On Thursday, 21 May 2020 at 16:13:57 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:
Hunt Framework is a full stack Web framework based on DLang
language.
Just found this, poking around for a D HTTP server, and I have to
say it looks pretty sweet. Only five reasonable sized
dependencies, recursively, all 1st party.
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 22:44:51 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 22:23:57 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
In reality you can actually disable the GC and still use:
- classes
- associative arrays (dplug:core)
- dynamic arrays if you manage their lifetime
Honestly, a guide how
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 22:23:57 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
In reality you can actually disable the GC and still use:
- classes
- associative arrays (dplug:core)
- dynamic arrays if you manage their lifetime
Honestly, a guide how to do this would be very helpful. I'm
particularly
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 15:45:48 UTC, Dagmar wrote:
D has a GC. If you turn it off you lose dynamic/associative
arrays, classes, probably something else.
This is the outside perception of the way things are.
In reality you can actually disable the GC and still use:
- classes
- associative
On 6/29/20 8:45 AM, Dagmar wrote:
> I am a C++ developer.
I used to be a C++ developer; luckily, I primarily write in D these
days. (I can still code in C++ and will have to do so again soon.)
> I do want to move to a modern language, but there
> is no one that fits my needs.
[...]
> Go is
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 18:29:54 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 12:41 +, Paulo Pinto via
Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
[…]
Concepts, coroutines, and modules are already in ISO C++20.
Only once the standard is voted in. :-)
Also ranges are in I believe.
And
On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 12:41 +, Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
[…]
>
> Concepts, coroutines, and modules are already in ISO C++20.
Only once the standard is voted in. :-)
Also ranges are in I believe.
> And co-routines are in a much better story than the incompatible
>
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 16:47:27 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 15:44:38 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
[snip]
And that is completely wrong headed.
+1
As much as I'm sympathetic to the arguments for a slim standard
library, the amount of problems I've had in a corporate
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 15:44:38 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
[snip]
And that is completely wrong headed.
+1
As much as I'm sympathetic to the arguments for a slim standard
library, the amount of problems I've had in a corporate setting
trying to get libraries installed behind
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 15:45:48 UTC, Dagmar wrote:
D has a GC. If you turn it off you lose dynamic/associative
arrays, classes, probably something else.
You just have to construct them with a function instead of with
the built-in `new` operator. (Well, associative array will need a
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 12:17:57 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Of course C++ is now really a niche language used by those who
still use it and do not move on to more modern languages!
I am a C++ developer. I do want to move to a modern language, but
there is no one that fits my needs.
Rust has
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 12:17:57 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 10:31 +, IGotD- via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Another rant…
…batteries included standard libraries are a thing of the 1990s
and earlier. They are a reflection of pre-Internet thinking.
You got a
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 12:17:57 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 10:31 +, IGotD- via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[…]
Back to C++20 and beyond which Herb Sutter refers to a lot. Is
C++20 a success, or even C++17? Does anyone know this? Modern
C++ isn't a programming
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 10:31:43 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
On Saturday, 27 June 2020 at 15:48:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
How to answer "why will yours succeed, when X, Y, and Z have
failed?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIHfaH9Kffs
Very insightful talk.
Back to C++20 and beyond
On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 10:31 +, IGotD- via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
[…]
> Back to C++20 and beyond which Herb Sutter refers to a lot. Is
> C++20 a success, or even C++17? Does anyone know this? Modern C++
> isn't a programming standard so what I've seen is just a mix of
> everything.
On 6/28/20 8:37 PM, aberba wrote:
On Sunday, 28 June 2020 at 20:26:43 UTC, JN wrote:
What's iopipe and what does it do? How does it compare with std.process?
I my line of words, its what you'd use to stream large files and do
processing on it. Like CSV, video??, Json, and the like. Its high
On Sunday, 28 June 2020 at 21:00:09 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:
To be honest the analysis doesn't quite stack up. Because
compatibility is not the reason for the success of Go, or Rust.
I would say the success of a language depends on many factors:
Think of a reasons of why people are
On Saturday, 27 June 2020 at 15:48:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
How to answer "why will yours succeed, when X, Y, and Z have
failed?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIHfaH9Kffs
Very insightful talk.
Back to C++20 and beyond which Herb Sutter refers to a lot. Is
C++20 a success, or
18 matches
Mail list logo
