I have the need to create an enum flag like structure to specify
certain properties of a type easily.
e.g.,
enum properties
{
Red,
Blue,
Hot,
Sexy,
Active,
...
}
But some properties will be mutually exclusive. I would like to
contain all those rules for in the enum itself
On Thursday, 19 January 2017 at 02:51:03 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 19/01/2017 3:35 PM, Ignacious wrote:
On Thursday, 19 January 2017 at 02:25:44 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Thursday, 19 January 2017 at 02:15:04 UTC, rikki
cattermole wrote:
On 19/01/2017 3:08 PM, Ignacious wrote:
On Thursday, 19 January 2017 at 02:25:44 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 19 January 2017 at 02:15:04 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 19/01/2017 3:08 PM, Ignacious wrote:
class Y
{
int y;
alias y this;
}
class X
{
Y[] x;
alias x this;
}
This should not fail:
X x = new
class Y
{
int y;
alias y this;
}
class X
{
Y[] x;
alias x this;
}
Yet X ~= 3; fails.
3 should be implicitly convertible to Y and then ~ should assign
it.
?
string concatenation is weird.
We can do stuff like
writeln(x);
where x is, say a struct and it prints fine
but when we do
writeln(x ~ " ok");
it fails and requires us to convert x!
Why can't string concatenation automatically try to convert the
arguments? Is there any reason this is bad
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 11:32:10 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
You can utilize a little-known `switch` syntax trick in
combination with `foreach`. Because a `foreach` over tuples is
unrolled at compile time, it works even if your fields don't
have exactly the same types:
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 08:30:04 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 05:29:49 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
enum XX
{
X = Q.X.offsetof,
Y = Q.Y.offsetof
//ect.
}
and then
*(cast(void*)(this) + x) = e; //if inside struct/class
or
*(cast(void*)(q) + x) = e; // if
When doing common functionality for a switch, is there any way to
optimize:
switch(x)
{
case X:
q.X = e;
break;
case Y:
q.Y = e;
break
etc...
}
e is basically a value that, depending on the what kind(x), we
assign it to a field in q. The name of
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 01:40:58 UTC, Chris M. wrote:
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 21:53:29 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 19:30:40 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:19:57 +, Ignacious wrote:
[...]
LGPL is much more common, and LGPL isn't a
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 20:40:32 UTC, mustafa wrote:
dfdsfsd
afdsaaf?
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 22:57:09 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 22:22:12 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
Like, which arguments actually pass and which ones fail, etc.
Yes, I agree entirely. This would be a HUGE usability bonus,
far better than most the other things
It would be EXTREMELY helpful if dmd would give a better result
than
main.d(30): Error: template main.Do cannot deduce function from
argument types !(1, string, int)(2, "adf"), candidates are:
main.d(6):main.Do(int x, string y, alias Q)(int z, string
q)
Like, which arguments
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 19:30:40 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:19:57 +, Ignacious wrote:
Yes, but D uses mostly bindings and if any of those bindings
use it then It effects the D program that uses it. Since many
of the bindings are written in C/C++ one can expect
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 15:56:40 UTC, Claude wrote:
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 15:15:14 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 12:01:22 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
This is not the proper place to blog about software license
preferences or to make unsubstantiated accusations
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 06:37:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 02:25:03 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 01:27:02 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
[...]
That makes no sense(it's obvious by the definition of
derivative so you are not saying anything
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 12:01:22 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 02:25:03 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
[...]
This is not the proper place to blog about software license
preferences or to make unsubstantiated accusations against an
organization you don't like. There are
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 01:27:02 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
You offer an API and someone decides to build on it using the
GPL -- no trouble there; your work is not a derivative of
theirs, so their copyright cannot place restrictions on your
work.
That makes no sense(it's obvious by the
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html
http://z505.com/cgi-bin/qkcont/qkcont.cgi?p=Please%20Stop%20Using%20GNU%20Licenses
http://gng.z505.com/cult.htm
And, I should point out:
"If I write a plug-in to use with a GPL-covered program, what
On Wednesday, 11 January 2017 at 19:23:10 UTC, Razvan Nitu wrote:
Hi,
I am currently trying to create a function
makeMultidimensionalArray which allocates memory for a
multidimensional array. It is very similar with [1],
the difference being that it is uninitialized. Here is the code:
auto
On Wednesday, 11 January 2017 at 03:49:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 January 2017 at 18:48:17 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
[...]
It's probably not easier, and in any case, android-x86 won't be
supported, largely because I don't have any working x86 devices.
[...]
Ok, well the x86 thing
On Wednesday, 11 January 2017 at 19:23:10 UTC, Razvan Nitu wrote:
Hi,
I am currently trying to create a function
makeMultidimensionalArray which allocates memory for a
multidimensional array. It is very similar with [1],
the difference being that it is uninitialized. Here is the code:
auto
Well, I posed a reply but I guess it didn't get though ;/
I'm only suing android-x86 because I thought it would be easier
to test/debug. My device is a cortex-arm7.
Two questions I have:
1. In the command lines present there is a lot of use of `x86`. I
used them to compile the hello world
It would be nice, also, if when we click on a link in the forum
that it takes us to the last page/message(Scrolls down to it)
rather than forcing us to do this. Most of the time we don't want
to have to either read through all the messages or click on the
last page in the first place. If we
On Tuesday, 10 January 2017 at 02:05:34 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 9 January 2017 at 23:08:49 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
I try to post something, thinks it's spam, asks me to solve
the captcha, then when I do, says I have to wait to post...
which I do, then asks me to solve the captcha,
On Monday, 9 January 2017 at 23:08:49 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
I try to post something, thinks it's spam, asks me to solve the
captcha, then when I do, says I have to wait to post... which I
do, then asks me to solve the captcha, then wait to post, then
asks me to solve the captcha, etc... ad
How difficult is it to build for x86/x64?
Would be nice to be able to use something like
http://www.android-x86.org/
as a test instead of an actual device.
Does one simply have to use the proper ldc2/dmd and link in the
correct libs? or is it more complex?
Also, I'm a bit confused on how
I try to post something, thinks it's spam, asks me to solve the
captcha, then when I do, says I have to wait to post... which I
do, then asks me to solve the captcha, then wait to post, then
asks me to solve the captcha, etc... ad infinitum.
On Monday, 9 January 2017 at 08:28:04 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Monday, 9 January 2017 at 00:40:35 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
On Sunday, 8 January 2017 at 22:19:31 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 8 January 2017 at 21:52:01 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
Not sure what is going on, of course ;) So much BS just to
Just reporting here that I was able to get a hello world working
using windows and UoW.
Some issues I had:
1. Had issues with outdated libraries. (ncurses, gcc, etc)
2. UoW Aniversary is based on Ubuntu 14, I was able to upgrade to
16.04 following online sources. Lots of snags but eventually
On Sunday, 8 January 2017 at 22:19:31 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 8 January 2017 at 21:52:01 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
Not sure what is going on, of course ;) So much BS just to do
something that is suppose to be simple ;)
test.d
void main()
{
}
here is test.o
On Sunday, 8 January 2017 at 20:34:21 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 8 January 2017 at 19:58:06 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
I suppose it will be easier to install a real ubuntu distro
rather than relying on windows? All these issues seem to be
related to outdated versions?
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Yeah, not a good idea to build from source yourself. Try the
advice here, ie see if you can install a package with that
library or just symlink to the older library if not:
http://askubuntu.com/questions/771047/erlang-error-while-loading-shared-libraries-libncursesw-so-6
Well, the only
On Friday, 6 January 2017 at 15:47:21 UTC, Igor Myronov wrote:
Hi there comunity !!!
Im an beginner in programming MCU ,but i'm already programming
in D and also here im an absolute beginner.
So ,my question is :
Is possible to program in D micro*-controllers like the PIC32 ?
Thanks to all.
when one prints out a string with some extended(I guess it's
unicode), writeln prints out the ascii versions that do not
correspond to what they really are. e.g., an umlaut is printed
out as 1/2 or something.
how to get it to print the correct codes?
On Monday, 2 January 2017 at 03:08:10 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 1 January 2017 at 09:34:24 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
Can you try
sudo apt-get install libconfig9
I don't know if that will install something different, but
it's the command I see others using online. Otherwise, check
if the
Can you try
sudo apt-get install libconfig9
I don't know if that will install something different, but it's
the command I see others using online. Otherwise, check if the
libconfig++9 package you installed included libconfig.so.9,
which is what ldc is linked against. If not, install the
On Saturday, 31 December 2016 at 12:31:07 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
On Saturday, 31 December 2016 at 11:39:39 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
[...]
Oh and `kernel` could be a template function that would need
its args forwarded to it.
Alias it away using a wrapper?
On Thursday, 29 December 2016 at 10:14:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 December 2016 at 23:33:57 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
What is the current status for building android apps in D? I
would like to create simple graphic based apps but don't wanna
get bogged down in trying to get car moving
On Saturday, 31 December 2016 at 06:33:10 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
On Saturday, 31 December 2016 at 05:52:00 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
On Thursday, 29 December 2016 at 10:14:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[...]
Is there any way to get a package that works for windows?
While the steps don't seem too
On Saturday, 31 December 2016 at 05:52:00 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
On Thursday, 29 December 2016 at 10:14:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[...]
Is there any way to get a package that works for windows? While
the steps don't seem too difficult to do, things never go well
for me(something always breaks...
On Thursday, 29 December 2016 at 10:14:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 December 2016 at 23:33:57 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
What is the current status for building android apps in D? I
would like to create simple graphic based apps but don't wanna
get bogged down in trying to get car moving
On Thursday, 29 December 2016 at 10:14:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 December 2016 at 23:33:57 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
What is the current status for building android apps in D? I
would like to create simple graphic based apps but don't wanna
get bogged down in trying to get car moving
What is the current status for building android apps in D? I
would like to create simple graphic based apps but don't wanna
get bogged down in trying to get car moving without any wheels.
On Sunday, 25 December 2016 at 09:44:07 UTC, Doug wrote:
On Sunday, 25 December 2016 at 07:30:39 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
Given that Christmas is one of the hugest fabrications in
human history, I find this very difficult to believe! (or
simply to cover all bases, quite easy to believe)
xmas is
On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 22:14:08 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1724
Ho-ho-ho!
Andrei
Given that Christmas is one of the hugest fabrications in human
history, I find this very difficult to believe! (or simply to
cover all bases, quite easy
Would it be difficult to implement the following, or something
with similar capabilities, as a patch to dmd?
Create a compiler that lets one use actual code as templates.
e.g., a text block of a function can be referenced by in the code
using a "dom" to modify that code similar to how we can
46 matches
Mail list logo
