On Sunday, 24 August 2014 at 09:24:55 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-08-24 10:53, bearophile wrote:
Dicebot:
In reddit thread one of commenters complained about D
performance and
linked this benchmark :
That benchmark found a small performance bug in ldc2, that I
reported,
but I
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 12:51:10 +
Mike via Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com
wrote:
ps.
6. This change
(https://github.com/nsf/pnoise/commit/baadfe20c7ae6aa900cb0e4188aa9d20bea95918)
with GDC has no effect at all.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday, 24 August 2014 at 13:13:58 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 12:51:10 +
Mike via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com
wrote:
ps.
6. This change
Mike:
Then I add change only #6 above, and remove the excessive
function attributes,
Maybe I'll make a pull request for it. I don't think users
should have to decorate their code like a Christmas tree
I don't agree, function attributes are not excessive, they are
idiomatic in D.
Bye,
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 13:44:07 +
Mike via Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com
wrote:
hm. for my GDC 4.9.1. git HEAD #6 has no effect at all.
p.s. it's unfair to specify -msse3 -mfpmath=sse for gcc and not for
gdc. gdc can use this flags too! (yeah, the effect is great:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 13:44:07 +
Mike via Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com
wrote:
p.s. what i did is this:
auto tm = Timer();
tm.start;
foreach (; 0..100) {
auto n2d = Noise2DContext(0);
foreach (i; 0..100) {
foreach (y; 0..256) {
foreach
On Sunday, 24 August 2014 at 14:04:22 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 13:44:07 +
Mike via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com
wrote:
p.s. what i did is this:
auto tm = Timer();
tm.start;
foreach (; 0..100) {
auto n2d =
On Sunday, 24 August 2014 at 14:09:03 UTC, Mike wrote:
I'm guessing the dependency is probably due to our
configure/build of GDC. I'm using Arch Linux 64's default GDC
from their repository. Perhaps it's configured in a way that
has these optimizations on by default. It probably should.
On Sunday, 24 August 2014 at 02:22:41 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Well difference is that internal substring in the fully
qualified name that is much more likely to tell user he is
better to not touch it. However, original Kagamin proposal of
embedding it into module names themselves does address that
On 24 Aug 2014 14:09, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 12:51:10 +
Mike via Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com
wrote:
5. Using C's floor instead of D's floor. - very significant (why?)
gcc/clang
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 16:16:43 +0100
Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
That's because floor isn't an intrinsic. The crippling speed issue
was the fact that floor computed and returned at real precision.
i'm testing on x86, and the difference
On 24 Aug 2014 16:26, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 16:16:43 +0100
Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
That's because floor isn't an intrinsic. The crippling speed issue
I have made a fork of QTD, the Qt bindings for D, to get it to work with
dmd 2.066:
https://github.com/remy-j-a-moueza/qtd/tree/dmd-2.066
I have only made it to build on Linux (32 bit Ubuntu 14.04) with nearly
no testing.
I haven't updated the examples either, so lots of them are not
On Sunday, 24 August 2014 at 20:27:59 UTC, Rémy Mouëza wrote:
I have made a fork of QTD, the Qt bindings for D, to get it to
work with dmd 2.066:
https://github.com/remy-j-a-moueza/qtd/tree/dmd-2.066
I have only made it to build on Linux (32 bit Ubuntu 14.04)
with nearly no testing.
I
14 matches
Mail list logo
