. Generate a sequence of pluasable expressions/functions.
And yes, this is indeed regression but of a kind unavoidable with
D module system so there isn't anything that can be done here but
adjusting your code, sadly.
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 21:56:22 UTC, sigod wrote:
```
T to(string units, T, D)(D td)
```
But what compiler does with this function? How `void` appears
in the error message?
There are no arguments used thus `to` is resolved as plain
template symbol, not a function. Template that
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14937
--- Comment #2 from secondaryacco...@web.de ---
Created attachment 1544
-- https://issues.dlang.org/attachment.cgi?id=1544action=edit
full benchmark code for reduced input file
The attached input file contains 1400 example vectors. This benchmark
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 21:26:34 UTC, sigod wrote:
Consider this code:
Not a regression per se - core.time just introduced a new `to`
function that is conflicting with your variable name because you
imported core.time in a more local scope.
You can just do [to: this.to] to
On Tuesday, 18 August 2015 at 10:45:49 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Martin ran some benchmarks recently that showed that ddmd
compiled with dmd was about 30% slower than when compiled with
gdc/ldc. This seems to be fairly typical.
I'm interested in ways to reduce that gap.
There are 3 broad
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14937
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||performance
Minor update to scriptlike: Utility library to aid in writing
script-like programs in D.
Homepage and features:
https://github.com/Abscissa/scriptlike
On DUB:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/scriptlike
API Reference:
http://semitwist.com/scriptlike
Full Changelog:
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
