On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 22:04:45 UTC, w0rp wrote:
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 16:32:15 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 27.07.2014 00:54, schrieb w0rp:
You can see some running examples on the site now.
http://w0rp.com:8010/library/std.parallelism/
cool stuff, congrats on the progress, i
Thanks for the response! I do agree that the colors are way too
hot (I've must've been quite tired when I submitted that mockup)
Someone noted that the concept that I pitched had too much
whitespace, which is a sentiment that I do not share. There's a
lot of issues with the readability in the
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 02:36:22 UTC, Hubert wrote:
You may feel that a Getting started section and simplified
link/navigation structure might be insulting or inefficient,
but is the site supposed to cater to the entrenched
D-practitioners? As long as the readability and the layout of
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 02:36:21AM +, Hubert via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Thanks for the response! I do agree that the colors are way too hot
(I've must've been quite tired when I submitted that mockup)
Someone noted that the concept that I pitched had too much whitespace,
which is a
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 15:16:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 15:14:05 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 12:09:38 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
It probably looks good as a landing page for a newcomers but
I will annoyed with extra forced navigation very
On 08/21/2014 01:37 PM, Théo Bueno mun...@gmx.com wrote:
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 17:31:45 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 17:24:28 UTC, Théo Bueno wrote:
Also please avoid personal insults :P
I wasn't insulting, my intention was to mention the fact that
this
On 08/21/2014 12:59 AM, Hubert wrote:
First I wanna say that I've become a huge fan of D, and I hope one day I can
replace all my creative projects with a D codebase. With that said, I do
agree that D could use a redesign. I've not been monitoring this thread very
closely, but the design
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 04:59:20 UTC, Hubert wrote:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/oicmwoboku136jq/dlang_test_redesign.png
My emphasis has been on creating a friendly first impression; a
lightweight page to introduce newcomers to D and get them
started quickly.
+1 Cool look! The
On 21/08/14 06:59, Hubert wrote:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/oicmwoboku136jq/dlang_test_redesign.png
I kind of like the structure of the page, but not the colors.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 04:59:20 UTC, Hubert wrote:
First I wanna say that I've become a huge fan of D, and I hope
one day I can replace all my creative projects with a D
codebase. With that said, I do agree that D could use a
redesign. I've not been monitoring this thread very closely,
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:09:37 +
Dicebot via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
It probably looks good as a landing page for a newcomers but I
will annoyed with extra forced navigation very quick through
daily usage of the web site. It sacrifices productivity in favor
of
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 04:59:20 UTC, Hubert wrote:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/oicmwoboku136jq/dlang_test_redesign.png
That does look quite nice. It may be a bit *too* minimalist, and
the colours aren't right, but the design is solid.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 04:59:18AM +, Hubert via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
https://www.dropbox.com/s/oicmwoboku136jq/dlang_test_redesign.png
My emphasis has been on creating a friendly first impression; a
lightweight page to introduce newcomers to D and get them started
quickly. I think
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 12:09:38 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
It probably looks good as a landing page for a newcomers but I
will annoyed with extra forced navigation very quick through
daily usage of the web site. It sacrifices productivity in
favor of good looks.
Hmm... I don't remember,
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 15:14:05 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 12:09:38 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
It probably looks good as a landing page for a newcomers but I
will annoyed with extra forced navigation very quick through
daily usage of the web site. It sacrifices
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 04:59:20 UTC, Hubert wrote:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/oicmwoboku136jq/dlang_test_redesign.png
This is a brilliant idea, except for the logo. We have one, and
with it an identity, and we should not loose it.
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 12:09:38 UTC, Dicebot
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 17:12:38 UTC, Théo Bueno wrote:
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 12:09:38 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
It probably looks good as a landing page for a newcomers but I
will annoyed with extra forced navigation very quick through
daily usage of the web site. It sacrifices
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 17:15:30 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I prefer to have my cake and eat it at the same time. There is
no reason why it can't have better navigation while making
important information highlighted and visually eye-catching.
Of course :)
Also please avoid personal insults
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 17:24:28 UTC, Théo Bueno wrote:
Also please avoid personal insults :P
I wasn't insulting, my intention was to mention the fact that
this argument is not entirely a matter of productivity, but a
fear of change.
I was referring to Don't forget that programmers
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 17:12:38 UTC, Théo Bueno wrote:
There is too much links in our actual homepage, newcomers are
simply lost, we absolutely need to light it, to make it more
friendly.
Also, please see this message :
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/euxbskjjoetrwrqtk...@forum.dlang.org
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 17:31:45 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 17:24:28 UTC, Théo Bueno wrote:
Also please avoid personal insults :P
I wasn't insulting, my intention was to mention the fact that
this argument is not entirely a matter of productivity, but a
fear of
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 04:59:20 UTC, Hubert wrote:
First I wanna say that I've become a huge fan of D, and I hope
one day I can replace all my creative projects with a D
codebase. With that said, I do agree that D could use a
redesign. I've not been monitoring this thread very closely,
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 06:10:09 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/26/14, 8:47 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 07:39:50PM -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 7/26/14, 6:30 PM, w0rp wrote:
The std.algortihm documentation doesn't look
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 15:16:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I check various parts of documentation (not DDOC-generates
Phobos part but manually written articles) on a regular basis.
It is often faster to find via navigating then search query
because term usage is spread all across.
But you
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 04:59:20 UTC, Hubert wrote:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/oicmwoboku136jq/dlang_test_redesign.png
My emphasis has been on creating a friendly first impression; a
lightweight page to introduce newcomers to D and get them
started quickly. I think this is a sane design
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:12:37 +
via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Don't forget that programmers are hipsters, and we need to take
care of our image.
i'm glad that i'm not a programmer then.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
First I wanna say that I've become a huge fan of D, and I hope
one day I can replace all my creative projects with a D codebase.
With that said, I do agree that D could use a redesign. I've not
been monitoring this thread very closely, but the design
suggestions I've seen so far has
Random guy here. I think the redesign is good. Populating the On
This Page box with the function, enum etc. names would be nice.
Preserving some form of site/page link navigation in the narrow
mode is essential, be it switching to boxes at the top/bottom of
the page or minimizing/maximizing
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 17:23:37 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
It is frustrating because i want this to be done well as it
could really help D take off.
Doing it on LAMP won't help D to take off. In a sense, you don't
even criticize this work, as a professional web designer, you can
provide
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 19:13:12 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Also who starts a project without designing it first? I mean
honestly, why start such a major piece of work without even a
vague spec? Has w0rp even asked users here what the site needs
to encompass? Has the question been asked
Am 29.07.2014 00:54, schrieb w0rp:
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 22:38:10 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I'll look at playing with the style of the documentation pages some more
another evening. I've had a few ideas for improvements, and I obviously
still need to include syntax highlighting. Is this the
On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 08:27:40 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 29.07.2014 00:54, schrieb w0rp:
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 22:38:10 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I'll look at playing with the style of the documentation
pages some more
another evening. I've had a few ideas for improvements, and
I
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 19:13:12 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Do you think users give a hoot how facebook works?
I've seen an expressed concern here (probably by Nick) about
facebook using PHP, the latter being a not so good language. In a
reddit announcement about dlang forum there was a
On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 08:51:43 UTC, w0rp wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 08:27:40 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 29.07.2014 00:54, schrieb w0rp:
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 22:38:10 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I'll look at playing with the style of the documentation
pages some more
another
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 23:38:44 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 08:43:48PM +, w0rp via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
You absolutely must change your content to fit it into smaller
screens. You cannot send a massive cargo plane to an airfield
which
doesn't
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 16:59:15 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I really wish you'd stop with this destructive attitude. Yes,
the web design part is not ready for prime time, but it's
definitely a big step forward already in many aspects, IMO.
Since when is the truth destructive?
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 20:43:49 UTC, w0rp wrote:
You absolutely must change your content to fit it into smaller
screens. You cannot send a massive cargo plane to an airfield
which doesn't have large enough runways. You send smaller
planes to carry your freight to that airport. If you have
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 07:51:51 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
I think you should represent the information once. Otherwise
people using assistive technologies might run into problems.
(You might also run into SEO problems, getting a reduced ranking
in search engines, if you make lots of
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 06:54:00 UTC, w0rp wrote:
media query syntax in there. One option in a few cases is to
show one element at larger screen sizes, and another element at
smaller screen sizes.
I think you should represent the information once. Otherwise
people using assistive
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 07:29:48 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 20:43:49 UTC, w0rp wrote:
You absolutely must change your content to fit it into smaller
screens. You cannot send a massive cargo plane to an airfield
which doesn't have large enough runways. You send
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 08:30:05 UTC, w0rp wrote:
Your comments are being ignored because your comments have been
nothing short of a personal attack on myself. If you wish to
make
a serious contribution to a project, you should learn to use
more
tact, and speak to objective points of
Am 28.07.2014 09:18, schrieb Gary Willoughby:
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 16:59:15 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I really wish you'd stop with this destructive attitude. Yes, the web
design part is not ready for prime time, but it's definitely a big
step forward already in many aspects, IMO.
Since
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 09:16:44 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
You said you don't like it and you were heard the first time
I'm speaking the truth which often hurts.
Yes and I don't see w0rp running off and sulking about it either.
Your problem is you are not able to take any criticism
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 09:16:44 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Your problem is you are not able to take any criticism
whatsoever against this piece of work. The design is awful,
period.
Criticism is worthless if you are not ready to actually do
something about it - providing detailed list
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 11:16:39 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
going and getting stuff done - same principle apply here. If
you have professional web development experience that may help
here - start helping somehow.
You need to define and agree on a process first. If not you will
have to redo the
On 7/28/14, 12:29 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
I am contributing but you are completely ignoring me and attacking what
i'm saying. I've been a professional web application developer for years
and have a lot of experience with design and UX. Everybody here is
completely ignoring that fact! You
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 16:58:53 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/28/14, 12:29 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
I am contributing but you are completely ignoring me and
attacking what
i'm saying. I've been a professional web application developer
for years
and have a lot of experience with
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 11:35:21 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 11:16:39 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
going and getting stuff done - same principle apply here. If
you have professional web development experience that may help
here - start helping somehow.
You need to
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 10:38:12 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
completely the wrong way to design anything., current design
look ridiculous, poor amateurish design, i wish you would
stop right now - all of those comments look pretty destructive
to me.
No, that's the truth! You can sugar coat
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 09:58:59AM -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 7/28/14, 12:29 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
I am contributing but you are completely ignoring me and attacking
what i'm saying. I've been a professional web application developer
for years and have a lot
On 7/28/14, 10:25 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 10:38:12 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
completely the wrong way to design anything., current design look
ridiculous, poor amateurish design, i wish you would stop right
now - all of those comments look pretty destructive to me.
Am 28.07.2014 19:25, schrieb Gary Willoughby:
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 10:38:12 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
completely the wrong way to design anything., current design look
ridiculous, poor amateurish design, i wish you would stop right
now - all of those comments look pretty destructive to me.
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 18:13:50 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/28/14, 10:25 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 10:38:12 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
completely the wrong way to design anything., current
design look
ridiculous, poor amateurish design, i wish you would
Am 28.07.2014 21:13, schrieb Gary Willoughby:
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 18:51:45 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Also, and this needs to be stressed, the major part of w0rp's work so
far is about the technical basis. You dismissed that as a minor
detail, but it is not.
The design is *the* most
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 19:31:24 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 28.07.2014 21:13, schrieb Gary Willoughby:
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 18:51:45 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Also, and this needs to be stressed, the major part of w0rp's
work so
far is about the technical basis. You dismissed that as
On 7/28/14, 12:13 PM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 18:13:50 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/28/14, 10:25 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 10:38:12 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
completely the wrong way to design anything., current design look
On 07/27/2014 04:39 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/26/14, 6:30 PM, w0rp wrote:
The std.algortihm documentation doesn't look good, and I don't have any
good ideas for it.
I find std.algorithm among the best documented libraries out there! I
^~~
This actually
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 16:32:15 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 27.07.2014 00:54, schrieb w0rp:
http://w0rp.com:8010/library/index.html
Since the site is running with vibe.d anyway, I'd think about
using registerApiDocs() instead of generating individual HTML
files. This gives much nicer
Am 29.07.2014 00:04, schrieb w0rp:
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 16:32:15 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 27.07.2014 00:54, schrieb w0rp:
http://w0rp.com:8010/library/index.html
Since the site is running with vibe.d anyway, I'd think about using
registerApiDocs() instead of generating individual
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 22:38:10 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I'll look at playing with the style of the documentation pages
some more
another evening. I've had a few ideas for improvements, and I
obviously
still need to include syntax highlighting. Is this the library
which is
being used on
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 11:35:21 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 11:16:39 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
going and getting stuff done - same principle apply here. If
you have professional web development experience that may help
here - start helping somehow.
You need to
On 7/26/14, 8:47 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 07:39:50PM -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 7/26/14, 6:30 PM, w0rp wrote:
The std.algortihm documentation doesn't look good, and I don't have
any good ideas for it.
I find std.algorithm
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 06:10:09 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/26/14, 8:47 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 07:39:50PM -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 7/26/14, 6:30 PM, w0rp wrote:
The std.algortihm documentation doesn't look
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 13:30:18 UTC, w0rp wrote:
It's not the text, it's just the current formatting. The cheat
sheet can't fit into a smaller column size as a table. So you
can break that down into smaller headings and paragraphs
instead so it will reflow, but then the length of the page
Am 27.07.2014 00:54, schrieb w0rp:
http://w0rp.com:8010/library/index.html
Since the site is running with vibe.d anyway, I'd think about using
registerApiDocs() instead of generating individual HTML files. This
gives much nicer URLs and also avoids potential issues with file systems
that
Am 27.07.2014 16:55, schrieb Gary Willoughby:
This is a poor amateurish design and i wish you would stop right now. If
this ever goes live not only will all developers be extremely frustrated
trying to actually read the documentation but we as a community are
going to be laughing stock of the
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 14:55:59 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 13:30:18 UTC, w0rp wrote:
It's not the text, it's just the current formatting. The cheat
sheet can't fit into a smaller column size as a table. So you
can break that down into smaller headings and
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 08:43:48PM +, w0rp via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
You absolutely must change your content to fit it into smaller
screens. You cannot send a massive cargo plane to an airfield which
doesn't have large enough runways. You send smaller planes to carry
your freight to
http://w0rp.com:8010/library/index.html
I just updated the site hosted there with the work I've done on
integrating the library documentation to date. I spent a lot of
time staring at the pages for a while trying to figure out how to
fit everything on a page decent. I admit to hacking the
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 10:54:12PM +, w0rp via Digitalmars-d wrote:
http://w0rp.com:8010/library/index.html
I just updated the site hosted there with the work I've done on
integrating the library documentation to date. I spent a lot of time
staring at the pages for a while trying to
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 00:38:14 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
All pages seem to miss all examples - simply not implemented
yet or oversight?
ah, nevermind:
I still haven't included syntax highlighting. This really isn't
hard, I just haven't gotten around to doing it yet.
..and fixed width docs again. Unfortunately I am not competent
enough to propose any change so user CSS it stays for me :(
All pages seem to miss all examples - simply not implemented yet
or oversight?
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 00:43:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 10:54:12PM +, w0rp via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
http://w0rp.com:8010/library/index.html
I just updated the site hosted there with the work I've done on
integrating the library documentation to
On 7/26/14, 6:30 PM, w0rp wrote:
The std.algortihm documentation doesn't look good, and I don't have any
good ideas for it.
I find std.algorithm among the best documented libraries out there! I
must be in denial... -- Andrei
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 07:39:50PM -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 7/26/14, 6:30 PM, w0rp wrote:
The std.algortihm documentation doesn't look good, and I don't have
any good ideas for it.
I find std.algorithm among the best documented libraries out there! I
must be
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 21:20:28 UTC, Alix Pexton wrote:
On 09/07/2014 4:43 PM, Chris wrote:
This sounds just like Imperial education. Very interesting how
it
equates Imperial practices with the right thing and the
(continental)
arch enemy with the wrong thing. By the way, there was a
On 09/07/2014 12:36 PM, Chris wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 July 2014 at 21:01:46 UTC, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
And everyone should drive on the left.
Driving on the left goes back to the times when coaches (carriages) were
still in use. This was to avoid that drivers would accidentally hit
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 15:34:03 UTC, Alix Pexton wrote:
On 09/07/2014 12:36 PM, Chris wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 July 2014 at 21:01:46 UTC, Iain Buclaw via
Digitalmars-d
And everyone should drive on the left.
Driving on the left goes back to the times when coaches
(carriages) were
still
On 09/07/2014 4:43 PM, Chris wrote:
This sounds just like Imperial education. Very interesting how it
equates Imperial practices with the right thing and the (continental)
arch enemy with the wrong thing. By the way, there was a reason why
combatant riders would ride on the right side on a
79 matches
Mail list logo
