On 2014-11-01 01:54, Michel Fortin wrote:
I can't remember if this is an oversight or just something that I hadn't
got to yet. In my mind this was already done.
I did a grep for dealloc and couldn't find anything related.
Anyway, the answer is *yes*: the destructor should be mapped to the
On 2014-11-01 01:58, Michel Fortin wrote:
That said, there are other parts of D/Objective-C that could pose
difficulties to existing languages tools, some syntactic (__selector, or
this.class to get the metaclass)
this.class could perhaps be called this.classof, at least that's
valid syntax.
If you still need a copy of Andrei's great book:
http://www.informit.com/deals/
Regards,
Kai
I may be ignorant, can someone explain what's the difference
between:
Container container;
container.register!(IGreeter, Greeter);
auto greeter = container.get!IGreeter();
writefln(greeter.greet)
and
auto greeter = new Greeter();
writefln(greeter.greet)
?
On Saturday, 1 November 2014 at 16:36:02 UTC, JN wrote:
I may be ignorant, can someone explain what's the difference
between:
Container container;
container.register!(IGreeter, Greeter);
auto greeter = container.get!IGreeter();
writefln(greeter.greet)
and
auto greeter = new Greeter();
On Saturday, 1 November 2014 at 18:54:04 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
It's the fundamental way dependency injection containers are
used. Instead of having complex dependencies on other resources
you can just rely on the container to serve resources as needed.
For example if you have a class
Usually an object receives all needed dependencies with the
constructor and thus doesn't need the container itself. Well,
either way, it's better to pass one object around instead of ~10
or more.
On Thursday, 30 October 2014 at 01:02:40 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
https://code.dawg.eu/reducing-vibed-turnaround-time-part-1-faster-linking.html
Could you add a reference on how to DUB-build a library as
dynamic instead of static library to easy the process for
newcomers?
From the homepage[1]: Chocolatey is a Machine Package Manager,
somewhat like apt-get, but built with Windows in mind.
I have added dmd[2] and dub[3] as packages. This means you can do
command line installation and have them ready to go in one step.
I also made sure to allow users to change
On Sunday, 2 November 2014 at 01:52:27 UTC, Daniel Jost wrote:
From the homepage[1]: Chocolatey is a Machine Package Manager,
somewhat like apt-get, but built with Windows in mind.
I have added dmd[2] and dub[3] as packages. This means you can
do command line installation and have them ready
10 matches
Mail list logo
