On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 14:59:45 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
There are lots of algorithms that will break if you randomly
switch precision of different expressions.
There is nothing "random" about increasing precision till the
end, it follows a well-defined rule.
Heck, nearly all of t
On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 11:30:33 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-05-17 11:27, Joakim wrote:
[...]
It depends. One approach would be to add an option to the
druntime makefile, which would add -version CRuntime_Musl when
compiling. In that case version(CRuntime_Musl) needs to come
befo
On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 09:24:50 UTC, Bottled Genie wrote:
Can someone help me?
How can I call core.sys.linux.execinfo:backtrace from a
core.stdc.signal: signal handler? The problem is that signal
has been declared with @nogc in druntime and backtrace does not
have that attribute.
There
On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 09:26:33 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 08:51:01 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I'm not sure how to best handle different C standard libraries
when it comes to choosing which one to use. Is it best to
choose that when building the compiler or when bui
On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 08:51:01 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
As an alternative to glibc there's a C standard library called
musl [1]. This is the C standard library used by ELLCC [2], a
cross-compiler based on Clang. This cross-compiler makes it
very easy to target other platforms and can be
On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 05:54:29 UTC, Nick B wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 05:39:41 UTC, Nick B wrote:
source:
http://www.wired.com/2016/03/epic-story-dropboxs-exodus-amazon-cloud-empire/
also
But Go’s “memory footprint”—the amount of computer memory it
demands while running Magic Po
On Saturday, 14 May 2016 at 20:38:54 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/14/2016 11:46 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
I used to design and build digital electronics out of TTL
chips. Over time, TTL
chips got faster and faster. The rule was to design the
circuit with a minimum
signal propagation delay, but
On Sunday, 15 May 2016 at 18:33:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/14/16 11:46 AM, Joakim wrote:
On Saturday, 14 May 2016 at 13:07:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The thread "Github names & avatars" is not related to the D
language,
and adds much traffic to the forum. Please place [OT]
On Sunday, 15 May 2016 at 07:46:05 UTC, Adil wrote:
Found this on Reddit.
http://blog.rust-lang.org/2016/05/13/rustup.html
Do you think it's possible to have this in D? It's worth
reading the article even if we don't plan to build one of our
own.
Of course it's possible, shouldn't be too ba
On Saturday, 14 May 2016 at 13:07:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The thread "Github names & avatars" is not related to the D
language, and adds much traffic to the forum. Please place [OT]
in title when posting anything that is not releated to the D
language.
Thanks,
Andrei
It was abou
On Friday, 13 May 2016 at 22:18:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/13/2016 1:54 PM, Xinok wrote:
I've known a couple people who had to apply for over 200-300
positions before
they finally got a job in their field. Life isn't so
convenient that we can pick
and choose which job we want. Sometimes,
On Thursday, 12 May 2016 at 01:58:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/11/2016 6:52 PM, Joakim wrote:
That example is misleading, as that was translated from C++
and the host half of
it was removed a couple months ago:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/5549/files
I'll submit a PR for the rest: I
He mentions Swift, Rust, and Go as his hopes at the end, too bad
he doesn't include D:
https://medium.com/@deathdisco/today-i-accept-that-rails-is-yesterday-s-software-b5af35c9af39
He'd probably be happy with D, particularly given Walter's stance
on the monkey-patching that guy now rues:
"Mo
On Tuesday, 10 May 2016 at 14:47:05 UTC, Tomer Filiba wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 May 2016 at 12:27:19 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
We resort to enums whenever 'version' is not adequate like
this:
https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/blob/master/ddmd/globals.d#L18-L45
A good example -- which only pro
On Tuesday, 10 May 2016 at 11:12:58 UTC, Tomer Filiba wrote:
Hey guys,
Looking at our code base (weka), I realized it would be really
useful if we had logical operators (negation, conjunction,
disjunction) in the version's "condition" clause. Here's what I
have in mind:
version(!extra_check
On Monday, 9 May 2016 at 19:09:35 UTC, Joe Duarte wrote:
One D-specific question I do have: Have any women ever posted
here? I scoured a bunch of threads here recently and couldn't
find a female poster. By this I mean a poster whose supplied
name was female, where a proper name was supplied (so
I've gone through about seven sessions in the archived livestream
videos and here are some quotes that stood out for me. Share
your memorable quotes, for those deciding what to watch.
"Normally, I'd have somebody in the company say, 'OK, what can I
do in D that I can't do in C++?'
Every tim
On Thursday, 5 May 2016 at 20:53:21 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Thursday, 5 May 2016 at 20:41:22 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Thursday, 5 May 2016 at 18:22:50 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
Please let me know what you think! I believe this is a good
first step in the right direction.
Does tumblr allow for
On Thursday, 5 May 2016 at 13:44:47 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 May 2016 at 19:38:45 UTC, Joakim wrote:
If we want to close all gaps, we should also close the gender
gap for occupational fatalities:
http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2009/09/occupational-male-female-death-gap-is.html
That me
On Wednesday, 4 May 2016 at 19:47:41 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 04.05.2016 21:38, Joakim wrote:
If we want to close all gaps, we should also close the gender
gap for
occupational fatalities:
http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2009/09/occupational-male-female-death-gap-is.html
That means 4,000 more wom
On Wednesday, 4 May 2016 at 15:46:13 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Anti-female systems in place? Bull fucking shit. Anyone who
claims there are: put up REAL fucking examples instead of
parroting vacuous rhetoric or shut the fuck up forever.
Well, there's the Obama White House:
https://www.washi
On Wednesday, 4 May 2016 at 09:27:38 UTC, dilkROM wrote:
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 03:17:20 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 28/05/2015 12:54 p.m., Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
John Colvin's experiment is great and we want to make it a
full success.
Please post here feedback and suggestions for
On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 22:40:36 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 28.04.2016 05:55, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:38:17 UTC, Max Samukha wrote:
[...]
Syntax matters. Both for the ease of programmers reading it
and, as
we've seen with C++, the speed of the compiler.
I look
On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:38:17 UTC, Max Samukha wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 April 2016 at 18:16:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
He gave very specific criticism, along with a code sample,
then made a prediction, followed by suggesting another
competing language that might do better. None of that is
On Tuesday, 26 April 2016 at 13:55:23 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 26.04.2016 10:20, Suliman wrote:
Do you really think that modern language should like this?
I talked with a lot of rust fun-boys. Most of them do not
understand do
not understand the code of their favourite language.
Rust will die
On Monday, 25 April 2016 at 09:15:53 UTC, Nick B wrote:
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 00:42:51 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Almost certainly yes. I will make announcement as soon as some
last details are figured out (expect it within 24 hours ;)).
Hi. Any news on this this ?
Nick
Yes:
http://for
On Saturday, 23 April 2016 at 07:20:10 UTC, Ozan Nurettin Süel
wrote:
Hi
I was looking for a direct link to our D Foundation, to know
about what are the current projects and the future topics.
First try: http://www.dfoundation.net/ , a non-profit
organization in india
Second try: Back to dla
On Sunday, 3 April 2016 at 09:34:16 UTC, Adil wrote:
On Sunday, 3 April 2016 at 09:12:05 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I though Laeeth had a good suggestion on how to market D a
couple months ago, as the current front-page pitch may be too
general for some chunk of readers:
"A set of 'channels' for diff
I though Laeeth had a good suggestion on how to market D a couple
months ago, as the current front-page pitch may be too general
for some chunk of readers:
"A set of 'channels' for different use cases might be helpful.
Eg bioinformatics, numerical computing, web, etc. Both for
tutorials and
On Friday, 25 March 2016 at 16:33:26 UTC, bitwise wrote:
On Thursday, 24 March 2016 at 00:56:33 UTC, bitwise wrote:
Thoughts?
Bit
Ok..How about "Thought"? One thought will do. I'll take what I
can get ;)
Bit
Martin is the guy to talk to, he wrote all that code. David
might hav
On Thursday, 24 March 2016 at 23:52:58 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Thursday, 24 March 2016 at 23:04:42 UTC, QAston wrote:
If only one could somehow engineer societies (males? - that
seems to be the problem) meeting your standards.
Replace male by jew in your sentence and ask yourself how it
soun
On Thursday, 24 March 2016 at 09:39:34 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Thursday, 24 March 2016 at 08:41:18 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
We recently had a suggestion her for a means of marking
threads as important or useful.
I really think this is entirely unnecessary.
"Sticky" threads on typical
On Monday, 21 March 2016 at 14:51:48 UTC, Vincent R wrote:
Hi,
When looking at core definitions like core.sys.posix.pthread I
can see some "duplicated" code because it seems version doesn't
support Or as we would do in C/C++ with #ifdefined.
For instance if can read this:
[...]
The languag
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 12:09:02 UTC, Adi wrote:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 08:05:48 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
This appears to have involvement from all major browser
vendors, which provides hope it might actually catch on
properly. An llvm backend will be created which will compile
to "wa
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 06:18:06 UTC, Rajat Kumar wrote:
Hello.
I am Rajat Kumar, a junior year university student from India.
I have working experiences in languages like C,C++ and Python.
I am really really interested in working in D language. I want
to work in the project - Flatbuffer
"Crowling, Turner, and others originally built Magic Pocket using
a new programming language from Google called Go. Here too,
Dropbox is riding a much larger trend, languages designed
specifically for the new world of massively distributed online
systems. Apple has one called Swift, Mozilla mak
On Tuesday, 15 March 2016 at 20:18:40 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 March 2016 at 16:12:46 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Maybe deadalnix would be interested in mentoring, I think he
showed some interest earlier. Or worst case, 3-4 of us could
tag team, if that's allowed.
I can. I know LLVM fairl
On Tuesday, 15 March 2016 at 13:01:31 UTC, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 March 2016 at 11:56:40 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 16:14:55 UTC, CraigDillabaugh
wrote:
On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 15:53:39 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I can chip in general input on porting
On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 15:14:17 UTC, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 07:46:28 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Saturday, 27 June 2015 at 15:01:53 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
[...]
You got your wish, they just exposed webasm through v8 a
couple days ago:
[...]
I am still
On Saturday, 27 June 2015 at 15:01:53 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 02:29:40 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
By this time we'd have a PR and we could play with it to
decide using first hand experience.
For which browser? It isn't implemented, is it?
You got your wish, they
On Thursday, 10 March 2016 at 11:12:47 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
On Thursday, 10 March 2016 at 05:01:37 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Perhaps someone could build off of Sociomantic's concurrent GC
(https://www.sociomantic.com/blog/2013/06/porting-cdgc-to-d2/), which I assume has been ported to D2, porting it t
On Wednesday, 9 March 2016 at 22:49:28 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
Hey all,
I'm trying to think of good project ideas for this years GSoC,
and one in particular I thought would be a great was working on
and improving the GC. I'm not sure what the scope of this
project would be like, but at the
On Monday, 7 March 2016 at 02:34:41 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
For those interested in seeing the actual proposal I am working
on, I have provided the link below. Just know that this is my
first draft and *a lot* of revising and editing still needs to
be done.
https://github.com/Jebbs/DSFML/fi
On Friday, 4 March 2016 at 09:23:01 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Friday, 12 February 2016 at 08:29:45 UTC, SomeDude wrote:
Hey, just a post to say how cool the new website is. I can
browse it on an iPhone without issue.
I wonder what percentage of traffic is now mobile? I know I only
use
On Tuesday, 1 March 2016 at 11:50:02 UTC, Abhishek Kumar wrote:
Hello
I am Abhishek Kumar,computer science student from India.I am
interested in working on D language during GSoC 2016.I found
"GDC Project - The GNU D Compiler" interesting.
I have interest in programming languages and compilers.
On Saturday, 27 February 2016 at 11:27:39 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/27/2016 1:12 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
I've had similar problems in the past with template mixins. It
seems D's
compile-time features don't mix with any kind of separate
compilation, which is
a shame.
Any ideas on how unit
On Saturday, 27 February 2016 at 10:56:08 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Saturday, 27 February 2016 at 10:18:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Saturday, 27 February 2016 at 09:11:02 UTC, Atila Neves
wrote:
On Saturday, 27 February 2016 at 03:51:00 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/26/2016 4:45 AM, Atila Neves
On Saturday, 27 February 2016 at 09:11:02 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Saturday, 27 February 2016 at 03:51:00 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/26/2016 4:45 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
'_D3bar16__unittestL2_531FZv'
'_D3bar14__unittestL2_1FZv'
It uses a sequence number to generate different ids for the
On Friday, 26 February 2016 at 12:45:35 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
foo.d:
-
void main() {
import bar;
foreach(ut; __traits(getUnitTests, bar)) ut();
}
-
bar.d:
-
unittest { assert(1 == 2); }
-
# compile all at once
dmd -unittest foo.d bar.d # fine
# compile separately
dm
On Friday, 26 February 2016 at 09:25:19 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On Thursday, 25 February 2016 at 19:21:48 UTC, Joakim wrote:
But can such a powerful phone handle Ubuntu Touch? ;) The
preliminary reviews for the Meizu Pro 5 Ubuntu Edition, which
you're presumably referencing, are not
On Thursday, 25 February 2016 at 17:27:45 UTC, karabuta wrote:
Maybe you might only be thinking about Android or iOS, but
Ubuntu Touch (a single Ubuntu OS meant to run across multiple
devices from PC to Phones) is really gaining traction. The good
news is that QML is officially the way to build
On Thursday, 25 February 2016 at 02:58:08 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/18/2016 11:54 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
But imagine that Walter
would have invested all the time he spent e.g. on implementing
DWARF EH into
optimizing the LDC frontend/glue layer/backend pass structure
instead. Who
know
Looks like the competition for D as a cross-mobile language just
got more serious:
https://www.thurrott.com/dev/64861/microsoft-finally-buys-xamarin
On Friday, 19 February 2016 at 12:13:53 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Sunday, 3 May 2015 at 17:47:15 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 3 May 2015 at 17:39:48 UTC, Robert burner Schadek
wrote:
std.xml has been considered not up to specs nearly 3 years
now. Time to build a successor. I currently plan the
fol
On Tuesday, 16 February 2016 at 10:20:57 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
http://www.nature.com/news/the-chips-are-down-for-moore-s-law-1.19338
Good news for D and other AoT-compiled languages, as software
will have to take up the slack. Software has been able to get
much more inefficient over the
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 at 15:31:02 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
People are not looking for a general purpose language. They are
looking for a solution to their particular problem area...
Go
Rust
Swift
All fairly specialized and gaining ground.
I wouldn't call Swift specialized, may
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 at 12:47:20 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 at 11:46:44 UTC, Joakim wrote:
That's why I differentiated between getting a team on the same
page and high-quality coherent designs. The former may get
more done, but usually not at high qu
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 at 10:52:31 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 at 09:51:16 UTC, Joakim wrote:
All of which are decades-old projects from the heyday of the
GPL, when many mistakenly attributed linux's success to the
GPL and copied its license blindly.
Y
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 at 09:51:16 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Consensus is for getting everybody doing the same thing, which
is not the road to technical quality. Linus has talked about
the "wasteful" OSS approach, which he compares to evolution:
http://bobweigel.net/projects/index.php?title=W
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 at 07:32:00 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 at 06:20:33 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Eh, there were always the BSDs and essentially nobody runs GNU
code today.
Uhm... Many do. And beyond GNU, the GPL/LGPL are the most
common licenses in commun
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 at 04:27:43 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
wrote:
Joakim:
"Pretty funny that he chose Stallman as his example of a guy
who gets stuff done, whose Hurd microkernel never actually got
done, :) though certainly ambitious, so Stallman would never
have had a FOSS OS on which to ru
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 at 05:38:54 UTC, Andrew Godfrey
wrote:
I just upgraded from DMD 2.065.0 (so about 2 years old) to
2.070.0, and noticed a difference in compilation speed. I'll
detail what I see, in case it's interesting, but really I just
want to ask: What should I expect? I know t
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 at 23:55:17 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Also because context switching got from a handful of cycle at
the time to about 1000 cycles on modern CPU, making the idea of
microkernel somewhat less attractive.
But saying Stallman released nothing is unfair. If we can
consid
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 at 18:31:22 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On 02/10/2016 01:09 PM, Joakim wrote:
Pretty funny that he chose Stallman as his example of a guy
who gets
stuff done, whose Hurd microkernel never actually got done, :)
though
certainly ambitious, so Stallman would never
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 at 02:11:25 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
wrote:
http://sealedabstract.com/rants/conduct-unbecoming-of-a-hacker/
(His particular suggestion about accept patches by default is
not why I post this).
'
We’re all talk
[...]
Pretty funny that he chose Stallman as his example o
On Sunday, 7 February 2016 at 10:27:02 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 07/02/16 11:22 PM, Wobbles wrote:
Just curious, is there a backup plan for D if github.com goes
by the
wayside?
Now that there seems to be community back-lash against it (at
least on
reddit) maybe a contingency plan would
On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 20:18:52 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
On 2/3/16 11:28 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sunday, 31 January 2016 at 06:34:26 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
[...]
It's always nice when that happens, especially when there's
not much FreeBSD-specific work g
On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 10:21:37 UTC, Nikolay wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 06:25:49 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 February 2016 at 18:45:20 UTC, Nikolay wrote:
You're probably better off porting dmd 2.068 first (as it's
the last dmd written wholly in C++), using it to co
On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 07:01:10 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 3 Feb 2016 7:30 am, "Joakim via Digitalmars-d" <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 February 2016 at 18:45:20 UTC, Nikolay wrote:
I am porting LDC/phobos/druntime to NetBSD. Currently my
patc
On Tuesday, 2 February 2016 at 18:45:20 UTC, Nikolay wrote:
I am porting LDC/phobos/druntime to NetBSD. Currently my patch
is merged into LDC master. I have several questions about
phobos/druntime and general workflow.
As I can understand I should prepare pull requests for
phobos/druntime maste
On Sunday, 31 January 2016 at 15:44:37 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Walter - sorry about that. I need to get someone to help on
that front as I have so little time. Should work now.
Still happening, had three email replies returned this weekend.
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 14:35:53 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 14:24:57 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 07:18:43 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 04:57:11 UTC, Joakim wrote:
It is amazing that D has gotten s
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 07:18:43 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 04:57:11 UTC, Joakim wrote:
It is amazing that D has gotten so far as an OSS project
without commercial backing, a credit to the engineering sense
of Walter and the core team. But I don't thi
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 22:12:06 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 16:20:50 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 01/25/2016 11:02 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I don't think we should read *too* much into the words.
Yeah, it's interesting. I recall thinking as I was draf
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 16:20:50 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 01/25/2016 11:02 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I don't think we should read *too* much into the words.
Yeah, it's interesting. I recall thinking as I was drafting the
document: "One word... ONE word that doesn't sit well and
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 03:14:47 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
In case you missed it from the announce forum:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 -- Andrei
Some comments:
- I'm not sure number of PRs is worth measuring, maybe a better
metric would be number of devs submitting a PR, es
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 00:04:33 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 23:49:39 UTC, cym13 wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 23:46:26 UTC, anonymous wrote:
The logo is repeatedly being called out as a weak spot of the
D brand. But so far Walter has been adamant about
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 17:02:07 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 14:01:15 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
one of the biggest things D has over C++ is its vastly
superior module system.
When you compare D's something with C++'s nothing, then the
module system in D is infinitely
On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 15:13:28 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 08:35:40AM +, tsbockman via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 07:52:11 UTC, Jack Stouffer
wrote:
>dmd is now in D; theoretically that should allow for other
>projects to import from it
On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 05:36:23 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 05:29:03 UTC, Jack Stouffer
wrote:
On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 05:11:57 UTC, Joakim wrote:
The ddmd lexer is already on dub, just have to add the parser
next:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/ddmd
On Friday, 15 January 2016 at 23:58:32 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Friday, 15 January 2016 at 04:53:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/1196
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/5352
Destroy!!
Andrei
Since dmd is now in D
On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 16:32:38 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:09:29AM -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]
Yes, this needs to be fixed. -- Andrei
This issue has been known for a long time:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10378
On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 15:32:10 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 14:40:05 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 13:47:39 UTC, Dibyendu
Majumdar wrote:
I did find that I had to go through many articles, video
presentations etc. to form my c
On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 13:47:39 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
Hi
I wrote recently that I am looking at an alternative to C++ for
a project currently being coded in C++. I am pleased to say
based on preliminary investigations I have chosen D over Go,
Rust, and Swift. I have yet to wri
On Wednesday, 13 January 2016 at 00:00:17 UTC, israel wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 January 2016 at 23:26:07 UTC, karabuta wrote:
Anyone has the fuel and time to take the initiative? It will
probably take over HTTP.
Currently implemented in Go with JavaScript and Python on the
way. However it seems m
On Tuesday, 12 January 2016 at 13:17:16 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 13:13 +0100, Jacob Carlborg via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
[…]
[...]
I tried on Debian Sid. I have both LLVM 3.6 and 3.7 installed
(3.6 is still the default but I am using 3.7 to build LDC.
I have yet
On Saturday, 9 January 2016 at 19:43:03 UTC, Jakob Jenkov wrote:
Hi,
What is the status of cross compiling D to multiple platforms?
I know it is possible, but how easy is it? How many issues do
you have to mess with on different platforms?
What about ARM / Android support?
And what about Op
On Saturday, 9 January 2016 at 17:29:34 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Saturday, 9 January 2016 at 16:58:15 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Saturday, 9 January 2016 at 14:01:20 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
Copy protection. Anti-piracy measure in hardware.
Heh, the web had none until very recentl
On Saturday, 9 January 2016 at 14:01:20 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Saturday, 9 January 2016 at 13:43:09 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Saturday, 9 January 2016 at 10:13:01 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Saturday, 9 January 2016 at 04:24:05 UTC, Joakim wrote:
How is it "political?" My predic
On Saturday, 9 January 2016 at 10:13:01 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Saturday, 9 January 2016 at 04:24:05 UTC, Joakim wrote:
How is it "political?" My prediction is entirely geared
around hardware and software realities.
No, businesses don't want P2P, client-server is the ultimate
dong
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 19:21:30 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 18:31:37 UTC, Joakim wrote:
decide that for yourself. In any case, since it's still using
the same client-server approach as the web, I don't think it
matters: that entire approach is doomed.
S
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 18:01:39 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 04:10:58 UTC, Joakim wrote:
OK, not a full C competitor, but taking some of the
higher-level work. I think D could take all of C's domain,
Walter certainly knows how.
He has categorically refu
s will say what kind of data they contain, and the client
will construct UIs tailored for the various kinds of message data
it receives.
On Thursday, 7 January 2016 at 13:32:40 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 16:52 +, Joakim via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[…]
We're talking
On Wednesday, 6 January 2016 at 18:52:05 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 January 2016 at 16:52:34 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Swift is dumbed down?
Yes, they are streamlining for apps. It is ARC through and
through. They are removing things like "++", currying and
C-style for-loops;
On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 16:54:32 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 15:20:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
D probably should aim for a lower ceiling and keep focus on
"advanced features". Go and Swift will try to stay "dumbed
down", like Java and C# to remain attractive to
On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 23:05:49 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 22:18:22 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
Intel compiler, please. ;)
Or at least some good story for SIMD on Win32. Although I
didn't really check how good/bad D is now in this regard.
D frontend + Intel b
On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 10:49:06 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 04:19:33 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Because they're much higher up.
Yes, but the languages that are on the rise are cutting into
the existing languages. It is difficult to predict when they
hit a cei
On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 13:42:26 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 13:24:58 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I plan on using the new Android support to build a mobile app
entirely in D, with some components running on the server, ie
"cloud," at least initially.
[...]
I don'
On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 12:27:12 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
I wonder what kind of programming people plan or _hope_ to use
D for in 2016?
Do you have plans to:
1. migrate legacy C++ code bases to D when C++ bindings are
final?
2. integrate with numerical solutions like TensorFlow
On Monday, 4 January 2016 at 20:25:09 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 4 January 2016 at 11:12:49 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I don't think Go's even hit the second tier yet, ie python and
ruby, certainly not in the first tier with Java and C, though
tough for such a young language to get up t
501 - 600 of 1023 matches
Mail list logo
