On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3:
1) by ponce:
Variant 1:
https://github.com/p0nce/dconf.org/blob/master/2016/images/logo-sample.png
Variant 2:
On Thursday, 22 October 2015 at 01:19:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Great news! What's the story on exceptions? Does Calypso allow
D code to catch exceptions thrown from C++ code? -- Andrei
Small update: the LDC 0.16.1 merge was done and it's now possible
to catch about any C++ exception
On Tuesday, 10 November 2015 at 16:00:06 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3s9cfe/rust_impressions_from_a_cd_programmer_part_1/
Ali
Atila wrote:
I thought I’d like Rust more than I actually do at this point.
I’m glad I’m taking the time to learn it, but
On Monday, 16 November 2015 at 00:40:33 UTC, The Old One wrote:
My point: until you can easily write D bare-metal code, without
any runtime, and honestly without garbage collection, it just
isn't a Real Systems Language.
It really isn't hard. Yes, there's a learning curve to get
started, but
On Monday, 16 November 2015 at 00:50:50 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 16 November 2015 at 00:40:33 UTC, The Old One wrote:
My point: until you can easily write D bare-metal code,
without any runtime, and honestly without garbage collection,
it just isn't a Real Systems Language.
It
On Monday, 16 November 2015 at 00:40:33 UTC, The Old One wrote:
My point: until you can easily write D bare-metal code, without
any runtime, and honestly without garbage collection, it just
isn't a Real Systems Language.
I'm honestly tired of reading this as if "bare metal rust" has
all the
On Monday, 16 November 2015 at 00:40:33 UTC, The Old One wrote:
With the World turning to IOT, and most startups having an
embedded system as at least a part of their offering, even old
languages should take this seriously. Not everybody actually
fathoms the size of this tsunami, or the
