https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18958
Mike Franklin changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh
Under mecca, we're using GC free exceptions.
I have code that uses mkEx
(https://github.com/weka-io/mecca/blob/master/src/mecca/lib/exception.d#L307).
Essentially, it constructs an exception in place inside a fiber-local
buffer. The construction code seems correct, and the parent seems set
On Thursday, 26 July 2018 at 02:21:58 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 07/25/2018 04:27 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 21:59:52 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Somebody had posted an article here on how well different
languages matched certain requirements of a certain coding
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18997
Mike Franklin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slavo5...@yahoo.com
See Also|
On 26/07/2018 6:13 AM, Jacob Shtokolov wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 09:42:00 UTC, Ivo wrote:
I'm a macOs user and I need to build a application with a GUI.
Not sure if the author of the DLangUI is visiting this forum so often to
be able to answer.
If you won't get an answer in the
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19033
Mike Franklin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slavo5...@yahoo.com
See Also|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18786
Mike Franklin changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 07:19:21 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
If I'm not wrong, Python has grown up really slowly and
quietly, till the recent big success in the scientific field.
Python replaced Perl and to some extent Php... Two very
questionable languages, which was a good
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 at 13:55, 12345swordy via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> > It's not a false equivalence fallacy: all the discussion is
> > about IMPLICIT conversion or rvalues to lvalues.
> Yes it is, the issues regarding rvalue/lvalue conversion is not
> the same issues regarding the
Somebody had posted an article here on how well different languages
matched certain requirements of a certain coding safety standards.
I remember D was doing pretty well and I think Ada (or SPARK?) was
included as well. What article? Where?
Thank you,
Ali
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 18:01:54 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
This works for me:
struct Optional(T) {
private T _value;
private bool empty = true;
this(T value) {
_value = value;
empty = false;
}
auto opUnary(string op)() {
if(!empty) mixin(op ~
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 21:16:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/24/2018 4:53 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
str = str1 + " " + str2;
But you have to be careful how it is written:
str = "hello" + "world";
str = "hello" + "world" + str1;
don't work, etc.
Yeah. That's exactly
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19107
--- Comment #2 from Mike Franklin ---
Further reduced to no longer require Phobos:
--- sing.d
module sing;
alias I(alias A) = A;
--- git.d
import sing : I;
--- manager.d
module manager;
import git;
template all(alias pred = "a")
{
bool
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 21:55:00 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 at 13:55, 12345swordy via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> It's not a false equivalence fallacy: all the discussion is
> about IMPLICIT conversion or rvalues to lvalues.
Yes it is, the issues regarding rvalue/lvalue conversion
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19116
Alex Braunegg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Severity|enhancement
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 20:24:39 UTC, bpr wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 17:23:40 UTC, Ecstatic Coder
wrote:
But don't be too optimistic about BetterC...
I'm too old to get optimistic about these things. In the very
best case, D has quite an uphill battle for market share. Any
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 21:59:52 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Somebody had posted an article here on how well different
languages matched certain requirements of a certain coding
safety standards.
I remember D was doing pretty well and I think Ada (or SPARK?)
was included as well. What
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:27:45PM +, Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 00:41:54 UTC, RhyS wrote:
[...]
> > I am sorry to say but to succeed as a language beyond being a small
> > or hobby language it takes: Being established already or having a
> > big name
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 00:41:54 UTC, RhyS wrote:
On Monday, 23 July 2018 at 22:45:15 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I've predicted before that what will kill C is managers and
customers requiring memory safety because unsafeness costs
them millions. The "just hire better programmers" will
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19116
--- Comment #4 from Alex Braunegg ---
Yes - this has been tried - LDC compiled binary runs without issue on Ubuntu /
Debian 32bit platforms.
The question here however is:
Why does the DMD compiled binary not work for Ubuntu / Debian 32bit
On 07/25/2018 04:27 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 21:59:52 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Somebody had posted an article here on how well different languages
matched certain requirements of a certain coding safety standards.
I remember D was doing pretty well and I
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19107
--- Comment #3 from Mike Franklin ---
Even further reduced:
--- sing.d
module sing;
alias I(alias A) = A;
--- git.d
import sing : I;
--- manager.d
module manager;
import git;
template all(alias pred)
{
void all(T)(T t)
if
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 16:35:32 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:13:16PM +, Dukc via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 12:37:21 UTC, Cym13 wrote:
> That argument sounds quite dangerous to me, especially since
> my experience is on the contrary that
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19107
--- Comment #1 from Mike Franklin ---
Further reduced:
--- sing.d
module sing;
alias I(alias A) = A;
--- git.d
import sing : I;
--- manager.d
module manager;
import std.algorithm;
import git;
class DManager
{
void
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13768
ag0aep6g changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17778
Radu Racariu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||radu.raca...@gmail.com
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11064
John Hall changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||john.michael.h...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19116
Issue ID: 19116
Summary: dmd compiles binary but segfaults immediately when run
on Ubuntu / Debian 32Bit architectures
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19116
Alex Braunegg changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Windows |Linux
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19116
--- Comment #1 from Alex Braunegg ---
Additionally:
Arch Linux 2018.07.01 i686
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19116
--- Comment #2 from Alex Braunegg ---
Additionally:
Arch Linux 2018.07.01 i686
- This works without issue using same compilation method
Fedora LXDE i386 28-1.1
- - This works without issue using same compilation method
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19116
Seb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||greensunn...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Seb ---
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 14:11:51 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 07/24/2018 02:47 AM, Timoses wrote:
> Why does this fail while it works when replacing T with U in
struct
> W(T)?? It's so odd. Both T and U seem to resolve to "string".
>
> struct W(T) {
> const T value;
>
I'm a macOs user and I need to build a application with a GUI.
I started using Dlangui with SDL2. I need to be able to call some
functions of my program while working with other applications.
So I would like to personalize the app icon on the dock so that
when right-clicking such icon the
Back to questions after homework done :) What I've tested:
Made test class in CPP:
---testlib.cpp
class __declspec(dllexport) Foo {
int *a;
public:
Foo(int value) {
a = new int(value);
}
~Foo() {
delete a;
}
};
---
Binding on D side:
---
extern(C++) {
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 12:04:16 UTC, Vladimir Marchevsky
wrote:
What I've tested:
Even more: if I create another trivial class in cpp (say, Bar)
and new/delete it in first one ("b = new Bar();" in ctor, "delete
b;" in dtor of Foo) - D app with bound Foo just crashes silently
for some
I'm trying to build my project with -allinst, after reading the
comments of issue 18026[1]. Manjaro/Arch 64-bit, dmd 2.081.1 and
ldc 1.0.0.
I get a wall of text with linker errors, both with dmd and ldc.
Demangled excerpt:
characterencodings.o: In function `pure nothrow @nogc @safe
void
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 09:42:00 UTC, Ivo wrote:
I'm a macOs user and I need to build a application with a GUI.
Not sure if the author of the DLangUI is visiting this forum so
often to be able to answer.
If you won't get an answer in the next few days, I would
recommend to make an
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 15:56:50 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
I'm trying to build my project with -allinst, after reading the
comments of issue 18026[1]. Manjaro/Arch 64-bit, dmd 2.081.1
and ldc 1.0.0.
I get a wall of text with linker errors, both with dmd and ldc.
Demangled excerpt:
[...]
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 04:46:20 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 25/07/2018 5:32 AM, Guillaume Lathoud wrote:
Thanks for all the answers. I've just had a look at an
alternative: using dmd as a package. However that's a lot of
doc to browse... Maybe someone has experience with dmd as a
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 19:05:08 UTC, Guillaume Lathoud
wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 04:46:20 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 25/07/2018 5:32 AM, Guillaume Lathoud wrote:
Thanks for all the answers. I've just had a look at an
alternative: using dmd as a package. However that's a
On Friday, 20 July 2018 at 18:24:11 UTC, Timoses wrote:
[snip]
It works in module scope
https://run.dlang.io/is/OQKYag
I don't know why though...
This was reported in 2013. IMO, it should be mentioned in the
spec if they don't plan on changing it.
On Monday, 23 July 2018 at 18:31:03 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 23 July 2018 at 16:57:20 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 04:26:42PM +, Seb via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
tl;dr: the currently proposed syntax options are:
---
struct S
{
int a = 2, b = 4, c = 6;
}
void
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 02:21:18 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Sat, 21 Jul 2018 19:22:05 +
schrieb 12345swordy :
On Saturday, 21 July 2018 at 08:55:59 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
> Frankly speaking, my feeling is that D is becoming a
> horrible mess for the programmer...
> /Paolo
Forget the "why" for the moment.
T construct(T, ARGS...)(ARGS args) if( is(T==class) ) {
auto buffer = new ubyte[__traits(classInstanceSize, T)];
T cls = cast(T)buffer.ptr;
// Is this really the best way to do this?
buffer[] = cast(ubyte[])typeid(T).initializer()[];
On 25/07/2018 8:05 PM, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Forget the "why" for the moment.
T construct(T, ARGS...)(ARGS args) if( is(T==class) ) {
auto buffer = new ubyte[__traits(classInstanceSize, T)];
T cls = cast(T)buffer.ptr;
Allocates the storage space of the fields (both public and
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 09:54:37 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 00:41:54 UTC, RhyS wrote:
[...]
+1
IMO, D in its current state, and with its current ecosystem,
even after more than a decade of existence, is still NOT the
best alternative to C/C++ where they HAVE
To be exact as a "HEUR:Trojan-Downloader.Win32.Agent.gen".
Few other AV software does the same:
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/0aa364c5cb90630a5757aacc0c3c05a2273f5fdb88e14e2b80d4c19ee5b16d10/detection
I think, we should do something about it, at very least report
for false-positive to
On 25/07/2018 8:27 PM, Rel wrote:
To be exact as a "HEUR:Trojan-Downloader.Win32.Agent.gen".
Few other AV software does the same:
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/0aa364c5cb90630a5757aacc0c3c05a2273f5fdb88e14e2b80d4c19ee5b16d10/detection
I think, we should do something about it, at very
On Wed., 25 Jul. 2018, 12:30 am Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d, <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 02:21:18 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
> > Am Sat, 21 Jul 2018 19:22:05 +
> > schrieb 12345swordy :
> >
> >> On Saturday, 21 July 2018 at 08:55:59 UTC, Paolo
Current implementation of compilers assumes libc implementation,
which leads to an infinite loop if we want to implement
primitives like memset with our own code because the compiler
will optimize consecutive set with "memset". This suggests that
we cannot write a freestanding program without
Minimal example in D: https://run.dlang.io/is/EYVTzb. Affects at
least dmd and ldc.
On Monday, 23 July 2018 at 22:45:15 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/23/2018 5:39 AM, Joakim wrote:
In my experience, people never learn, even from the blatantly
obvious, _particularly_ when they're invested in the outdated.
What inevitably happens is the new tech gets good enough to
put them
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 08:27:25 UTC, Rel wrote:
To be exact as a "HEUR:Trojan-Downloader.Win32.Agent.gen".
Few other AV software does the same:
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/0aa364c5cb90630a5757aacc0c3c05a2273f5fdb88e14e2b80d4c19ee5b16d10/detection
I think, we should do something
On Saturday, 21 July 2018 at 08:59:39 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 at 00:15, Johannes Loher via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Saturday, 21 July 2018 at 05:59:37 UTC, Manu wrote:
> [...]
Let me give a concrete example of one of the situations
Jonathan is describing. Consider the following
On 25/07/2018 8:59 PM, Zheng (Vic) Luo wrote:
Minimal example in D: https://run.dlang.io/is/EYVTzb. Affects at least
dmd and ldc.
https://run.dlang.io/is/8tPOVX
Note that switch void* to ubyte* won't matter once its extern(C)'d.
My version (_memcpy_impl2) is just the regular old memcpy
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 09:16:19 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 25/07/2018 8:59 PM, Zheng (Vic) Luo wrote:
Minimal example in D: https://run.dlang.io/is/EYVTzb. Affects
at least dmd and ldc.
https://run.dlang.io/is/8tPOVX
Note that switch void* to ubyte* won't matter once its
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 09:16:19 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 25/07/2018 8:59 PM, Zheng (Vic) Luo wrote:
Minimal example in D: https://run.dlang.io/is/EYVTzb. Affects
at least dmd and ldc.
https://run.dlang.io/is/8tPOVX
Note that switch void* to ubyte* won't matter once its
On 25/07/2018 9:23 PM, Zheng (Vic) Luo wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 09:16:19 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 25/07/2018 8:59 PM, Zheng (Vic) Luo wrote:
Minimal example in D: https://run.dlang.io/is/EYVTzb. Affects at
least dmd and ldc.
https://run.dlang.io/is/8tPOVX
Note that
On 25/07/2018 9:32 PM, Zheng (Vic) Luo wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 09:16:19 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 25/07/2018 8:59 PM, Zheng (Vic) Luo wrote:
Minimal example in D: https://run.dlang.io/is/EYVTzb. Affects at
least dmd and ldc.
https://run.dlang.io/is/8tPOVX
Note that
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 08:57:41 UTC, Zheng (Vic) Luo wrote:
gcc and clang provides an option "-ffreestanding" to bypass
optimizations that need libc support. Although we can hack
around this issue by making our implementation complicated
enough/using assembly to bypass the optimizer,
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 08:31:05 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 25/07/2018 8:27 PM, Rel wrote:
To be exact as a "HEUR:Trojan-Downloader.Win32.Agent.gen".
Few other AV software does the same:
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 09:37:56 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
You misunderstand.
It isn't optimizing anything.
You requested the call to memcpy, explicitly when you said 'I
want this copied ASAP'.
By the looks, the spec doesn't clearly explain this properly.
Well, it seems that this
On 25/07/2018 9:48 PM, Zheng (Vic) Luo wrote:
First, IIRC, the name hacking is a technique used to bypass llvm
optimizers, I'm not sure if it also applies to gdc. Moreover, I think
this *is* a hack around compiler because this forces memset implementer
to write all code in that function.
I
On Saturday, 21 July 2018 at 01:17:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, July 20, 2018 18:04:26 Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 at 18:02, Manu wrote:
> [...]
>
> I think you're describing now a bug where a function returns
> an lvalue, but it was meant to return an
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 08:34:30 UTC, Manu wrote:
[snip]
It upsets me when people present strong opinions about this who
literally have no horse in the race. This is only really
meaningful, and only affects you if it actually affects you...
It's clearly not important to you, or you
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 08:34:30 UTC, Manu wrote:
With UFCS as a super popular feature of D, 'this' is not really
much of a
special guest at all.
It's just as much the first argument of a function as the first
argument of
*any* UFCS call.
Guido van Rossum has raised an objection on
On 26/07/2018 12:40 AM, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
Just to be clear, I'm also against all the new proposed addition for,
named parameter, new struct initialisation and so on
You'll go giddy once you hear about what I have planned after named
parameters ;)
But seriously tho, just because a
Hi, I'm working on an Optional!T type that is a mixture of
Scala's Option[T] (i.e. range based) and Swift's and Kotlin's T?
(i.e. safe dispatching). I'm interested in hearing about
mutability concerns.
So I want operations on the optional to dispatch to the
underlying type T if it's present.
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 12:40:16 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
That proposal is a 'Syntactic Sugar' feature, that simply hide
what normally need to be explicitly coded: proved a temp
rvalue, pass it to a callable taking ref. What you call
'simplification', I call it 'obfuscation'; what
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 09:13:27 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 08:27:25 UTC, Rel wrote:
To be exact as a "HEUR:Trojan-Downloader.Win32.Agent.gen".
Few other AV software does the same:
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 14:30:57 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 09:13:27 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 08:27:25 UTC, Rel wrote:
Possibly because anything that says "pay money or we'll flag
your binary and scare our users about it!"
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 08:23:40 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 09:54:37 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 00:41:54 UTC, RhyS wrote:
[...]
+1
IMO, D in its current state, and with its current ecosystem,
even after more than a decade of
Hello,
A project I’m helping develop mixes D code along with C and C++,
and in the latter two languages we have custom macros that print
things the way we need to, along with app-specific cleanup tasks
before halting the program. Because it uses multiple languages,
two of which have spotty
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 15:24:50 UTC, Alexander Nicholi
wrote:
Hello,
A project I’m helping develop mixes D code along with C and
C++, and in the latter two languages we have custom macros that
print things the way we need to, along with app-specific
cleanup tasks before halting the
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 15:24:50 UTC, Alexander Nicholi
wrote:
Is there a way to change this to use our own handlers with the
D runtime?
You can provide your own implementations of the runtime hooks at
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 17:24:41 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 17:14:53 UTC, Chris M. wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 16:15:52 UTC, bpr wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 14:07:43 UTC, Ecstatic Coder
wrote:
[...]
No. For many C++ users, tracing GC is absolutely not an
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 13:36:38 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 12:40:16 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
That proposal is a 'Syntactic Sugar' feature, that simply hide
what normally need to be explicitly coded: proved a temp
rvalue, pass it to a callable taking ref.
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 16:39:51 UTC, bpr wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 17:24:41 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 17:14:53 UTC, Chris M. wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 16:15:52 UTC, bpr wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 14:07:43 UTC, Ecstatic Coder
wrote:
[...]
On Saturday, 21 July 2018 at 08:59:39 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 at 00:15, Johannes Loher via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Saturday, 21 July 2018 at 05:59:37 UTC, Manu wrote:
> [...]
Let me give a concrete example of one of the situations
Jonathan is describing. Consider the following
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 16:43:38 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
That's an opinion, naturally.
No I am expressing an argument not an opinion.
"let's force the programmer to think about what he is doing,
passing an rvalue by ref"
Nonsense, you have shown no evidence that they don't know
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 12:51:08 UTC, aliak wrote:
Hi, I'm working on an Optional!T type that is a mixture of
Scala's Option[T] (i.e. range based) and Swift's and Kotlin's
T? (i.e. safe dispatching). I'm interested in hearing about
mutability concerns.
So I want operations on the
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 at 04:50, Jim Balter via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 08:34:30 UTC, Manu wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > Meanwhile I think we have determined that the presumed
> > practical trouble
> > cases are even less that I suspected up front.
>
> That's surprising; I
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 at 10:45, Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> > ...all that said, we understand that there is value in
> > inhibiting calls with rvalues in some cases. We address this in
> > a very nice way with @disable, which is also nicely symmetrical
> > such that the limitation may
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 at 10:45, Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 21 July 2018 at 08:59:39 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > [...]
> > 3. Scenario depends on introduction of a getter, but any getter
> > property that returns a member by-val is almost certainly a
> > primitive
> > type. A
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 17:52:00 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 16:43:38 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
That's an opinion, naturally.
No I am expressing an argument not an opinion.
I don't know what vocabulary you are used to consult, but your
'pointless' it's
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 17:23:40 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
But don't be too optimistic about BetterC...
I'm too old to get optimistic about these things. In the very
best case, D has quite an uphill battle for market share. Any non
mainstream language does. If I were a betting man,
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 19:55:50 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
I don't know what vocabulary you are used to consult,
ad hominem attacks is not an argument
Actually, by definition, every bug is made by a programmer that
THINK to know what he is doing... no?
Avoiding burden of proof by
On 7/24/2018 4:53 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
str = str1 + " " + str2;
But you have to be careful how it is written:
str = "hello" + "world";
str = "hello" + "world" + str1;
don't work, etc.
89 matches
Mail list logo
