Re: My LLVM talk @ FOSDEM'16

2016-02-01 Thread Kai Nacke via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 1 February 2016 at 20:08:17 UTC, deadalnix wrote: On Saturday, 30 January 2016 at 12:25:38 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote: Live streaming is index here: https://fosdem.org/2016/schedule/streaming/ Room is K.3.201. Regards, Kai On Thursday, 7 January 2016 at 23:38:07 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:

Re: Better docs for D (WIP)

2016-02-01 Thread Chris Wright via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 10:03:25 +0200, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > The problem is the D logo etc at the top of his docs mixed with Adam's > resentment. Your email validates what I was suggesting he should avoid. My newsreader's history doesn't support your memory of events.

Re: Better docs for D (WIP)

2016-02-01 Thread Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 1 February 2016 at 20:14:42 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: On Monday, 1 February 2016 at 20:01:11 UTC, Chris Wright wrote: What I would actually expect, instead of a C letter, is a set of guidelines for using the D logo and other trademarked material. That's pretty standard for

Re: Better docs for D (WIP)

2016-02-01 Thread Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 1 February 2016 at 20:01:11 UTC, Chris Wright wrote: What I would actually expect, instead of a C letter, is a set of guidelines for using the D logo and other trademarked material. That's pretty standard for open source projects. And if those guidelines forbad using the D logo for

Re: Better docs for D (WIP)

2016-02-01 Thread Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 1 February 2016 at 20:01:11 UTC, Chris Wright wrote: My newsreader's history doesn't support your memory of events. I don't think this is worth arguing over...

Re: Better docs for D (WIP)

2016-02-01 Thread Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Chris Wright via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > > On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:14:08 +0200, Rory McGuire via > Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > > > If you don't get a cease and desist letter from the D Foundation soon > > I'd be

Re: Better docs for D (WIP)

2016-02-01 Thread Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Sunday, 31 January 2016 at 11:14:08 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: >> >> If you don't get a cease and desist letter from the D Foundation soon I'd >> be surprised. > > >

Re: Vision for the first semester of 2016

2016-02-01 Thread David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 1 February 2016 at 11:42:54 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote: The process will be complete when you've backported the entirety of 2.068. From what I recall, 2.068 was fairly painless to merge anyway compared to other releases. — David

Re: Vision for the first semester of 2016

2016-02-01 Thread Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 1/02/2016 8:46 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: I know, I've been hitting bug after bug in 2.067, and the answer has always been to backport from 2.068. I already have backported druntime's object.d from 2.068 because 2.067's object module has drifted so far out of sync

Re: My LLVM talk @ FOSDEM'16

2016-02-01 Thread deadalnix via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 30 January 2016 at 12:25:38 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote: Live streaming is index here: https://fosdem.org/2016/schedule/streaming/ Room is K.3.201. Regards, Kai On Thursday, 7 January 2016 at 23:38:07 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote: Hi everybody! Like the last 2 years I am a speaker in the

Re: Better docs for D (WIP)

2016-02-01 Thread Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Chris Wright via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 10:03:25 +0200, Rory McGuire via > Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > >> The problem is the D logo etc at the top of his docs mixed with Adam's >> resentment.