On Monday, 15 April 2013 at 05:26:27 UTC, BLM768 wrote:
If I can automate the generation of bindings to a satisfactory
degree, expanding the bindings should be a very simple process,
so I could just write bindings for the core functionality and
have others expand the bindings as needed. That
I know Bullet is the most noteworthy open-source physics library,
but if you intent is to have a D-style physics lib for games/apps
you might have a lot more success porting a C# physics engine
like Jitter (http://jitter-physics.com/wordpress/) over to D
first (then possibly adapt some stuff
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
That's completely FALSE. You might need some bugfixes! That
view of if you want to be up to date you have to be
willing to update a lot of code is really hurting D's
stability.
Evolution was never pain-free. The idea that D can thrive without
adapting to it's
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 17:37:27 UTC, F i L wrote:
I know Bullet is the most noteworthy open-source physics
library, but if you intent is to have a D-style physics lib for
games/apps you might have a lot more success porting a C#
physics engine like Jitter
On 28-5-2013 21:22, BLM768 wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 17:37:27 UTC, F i L wrote:
I know Bullet is the most noteworthy open-source physics library, but
if you intent is to have a D-style physics lib for games/apps you
might have a lot more success porting a C# physics engine like Jitter
On 28 May 2013 14:38, Peter Williams pwil3...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
On 28/05/13 13:22, David Eagen wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 01:38:22 UTC, Peter Williams wrote:
So you're going to spell check them all to make sure that they're
English? Or did you mean ASCII?
Peter
That's it.
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 04:12:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/27/2013 7:44 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
(Sorry for the NG noise, I would have just emailed you
directly about this but I
couldn't manage to find your email address)
Could you use the AWS hosted URLs for the zip files in the
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 04:52:50 Diggory wrote:
Are you really arguing that the existing system is easier to
understand?
I'm arguing that the only problem in the current design is the name. TypeTuple
is a template for creating built-in tuples, and the built-in tuples deal with
both
On 27.05.2013 13:51, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Yeah, me too.
I take a working program and add gf to the middle of it. Here's the
errors:
base.d(2143): Error: found '{' when expecting ';' following statement
base.d(2168): Error: unexpected ( in declarator
base.d(2168): Error: basic type expected,
On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 18:43:30 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/26/2013 8:43 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 14:10:44 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Yeah, you are right. C and C++ stab themselves only to die a
few hours later
in a code section totally unrelated or just behave
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 00:16:23 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Sebastian Graf:
Plus, the compiler is still able to optimize most of the
delegate/range fluff away (as opposed to e.g. C#).
There are several optimizations that D/DMD is not performing on
those ranges and higher order functions. The
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 00:43:25 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 17:51:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Looking at object.d source, it looks like you are generating
TypeInfo stubs that can be optimized away, have I understood
it right?
I'm not sure if they can be optimized away,
I posted bugzilla entry:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10177a few days ago. In
short, it says: 'why not just stop semantic3 passes at
1st error occurence' ?
Other entries related to irrelevant error messages that I've recently
reported:10169 , 10141, 10177.
On Mon, May 27, 2013
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 07:26:34 UTC, nazriel wrote:
I tried to port your package to x86_64 but dozens of:
/home/raz/.dvm/compilers/dmd-2.063/src/druntime/src/rt/typeinfo/ti_Acfloat.d(35):
Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (s.length * 8LU) of
type ulong to uint
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 00:43:25 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I think line 87 was one of the TypeInfos though, and dmd
expects them to be a particular size, and it is slightly
different on 64 bit. If it is TypeInfo_Struct, on 32 bit
void*[13] stuff; is good enough for dmd to shut up.
Ah
Arising from a thread on the GoLangNuts email list, I wrote the
following:
import std.algorithm: reduce;
import std.bigint;
import std.range: iota;
import std.stdio: writeln;
int main(immutable string[] args) {
foreach (int i; iota(10,
On 5/28/2013 12:06 AM, Don wrote:
On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 18:43:30 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Fibers should be implemented by mapping a 4K page with no access rights at the
end of each stack.
We do that in our code. Fibers are virtually unusable without it, it is
incredibly easy to get a
very often I would wish that sort (+ related functions) could take unaryFun
arguments and convert them to binaryFun as follows:
//pseudocode:
template unaryToBinaryComp(alias foo) {
bool unaryToBinaryComp(T)(T a, T b) if (__traits(compiles,foo(a) foo(b))
) {
return foo(a) foo(b);
}
}
Using
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 23:23:52 UTC, Sebastian Graf wrote:
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 21:36:12 UTC, bearophile wrote:
snip
Every time I see that kind of code, my heart makes a delightful
jump. That code is what I enjoy most about D compared to C++.
Plus, the compiler is still able to
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 07:26:06 UTC, Sebastian Graf wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 00:16:23 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Sebastian Graf:
Plus, the compiler is still able to optimize most of the
delegate/range fluff away (as opposed to e.g. C#).
There are several optimizations that D/DMD is
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 08:55:10 Russel Winder wrote:
Arising from a thread on the GoLangNuts email list, I wrote the
following:
import std.algorithm: reduce;
import std.bigint;
import std.range: iota;
import std.stdio: writeln;
int
On 5/28/2013 1:32 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 08:55:10 Russel Winder wrote:
Arising from a thread on the GoLangNuts email list, I wrote the
following:
import std.algorithm: reduce;
import std.bigint;
import std.range: iota;
import
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 02:01:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I'm disappointed cartesianProduct works that way; I should have
caught that during the code review. A better iteration order
would have spanned the lower position in both ranges first,
i.e. create squares of increasing side in
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 00:11:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Every time I've been to a programming shop in a foreign
country, the developers speak english at work and code in
english. Of course, that doesn't mean that everyone does, but
as far as I can tell the overwhelming bulk is done in
The way template are mangled in super redundant.
Are you referring to the way that a template name is repeated twice in its
mangled representation ?
eg:
template ABC(T){struct ABC{}}
writeln(ABC!int.mangleof); // S5tests18main10__T3ABCTiZ3ABC =
corresponding to ABC!(int).ABC
How would we
ok, reported here: bugzilla:10189
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Daniel Murphy yebbl...@nospamgmail.comwrote:
Timothee Cour thelastmamm...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.207.1369611513.13711.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Is there any plan to support demangling of those:
On 2013-05-28 04:28, Lionello Lunesu wrote:
But yet, super should just work: it should be a variable of type C and
treated as such.
So super should work with UFCS?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2013-05-28 04:28, Lionello Lunesu wrote:
I think this works just fine, you just have to drop the writeln(). foo()
doesn't return anything, but prints itself.
But yet, super should just work: it should be a variable of type C and
treated as such.
What about this.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2013-05-27 18:18, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 15:22:21 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
Am I the only person that worries greatly about the length of symbols
in D?
No, I do as well. My units of measurement project suffered from very
non-negligible code bloat due to symbol
On 2013-05-28 04:32, Lionello Lunesu wrote:
Walter,
Any chance we can get the source of htod? If found it a very useful
little utility, although there are many issues with it.
VisualD also include a similar utility to convert header files to D, but
it is more tuned to Windows header files.
On 2013-05-28 03:38, Peter Williams wrote:
So you're going to spell check them all to make sure that they're
English? Or did you mean ASCII?
Don't you have a spell checker in your editor? If not, find a new one :)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2013-05-28 08:00, Manu wrote:
Is there anywhere other than America that doesn't?
Canada, Jamaica, other countries in that region?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2013-05-27 22:32, Walter Bright wrote:
The usual approach to handling errors in a compiler is to guess at what
the user actually meant, repair the AST according to that guess, then
continue on. Unfortunately, the guess is usually wrong and the result is
cascaded errors, of which only the
Walter Bright:
Please enter this into Bugzilla.
My request is in Bugzilla:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6447
Bye,
bearophile
Peter Alexander:
This will be part of my combinatorics library, but is more
general. pairWise is just a specific case of k-subsets (with
k=2).
Yes, that's what's written a bit lower in my post, in the
combinations() of Python.
Bye,
bearophile
Timothee Cour:
python uses itertools.product which is lexicographic_depth.
Like you say, no-one can agrees what the order should be, so
let's leave it
up to user through a template. Sounds like a no-brainer to me.
There are
use cases for each order I mentioned.
Different cases enjoy
Walter Bright:
There are several optimizations that D/DMD is not performing
on those ranges and
higher order functions. The Haskell compiler GHC optimized
that stuff using
purity, library defined rewrite rules, stream
fusion/deforestation and more.
DMD does nothing of this, or very little. I
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 11:27 +0200, bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
Please enter this into Bugzilla.
My request is in Bugzilla:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6447
Bye,
bearophile
I have added myself to the cc list of this 2 year old problem.
I don't have the time,
I have created before two threads about the weird semantics of
labeled block statements. In a word: putting a label before a
block means that block does not create a scope, and the variables
created inside that scope will leak to the outside of said
scope. I've found this to be problematic on
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 01:34:47 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Why? You said previously that you'd love to support extended
operators ;)
Extended operators, yes. Non-ascii identifiers, no.
BTW, this is one of big D advantage, take into account
some day D could be used for teaching in schools
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 23:46:17 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:28:22AM +0200, Hans W. Uhlig wrote:
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 23:05:46 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/27/2013 3:18 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Well, D *does* support non-English identifiers, y'know... for
example:
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 00:11:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Every time I've been to a programming shop in a foreign
country, the developers speak english at work and code in
english. Of course, that doesn't mean that everyone does, but
as far as I can tell the overwhelming bulk is done in
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 22:20:16 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:04:52AM +0200, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 21:24:15 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Besides, it's impractical to use compose key sequences to
write
large amounts of text in some given language;
monarch_dodra:
So basically, this is saying If your C code compiles in D,
you'll get the same result. I guarantee it :)
It's a general rule, but it has some exceptions, like C programs
that rely on global floating point variables initialized to 0, or
when you use a fixed-sized array, that D
On 5/28/13 12:11, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/27/2013 8:35 PM, Lionello Lunesu wrote:
On 5/28/13 11:08, Diggory wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 02:32:24 UTC, Lionello Lunesu wrote:
Walter,
Any chance we can get the source of htod? If found it a very useful
little utility, although there are
On 2013-05-28 02:16, bearophile wrote:
My editor uses a single uniform color for the contents of normal
strings, unlike quoted strings.
Why not use proper lambdas instead of strings?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Jacob Carlborg:
Why not use proper lambdas instead of strings?
Mostly for personal reasons: quoted strings are sometimes a
little shorter, and they require you to use arguments with
default names (as a and b), this increased standardization
makes me read them a little faster than lambdas
On 28 May 2013 19:12, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2013-05-28 08:00, Manu wrote:
Is there anywhere other than America that doesn't?
Canada, Jamaica, other countries in that region?
Yes, the region called America ;)
Although there's a few British colonies in the Caribbean...
On 2013-05-28 14:09, Manu wrote:
Yes, the region called America ;)
Although there's a few British colonies in the Caribbean...
Oh, you meant the whole region and not the country.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Tue, 28 May 2013 14:11:29 +0200, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2013-05-28 14:09, Manu wrote:
Yes, the region called America ;)
Although there's a few British colonies in the Caribbean...
Oh, you meant the whole region and not the country.
America is not a country. The country is
On 05/27/2013 08:22 PM, deadalnix wrote:
The way template are mangled in super redundant. This can probably be
fixed easily, but this is a breakage.
How would you mangle them instead?
On 05/27/2013 10:34 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
Surely a better solution would be to use a lossless compression?
Yeah, I would hate to loose the ability to demangle a symbol.
On 05/27/2013 06:18 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
non-negligible code bloat
I wouldn't really call this code bloat, as it only affects your object
files, the linker and the runtime linker.
On Sun, 26 May 2013 18:56:58 -0400, Timothee Cour
thelastmamm...@gmail.com wrote:
In fact it's also possible to know that these don't return a reference
to
their parameter.
Watch out for this:
Struct S {double x;}
ref double foo(ref S a){return a.x;}
That case is covered by the proposal.
On Tue, 28 May 2013 01:05:46 +0200, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 5/27/2013 3:18 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Well, D *does* support non-English identifiers, y'know... for example:
void main(string[] args) {
int число = 1;
foreach (и;
On 2013-05-28 14:58, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
America is not a country. The country is called USA.
I know that, but I get the impression that people usually say America
and refer to USA.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Tue, 28 May 2013 05:35:22 +0200, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 21:55:00 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
Now, if we wanted to add compiler support for non-nullable references,
many
more things would need to be decided - how do they look? Do they assert
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 13:06:01 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 05/27/2013 06:18 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
non-negligible code bloat
I wouldn't really call this code bloat, as it only affects your
object files, the linker and the runtime linker.
And unstripped executables.
David
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 08:16:47 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
sort!foo(a) =sort!(unaryToBinaryComp!(unaryFun!foo(a)))
= sort!foo(a) foo(a)
sorting in reverse order is easy: just use sort!-foo(a)
In this case, schwartzSort might actually be more appropriate.
But in general, I see your point.
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 12:56:15 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 05/27/2013 08:22 PM, deadalnix wrote:
The way template are mangled in super redundant. This can
probably be
fixed easily, but this is a breakage.
How would you mangle them instead?
templateSymbolKKKtepplateArguments
Where
On Sat, 25 May 2013 01:52:10 -0400, Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
What does ObjC do? It seems to work okay on embedded hardware (although
not
particularly memory-constrained hardware).
Didn't ObjC recently reject GC in favour of refcounting?
Having used ObjC for the last year or so
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 08:02:46 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/28/2013 12:06 AM, Don wrote:
On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 18:43:30 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Fibers should be implemented by mapping a 4K page with no
access rights at the
end of each stack.
We do that in our code. Fibers are
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 09:02:32 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-05-28 04:28, Lionello Lunesu wrote:
I think this works just fine, you just have to drop the
writeln(). foo()
doesn't return anything, but prints itself.
But yet, super should just work: it should be a variable of
type C
On Fri, 24 May 2013 10:18:37 -0400, Adam D. Ruppe
destructiona...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, 24 May 2013 at 12:56:54 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Thursday, 23 May 2013 at 22:22:26 UTC, Meta wrote:
I'm thinking of starting on a small XMPP-based messaging
You should give a try to dom.d
So I've run into an expression I need to be able to implement std.simd
properly for GDC/LDC.
Doesn't work:
@attribute(target, T) void func(string T)(...);
In this case, currently, the UDA can't receive the template arg that was
given to the function.
I require that attributes on templates be
On Sat, 25 May 2013 23:58:39 -0400, Peter Williams
pwil3...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
Is the inability to use dup and ~ with const arrays of class objects a
deliberate design restriction? I couldn't find mention of it in the
specification or Andrei's book and only discovered it the hard way.
2013/5/28 Manu turkey...@gmail.com
So I've run into an expression I need to be able to implement std.simd
properly for GDC/LDC.
Doesn't work:
@attribute(target, T) void func(string T)(...);
In this case, currently, the UDA can't receive the template arg that was
given to the function.
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 13:33:39 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I asked David Nadlinger at the conference whether we could
leverage this power in LDC, since LLVM is the compiler back-end
used by Apple, but he said all those optimization passes are in
the Objective-C front-end.
Hm,
On 28 May 2013 23:33, Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Sat, 25 May 2013 01:52:10 -0400, Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
What does ObjC do? It seems to work okay on embedded hardware (although
not
particularly memory-constrained hardware).
Didn't ObjC recently reject GC in
On Tue, 28 May 2013 09:50:42 -0400, David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at
wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 13:33:39 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I asked David Nadlinger at the conference whether we could leverage
this power in LDC, since LLVM is the compiler back-end used by Apple,
but
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 13:56:03 UTC, Manu wrote:
Yep, I can imagine it would work really well, if the front-end
implemented
the logic to factor out redundant inc/dec ref's.
It isn't the best idea to do this sort of optimizations
(entirely) in the front-end, because you really want to be
Indeed it does.
It's a bit obtuse though having to wrap my function up in an outer template
just to scope the template arg correctly.
Do you think it's reasonable that an attribute should be scoped such that
it can see the template args of the declaration it's bound to?
It kinda makes sense, an
On 29 May 2013 00:01, David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 13:56:03 UTC, Manu wrote:
Yep, I can imagine it would work really well, if the front-end implemented
the logic to factor out redundant inc/dec ref's.
It isn't the best idea to do this sort of
On 2013-05-28 01:34:17 +, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com said:
On 5/27/2013 6:06 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I don't find this a compelling reason to allow full Unicode on
identifiers, though. For one thing, somebody maintaining your code may
not know how to type said identifier
On 5/28/13 4:16 AM, Timothee Cour wrote:
very often I would wish that sort (+ related functions) could take
unaryFun arguments and convert them to binaryFun as follows:
//pseudocode:
template unaryToBinaryComp(alias foo) {
bool unaryToBinaryComp(T)(T a, T b) if (__traits(compiles,foo(a)
On 5/28/13 4:32 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The problem is simple enough. iota doesn't currently try and work with any
type that has addition (like it probably should). It specifically only works
with integers, floating point values, and pointers. BigInt is not an integral
type as far as
On Sat, 25 May 2013 23:50:28 +0100, Klaim - Joël Lamotte
mjkl...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this have not been posted yet around here but might be
interesting
to the D community as it is actually criticizing several languages
including D but with an interesting aproach:
On 5/28/13 8:57 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 05/27/2013 10:34 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
Surely a better solution would be to use a lossless compression?
Yeah, I would hate to loose the ability to demangle a symbol.
Well we'd need a scheme that compresses to text, e.g. binary compression
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 10:41:46 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Is this a symptom of Phobos being predicated on hardware data
types? If
so there is a mass of applications out there that D cannot
handle
sensible (unlike Python (especially SciPy), Julia, R, Matlab,
Mathematica, etc.
I think it
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 13:35:01 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 08:02:46 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/28/2013 12:06 AM, Don wrote:
On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 18:43:30 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Fibers should be implemented by mapping a 4K page with no
access rights
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 13:17:37 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2013 05:35:22 +0200, deadalnix
deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 21:55:00 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
Now, if we wanted to add compiler support for non-nullable
references, many
more things would
Hi,
I think I am missing something very obvious…
For unit tests I want a std.stdio.File object that is backed by an in
memory string buffer rather than an actual file on disc, be it temporary
or otherwise. I think I am missing where this is documented in the
documentation. Or is it actually not
28-May-2013 00:42, Martin Nowak пишет:
On 05/27/2013 09:21 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
See unittest/benchmark here:
https://gist.github.com/blackwhale/5653927
Looks promising.
This will not detect 0xFF as invalid UTF-8 sequence.
For sequences with 5 or 6 bytes, that aren't used for unicode,
It looks reasonable, but in general case it would introduce not trivial
semantic issue.
Based on the current D language spec, prefix attribute is just rewritten to
blocked attribute.
@attribute(target, T) void func(string T)() {}
to:
@attribute(target, T) {
void func(string T)() {}
}
And
On Tue, 28 May 2013 16:51:33 +0200, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 13:17:37 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2013 05:35:22 +0200, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 21:55:00 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
Now, if we wanted
I think this is a corner case bug of current dmd parser.
Kenji Hara
2013/5/28 monarch_dodra monarchdo...@gmail.com
I have created before two threads about the weird semantics of labeled
block statements. In a word: putting a label before a block means that
block does not create a scope, and
Am Tue, 28 May 2013 22:51:29 +0900
schrieb Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com:
2013/5/28 Manu turkey...@gmail.com
This code works.
Interesting. I tried that as well but used writeln to print the output:
writeln(__traits(getAttributes, func!a)); //Fails
enum result = __traits(getAttributes,
On 5/28/2013 7:26 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/28/13 4:32 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The problem is simple enough. iota doesn't currently try and work with any
type that has addition (like it probably should). It specifically only works
with integers, floating point values, and
On 5/28/2013 7:48 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 13:35:01 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 08:02:46 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/28/2013 12:06 AM, Don wrote:
On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 18:43:30 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Fibers should be implemented by
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:37:06AM +0200, bearophile wrote:
Timothee Cour:
python uses itertools.product which is lexicographic_depth. Like you
say, no-one can agrees what the order should be, so let's leave it up
to user through a template. Sounds like a no-brainer to me. There
are use
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Regan Heath re...@netmail.co.nz wrote:
On Sat, 25 May 2013 23:50:28 +0100, Klaim - Joël Lamotte
mjkl...@gmail.com wrote:
/emphasis/ mine. Is it actually true that you can remove null pointer
exceptions at no runtime cost?
It's possible if you remove
Am 28.05.2013 15:33, schrieb Steven Schveighoffer:
On Sat, 25 May 2013 01:52:10 -0400, Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
What does ObjC do? It seems to work okay on embedded hardware
(although not
particularly memory-constrained hardware).
Didn't ObjC recently reject GC in favour of refcounting?
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 10:03:59 Walter Bright wrote:
With iota, shouldn't it test for the existence of ++ and --, rather than
being integer-like?
It gets more complicated if you give a step argument, but yes, it really
should be testing for the operations that it needs rather than that the
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 16:04:32 Russel Winder wrote:
Hi,
I think I am missing something very obvious…
For unit tests I want a std.stdio.File object that is backed by an in
memory string buffer rather than an actual file on disc, be it temporary
or otherwise. I think I am missing where
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 16:38:50 UTC, Kenji Hara wrote:
I think this is a corner case bug of current dmd parser.
Kenji Hara
It's not a corner case. It's the spec.
It's a LabeledStatement : NoScopeStatement
http://dlang.org/statement.html#LabeledStatement
I was finally able to track down
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 17:46:36 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
(and I honestly don't know what
you'd be trying to do with it where it would make any sense for
to operate on anything other than an actual file).
That's easy! Suppose you have a nice library that's practically
unchangeable:
On 05/28/2013 05:04 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
Hi,
I think I am missing something very obvious…
For unit tests I want a std.stdio.File object that is backed by an in
memory string buffer rather than an actual file on disc, be it temporary
or otherwise. I think I am missing where this is
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 09:54:35 UTC, bearophile wrote:
The rewrite rules is a feature of the GHC compiler. It allows
the library writers to define rules that in most (or many)
cases are advantageous and lead to better optimization. As
example one of such rules swap map and filter, putting
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 17:54:32 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 16:38:50 UTC, Kenji Hara wrote:
I think this is a corner case bug of current dmd parser.
Kenji Hara
It's not a corner case. It's the spec.
EDIT: Well, that or I could be miss-interpreting the spec,
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 19:55:43 Peter Alexander wrote:
Phobos does this a little bit in simple cases. For example,
retro(retro(r)) returns r if I remember correctly.
Yes. Phobos tries to optimize useless templates like that, and definitely does
it in this particular case, though I don't know
1 - 100 of 264 matches
Mail list logo
