Re: Passing a sting as 'in char[]' yields "immutable is not callable using argument types ()"

final Tuple!(int,"value",bool,"hasValue") value(const string name) { return nameImpl(value); } Sorry, this is the error. It should have been final Tuple!(int,"value",bool,"hasValue") value(const string name) { return valueImpl(name); }

[Issue 14136] std.uni.utfMatcher breaks @safety

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14136 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 14136] std.uni.utfMatcher breaks @safety

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14136 --- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/16099c6ec538b34cc5de97940f509fb0c15c0268 fix Issue 14136 - std.uni.utfMatcher breaks @safety

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:52:06 UTC, ketmar wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:40:48 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:31:34 UTC, ketmar wrote: i'm trying to hint that there is no reason to reimplement *everything* in D. bad engineers reinvent, good

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 16:23:13 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: Yes, no point in writing your own forum software. ah, sure, there was the reason to write DFeed! that's why forum.dlang.org is using engine written in D.

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

On 2016-06-08 16:58, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: I agree with Jacob. A comment is a comment. There is no reason one needs to use specifically /+. In fact the only reason for the existence of /+ is to allow nesting of comments -- which doesn't apply here. And basically the only reason why /+

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 16:28:54 UTC, dewitt wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:18:27 UTC, ketmar wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:05:54 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: People check out stuff like that. The forum backend also use a standard NNTP server, not implemented in D?

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 16:40:37 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: DFeed is a NNTP client, not a NNTP server. sure. why should it be an NNTP server? there is task to solve: provide web frontend to the existing NNTP server. that task was solved. there was no task "waste some time to

Re: The Official D Blog is Live

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 16:44:35 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 14:45:07 UTC, bachmeier wrote: Is it possible to announce the new This Week In D from the blog when it comes out? That sort of post doesn't really fit within the goals of the blog. I mean, TWID is put

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 16:53:32 UTC, ketmar wrote: go write it! nope? why do you think that D devs should? they have other work to do, it would be *stupid* to not reuse existing tools. If I thought that D was good for the purpose, I would. I have not made such claims. I am pointing out

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 14:43:35 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: Really? I just don't see it as that big of a deal. Again, three subdomains are using D right now. So it's not like it's not being used at all. Moving the website to D just hasn't been a priority (nor should it be, IMO). Anyone in

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

On 6/8/16 8:21 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote: On 2016-06-08 11:15, Sönke Ludwig wrote: I generally really do appreciate your critique, but without backing reasons it doesn't really have a constructive effect. Two good properties about restricting to /+ +/ is that it's still possible to put

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 14:57:11 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote: However, I think you have to consider the emotional impact of this. nodejs.org's homepage is served by nginx. D is general purpose, node is specifically web. Nobody seems to care (probably because using nginx is the

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 14:45:58 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: What does that have to do with the website? The forum software is written in D and has a reputation for performance. This is simply a matter of it not popping up on anyone's radar and has nothing to do with the GC or performance

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:18:27 UTC, ketmar wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:05:54 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: People check out stuff like that. The forum backend also use a standard NNTP server, not implemented in D? That's ok too as there is no D forum software... it's even

[Issue 16140] New: while(auto x = y) does not behave like if(auto x = y)

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16140 Issue ID: 16140 Summary: while(auto x = y) does not behave like if(auto x = y) Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86 OS: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity:

Re: The Official D Blog is Live

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 14:45:07 UTC, bachmeier wrote: Is it possible to announce the new This Week In D from the blog when it comes out? That sort of post doesn't really fit within the goals of the blog. I mean, TWID is put out every Sunday. That would mean I'd make a two or three line

Re: About GC: The Future of Rust : GC integration

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:24:45 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 06:19:08 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: Yes, Inkscape uses the boehm collector, which is the same kind of collector D uses. Inkscape feels sluggish. Wow, I did not expect to see "Inkscape" pop up

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 16:58:31 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: This is very basic marketing 101. engineers doesn't do marketing. engineers solving tasks.

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 16:07:26 UTC, ketmar wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:57:42 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: Huh? No, as long as D is not backed by some giant like Google or Apple it has to do its own marketing and showcase its own stuff where it can. the key words are

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 13:32:00 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 13:13:07 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote: I've decided to write a web application using vibe and was shocked to see that dlang.org was using apache. Should I be scared that even after this long, the official

Re: Interest in Paris area D meetups?

On Wednesday, 1 June 2016 at 20:33:40 UTC, Guillaume Chatelet wrote: On Wednesday, 1 June 2016 at 19:25:13 UTC, Claude wrote: On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 15:05:21 UTC, Guillaume Chatelet wrote: I got inspired by Steven's thread :) Anyone in Paris interested in D meetups? Sorry for the later

Re: How to enable feedback for AssertError?

On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 04:21:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 02:05:00 UTC, Seb wrote: On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 01:40:01 UTC, your_name wrote: The way I traced the problem, ironically ;), was to catch Error and print it to screen. It involved dereferencing a null

Re: About GC: The Future of Rust : GC integration

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 12:04:34 UTC, ketmar wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 06:19:08 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: I've yet to see a large desktop app relying on GC that does not feel sluggish. i've yet to see a large desktop app that does not feel sluggish. Most games.

[Issue 16096] Linking to static library: can't parse __DATA/__objc_imageinfo

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16096 --- Comment #2 from Jacob Carlborg --- There's some difference in the order the code is generate depending on if the -lib flag is passed or not. If the flag is passed, no __objc_imageinfo section is outputted. --

Re: Passing a sting as 'in char[]' yields "immutable is not callable using argument types ()"

String is an alias for 'immutable(char)[]'. I assume you meant const(char)[] instead of 'const string'? P.S. always use parentheses.

Nested comments

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:04:28 UTC, Kagamin wrote: BTW do people find nested comments particularly useful? Yes for: A) commenting out a block of code without having to care about syntactic correctness (otherwise version(none)) or whether it contains comments (otherwise /* */) B)

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:18:27 UTC, ketmar wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:05:54 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: People check out stuff like that. The forum backend also use a standard NNTP server, not implemented in D? That's ok too as there is no D forum software... it's even

Re: LDC+Dub+Vibe.d work on SmartOS 64bit now

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 10:06:00 UTC, Oleg Nykytenko wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 08:43:59 UTC, Joakim wrote: Have you run the standard library's tests? There was a thread last summer about this: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/zhcduibirwprgbzqk...@forum.dlang.org We haven't run

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:05:54 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 14:45:58 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: What does that have to do with the website? The forum software is written in D and has a reputation for performance. This is simply a matter of it not popping up

Passing a sting as 'in char[]' yields "immutable is not callable using argument types ()"

I have an immutable final class with methods with the following signature import std.typecons; immutable class Base{ ... @safe pure nothrow final Tuple!(int,"value",bool,"hasValue") value(const string name) { return nameImpl(value); } @safe pure nothrow protected

Re: Web page listing all D compilers (and DMDFE version!) on travis-ci

On 06/07/2016 12:05 PM, FreeSlave wrote: On Tuesday, 26 April 2016 at 06:42:11 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: https://semitwist.com/travis-d-compilers That's an auto-generated listing of all versions of DMD, GDC and LDC available on travis-ci. [...] Looks like semitwist.com is down. Oops.

Berlin D Meetup June 2016

Hi All, The June Berlin D Meetup will be happening at 20:00 (note new time) on Friday the 17th of June at Berlin Co-Op (http://co-up.de/) on the fifth floor. Danny Arends will be giving a more detailed version of his lightning talk he gave at the D conference on his web server, "DaNode".

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:51:58 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:05:54 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: The forum-index http header report: Server:nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu) People check out stuff like that. Yeah, and that's an industry-standard production

[Issue 16131] A struct is being copied unnecessarily when initialized

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16131 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:05:54 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: The forum-index http header report: Server:nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu) People check out stuff like that. Yeah, and that's an industry-standard production deployment. But perhaps we should just change the server line for the

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:40:48 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:31:34 UTC, ketmar wrote: i'm trying to hint that there is no reason to reimplement *everything* in D. bad engineers reinvent, good engineers reuse! This is about marketing, not engineering.

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:57:42 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: Huh? No, as long as D is not backed by some giant like Google or Apple it has to do its own marketing and showcase its own stuff where it can. the key words are "where it can". rewriting already working tools (perfectly

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 16:38:02 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: They do of course use golang for their blog and make it available as a download. As they _should_. google. money. does that rings the bell?

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 16:36:50 UTC, ketmar wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 16:23:13 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: Yes, no point in writing your own forum software. ah, sure, there was the reason to write DFeed! that's why forum.dlang.org is using engine written in D. DFeed is

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 16:49:46 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 16:44:00 UTC, ketmar wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 16:38:02 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: They do of course use golang for their blog and make it available as a download. As they

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 16:44:00 UTC, ketmar wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 16:38:02 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: They do of course use golang for their blog and make it available as a download. As they _should_. google. money. does that rings the bell? No. The go blog

template with enum arg ?

In a first implementation I defined a named enum in my class which I could use with my template function foo. final class Info { ... enum Value { info_1 = 1, ... } ... static bar(Value e) {...} } void foo(T)(T.Value e) { T.bar(e); } I could then write :

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 17:05:42 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote: I can picture the article now: I can't. It is an industry-standard deployment with a commonly used configuration option - people change that all the time. PHP, for example, will modify it to output something like this:

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 09:15:09 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: Two good properties about restricting to /+ +/ is that it's still possible to put something else in front of it, and that it stands out from the usual /* */ comments. It stands out because we don't have a recognizable convention

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:04:24 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 14:57:11 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote: However, I think you have to consider the emotional impact of this. nodejs.org's homepage is served by nginx. D is general purpose, node is specifically web.

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:05:54 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: People check out stuff like that. The forum backend also use a standard NNTP server, not implemented in D? That's ok too as there is no D forum software... it's even more than that: D servers are using OS which is not

Re: About GC: The Future of Rust : GC integration

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 06:19:08 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: Yes, Inkscape uses the boehm collector, which is the same kind of collector D uses. Inkscape feels sluggish. Wow, I did not expect to see "Inkscape" pop up in the D forums! Inkscape can be sluggish, but that has nothing to

Re: Nested comments

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:21:08 UTC, John Colvin wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:04:28 UTC, Kagamin wrote: BTW do people find nested comments particularly useful? Yes for: A) commenting out a block of code without having to care about syntactic correctness (otherwise

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:31:34 UTC, ketmar wrote: i'm trying to hint that there is no reason to reimplement *everything* in D. bad engineers reinvent, good engineers reuse! This is about marketing, not engineering. Walter is arguing that vibe.d should be distributed with the compiler.

Re: 10 lesser known languages, but no dlang?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 10:08:11 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: http://programmingzen.com/2016/06/07/10-lesser-known-programming-languages-worth-exploring/ Maybe someone feel the inspiration to add a thoughtful comment in the comment-section on the article with a pointer to dlang.org?

Re: The Official D Blog is Live

Is it possible to announce the new This Week In D from the blog when it comes out?

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 14:41:55 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: But DMD also doesn't use the GC because it doesn't perform well enough. Stuff like this adds up. So I agree with you in essence, sending the message that there are things to avoid is not good in the long run. It might

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:23:58 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:18:27 UTC, ketmar wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:05:54 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: People check out stuff like that. The forum backend also use a standard NNTP server, not

[Issue 16131] A struct is being copied unnecessarily when initialized

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16131 --- Comment #6 from Sobirari Muhomori --- Try this: struct Foo { int x; Fiber fib; @disable this(this); void create(int x) { this.x = x; fib = new Fiber(); } void run() {

Re: 10 lesser known languages, but no dlang?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:52:49 UTC, Wyatt wrote: And basically _no one_ knows about J... i know! i even know about CLU!

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 17:05:42 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:51:58 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:05:54 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: The forum-index http header report: Server:nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu) People check out stuff like

Re: Recursive SymbolNames solved.

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 13:28:19 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: Hi, I solved the issue. PR is coming shortly. How was they getting recursive?

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 17:59:29 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 17:43:23 UTC, dewitt wrote: vibes website doesn't use a proxy. Yes, but more people visit dlang.org, and it makes it more official if it is showcased here as a visible part of the website (one

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 17:34:25 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 17:17:37 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: bother with a proper setup. There's a reason ALL the other major languages and frameworks use Apache/nginx/IIS on their websites. It's the recommended way to do

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 17:05:42 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:51:58 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:05:54 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: The forum-index http header report: Server:nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu) People check out stuff like

Re: Passing private functions to template algorithms

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 05:51:38 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: If I had a specific case in mind I would have provided it. Then is is FUD.

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 17:34:25 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 17:17:37 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: bother with a proper setup. There's a reason ALL the other major languages and frameworks use Apache/nginx/IIS on their websites. It's the recommended way to do

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 18:15:22 UTC, Seb wrote: - good nosql interface what's wrong with vibed's mongodb? Probably nothing for those who use it. I only use: https://cloud.google.com/datastore/ https://cloud.google.com/storage/ https://cloud.google.com/sql/ Amazon and Microsoft have

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 14:41:55 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: [snip] I like the "are we fast yet" websites that various project put up, displaying improvements over time. You mean like this? http://digger.k3.1azy.net/trend/

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 16:58:42 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: At any rate, we *are* using our own tech in several places. And I think Seb has shown that in practice, it probably isn't that big a deal that the entire website isn't served by a D project. If you want to convince me, as a backend

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 17:25:32 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 14:41:55 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: [snip] I like the "are we fast yet" websites that various project put up, displaying improvements over time. You mean like this?

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 17:43:23 UTC, dewitt wrote: vibes website doesn't use a proxy. Yes, but more people visit dlang.org, and it makes it more official if it is showcased here as a visible part of the website (one way or another). But if D wants to compete in web then there are

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote: > Am 08.06.2016 um 08:59 schrieb Jacob Carlborg: >> >> On 2016-06-07 20:42, Sönke Ludwig wrote: >> >>> No, it has to be the "+" variant (the first /+ +/ comment is evaluated). >> >> >> That's unfortunate. >

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

Am 08.06.2016 um 16:58 schrieb Steven Schveighoffer: I agree with Jacob. A comment is a comment. Well, there are normal comments, doc comments and now DUB recipe comments. But at least if doc comments serve as an analogy, those are possible with all three comment styles, so that could be

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

regex version pull request: https://github.com/dlang/dub/pull/869 On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Rory McGuire wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Sönke Ludwig > wrote: >> Am 08.06.2016 um 08:59 schrieb Jacob Carlborg: >>> >>> On

Re: About GC: The Future of Rust : GC integration

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 17:13:38 UTC, deadalnix wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 12:04:34 UTC, ketmar wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 06:19:08 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: I've yet to see a large desktop app relying on GC that does not feel sluggish. i've yet to see a large

Re: GSlice - Re: [OT] About GC: The Future of Rust : GC integration

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 11:59:49 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 03:50:26 UTC, deadalnix wrote: (a fast malloc already needs to be able to find the allocation metadata from free's argument effisciently, BTW GLib (GTK+) have a GSlice API that doesn't allow resizing

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 17:17:37 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: bother with a proper setup. There's a reason ALL the other major languages and frameworks use Apache/nginx/IIS on their websites. It's the recommended way to do it. Sure, you can have vibe.d behind nginx, if you want to, but it

Re: About GC: The Future of Rust : GC integration

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:24:45 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 06:19:08 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: Yes, Inkscape uses the boehm collector, which is the same kind of collector D uses. Inkscape feels sluggish. Wow, I did not expect to see "Inkscape" pop up

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 17:43:03 UTC, Seb wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 17:05:42 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:51:58 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:05:54 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: The forum-index http header report:

Re: dlang.org using apache?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 17:50:11 UTC, Seb wrote: I agree that a showcase website for vibed (or another D web framework) would be beneficial, but a real showcase has totally different specs: - > 1 million visitors per day - highly dynamic content (high-throughput databases) - solved

Re: The Problem With DIPs

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 20:44:10 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: I agree we should do better, I certainly welcome any efforts you're willing to devote to this. Most of the huge improvements in process in D have come about precisely because someone selected himself to take charge of the matter

Re: Recursive SymbolNames solved.

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 18:02:41 UTC, Jerry wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 13:28:19 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: Hi, I solved the issue. PR is coming shortly. How was they getting recursive? Think to the fibo templatized example, it generates a very long mangle with basically always

Re: The Problem With DIPs

On 6/8/2016 1:22 PM, Dicebot wrote: I believe it is big mistake to treat DIPs as a creative idea database. Most importantly because it diminishes motivation to put real effort into working on the DIP as opposed to just quickly throwing something on the table and moving on. Sure, those are useful

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

I made a little parser, it doesn't handle nested + comments (just needs a depth check). https://github.com/dlang/dub/pull/871 On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Rory McGuire wrote: > regex version pull request: > https://github.com/dlang/dub/pull/869 > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at

Re: The Problem With DIPs

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 19:59:27 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 6/7/2016 1:32 PM, Jack Stouffer wrote: a lousy 28% of DIPs are either definitively closed or accepted. There are currently 34 issues on it, where we implemented a feature and inadvertently broke something. There are constant

Re: 10 lesser known languages, but no dlang?

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:52:49 UTC, Wyatt wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 10:08:11 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: http://programmingzen.com/2016/06/07/10-lesser-known-programming-languages-worth-exploring/ Maybe someone feel the inspiration to add a thoughtful comment in the

Re: The Problem With DIPs

On 6/8/2016 1:47 PM, Dicebot wrote: I will finish description for proposed process this weekend and send it to dmd-internal mail list. Cool!

Re: The Problem With DIPs

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 21:15:20 UTC, deadalnix wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 19:59:27 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 6/7/2016 1:32 PM, Jack Stouffer wrote: a lousy 28% of DIPs are either definitively closed or accepted. I understand that is frustrating. It happens to mine as well,

[Issue 14136] std.uni.utfMatcher breaks @safety

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14136 David Nadlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 16138] Attributes of private functions should be inferred

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16138 Daniel Nielsen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gox...@gmail.com

Re: The Problem With DIPs

On 6/8/2016 1:37 PM, Pie? wrote: How about everyone stop working on "new features" and try to make D solid? This does get repeatedly proposed, usually along with "just add this one more feature" :-( There aren't any easy answers.

[Issue 16141] New: Organizations page unreachable

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16141 Issue ID: 16141 Summary: Organizations page unreachable Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All URL: http://dlang.org/ OS: All Status: NEW

Re: template with enum arg ?

On 06/08/2016 10:02 AM, chmike wrote: In a first implementation I defined a named enum in my class which I could use with my template function foo. final class Info { ... enum Value { info_1 = 1, ... } ... static bar(Value e) {...} } void foo(T)(T.Value e) { T.bar(e); }

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 09:54:19 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: DUB 1.0.0 is nearing completion. The new feature over 0.9.25 is... Great work! I've spread the news to all my hackish friends.

[Issue 16142] New: Adding a dtor / postblit (even disabled) forces opAssign

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16142 Issue ID: 16142 Summary: Adding a dtor / postblit (even disabled) forces opAssign Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW

Re: Optimizations and performance

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 22:32:49 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 22:19:47 UTC, Bauss wrote: D definitely needs some optimizations, I mean look at its benchmarks compared to other languages: https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks I believe the first step

Optimizations and performance

D definitely needs some optimizations, I mean look at its benchmarks compared to other languages: https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks I believe the first step towards better performance would be identifying the specific areas that are slow. I definitely believe D could do much better than

[Issue 16076] auto-deploy on every merged PR

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16076 greensunn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: Optimizations and performance

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 22:19:47 UTC, Bauss wrote: D definitely needs some optimizations, I mean look at its benchmarks compared to other languages: https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks I believe the first step towards better performance would be identifying the specific areas that are

Re: Asio Bindings?

I do have (Steinberg) ASIO binding in D. The problem is I couldn't release the bindings. I've asked Steinberg if it was OK to release D bindings and they were strongly against it unfortunately (and this was over 3 years ago..). Any kind of direct use of ASIO requires their approval first..

Re: About GC: The Future of Rust : GC integration

On 6/8/16 3:08 PM, Matthias Bentrup wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 03:19:18 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 03:10:32 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote: In D some very important things like exceptions depend on GC. This is a common misconception. Exceptions do not have to

Re: About GC: The Future of Rust : GC integration

On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 03:19:18 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 03:10:32 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote: In D some very important things like exceptions depend on GC. This is a common misconception. Exceptions do not have to use the GC, they just often are. All you

dlang.org using apache?

I've decided to write a web application using vibe and was shocked to see that dlang.org was using apache. Should I be scared that even after this long, the official D website doesn't rely on its own web tools?

  1   2   >