On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:05:30 +
Xinok via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Well, the error the compiler prints is:
Error: forward reference to inferred return type of function call
'correct'
I played with it a bit and it seems to deduce a common type from
all the
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:24:07 +
via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Thursday, 15 January 2015 at 00:13:38 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
So could you please tell me a good use case to for using return
type deduction?
Templates.
and returning voldemort types.
signature.asc
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 02:05:09 +
deadalnix via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 at 12:43:05 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:37:22 +
Bruno Medeiros via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
On 10
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 01:01:26 +
via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Friday, 16 January 2015 at 00:48:57 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Thursday, 15 January 2015 at 21:29:28 UTC, Tobias Müller
wrote:
In a well-designed interface, every function specifies all the
errors
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 08:10:50 -0800
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
On 1/16/15 7:50 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:20:32PM -0800, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 17:16:38 +
Tobias Pankrath via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Friday, 16 January 2015 at 16:22:13 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 08:10:50 -0800
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:23:02 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 1/16/2015 9:49 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm thinking of something like: if there's $(legitimate) request for
changes but
the author is dormant for more than $(X) days, then
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 00:38:08 +
Luc Bourhis via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Testing constness implementation is easy:
const Foo a;
a.non_const_method(); // compilation fails
but how would I catch that in a unittest?
i don't think that you can do it with one
Hello.
there is a link in side menu: downloadtools-debugger. it leads to
http://dlang.org/debugger.html which is missing.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 08:33:49 +
deadalnix via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
This is accepted :
auto fun(T)(T T) inout if(...) { ... }
This is not :
auto fun(T)(T T) if(...) inout { ... }
Is there a reason ?
the first is easier to parse, and i it's looking better.
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:55:31 +
deadalnix via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Saturday, 17 January 2015 at 16:02:16 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 08:33:49 +
deadalnix via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:22:52 -0500
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
On 1/20/15 8:54 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Hello.
is there any officially dead newsgroups on dlang.org that nobody
sees, yet they still working and can be used to test my
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 22:35:16 -0300
Ary Borenszweig via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 1/19/15 9:17 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/19/2015 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without an IDE?
I do a text search for the
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:49:47 +
MattCoder via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 13:47:11 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
void function foo () { ... }
foo();
do you see the subtle difference? yes, that tiny whitespace
Hello.
is there any officially dead newsgroups on dlang.org that nobody
sees, yet they still working and can be used to test my simple nntp
code?
yes, i know that i can setup local nntp server and play with it, but i
want to test it on dlang groups to see if it's really working, and i
can't up
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:17:56 +
Meta via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 18:12:27 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Hello.
as there is no possibility to doing GC allocations in class
destructors, wouldn't it be nice to just force
Hello.
as there is no possibility to doing GC allocations in class
destructors, wouldn't it be nice to just force @nogc attribute on
such dtors?
i know, i know, this will break alot of code. i'm pretty sure that
this will break alot of INVALID code, which better be broken at
compile-time anyway.
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:14:42 +
Meta via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I'm trying to build to build DMD and I've encountered a very
strange problem. When I run `make -fwin32.mak`, there are errors
when it tries to compile id.c:
id.c(298) : Error: 'idPool' is not a
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:39:14 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Why even ship such a product you have no intention of fixing bugs for? It's a
net negative for one's image.
ah, that's a different question! i don't know why they still shipping
it instead of
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:56:53 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 08:19:39 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
i even knew how to quit vi
ctrl-c?
nope! it beeps. ;-)
Duh! Don't console programs know, what ctrl-c
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:16:47 +
Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 01:52:51 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 01:44:07 +
Vlad Levenfeld via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:36:46 +
MattCoder via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 13:19:00 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
It is a lot easier to just run wine dmd and distribute the
finished exe than it is to copy all the development files to
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:40:48 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I find this utterly baffling. Why make it so difficult to report a bug?
Microsoft has always been like this, the only way I've ever been able to
submit
a bug report was if I had a friend
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:29:21 +
Kapps via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 18:12:27 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
let's see how this proposal will be rejected. will there be
some sane
reasons, or only the good old song about
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:34:54 +
Freddy via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 18:12:27 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Hello.
as there is no possibility to doing GC allocations in class
destructors, wouldn't it be nice to just force
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:41:15 +
Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
Not an error, Make it a warning.
alas, attribute violations are errors. turning that into
warning means
that compiler needs new flags and new code to determine if that
is
hard
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:30:16 +
Meta via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 22:25:18 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
if you'll make a PR, it would be good to change other
invocations too:
optabgen and impcnvgen.
I have; the PR
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:51:17 -0500
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
p.s. another point is that all mechanics compiler needs for doing such
checks is already there, so it's not a huge change to compiler
codebase. it's not something that requires adding a
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:37:54 +
via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 21:29:40 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
How's that? The current runtime aborts on memory allocation
inside the GC collection routine, it's not a memory safety
issue.
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:51:17 -0500
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
On 1/20/15 3:39 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
and all that mess can be avoided just by enforcing the one simple rule,
which compiler is perfectly able to check.
I think
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:11:29 +
Meta via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 20:50:49 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
this may be timestamp-related somehow, 'cause make looks only to
timestamps to determine which file(s) should be rebuild
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:30:14 -0500
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
On 1/20/15 4:06 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:51:17 -0500
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
p.s. another
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:40:57 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
So, what do you think? Should we merge this, or should we not?
please, please, please! please, whoever can do it: just merge it right
away! you can revert chat changes later, but if it will go into
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:34:21 +
deadalnix via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Saturday, 17 January 2015 at 17:08:12 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
sure i have. i made alot of patches to the parser, so i know
how it
is written. to make this work parser need
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:18:17 -0800
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
I took the better part of today working on this:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/780. See demo
at http://erdani.com/d/.
What do you all think? Is it an
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:05:25 +
MattCoder via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Saturday, 17 January 2015 at 18:04:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I think http://dlang.org/overview.html is long in the tooth and
needs a rewrite or replacement. It's not appropriate
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 18:34:36 -0800
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
With all this discussion on more dynamic content on dlang.org, I sat
down (figuratively; I've been on a hike today) and thought - what is
dynamic about D?
So it hit me like a
for those who may be interested, i put my dirty hack there:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14008
feel free to not use it.
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:51:02 +
Alexey T. via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins
with keyword. def of func. e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
or
func myName(params...) - typeOfResult;
easier to
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:09:44 -0800
Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Reduced:
import std.container;
class Node
{
SList!Node children;
}
void main()
{}
Error: class deneme.Node no size yet for forward reference
I wonder why an SList of a
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:29:57 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 16:34:26 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
i even knew how to quit vi
ctrl-c?
nope! it beeps. ;-)
Duh! Don't console programs know, what ctrl-c
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:12:33 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:08:29PM +, Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 14:00:54 UTC, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
[...]
So what you are saying is
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:51:26 +
bearophile via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Kiith-Sa:
http://developers.slashdot.org/story/15/01/20/2026221/is-d-an-underrated-programming-language?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanonutm_medium=feed
One interesting comment:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 01:44:07 +
Vlad Levenfeld via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
i can see how this thread slowly turning into how i was forced to live
with windows and how painful it was thread. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:51:34 -0500
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
You can always put @nogc on the dtor if you want.
seems that you completely missing my point. (sigh)
Nope, not missing it. The mechanics are there. You just have to annotate.
that
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 01:07:03 +
Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 01:04:11 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
two days making dmd.exe work with Wine to write the simple
utility which i can write in two hours using
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:06:59 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 01:56:32AM +, Vlad Levenfeld via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 01:52:51 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 01:44:07
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:02:53 -0500
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
You may be able to, but I don't see the point. writeln can work
perfectly fine for the most part inside dtors. But it can't be marked nogc.
now, that's really nice. it's wrong, it can
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:15:43 +
Meta via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 22:03:27 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 21:57:56 UTC, Meta wrote:
The only things in my path when I run make are:
C:\D\dmd2\windows\bin
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 07:56:47 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 02:23:03 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
i even knew how to quit vi
ctrl-c?
nope! it beeps. ;-)
BTW, is there a way to make the shell autocomplete file
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:43:04 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I almost nuked my
entire system with a mistyped `rm -rf` command, as I'm sure every *nix
person has at least once in his life
my expirience was simply doing `chmod -R 600 /` as root. lucky me.
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 06:08:49 +
Israel via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 01:07:04 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 01:04:11 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
two days making dmd.exe work with Wine
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:22:59 +
Meta via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
what is that id.c at all? i can't find such file in dmd git
repo...
It's generated by idgen.exe, which is compiled from idgen.c. I'm
not sure why, exactly.
ah, sorry, i should read your post
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:30:00 +
Jonathan Marler via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 03:28:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/19/2015 7:20 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Yes. Search Again is a single button press. It really has
never occurred to
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:25:13 +
Meta via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 18:25:42 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
how likely this to be changed? is there *any* chances of that
in 2015?
2016? and why we can't just remove
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:22:59 +
Meta via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
ah, and id.obj, of course. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:37:03 +
Meta via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 20:33:58 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:22:59 +
Meta via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
what is that id.c
and i found what is wrong here. ah, not exactly *what* is wrong,
but *where* it goes mad: it's root/async.c. i don't know what
Wine did wrong there, but it keep crashing in that threaded
reader. and *sometimes* it works. i turned that messy thingy off,
and voila! dmd.exe is not crashing under
Hello.
it seems that current dmd.exe segfaults in Wine (at least on my
GNU/Linux x86 box, with freshly created WINEPREFIX), which forces me to
switch between windoze VM and working environment if i want to write
some win32 program (and i have to :-( ).
so i have a bunch of questions:
1. does
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 17:32:28 +
Joakim via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I used dmd under Wine years ago and didn't have a problem
building a small utility, no recent use though.
the strange thing is that is sometimes works... once in a while it is
able to build hello.d,
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:56:23 +
Jens Bauer via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 18:16:47 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
Unfortunately, this would break existing code:
That is absolutely correct. Good catch. I did not think of that
particular case.
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 23:16:11 +
Jens Bauer via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I'd like to give an example on a different use of the same
feature:
while(length--)
{
*d++ = *s++;
}
if(length == -1) /* the programmer will need to know the value
of length here.
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 23:20:43 +
Jens Bauer via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
-A rejection will not stop me from making another proposal,
though - in fact, I do have one more. ;)
sure, you're welcome! this one is not so good, but another one may be
brilliant. and even if
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 23:47:30 +
MattCoder via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 21:27:25 UTC, NVolcz wrote:
Googles pagespeed also gives some nice guidelines:
https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=dlang.org
Nice and for
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 19:39:24 +, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 19:37:11 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
Might be of use to someone, but I was looking for ways to speed up
dmd's albeit already fast compilation times.
Just by dropping in jemalloc in place of glibc's malloc
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:32:59 +, weaselcat wrote:
I see it as quite a shame that people repeatedly say they actively avoid
using classes in D in favor of structs where possible, until forced to
use classes.
it has nothing with GC per se, i just don't like the concept. not
epsecially D
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:51:19 -0800, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
and (2) I don't have a Windows machine to test changes to win32.mak,
I think you can run DM make under Wine.
Interesting.
yep, the whole dmd can be built under wine, using tools from dmc and dmc
itself. everything works
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:21:41 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/11/2015 1:37 PM, ketmar wrote:
yep, the whole dmd can be built under wine, using tools from dmc and
dmc itself. everything works like a charm (except dmd.exe itself, which
is broken ;-).
Bugzilla issue?
sure i did, along with
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:21:59 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/11/2015 2:34 PM, ketmar wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:21:41 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/11/2015 1:37 PM, ketmar wrote:
yep, the whole dmd can be built under wine, using tools from dmc and
dmc itself. everything works like a
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:46:20 +, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Monday, 9 February 2015 at 14:47:09 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 13:48:55 +, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
Everybody talks about it, but nobody does anything about it!
-- Mark Twain
Was the Mark Twain quote intentional?
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:00:45 -0500, Etienne wrote:
I'd like to announce the first release of Botan, which implements all
features of v1.11.10 in the C++ library.
I gave special attention to properly translating it to correct D code.
It only runs with DMD master for now, only tested on
On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 18:19:49 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Folks, we want to get 2.067 out the door on March 1. That's two short
weeks from now. We really need all hands on deck to make this a
successful release.
we can't. this issue, for example, was known for monthes (or, maybe,
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 12:16:50 +, rupert wrote:
If you think you could do a better job than the C++ committee you should
submit a proposal.
https://isocpp.org/std/submit-a-proposal
why he *should* to that? he *may* submit it. when someone sees people
doing shit, he is not obliged to
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:36:57 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* There is no added value to D users in splitting algorithm.d into a
package.
* Even the value to contributors is debatable and definitely low impact.
* The documentation is in shambles.
All told we're looking at a net
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:14:50 -0500, Etienne Cimon wrote:
So many nice projects :D
We have such sights to show you!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:35:08 +, Joakim wrote:
accompanied by benchmarks of the C++ and D code
it's better to keep silence. dmd was never very good in optimising
code. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:14:50 -0500, Etienne Cimon wrote:
I'll be working on HTTP/2 with websocket-style full duplex
communications once this is done, and then a CMS that has a windows
explorer-like desktop front-end with a redis filesystem and distributed
node management. So many nice
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 20:29:33 +, Will Cassella wrote:
Anyway, if anyone here can give me advice on whether I should transition
or not, I'd appreciate it.
do you really expecting the answer no, stay with C++ in newsgroup that
is dedicated to D language? ;-)
as for some of your answer...
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 21:24:42 +, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 18 February 2015 at 20:48, ketmar via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
GDC compiler is able to produce ARM code (and maybe LDC too, i don't
know),
GDC and LDC are able to produce any code. It's
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:16:38 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
Why you did it doesn't matter. What matters is you did it and
contributed it. Also, just because it wasn't reported before doesn't
mean it wasn't happening to people. The vast majority will see a bug,
and just dump the compiler and move
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 21:12:26 +, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thursday, 12 February 2015 at 20:16:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Me, for example, I very very rarely bother to report a bug in a product
I use. The reason isn't because I am lazy (although I am). It's because
companies make it
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:09:59 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/11/2015 3:34 PM, ketmar wrote:
no, i didn't found anything else. with this patch dmd with wine works
perfectly -- no crashes since then.
Thanks again for finding the problem and posting a fix.
now i feel ashamed, 'cause i did
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:18:28 +, Brian Schott wrote:
I've been looking for a graphical front-end for GDB that's not terrible,
and I've found that Nemiver works pretty well. It's worth trying out if
you're on Linux.
https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Nemiver/Features
if only they drop that
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:47:43 +, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 January 2015 at 08:07:11 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 01:32:21 +, Mike wrote:
i started the process of migration of all our work projects
(i'm a head of software company with ~100 employees, if anybody
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:11:55 +, Jonathan Marler wrote:
This has become quite frustrating. I'm not sure how else to explain
myself so maybe I'm just being dumb.
you are dumb. you can be dumb for some time, and then BANG! your proposal
is silently made right. yet you're still dumb. that is
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:56:00 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/26/2015 2:15 PM, Foo wrote:
Because you/we are community members and therefore second-class
citizens. If we suggest or discuss something, it is not that
important. But if a small reddit post is made, it matters more.
Major
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 01:32:21 +, Mike wrote:
In fact, it is the attitude against change that has put me on the fence
about D, when I was quite an advocate about a year ago. It has also
made me reluctant to put forth the necessary effort to study and make
any significant contributions
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:30:43 +, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 January 2015 at 07:50:36 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:11:55 +, Jonathan Marler wrote:
This has become quite frustrating. I'm not sure how else to explain
myself so maybe I'm just being dumb.
you are
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:44:17 +, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 January 2015 at 08:07:11 UTC, ketmar wrote:
heh. i was very passionate about D, and i started the process of
migration of all our work projects (i'm a head of software company with
~100 employees, if anybody is interested) to
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 23:07:44 +, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
dlangui doesn't depend upon it.
that dependency was removed since then.
And isn't aware of different versions.
of course. that's why it failed on my FreeImage: my library is older than
the one that Derelict is expecting to find, and
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:04:55 +1300, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
First off, Derelict-Util/Derelict-GL3 is a biggy here. Its old code,
lets admit it. Its also a standard for loading shared library functions.
please, not Derelict! it's a great work and all that, but it's habit to
load ALL functions
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:21:52 +, Jonathan Marler wrote:
Interesting points. Thanks for the response, it's a relief to hear
people making sense :)
the funny thing is that Ola is a kind of bad child too. heh.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:43:12 +, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
Hey, I have gray hairs in my beard!
me too!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:20:41 +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-01-26 20:50, Walter Bright wrote:
It's good to have this discussion.
Previously, it's all been advocacy and break my code by forcing a
change from pure = @pure.
Just a few days ago on slashdot, an anonymous D user wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 06:58:41 +, Tom wrote:
Or is there now the possibility of disabling the GC altogether, or
replacing it with a refcounting 'GC' etc?
you still can do manual memory management with `malloc()` and friends.
but you must be very cautious with dynamic arrays and slices. may
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:36:22 +0900, Mike Parker wrote:
On 1/28/2015 7:54 AM, ketmar wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:04:55 +1300, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
First off, Derelict-Util/Derelict-GL3 is a biggy here. Its old code,
lets admit it. Its also a standard for loading shared library
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 02:32:44 +, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 January 2015 at 00:58:41 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 23:07:44 +, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
dlangui doesn't depend upon it.
that dependency was removed since then.
And isn't aware of different versions.
of
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:53:09 +0100, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Microsoft does not have a offical C compiler. They only have a C++
compiler. And as a result they are also not supporting C99, they only
support that part of C which is required by C++ and afaik C99 is not
required by the C++ standard.
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:54:27 +, Zach the Mystic wrote:
I think a keyword is a keyword is a keyword. If it's a keyword to the
right it should be one everywhere. How is somethign that's a built-in
attribute one place and an identifier in another not context sensitive.
yep. that is slave to
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:29:26 +, Brian Schott wrote:
On Thursday, 29 January 2015 at 00:14:51 UTC, ketmar wrote:
that's good. as we already have at least 4 codebases to build tools
upon,
and you gave up using that and insisting on writing another one, and
failed... i doubt that your tool
901 - 1000 of 3410 matches
Mail list logo
