On 26.02.2015 11:17, Vadim Lopatin wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 at 08:21:19 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
On 17.02.2015 20:41, Vadim Lopatin wrote:
It looks like we need to develop some universal debugger library.
For linux, it can use gdb as a backend.
For windows - I'm not sure.
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 05:57:19 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 03:49:04 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:13:31 +, weaselcat wrote:
Are op* considered reserved member names?
no. that's just the we can break your code, and you can't
break ours!
On Monday, 23 February 2015 at 14:50:42 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
Expect two proposals from me by Friday too. I just simply
didn't get around to writing them up in between all the science
going on here yet.
Okay, my last week was … interesting, but I hope I just managed
to send one of the
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14230
sinkuup...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sinkuup...@gmail.com
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11792
Lionello Lunesu lio+bugzi...@lunesu.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Andrei Alexandrescu:
I'm following with interest the discussion My Reference Safety
System (DIP???). Right now it looks like a lot of work - a
long opener, subsequent refinements, good discussion. It also
seems just that - there's work but there's no edge to it yet;
right now a DIP along
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 10:30:55 UTC, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
Paolo Invernizzi wrote in message
news:wkcsqtzjqybortkab...@forum.dlang.org...
The druntime/phobos 2.067 are breaking every piece of software
out there that relies on core.sync or concurrency.scheduler,
vibe and tango
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 08:06:59 UTC, Rainer Schuetze
wrote:
On 26.02.2015 11:17, Vadim Lopatin wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 at 08:21:19 UTC, Rainer
Schuetze wrote:
On 17.02.2015 20:41, Vadim Lopatin wrote:
It looks like we need to develop some universal debugger
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13010
--- Comment #8 from Lionello Lunesu lio+bugzi...@lunesu.com ---
(In reply to David Nadlinger from comment #7)
I'm not sure whether this is worth the added language complexity. Do you
have an example for a compelling use case?
Statically testing
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14231
Issue ID: 14231
Summary: findRoot fails with trivial bounds
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13010
--- Comment #13 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---
(In reply to Lionello Lunesu from comment #12)
ubyte u;
//a lot of code
static assert(u 9);
I don't understand the point of this code.
--
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 21:19:31 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/27/15 1:07 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
What about this, if we're serious about @safe
actually*guaranteeing*
anything: after 2.067 is released, we reimplement @safe by
making it
reject every language
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 06:45:58 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I'm not a Mac user and I'm fairly clueless about it. The DMD
zip for OS X contains one executable. I assume it's a 64-bit
binary. Is that true?
Most likely a disk image (.dmg).
(en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Disk_Image)
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 06:45:58 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I'm not a Mac user and I'm fairly clueless about it. The DMD
zip for OS X contains one executable. I assume it's a 64-bit
binary. Is that true?
Hi!
Probably, yes. Anyway dmd compiles 64-bit binaries on OS X.
Ilya
Next step is Font, Text and Spritesheet. Then I'll inspect
Clock, Power and MessageBox and in the end I'll inspect Audio.
I think the most breaking changes will happen here, because
I'll use this time SDL_Audio instead of OpenAL.
Font, Text, Clock (renamed to StopWatch) and Power (renamed to
Paolo Invernizzi wrote in message
news:avsvjanhckbcjttao...@forum.dlang.org...
The druntime/phobos 2.067 are breaking every piece of software out there
that relies on core.sync or concurrency.scheduler,
This is reality: both actual version of vibe.d and tango can't be compiled
with 2.067,
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 12:22:46 UTC, Gan wrote:
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 11:02:31 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Next step is Font, Text and Spritesheet. Then I'll inspect
Clock, Power and MessageBox and in the end I'll inspect
Audio. I think the most breaking changes will happen
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13729
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---
Now this code:
int x;
void main() pure {
static void foo() {
x++;
}
foo();
}
Gives:
test.d(4,9): Error: pure function 'D main' cannot access mutable static data
'x'
I think a
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 11:03:14 UTC, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
Paolo Invernizzi wrote in message
news:avsvjanhckbcjttao...@forum.dlang.org...
The druntime/phobos 2.067 are breaking every piece of
software out there that relies on core.sync or
concurrency.scheduler,
This is reality:
On 2015-02-28 07:45, Mike Parker wrote:
I'm not a Mac user and I'm fairly clueless about it. The DMD zip for OS
X contains one executable. I assume it's a 64-bit binary. Is that true?
Yes. Since DMD on OS X got support for 64bit DMD has only been shipped
as 64bit. There's basically no Mac
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13010
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment
On 2/28/2015 10:36 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-02-28 07:45, Mike Parker wrote:
I'm not a Mac user and I'm fairly clueless about it. The DMD zip for OS
X contains one executable. I assume it's a 64-bit binary. Is that true?
Yes. Since DMD on OS X got support for 64bit DMD has only been
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13010
--- Comment #12 from Lionello Lunesu lio+bugzi...@lunesu.com ---
(In reply to David Nadlinger from comment #10)
(In reply to Lionello Lunesu from comment #8)
(In reply to David Nadlinger from comment #7)
I'm not sure whether this is worth the
Paolo Invernizzi wrote in message
news:wkcsqtzjqybortkab...@forum.dlang.org...
The druntime/phobos 2.067 are breaking every piece of software out there
that relies on core.sync or concurrency.scheduler, vibe and tango
included.
This is an exaggeration...
Zach the Mystic:
You can see exactly how D works by looking at how Kenji spends
his time. For a while he's only been fixing ICEs and other
little bugs which he knows for certain will be accepted.
I agree that probably there are often better ways to use Kenji
time for the development of D.
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 23:37:42 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 23:18:24 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
* When a scoped value is stored somewhere, it is then
reachable through the destination. Therefore, assuming the
source's scope is fixed, the destination's scope must
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 06:37:40 UTC, Zach the Mystic
wrote:
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 23:18:24 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
I think I have an inference algorithm that works. It can infer
the required scope levels for local variables given the
constraints of function parameters, and
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 11:02:31 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Next step is Font, Text and Spritesheet. Then I'll inspect
Clock, Power and MessageBox and in the end I'll inspect Audio.
I think the most breaking changes will happen here, because
I'll use this time SDL_Audio instead of OpenAL.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13729
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to 2.067 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/fe6729a9465c628e48712d9c3c7a722d4d100f1d
Merge pull request #4447 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7067
--- Comment #20 from Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net ---
(In reply to Martin Nowak from comment #19)
We had a talk about this during the 2nd D meetup in Berlin.
One remaining question was how to deal with memory management when
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 11:02:31 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Next step is Font, Text and Spritesheet. Then I'll inspect
Clock, Power and MessageBox and in the end I'll inspect Audio.
I think the most breaking changes will happen here, because
I'll use this time SDL_Audio instead of OpenAL.
PGP signatures are as meaningful in NG as they are in e-mail. It
is an identity proof.
On 02/28/2015 11:35 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Can you please fix your newsreader submitter to not post these? They're
fine for email, but out of place in the n.g.
done
On 2/28/2015 2:54 PM, Dicebot wrote:
PGP signatures are as meaningful in NG as they are in e-mail. It is an identity
proof.
1. it's not relevant in a n.g.
2. it doubles the size of most messages (not insignificant when just this n.g.
has 250,000 messages in it)
On 2/28/2015 2:31 AM, bearophile wrote:
Zach the Mystic:
You can see exactly how D works by looking at how Kenji spends his time. For a
while he's only been fixing ICEs and other little bugs which he knows for
certain will be accepted.
I agree that probably there are often better ways to use
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13390
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13390
--- Comment #11 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/568cd18b43fb2fe98a5eb62f06a00648450d7068
Fix Issue 13390 - Be
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 22:52:47 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 11:02:31 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Next step is Font, Text and Spritesheet. Then I'll inspect
Clock, Power and MessageBox and in the end I'll inspect
Audio. I think the most breaking changes will
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14232
Issue ID: 14232
Summary: redundant attribute 'const'
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority:
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 21:21:08 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/27/15 1:02 PM, Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2015-02-27 20:34:08 +, Steven Schveighoffer said:
void main()
{
C2 c2 = new C2;
c2.c = new C;
foo(c2.c, c2);
}
Still same question. The issue here is how do you
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13010
--- Comment #11 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---
Even this doesn't compile, but it should:
void main() {
ubyte x;
static assert(x = 0);
}
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13010
--- Comment #10 from David Nadlinger c...@klickverbot.at ---
(In reply to Lionello Lunesu from comment #8)
(In reply to David Nadlinger from comment #7)
I'm not sure whether this is worth the added language complexity. Do you
have an example for
I encountered an ugly problem. Actually, I had already run into
it in my first proposal, but Steven Schveighoffer just posted
about it here, which made me aware again:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mcqcor$aa$1...@digitalmars.com#post-mcqk4s:246qb:241:40digitalmars.com
class T {
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 21:11:54 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/28/15 12:20 PM, Sativa wrote:
I'm curious if project management(e.g., MS Project) is used to
optimize
and clarify goals for the D language?
I've pushed for trello for a good while, it didn't catch up. --
Andrei
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14220
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On 2/28/2015 1:46 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
Quite a lot of the open regressions concern phobos.
Maybe some people not reading the dmd-beta list may help with that?
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 19:49:37 UTC, Taylor Hillegeist
wrote:
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 07:26:06 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2015-02-26 20:53, Taylor Hillegeist wrote:
So, In languages like .net they have dll's that contain not
only
bytecode but also the necessary headers to
On 2/28/15 12:20 PM, Sativa wrote:
I'm curious if project management(e.g., MS Project) is used to optimize
and clarify goals for the D language?
I've pushed for trello for a good while, it didn't catch up. -- Andrei
Defines a significantly better function call protocol:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP74
Andrei
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/27/2015 03:04 PM, Ben Palmer wrote:
Wrapping the RNGs can cause problems as structs are passed by
value. This means that if the same RNG is used in subsequent calls
to say randomCover then the same sequence of random numbers will be
produced
On 2/27/2015 2:42 AM, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl wrote:
How can we make progress,
Look at the changelog, there's tremendous progress.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Quite a lot of the open regressions concern phobos.
Maybe some people not reading the dmd-beta list may help with that?
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to 2.067 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/128849de37d51ec6cd08860d1db08741bbd82046
Merge pull request #4441 from
On 2/28/2015 1:46 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU8jc6AAoJELJzgRYSuxk5NIAP/3sqCuwjoW7BfityRPZZLzK3
vc6+ye8D7/K40rOvhGng/96UqtfHD7AWmV3SCRde01TEA6OpOHc7pzMAwLcsA/qM
z7nJ1C905zUos4QpkpaF15Ujbkd7f0WoOQl25pkzJjiurJVmPe3SMOwkVdBqly8/
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 11:12:23 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 23:37:42 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
You don't cover the lifetime of the address of operation, and
I'm not how this is supposed to work in your proposal.
It was in the examples, but it was wrong. I've
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14230
--- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/43e56d57a51ef6a3240a459d3e6068fc4a9292a5
Fix Issue 14230 -
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14230
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14230
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to 2.067 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/b4fa59bd736c30c183039044fe48d7477a1cc615
Merge pull request
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14220
--- Comment #5 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com ---
Can repro on Win64 with the switches:
-m64 -O -release
--
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 17:24:57 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 19:49:37 UTC, Taylor Hillegeist
wrote:
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 07:26:06 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2015-02-26 20:53, Taylor Hillegeist wrote:
So, In languages like .net they have dll's
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7067
Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@dawg.eu
--- Comment #19 from
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 04:27:36 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 04:18:38 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:51:54 +, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 04:13:03 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
In that case, you shouldn't be subject to
On 2/28/15 7:53 AM, Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= schue...@gmx.net
wrote:
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 21:19:31 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/27/15 1:07 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
What about this, if we're serious about @safe actually*guaranteeing*
anything: after 2.067
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 10:40:32 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
I'm following with interest the discussion My Reference
Safety System (DIP???). Right now it looks like a lot of work
- a long opener, subsequent refinements, good discussion. It
also seems just that -
On 2015-02-27 21:04, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm fine with breaking code of people who happen to use the names
opAddRef and opRelease. -- Andrei
I don't think so because it's so easy to making it a non-breaking
change, i.e. require a compiler recognized UDA to enable the functionality.
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 19:49:37 UTC, Taylor Hillegeist
wrote:
I just think its a shame that all over the place people are
compiling code in different programming languages, and although
all the .o files are compatible with each other there isn't a
standard cross language way of
On 2/27/2015 7:33 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
@safe has some pretty nasty holes right now... like:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5270
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8838
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12822
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 02:58:31 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/26/15 6:17 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 05:57:53PM -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 2/26/15 5:48 PM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
I sometimes feel so bad for Kenji,
Kai Nacke k...@redstar.de writes:
Also note that LDC is mentioned in the release notes as one of the
projects who are already supporting LLVM 3.6. Just recompile LDC using
master branch from GitHub or from the 0.15.1 source.
This is the 6th time that LDC and D are mentioned in the LLVM
On 2015-02-28 10:41, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
I agree, as, well, this is starting to look pretty grotesque...
The druntime/phobos 2.067 are breaking every piece of software out there
that relies on core.sync or concurrency.scheduler, vibe and tango included.
Add DWT to that list.
--
/Jacob
On 2015-02-28 06:57, deadalnix wrote:
I think this is justified to break the code here, but I share the
irritation in front of the inconsistency.
I don't think so because it's so easy to making it a non-breaking
change, i.e. require a compiler recognized UDA to enable the functionality.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14232
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com ---
The following program already reported same error in 2.066:
struct Bug
{
const const void bug()
{
}
}
test.d(3): Error: redundant attribute 'const'
--
On 2/28/2015 3:01 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
done
Thanks!
On 2/28/15 5:43 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 28 February 2015 at 02:00, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2/27/15 7:52 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Well this is the case of the highest value to me, and DIP74 offers
nothing?
For structs
On 1 March 2015 at 12:22, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2/28/15 5:57 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Perhaps an operator that may be implemented to return a mutable
metadata pointer for objects? From an algebraic point of view, it
should be
On 2/28/15 6:49 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 1 March 2015 at 12:21, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2/28/15 5:43 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I'd like to see a struct with RC operators have implicit calls
generated (and elided) for
Dan Olson zans.is.for.c...@yahoo.com writes:
Kai Nacke k...@redstar.de writes:
Also note that LDC is mentioned in the release notes as one of the
projects who are already supporting LLVM 3.6. Just recompile LDC using
master branch from GitHub or from the 0.15.1 source.
This is the 6th time
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14232
Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14062
--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to bearophile_hugs from comment #0)
test.d(3): Error: pure function 'D main' cannot call impure function
'std.variant.VariantN!20u.VariantN.__ctor!int.this'
test.d(3): Error: pure
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 20:49:22 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
Any other ideas and opinions?
I'm a little busy. It'll take me some time. There's a lot going
on in recent days with all these ideas.
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 21:12:54 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Defines a significantly better function call protocol:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP74
Andrei
This is obviously much better, Andrei.
I think an alternative solution (I know -- another idea --
against my own first idea!)
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13612
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #1 from
On 1 March 2015 at 11:40, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Tracing garbage collection can afford the luxury of e.g. mutating data that
was immutable during its lifetime.
Reference counting needs to make minute mutations to data while references
to that
On 2/28/15 6:33 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
one of the biggest recurring
complaints relating to the D type system
That didn't get talked about in I don't remember. -- Andrei
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14056
--- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Martin Nowak from comment #3)
(In reply to Ulrich Küttler from comment #1)
This seems to be a conscious choice, the function has been restricted to
prevent a compile failure on
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 20:49:22 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
I encountered an ugly problem. Actually, I had already run into
it in my first proposal, but Steven Schveighoffer just posted
about it here, which made me aware again:
On 28 February 2015 at 02:02, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2/27/15 7:52 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Can I call opAddRef/opRelease from within the postblit/destructor
manually and expect the compiler to elide calls correctly?
That doesn't
On 2/28/15 5:43 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I'd like to see a struct with RC operators have implicit calls
generated (and elided) for exactly the same set of cases as classes,
in terms of construction/destruction/assignment/passing to/from
functions.
The short answer is that probably
On 2/28/15 5:57 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Perhaps an operator that may be implemented to return a mutable
metadata pointer for objects? From an algebraic point of view, it
should be defined that mutating metadata will have no effect on the
actual object.
But how would custom data be
On 1 March 2015 at 12:51, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2/28/15 6:49 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 1 March 2015 at 12:21, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2/28/15 5:43 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d
On 1 March 2015 at 13:13, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2/28/15 7:01 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 1 March 2015 at 12:51, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2/28/15 6:49 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14232
--- Comment #5 from Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org ---
this effectively turns compiler code to unmaintainable spaghetti. and i believe
that this is the perfect application for lint-like tool (yes, devs can finally
bless dfix). with dfix blessed
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 12:53:24PM +1000, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 1 March 2015 at 12:48, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2/28/15 6:33 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
one of the biggest recurring
complaints relating to the D type
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14218
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to 2.067 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/18f4c442e53e30b44a6c599e99f39eacc27ecef1
Merge pull request #4446 from
Tracing garbage collection can afford the luxury of e.g. mutating data
that was immutable during its lifetime.
Reference counting needs to make minute mutations to data while
references to that data are created. In fact, it's not mutation of the
useful data, the payload of a data structure;
On 28 February 2015 at 02:00, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2/27/15 7:52 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Well this is the case of the highest value to me, and DIP74 offers
nothing?
For structs you use postblit and destructors. -- Andrei
That
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14232
briancsch...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||briancsch...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13612
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/a91d0b3166229de8e243381c00650e09ad85f206
fix Issue 13612 - Wrong
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
We have a few candidates for solutions, but wanted to open with a good
discussion first. So, how do you envision a way to define and access
mutable metadata for objects (including immutable ones)?
Andrei
It seems to me that (in the particular case of _this_
On 2/28/15 7:30 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 1 March 2015 at 13:13, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Inserting calls to opAddRef and opRelease, and the rules that allow their
elision, follow quite closely (albeit not 100% identically) the rules
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
