On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 10:32:19 UTC, Chris wrote:
Why not think outside the box a little? Design trends change
every 3-5 years. I'm sure that users and web designers are
already getting sick and tired of the tablet-friendly layout we
see everywhere and are thinking of ways to improve
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 13:06:40 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 01:37:25 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 01:34:01 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:52:56 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
Suggested improvement:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 05:27:04 UTC, Zekereth wrote:
First of all I like the new design. Way better than what's here
now. I'll just throw another site into the mix that I like
which is Ocaml's site: https://ocaml.org/ .
I like than one and it addresses some of the remarks about a
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 23:25:04 UTC, Mike wrote:
I have to agree with Walter, and prefer the denser design.
This proposal is attractive, though, but the new website trends
are too sparse. I realize this is the modern trend, but that
trend seems to treat eveything like a 5
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 01:37:25 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 01:34:01 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:52:56 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
Suggested improvement:
http://imgur.com/a/zgSJa
Can't open link.
Direct image links:
current:
Can we just get back the old design, please?
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 19:51:57 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I can't say, but it's undeniable what people consider modern.
(I like the older style, as it is denser and easier to
navigate.)
I'm not a big fan of these sites either, but because of
association with bold marketing.
As I
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 14:54:16 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 14:15:58 UTC, ref2401 wrote:
Can we just get back the old design, please?
I think it's a waste of time to make the website look modern
while what we really need is to point out the topics of
interest
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 14:15:58 UTC, ref2401 wrote:
Can we just get back the old design, please?
I think it's a waste of time to make the website look modern
while what we really need is to point out the topics of interest
(better):
What is D?
- Systems programming language
-
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 19:51:57 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 1/21/2015 6:46 AM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I
basically took the `do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
Thank you very much for doing this!
On 2015-01-21 22:52, DaveG wrote:
You're not alone gents. I like some parts and content pages aren't too
bad, but the homepage is completely impractical. It feels like I'm
emulating a giant phone. The problem with mobile first design is the
desktop often gets left behind. This may not be a
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
`do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
http://dlang.skoppe.eu
It is still a wip, but the landing page and the
On 1/22/15 6:15 AM, ref2401 wrote:
Can we just get back the old design, please?
No. -- Andrei
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 16:00:51 UTC, NVolcz wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
`do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 05:27:04 UTC, Zekereth wrote:
First of all I like the new design. Way better than what's here
now. I'll just throw another site into the mix that I like
which is Ocaml's site: https://ocaml.org/ .
That's quite nice. It even has a section with recent forum
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 17:03:52 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 17:00:55 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 16:58:39 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 05:27:04 UTC, Zekereth wrote:
First of all I like the new design. Way better than
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 17:00:55 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 16:58:39 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 05:27:04 UTC, Zekereth wrote:
First of all I like the new design. Way better than what's
here now. I'll just throw another site into the mix
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 16:58:39 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 05:27:04 UTC, Zekereth wrote:
First of all I like the new design. Way better than what's
here now. I'll just throw another site into the mix that I
like which is Ocaml's site: https://ocaml.org/ .
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 17:15:59 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 17:03:52 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 17:00:55 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 16:58:39 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 05:27:04 UTC,
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 05:52:06PM +, MattCoder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:34:46 UTC, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
z
+1. I didn't like it either. But then again, the majority of people
rarely agree with me, so I didn't say anything. But obviously
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:34:46 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
z
+1. I didn't like it either. But then again, the majority of
people
rarely agree with me, so I didn't say anything. But obviously
I'm not
alone in disliking this spaced-out layout.
Well, of course it needs
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:16:52 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:12:22 UTC, aldanor wrote:
Sebastian, could please you publish your fork somewhere so we
could take a closer look and/or fork/destroy it? It would also
be easier to make specific
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:34:46 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 05:27:09PM +, anonymous via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan
Koppe wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:52:56 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
Suggested improvement:
http://imgur.com/a/zgSJa
Or: http://i.imgur.com/ciSn8vM.png
Matheus.
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
`do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
http://dlang.skoppe.eu
It is still a wip, but the landing page and the
On 1/21/15 10:47 AM, bachmeier wrote:
And it only took me 20 minutes to get to the bottom of the page. Sorry,
not a fan of that design, though I'm apparently the only one.
There are a few others (including myself) who are not fans of this
sparse homepage. IMHO the sparse design requiring a
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:52:07 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
Well, of course it needs some polishing, for example: I think
the top menu should be visible on screen while you scroll down,
because imagine that you are at bottom of the page and want to
go somewhere else (Forums, Documentation
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 18:01:14 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Then again, I'm biased because any major redesign means I'll
have to implement it a second time for the forum :)
And also fix CHM generation. Let's not forget CHM generation.
On 1/21/2015 6:46 AM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the dlang.org site. I
basically took the `do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
Thank you very much for doing this! I very much appreciate the hard work you put
into it.
For
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC,
Impressive. Make the top menu larger on phone, pls. Otherwise,
amazing.
shut up and take my money love it
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 15:35:59 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
`do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 15:25:53 UTC, wobbles wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
`do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
`do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
http://dlang.skoppe.eu
I must have been taking crazy pills, because everyone
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 16:22:08 UTC, aldanor wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 15:35:59 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan
Koppe wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
On 01/21/2015 07:00 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 01/21/2015 06:46 AM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the dlang.org
site. I basically took the `do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
http://dlang.skoppe.eu
I love it!
While you're at
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
`do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
http://dlang.skoppe.eu
It is still a wip, but the landing page and the
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
`do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
http://dlang.skoppe.eu
It is still a wip, but the landing page and the
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:10:09 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 16:30:37 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
This is awesome, and something I'd get behind. Here's a little
feedback coming from a self-admitted dilettante:
* On my laptop it looks like this:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 16:30:37 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
This is awesome, and something I'd get behind. Here's a little
feedback coming from a self-admitted dilettante:
* On my laptop it looks like this: http://imgur.com/v8TC1xq.
I'm seeing the red menu at the top, the gray
On 1/21/15 6:46 AM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the dlang.org
site. I basically took the `do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
http://dlang.skoppe.eu
It is still a wip, but the landing page and the language reference (see
Docs
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 05:27:09PM +, anonymous via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the dlang.org
site. I basically took the `do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
On 1/21/15 9:10 AM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
Yeah, but where can I get /dmd/src/dmd? Do I need to fork the dmd source
code?
Yah, it's all at
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
- step by step instructions that take you from nothing to where you want
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 15:35:59 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
`do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 15:25:53 UTC, wobbles wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
`do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:12:22 UTC, aldanor wrote:
Sebastian, could please you publish your fork somewhere so we
could take a closer look and/or fork/destroy it? It would also
be easier to make specific suggestions
https://github.com/skoppe/dlang.org
I case you only want to make
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 15:08:02 UTC, Xinok wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
`do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:16:52 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:12:22 UTC, aldanor wrote:
Sebastian, could please you publish your fork somewhere so we
could take a closer look and/or fork/destroy it? It would also
be easier to make specific
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
`do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
http://dlang.skoppe.eu
It is still a wip, but the landing page and the
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
`do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
http://dlang.skoppe.eu
Well like everyone else said, this is awesome.
I
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 16:15:21 UTC, eles wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC,
Impressive. Make the top menu larger on phone, pls. Otherwise,
amazing.
The menu is not working indeed. It needs to default to a sliding
menu on phones.
On 1/21/15 8:44 AM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
Yeah, alot of stuff needs some fine-tuning. Specially the fonts.
Better fonts would be awesome, these (and the existing ones) are just...
bare.
Content is just copy-n-paste, could definitely use some marketing.
No worries about content for now
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
`do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
http://dlang.skoppe.eu
It is still a wip, but the landing page and the
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 18:01:14 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:34:46 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 05:27:09PM +, anonymous via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan
On 1/21/15 11:55 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
This giant red band is present on
every page, effectively reducing the height of the browser window by 20%
for no good reason.
I'm also a fan of vertical navigation menus because today's screens have
a wide aspect ratio making vertical
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 19:57:25 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 05:52:06PM +, MattCoder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:34:46 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
z
+1. I didn't like it either. But then again, the
I really don't like this style of page. I much prefer the look of
the redesign that was proposed a while back and is floating
around somewhere (I think there's a pull request lying around
somewhere to get something very close to that). If I'm on a PC
then I want to be able to see all the
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 21:13:09 UTC, Brad Anderson
wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
`do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 23:25:04 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 19:51:57 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
The Dart one is probably most similar to this proposal. But
there definitely is a trend among these sites - a menu across
the top, lots of white space, lots of
On 22/01/2015 1:11 p.m., Walter Bright wrote:
snip
I don't think that's surprising, but a big desktop display and a
smartphone are different enough they need a different mindset. I'm not
going to start editing code on a smartphone in the foreseeable future. I
need a BFG 9000 display.
If you
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 23:32:29 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Here's a mock-up with a wide version of the logo I've been
toying around with:
http://i.imgur.com/nesKYdQ.png
SVG logo: https://mediacru.sh/8eaa7f9c3421
That looks great.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 04:11:38PM -0800, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 1/21/2015 3:25 PM, Mike wrote:
[...]
This proposal is attractive, though, but the new website trends are
too sparse. I realize this is the modern trend, but that trend seems
to treat eveything like a 5
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 19:51:57 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
The Dart one is probably most similar to this proposal. But
there definitely is a trend among these sites - a menu across
the top, lots of white space, lots of scrolling. I can't say
I'm a fan, but it's undeniable what
On 1/21/2015 3:25 PM, Mike wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 19:51:57 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
The Dart one is probably most similar to this proposal. But there definitely
is a trend among these sites - a menu across the top, lots of white space,
lots of scrolling. I can't say I'm a
On 22/01/2015 3:46 a.m., Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the dlang.org
site. I basically took the `do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
http://dlang.skoppe.eu
It is still a wip, but the landing page and the language reference (see
Docs
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 20:41:09 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/21/15 11:55 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
This giant red band is present on
every page, effectively reducing the height of the browser
window by 20%
for no good reason.
I'm also a fan of vertical
On 1/21/15 3:53 PM, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 20:41:09 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/21/15 11:55 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
This giant red band is present on
every page, effectively reducing the height of the browser window by 20%
for no good
First of all I like the new design. Way better than what's here
now. I'll just throw another site into the mix that I like which
is Ocaml's site: https://ocaml.org/ .
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 00:39:52 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 23:32:29 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Here's a mock-up with a wide version of the logo I've been
toying around with:
http://i.imgur.com/nesKYdQ.png
SVG logo: https://mediacru.sh/8eaa7f9c3421
That
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:52:56 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
Suggested improvement:
http://imgur.com/a/zgSJa
Can't open link.
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 20:46:40 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 19:51:57 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 1/21/2015 6:46 AM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I
basically took the
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 01:34:01 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:52:56 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
Suggested improvement:
http://imgur.com/a/zgSJa
Can't open link.
Direct image links:
current: http://i.imgur.com/5IN3Nui.png
better:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 19:51:57 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
Swift: https://developer.apple.com/swift/
Go: https://golang.org/
Rust: http://www.rust-lang.org/
C++: http://www.cplusplus.com/
C#: doesn't seem to have one!
Java: http://java.com/en/
Haskell: https://www.haskell.org/
On 21 Jan 2015 16:51, Ali Çehreli digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 01/21/2015 07:00 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 01/21/2015 06:46 AM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org
site. I basically took the
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 19:51:57 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 1/21/2015 6:46 AM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I
basically took the `do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
Thank you very much for doing this!
On 01/21/2015 06:46 AM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the dlang.org
site. I basically took the `do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
http://dlang.skoppe.eu
I love it!
I seriously think that this kind of modern look will help with
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
`do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
http://dlang.skoppe.eu
It is still a wip, but the landing page and the
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
`do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
http://dlang.skoppe.eu
This gets a big thumbs up from me. The layout is
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
`do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
http://dlang.skoppe.eu
It is still a wip, but the landing page and the language
reference (see Docs menu-item) is working.
Doing the ddoc was a
On 1/21/2015 11:46 PM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the dlang.org
site. I basically took the `do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
http://dlang.skoppe.eu
A giant +1. This is the direction the site should be going in.
80 matches
Mail list logo
