Re: Converting a ubyte[] to a struct with respect to endianness?

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:10:22PM -0700, Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > On 06/23/2017 09:26 PM, Felix wrote: > > That works, thanks! > > I've just tried this, which seems cleaner: > > import std.stdio; > import std.system; > import std.bitmanip; > > void ensureBigEndian(T)(ref T

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 21:36:07 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: Contracts within the DbC paradigm *are* abstractions that do not necessitate any particular implementation. In practice, though, what must any such implementation actually achieve? 1. allow the source code to express its intent

Re: Converting a ubyte[] to a struct with respect to endianness?

On 06/23/2017 09:26 PM, Felix wrote: That works, thanks! I've just tried this, which seems cleaner: import std.stdio; import std.system; import std.bitmanip; void ensureBigEndian(T)(ref T value) { if (endian == Endian.littleEndian) { value = *cast(T*)nativeToBigEndian(value).ptr;

Re: Converting a ubyte[] to a struct with respect to endianness?

That works, thanks!

Re: Converting a ubyte[] to a struct with respect to endianness?

On 06/23/2017 07:52 PM, Felix wrote: > So I'm guessing my ubytes are in the wrong order in the uint... how should I put them around the correct way so that my code won't break on another machine with different endianness? Yes, that would happen when your system is little-endian. (According to

Re: Suggest; LDC windows package offer to install VisualD like DMD does

On 23 June 2017 at 22:34, Kagamin via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > There's ldc installer? > Sounds like a good starting point :) Refit the DMD installer and offer it alongside the archives?

Converting a ubyte[] to a struct with respect to endianness?

I'm trying to read in just the first part of a .png file to peek at it's width and height without loading in the whole file. I'm using FreeImage for reading the whole file but since it doesn't have a function to let me peek at the image size before loading it all in I'm rolling my own. I've

Re: DirectX bindings

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 13:31:04 UTC, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote: Hi evilrat. That's unfortunate to hear. I would to suggest a way forward. What do you think about joining dlang-community [0] [1]? That way: * You remain an owner of your repo, so you can continue to develop it if/when

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 21:14:47 UTC, MysticZach wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 20:49:35 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: ... I'm not sure what you're getting at here. With the proposal Timon implemented we have the following: - the newer, decoupled contract syntax that separates contract

Re: What is your favorite D feature?

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:48:25AM +, Seb via Digitalmars-d wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently trying to modernize the D code example roulette on the > dlang.org front page [1]. Hence, I would love to hear about your > favorite feature(s) in D. > Ideas: > - favorite language construct > -

Re: Go 1.9

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 22:35:04 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 20:25:10 UTC, Joakim wrote: C# lost out internally at Microsoft precisely because of how bloated it made everything, with signs that native is ascendant again in recent years:

Re: Go 1.9

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 21:31:00 UTC, Araq wrote: ... That's just "I looked at the websites, never used these tools in practice but found them convincing" phrased differently to pretend you have an argument. The success of Go strongly indicates people generally don't connect Java/C# to

Re: Go 1.9

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 20:25:10 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 16:49:54 UTC, Kagamin wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 06:41:26 UTC, Bienlein wrote: Java, Kotlin, C# are still Jit compiled languages, with the memory footprint to prove it :) The memory footprint doesn't

Re: implib.exe no output files

On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 11:30:56 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote: [...] Step 5. I don't get any lib files. I got lib files on another computer, though.

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 21:14:47 UTC, MysticZach wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 20:49:35 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: Normal usage of the new syntax? If asserts later on get a (possibly breaking) syntax overhaul that will affect (and forward breakage to) the contract syntax, as well, if

Re: Go 1.9

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 20:13:15 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote: ExcelsiorJET is quite easy to figure out, you can download their open source version. So in other words, you do not have used these products and only read their websites, got it. Some products go the static linking way, others map

Re: daii - allocator-friendly closures and raii

On 6/23/17 4:24 PM, Boris-Barboris wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 20:13:07 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote: You've got bad `@trusted`s: Ty, I misunderstood the concept. I guess in a code like this it's mostly @system anyways, too many indirections to control safety level. I'm probably gonna remove

Re: Dub

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 10:38:23 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: 350 issues, 42 pull requests. I have to admit I am shocked. After looking at the dub code I have to say the code is well written and well structured. That makes it easy for the community to help solving bugs. My gut feeling is

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 20:49:35 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: Normal usage of the new syntax? If asserts later on get a (possibly breaking) syntax overhaul that will affect (and forward breakage to) the contract syntax, as well, if it uses the same compiler infrastructure. I believe this

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 20:27:58 UTC, MysticZach wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 20:03:17 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: No. Asserts are the meat of in/out contracts, these are actually asserts. Anything you do to the assert grammar should be done here as well. I agree. I can understand

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 04:15:38PM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...] > You can always still do in and out block syntax. Or is this DIP > proposing to do away with that? I didn't see any mention of > deprecating current syntax. > > I view this improvement like short

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 20:03:17 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: No. Asserts are the meat of in/out contracts, these are actually asserts. Anything you do to the assert grammar should be done here as well. I agree. I can understand wanting to pass in/out violations to a different handler

Re: Go 1.9

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 16:49:54 UTC, Kagamin wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 06:41:26 UTC, Bienlein wrote: Java, Kotlin, C# are still Jit compiled languages, with the memory footprint to prove it :) The memory footprint doesn't matter. Those times are OVER :-). Do you want D to

Re: daii - allocator-friendly closures and raii

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 20:13:07 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote: You've got bad `@trusted`s: Ty, I misunderstood the concept. I guess in a code like this it's mostly @system anyways, too many indirections to control safety level. I'm probably gonna remove most of the attributes.

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On 6/23/17 3:51 PM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 18:42:55 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 6/23/17 2:24 PM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: I'm all for this syntax, just one spec/implementation question: If the new contract syntax (formally) shares grammar rules with assert,

Re: daii - allocator-friendly closures and raii

On 06/23/2017 09:02 PM, Boris-Barboris wrote: https://github.com/Boris-Barboris/daii You've got bad `@trusted`s: https://github.com/Boris-Barboris/daii/blob/3e15429a4000494ce61330fb5adcfc700ec1942c/source/closure.d#L108 `_f` may be unsafe. It can't be trusted. `args` may have unsafe

Re: Go 1.9

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 19:27:56 UTC, Araq wrote: On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 11:27:47 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote: Java is AOT compiled to native code via Excelsior JET, IBM J9, IBM Websphere RealTime, JamaicaVM, SubstrateVM, Android ART and eventually Java 10. Have you used one of these

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 19:38:11 UTC, MysticZach wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 18:42:55 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 6/23/17 2:24 PM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: I'm all for this syntax, just one spec/implementation question: If the new contract syntax (formally) shares grammar rules

Re: Windows/Android/Mac/RaspberryPi/Linux/ARM/FPGA/ASIC/DSP/uC

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 19:03:01 UTC, FoxyBrown wrote: Hi, I will be developing some hardware and software that will need to be portable across a multitude of systems. At first, I will develop some of the non-specific infrastructural code base on windows for convenience. These involve

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 18:42:55 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 6/23/17 2:24 PM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 17:31:15 UTC, MysticZach wrote: [...] Yeah, my take is that the grammar for `assert`s applies to the new syntax as well. If the grammar for asserts is

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 18:42:55 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 6/23/17 2:24 PM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: I'm all for this syntax, just one spec/implementation question: If the new contract syntax (formally) shares grammar rules with assert, won't that cause more work for people who want

Re: What is your favorite D feature?

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 06:51:13PM +, Anonymouse via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...] > Fairly specific, but foreach (member; someStruct.tupleof). > > Part of my work on my IRC bot has been to serialise structs into > configuration files (since std.json was *non-trivial* to deal with), > and

Re: Go 1.9

On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 11:27:47 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote: Java is AOT compiled to native code via Excelsior JET, IBM J9, IBM Websphere RealTime, JamaicaVM, SubstrateVM, Android ART and eventually Java 10. Have you used one of these products? How do they deal with dynamic class loading?

Re: VhdCopy v2

On 2017-06-22 17:19, JamesD wrote: I have several utilities I have used in AutoIT, and I'm enjoying converting these to the D language with the DWT GUI. vhdCopy is a GUI wrapper for VboxManage.exe to copy vhd and set GUUID. This version 2 replaces buttons with a GUI menu that is useful as an

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 06:57:57PM +, MysticZach via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 18:20:23 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: > > On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 18:03:26 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote: [...] > > > Agreed. Implementation: > > >

Re: Read conditional function parameters during compile time using __traits

On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 20:48:52 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote: On 06/21/2017 09:39 PM, timvol wrote: size_t calcLength(ubyte ubFuncCode)() if ( ubFuncCode == 1 ) { return 10; // More complex calculated value } size_t calcLength(ubyte ubFuncCode)() if ( ubFuncCode ==

daii - allocator-friendly closures and raii

Hi, I wrote a small library, inspired by atilaneves automem. I didn't like some things, especially that smart pointers proxied underlying types, also I wanted class upcasting. https://github.com/Boris-Barboris/daii https://code.dlang.org/packages/daii What do you think about the

Windows/Android/Mac/RaspberryPi/Linux/ARM/FPGA/ASIC/DSP/uC

Hi, I will be developing some hardware and software that will need to be portable across a multitude of systems. At first, I will develop some of the non-specific infrastructural code base on windows for convenience. These involve the GUI, overall structure, etc. I think will need to move

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 18:20:23 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 18:03:26 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote: On 23.06.2017 18:21, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...] Agreed. Implementation: https://github.com/dlang/dmd/compare/master...tgehr:contract-syntax (At most one

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On 23.06.2017 06:27, MysticZach wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 00:17:23 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: We can call that contextual "keyword" result. Doesn't have to be a keyword, just the implied return value symbol name. Another problem is that any given contextual reserved identifier

Re: What is your favorite D feature?

On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 00:48:25 UTC, Seb wrote: Hi, I am currently trying to modernize the D code example roulette on the dlang.org front page [1]. Hence, I would love to hear about your favorite feature(s) in D. Ideas: - favorite language construct - favorite code sample - "only

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On 6/23/17 2:24 PM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 17:31:15 UTC, MysticZach wrote: [...] Yeah, my take is that the grammar for `assert`s applies to the new syntax as well. If the grammar for asserts is this: AssertExpression: assert ( AssertParameters ) ... then the

[Issue 11012] [TDPL] is(typeof(f) == function) fails with some functions

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11012 --- Comment #9 from Alexander --- I'm not sure about it being a bug, though I was before. I think spec should be a little more explicit on the difference between function and function pointer types. For now, this templates

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 18:06:34 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote: Because it cannot be parsed greedily. See: http://forum.dlang.org/post/beovehhmoxzuoepte...@forum.dlang.org I see what you're saying. I don't think I really grokked it when you posted the example yesterday. And also it is

Re: dlang website design

I'm kinda tempted to offer a pre-packaged compiler download with my libs and some other useful stuff. PHP has done that before, with the LAMP packages. And now that dmd is fully Boost, there's no legal barrier, but I question if it is really worth it because someone could just download the

Re: past.code123.org new service for sharing D code.

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 17:33:48 UTC, Suliman wrote: http://past.code123.org/ I did small paste-bin service for sharing D code. Now it's deep alpha it's powered by vibed. It's simply works and nothing more. It's support basic syntax highlighting (after page refresh) for few language

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 17:31:15 UTC, MysticZach wrote: [...] Yeah, my take is that the grammar for `assert`s applies to the new syntax as well. If the grammar for asserts is this: AssertExpression: assert ( AssertParameters ) ... then the grammar for the new syntax is: InExpression:

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 18:03:26 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote: On 23.06.2017 18:21, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...] Agreed. Implementation: https://github.com/dlang/dmd/compare/master...tgehr:contract-syntax (At most one contract of each type is supported. It is not very hard to

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 17:09:18 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 6/23/17 11:41 AM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 14:53:44 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 6/23/17 9:58 AM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: out (; globalStateStillValid) { ... } What's that mean?

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On 23.06.2017 19:52, jmh530 wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 17:31:15 UTC, MysticZach wrote: OutExpression: out ( ; AssertParameters ) out ( Identifier ; AssertParameters ) Why not? OutExpression: out ( AssertParameters ) out ( Identifier ; AssertParameters ) Because it cannot

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On 23.06.2017 18:21, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 09:06:59AM +, Solomon E via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...] T foo(T)(T x, T y) in (x > 0, y > 0) out (r; r > 0) { return x % y + 1; } Hmm, I like this syntax for out-contracts! It borrows from

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 17:31:15 UTC, MysticZach wrote: OutExpression: out ( ; AssertParameters ) out ( Identifier ; AssertParameters ) Why not? OutExpression: out ( AssertParameters ) out ( Identifier ; AssertParameters )

past.code123.org new service for sharing D code.

http://past.code123.org/ I did small paste-bin service for sharing D code. Now it's deep alpha it's powered by vibed. It's simply works and nothing more. It's support basic syntax highlighting (after page refresh) for few language besides D. I hope to finish it in next few days, but you can

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 16:21:28 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 09:06:59AM +, Solomon E via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...] T foo(T)(T x, T y) in (x > 0, y > 0) out (r; r > 0) { return x % y + 1; } Hmm, I like this syntax for out-contracts! It borrows from

Re: Dub

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 17:21:58 UTC, jmh530 wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 15:48:25 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: PS We need simple distinct names for Dub the tool and Dub the repository. Rust has Cargo and crates.io. The trouble is code.dlang.org doesn't quite roll off the tongue.

Re: Dub

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 15:48:25 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: PS We need simple distinct names for Dub the tool and Dub the repository. Rust has Cargo and crates.io. The trouble is code.dlang.org doesn't quite roll off the tongue. Some dub/reggae inspired names:

Re: Dub

On 06/23/2017 11:48 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote: PS We need simple distinct names for Dub the tool and Dub the repository. Rust has Cargo and crates.io. The trouble is code.dlang.org doesn't quite roll off the tongue. "dub" vs "dub repo"

Re: How to add class in DIET template

On 6/23/17 12:06 PM, Martin Tschierschke wrote: You can use the html syntax for the class parameter, the funny/nice thing is, that mystr can be used directly without "#{}" around. code(class=mystr) #{line} works. Yes, I just found out recently -- when you don't use quotes for an attribute

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On 6/23/17 11:41 AM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 14:53:44 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 6/23/17 9:58 AM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: out (; globalStateStillValid) { ... } What's that mean? Parenthesisless function call (as function calls are expressions). OK.

Re: Go 1.9

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 06:41:26 UTC, Bienlein wrote: Java, Kotlin, C# are still Jit compiled languages, with the memory footprint to prove it :) The memory footprint doesn't matter. Those times are OVER :-). Do you want D to compete in enterprise domain? Of 16 programs running on my

Re: Dub

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 10:38:23 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: 350 issues, 42 pull requests. I have to admit I am shocked. https://github.com/dlang/dub/graphs/contributors?from=2015-06-23=2016-06-23=c https://github.com/dlang/dub/graphs/contributors?from=2016-06-23=2017-06-23=c Shows that the

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 09:06:59AM +, Solomon E via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...] > T foo(T)(T x, T y) > in (x > 0, y > 0) > out (r; r > 0) > { > return x % y + 1; > } Hmm, I like this syntax for out-contracts! It borrows from existing foreach syntax, so it has some precedence,

[Issue 11012] [TDPL] is(typeof(f) == function) fails with some functions

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11012 anonymous4 changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

Re: How to add class in DIET template

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 06:59:22 UTC, Suliman wrote: I need to get external variable and make class by it's value - string mystr = "lng-" ~ language; - foreach(i, line; arrayOfLines ) li code.mystr #{line} I need to get HTML code like this: some D code But class

[Issue 11012] [TDPL] is(typeof(f) == function) fails with some functions

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11012 --- Comment #7 from anonymous4 --- How it works now: --- void f(){} static assert(is(typeof(f)==function)); static assert(is(typeof()==function)); --- line 3: Error: static assert (is(void function() == function)) is false

Re: Cannot implicitly convert expression (struct this)

On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 09:57:44 UTC, Andre Pany wrote: This line raises the error: TestStruct s2 = TestStruct(Reason.FU); Error: cannot implicitly convert expression ("Fu") of type Reason to InitialEnum!(Reason) While this line is working fine: TestStruct s1 = {reason: Reason.FU}; I

Re: Dub

On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 14:20 +0200, Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d wrote: > Am 23.06.2017 um 12:38 schrieb Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d: > > 350 issues, 42 pull requests. I have to admit I am shocked. > > > > It really shows that I have very little time left for DUB at the > moment.  >

Re: What is your favorite D feature?

On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 00:48:25 UTC, Seb wrote: Before you ask, yes - I want to add a couple of cool examples to dlang.org (and yep the roulette rotation is currently broken [2]). [1] https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Frontpage+example%22 [2]

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 14:53:44 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 6/23/17 9:58 AM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: out (; globalStateStillValid) { ... } What's that mean? Parenthesisless function call (as function calls are expressions).

[Issue 17543] New: __gshared block modifier is ignored by static variables

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17543 Issue ID: 17543 Summary: __gshared block modifier is ignored by static variables Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86 OS: Windows Status: NEW

Re: Go 1.9

On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 13:14 +, Wulfklaue via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Monday, 19 June 2017 at 16:13:20 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: > > I'd be more bothered by Kotlin native that Scala native. > > Well, Kotlin/Native just came out with version 0.3. And it  > includes Windows support. Take that

Re: Immutable

On 06/23/2017 04:29 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: try `new immutable AppendChatCommand` instead of just `new`. If it complains that it cannot call the mutable constructor, go to the class definition and add `pure` to the constructor. Should take care of that error. With a `pure` constructor,

[Issue 17542] New: DSON conversion of enums misses enum name

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17542 Issue ID: 17542 Summary: DSON conversion of enums misses enum name Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

Re: dlang website design

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 13:43:00 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote: On 06/23/2017 08:49 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote: "Systems programming" may scare users away who think they're not good enough for that kind of programming. True. "General-purpose programming" is a better fit, in my opinion. In mine

Re: dlang website design

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 13:29:29 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote: But for the remaining, unfortunately this is not as easy, and this requires some efforts before being able to develop web or GUI applications. I'm kinda tempted to offer a pre-packaged compiler download with my libs and some

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On 6/23/17 9:58 AM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: out (; globalStateStillValid) { ... } What's that mean? -Steve

Re: Dealing with the interior pointers bug

On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 18:38 +, Boris-Barboris via Digitalmars-d- learn wrote: > […] > > Casts are part of the type system. Yes, D type system allows  > invalid operations. It's not the compiler's fault, it's type  > system's fault. > […] Well maybe casts should be allowed as they effectively

Re: dlang website design

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 13:29:29 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote: That's why I'm in favor of adapting some thirdparty librairies so they become pre-installed standard librairies (std.web, std.ui, etc). Will not happen. I read too many threads already where this was mentioned and it always got

Re: Go 1.9

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 14:07:09 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 11:15:40 UTC, Bienlein wrote: I have not done any manual memory management at work for the last 25 years. But are you doing any programming for the low end of the hardware spectrum? It has been the

Re: Immutable

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 14:29:41 UTC, harakim wrote: heh. I've been working on this for an hour or so. Right after I posted, I tried casting it, which worked. Thank you for your time. cast works, but `new immutable` with a pure ctor should work better. (casts are easy to get wrong so best

Re: Immutable

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 14:29:40 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 14:25:48 UTC, harakim wrote: immutable(AppendChatCommand) command = new AppendChatCommand(type, text); try `new immutable AppendChatCommand` instead of just `new`. If it complains that it cannot call the

Re: Immutable

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 14:25:48 UTC, harakim wrote: I am building a system where one thread generates commands and sends them to another thread. The commands will never change once they are created. I have marked the values immutable, but I've been struggling to understand the requirements

Re: Immutable

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 14:25:48 UTC, harakim wrote: immutable(AppendChatCommand) command = new AppendChatCommand(type, text); try `new immutable AppendChatCommand` instead of just `new`. If it complains that it cannot call the mutable constructor, go to the class definition and add

Immutable

I am building a system where one thread generates commands and sends them to another thread. The commands will never change once they are created. I have marked the values immutable, but I've been struggling to understand the requirements for sharing a variable across threads. cannot

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 13:58:38 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: OT: Anyone interested in a DIP for more template constraint unfulfilled information in a consistent way to contracts (?) : --- int myFunc(Args...)(Args args) if (Args.length > 0, "Starving!") if (Args.length > 1, "Still

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 13:00:30 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 6/23/17 5:06 AM, Solomon E wrote: What I expected from my impression of existing D syntax was that something like this might be coming up: T foo(T)(T x, T y) in (x > 0, y > 0) out (r; r > 0) { return x % y

Re: dlang website design

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 13:43:00 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote: On 06/23/2017 08:49 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote: 1/ it's not especially obvious that D is also an easy to learn scripting language. Ok, I think I understand your goal now. There's a thing that I'd like to change on the home page, and I

[Issue 11012] [TDPL] is(typeof(f) == function) fails with some functions

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11012 ZombineDev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 11012] [TDPL] is(typeof(f) == function) fails with some functions

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11012 ZombineDev changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 15708] std.range.choose assumes hasElaborateCopyConstructor means "has __postblit"

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15708 ZombineDev changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

Re: Go 1.9

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 11:15:40 UTC, Bienlein wrote: I have not done any manual memory management at work for the last 25 years. But are you doing any programming for the low end of the hardware spectrum? It has been the low end hardware limitations that have the standard for memory

Re: DirectX bindings

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 13:31:04 UTC, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote: On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 09:09:40 UTC, evilrat wrote: [...] Hi evilrat. That's unfortunate to hear. I would to suggest a way forward. What do you think about joining dlang-community [0] [1]? That way: * You remain

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 13:26:53 UTC, jmh530 wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 13:00:30 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: The out contract looks pretty good actually. The in contract, not as good. That looks like a comma expression. I'd rather see this be: in(x > 0) in(y > 0)

Re: dlang website design

On 06/23/2017 08:49 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote: 1/ it's not especially obvious that D is also an easy to learn scripting language. Ok, I think I understand your goal now. There's a thing that I'd like to change on the home page, and I think it aligns with your thoughts: "D is a systems

Re: DirectX bindings

On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 09:09:40 UTC, evilrat wrote: On Sunday, 3 November 2013 at 05:27:24 UTC, evilrat wrote: https://github.com/evilrat666/directx-d I'm sorry to say that, but I have to quit the post of DirectX bindings maintainer. I haven't yet decided on what to do with dub

[Issue 17541] Template attribute deduction depends on compile invocation

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17541 --- Comment #3 from johanenge...@weka.io --- And in other cases, `pure` is deduced depending on compiler invocation, and is actually deduced wrong (function is not pure but is deduced `pure`). --

Re: dlang website design

The issue goes a bit beyond just the marketing. Somebody posted on Reddit a few days ago, that D can be used for a lot of different fields. From system programming to web development etc ... But the reality is a bit different. If you want web development you need to write your own framework

Re: DIP 1009--Improve Contract Usability--Preliminary Review Round 1

On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 13:00:30 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: The out contract looks pretty good actually. The in contract, not as good. That looks like a comma expression. I'd rather see this be: in(x > 0) in(y > 0) or in(x > 0 && y > 0) In this case, we have

Re: Go 1.9

On Monday, 19 June 2017 at 16:13:20 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: I'd be more bothered by Kotlin native that Scala native. Well, Kotlin/Native just came out with version 0.3. And it includes Windows support. Take that Apple/Swift ;) Its impressive how fast things are being developer by

[Issue 16640] void fun(string file=__FILE_FULL_PATH__) returns relative path

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16640 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

  1   2   >