https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18220
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18220
--- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/druntime
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/commit/6ca77797f1c5c8bede331cff3a4648288386ce02
Fix Issue 18220 - Allow `rt_trapexceptions` to be
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19090
Issue ID: 19090
Summary: core.internal.hash.bytesHash unit test uses incorrect
test vector on BigEndian machines
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: Other
OS: All
I am getting an error when I try and compile anything with the
GDC compiler which is coming up associated with source code
within a D include file which is not one of mine
I am using a Raspberry Pi with Ubuntu 16.04 and have just done an
"apt-get install gdc". Using ldc works fine.
The
Thankyou Ali.
Timoses.
I did try DiamondMVC for a bit, but I found that there is more
help out there for Vibe.d. So I reverted back to using that. And
the Dependency Injection in Diamond MVC brings all the obscurity
that spring has which makes debugging more of a guessing game
than a
On Mon., 16 Jul. 2018, 6:00 pm docandrew via Digitalmars-d, <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, 14 July 2018 at 10:53:17 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
> wrote:
> > On 7/14/18 5:03 AM, Luís Marques wrote:
> >> If there is "no other meaning of @implicit" (other than the
> >>
On Saturday, 14 July 2018 at 10:53:17 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/14/18 5:03 AM, Luís Marques wrote:
If there is "no other meaning of @implicit" (other than the
intersection of those two properties) why don't you just call
it something like @copyctor?
I'm totally cool with giving
On 7/16/18 3:12 PM, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 07/16/2018 09:06 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/14/18 11:26 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
[...]
That's easily fixed by implementing a compiler recognized UDA. That
would mean that it would only be a copy constructor if "implicit" is
defined in
On 07/16/2018 03:08 PM, Eric wrote:
This makes the compiler crash.
Always a compiler bug:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19089
Ali
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19089
Issue ID: 19089
Summary: Compiler crash for using struct
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
On Monday, 16 July 2018 at 22:16:10 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 16 July 2018 at 22:08:34 UTC, Eric wrote:
This makes the compiler crash. Is it illegal code?
Yes, a struct can be moved at any time by the compiler which
means pointers to it can be invalidated at random.
Unless you
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:08:34PM +, Eric via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> This makes the compiler crash. Is it illegal code?
>
> struct List {
> private List* head;
> private List* tail;
>
> this(int x) {
> head = null;
> tail = // <-- crasher
> }
> }
>
> List2 ls = 2;
On Monday, 16 July 2018 at 22:08:34 UTC, Eric wrote:
This makes the compiler crash. Is it illegal code?
Yes, a struct can be moved at any time by the compiler which
means pointers to it can be invalidated at random.
Unless you always allocate it externally yourself...
Pasted slightly wrong code, last line should be:
List ls = 2;
Question still stands.
This makes the compiler crash. Is it illegal code?
struct List {
private List* head;
private List* tail;
this(int x) {
head = null;
tail = // <-- crasher
}
}
List2 ls = 2;
On Sunday, 15 July 2018 at 20:29:29 UTC, tcb wrote:
I've been trying to compile a trivial program (extern C int
main() {return 0;}) without linking parts of the C runtime with
no success.
I compile with dmd -debuglib= -defaultlib= -v -L=/INFORMATION
-betterC but optlink shows a lot of things
On 07/16/2018 09:06 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/14/18 11:26 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
[...]
That's easily fixed by implementing a compiler recognized UDA. That
would mean that it would only be a copy constructor if "implicit" is
defined in core.attribute. This would also avoid any
On 7/14/18 11:26 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On Friday, 13 July 2018 at 01:18:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/12/18 2:30 PM, ag0aep6g wrote:
You're still potentially changing the semantics of existing code.
`@implicit` can be a UDA today:
enum implicit = 0;
struct C
{
On 7/14/18 5:32 PM, aliak wrote:
Alo, I'm wondering how phobos devs view or determine what goes in to
std.algorithm and what goes in to std.range.
To me some of them are quite obvious - well, most things can arguably be
an algorithm. But for example "refRange" is clearly a range specific
On 07/16/2018 11:30 AM, zhani wrote:
i got some problem about using CJK in windows10 console.
here my code(a code file encoded the utf-8):
--
import std.stdio;
/*
static this(){
core.stdc.wchar_.fwide(core.stdc.stdio.stdout, 1);
Johan Engelen wrote:
On Friday, 13 July 2018 at 14:51:17 UTC, ketmar wrote:
yeah. in simple words: safe code is *predictable*, but not
"segfault-less". segfaults (null dereferences) in safe code are allowed,
'cause they have completely predictable behavior (instant program
termination).
Johan Engelen wrote:
On Friday, 13 July 2018 at 14:51:17 UTC, ketmar wrote:
yeah. in simple words: safe code is *predictable*, but not
"segfault-less". segfaults (null dereferences) in safe code are allowed,
'cause they have completely predictable behavior (instant program
termination).
On Friday, 13 July 2018 at 14:51:17 UTC, ketmar wrote:
yeah. in simple words: safe code is *predictable*, but not
"segfault-less". segfaults (null dereferences) in safe code are
allowed, 'cause they have completely predictable behavior
(instant program termination).
@safe doesn't free you
On Tuesday, 3 July 2018 at 07:31:46 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 07/01/2018 05:34 AM, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 07/01/2018 08:00 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Apparent from uncharacteristic messages from Dmitry's account
to multiple destinations recently, I suspect his gmail
account has been
On Monday, 16 July 2018 at 15:07:20 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 17/07/2018 2:45 AM, Ali wrote:
Do we have any updates on Dmitry
was anyone able to check on him
I hope he is doing better
Nope, appears he's gone.
I think something happened. He do not getting online since
01.07.2018.
On 17/07/2018 2:45 AM, Ali wrote:
Do we have any updates on Dmitry
was anyone able to check on him
I hope he is doing better
Nope, appears he's gone.
Do we have any updates on Dmitry
was anyone able to check on him
I hope he is doing better
On Friday, 13 July 2018 at 19:53:45 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 June 2018 at 18:47:10 UTC, Jordi Gutiérrez
Hermoso wrote:
What are your ideas?
If you would like to expose C function and type declarations to
D, you could take a look at DPP, which allows you to just
#include
On Friday, 13 July 2018 at 20:03:37 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Friday, 13 July 2018 at 17:12:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
[...]
Hmm, thinking on this a little more...it does seem
difficult...but I don't think the problem is with immutable
borrows. I think the issue is with the exclusivity of
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18620
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Monday, 16 July 2018 at 13:13:53 UTC, Timoses wrote:
On Monday, 16 July 2018 at 12:00:57 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
On Monday, 16 July 2018 at 11:43:03 UTC, Timoses wrote:
Why does this fail?
It doesn't. Not using DMD 2.081.1 under Windows, at least. I
tried adding a bitfield since you
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18620
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/304850d8810f937360a0c1391cb278248cb28f4f
Fix Issue 18620 - error cannot be interpreted at compile time
On Monday, 16 July 2018 at 13:15:56 UTC, Timoses wrote:
On Monday, 16 July 2018 at 11:31:32 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Monday, 16 July 2018 at 11:12:20 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Saturday, 14 July 2018 at 03:08:50 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
I'll follow up with Alawain. Regardless, dscripten-tools
On Sunday, 15 July 2018 at 13:06:16 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Currently the API's don't support const(void)[], e.g.
import std.experimental.allocator : makeArray, theAllocator,
dispose;
import std.experimental.allocator.mallocator : Mallocator;
void main()
{
const a =
On Monday, 16 July 2018 at 11:31:32 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Monday, 16 July 2018 at 11:12:20 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Saturday, 14 July 2018 at 03:08:50 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
I'll follow up with Alawain. Regardless, dscripten-tools
borrows very little from the redistributable parts of
On Monday, 16 July 2018 at 12:00:57 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
On Monday, 16 July 2018 at 11:43:03 UTC, Timoses wrote:
Why does this fail?
It doesn't. Not using DMD 2.081.1 under Windows, at least. I
tried adding a bitfield since you mentioned it, but it compiles
nicely for me. Which version
On Monday, 16 July 2018 at 11:43:03 UTC, Timoses wrote:
Why does this fail?
It doesn't. Not using DMD 2.081.1 under Windows, at least. I
tried adding a bitfield since you mentioned it, but it compiles
nicely for me. Which version of DMD are you using, and are you
having the issues with the
Why does this fail?
struct F
{
int i;
ushort _x;
void x(ushort v) pure
{_x = v;}
ushort x() const
{ return _x; }
}
immutable F f1 = () pure {
F lf = F();
return lf; }();
// Error: cannot implicitly convert expression
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19082
Seb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||greeen...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Seb ---
I'm
On Monday, 16 July 2018 at 11:12:20 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Saturday, 14 July 2018 at 03:08:50 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
I'll follow up with Alawain. Regardless, dscripten-tools
borrows very little from the redistributable parts of
dscripten - mostly the "minimalistic runtime", which I think
On Saturday, 14 July 2018 at 03:08:50 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
I'll follow up with Alawain. Regardless, dscripten-tools
borrows very little from the redistributable parts of dscripten
- mostly the "minimalistic runtime", which I think was itself
borrowed from somewhere else.
Indeed, it
On Monday, 16 July 2018 at 09:30:22 UTC, zhani wrote:
howdy :-)
i got some problem about using CJK in windows10 console.
[...]
oh, sorry for my mistake. here:
--
writeln("你好"); // C
writeln("こんにちは"); // J
On Monday, 16 July 2018 at 08:28:06 UTC, Timoses wrote:
On Sunday, 15 July 2018 at 00:25:22 UTC, Venkat wrote:
[...]
I don't believe there currently exists a tool to rebuild the
Diet templates on the fly. The Diet templates require a step
during compilation (I think), so that the entire
howdy :-)
i got some problem about using CJK in windows10 console.
here my code(a code file encoded the utf-8):
--
import std.stdio;
/*
static this(){
core.stdc.wchar_.fwide(core.stdc.stdio.stdout, 1);
setlocale(0,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19088
Seb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||greensunn...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Seb ---
On Friday, 13 July 2018 at 11:37:09 UTC, Michael wrote:
On Friday, 13 July 2018 at 11:17:32 UTC, Radu wrote:
On Friday, 13 July 2018 at 11:12:47 UTC, Michael wrote:
On Friday, 13 July 2018 at 10:52:54 UTC, Radu wrote:
On Friday, 13 July 2018 at 10:21:54 UTC, Michael wrote:
[...]
Do you try
On Monday, 16 July 2018 at 07:49:33 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 13 July 2018 at 19:30:07 UTC, RhyS wrote:
If there is a language out there that gaps that C/Java/dynamic
fast and easy feel, and offers the ability to compile down
with ease. I have not seen it.
There's no silver bullet, you
On Thursday, 12 July 2018 at 22:17:29 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
On Thursday, 12 July 2018 at 21:51:18 UTC, aliak wrote:
Cool, is there on going work to sprucing up the D repl in the
dlang-community repo or is this a new attempt? Either way if
something is happening here then awesome!
Ah, that
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19088
Issue ID: 19088
Summary: I am working with the package tinyredis 2.1.1 and I
can't compile, dmd exit with exit code 1 because
EWOULDBLOCK is not defined
Product: D
On Sunday, 15 July 2018 at 00:25:22 UTC, Venkat wrote:
I am writing a simple vibe.d app. The following is what I do
right now.
- I make changes.
- build
- Restart the server.
Is there any tool that will auto publish my changes as I save
them ? I am using Visual Studio Code.
Thanks
Venkat
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19082
--- Comment #3 from Mitu ---
OK, I managed to find a minimal example. The code below builds properly for
debug build, but fails with the release build.
==
/+ dub.sdl: name "main" +/
import std.algorithm;
import
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19082
--- Comment #2 from Mitu ---
OK, I managed to find a minimal example. The code below builds properly for
debug build, but fails with the release build.
=
/+ dub.sdl: name "main" +/
import std.algorithm;
import
On Friday, 13 July 2018 at 19:30:07 UTC, RhyS wrote:
If there is a language out there that gaps that C/Java/dynamic
fast and easy feel, and offers the ability to compile down with
ease. I have not seen it.
There's no silver bullet, you can choose from what exists or
create your own. Recently
On Sunday, 15 July 2018 at 00:25:22 UTC, Venkat wrote:
I am writing a simple vibe.d app. The following is what I do
right now.
- I make changes.
- build
- Restart the server.
Is there any tool that will auto publish my changes as I save
them ? I am using Visual Studio Code.
Thanks
Venkat
54 matches
Mail list logo
