Re: DIP 1010--Static foreach--Accepted

2017-07-19 Thread Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 18.07.2017 00:44, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 7/17/17 8:38 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: What is the resolution of how break statements affect static foreach/foreach? We initially allowed break and continue to refer to the enclosing statement, but upon further consideration we will mak

Re: DIP 1010--Static foreach--Accepted

2017-07-17 Thread Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 2017-07-17 14:39, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: Awesome! Super glad and looking forward to this in 2.076? ;) It's already merged [1] so..., why not :) [1] http://forum.dlang.org/post/okiuqb$1eti$1...@digitalmars.com -- /Jacob Carlborg

Re: DIP 1010--Static foreach--Accepted

2017-07-17 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 7/17/17 8:38 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: What is the resolution of how break statements affect static foreach/foreach? We initially allowed break and continue to refer to the enclosing statement, but upon further consideration we will make it an error. This allows us to collect more ex

Re: DIP 1010--Static foreach--Accepted

2017-07-17 Thread Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 7/17/17 9:23 AM, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote: On Monday, 17 July 2017 at 12:38:27 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 7/16/17 1:04 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 7/16/17 9:10 AM, Mike Parker wrote: Congratulations to Timon Gehr. Not only was his "Static foreach" DIP accepted, it picke

Re: DIP 1010--Static foreach--Accepted

2017-07-17 Thread via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 17 July 2017 at 12:50:16 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote: On Monday, 17 July 2017 at 12:38:27 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 7/16/17 1:04 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 7/16/17 9:10 AM, Mike Parker wrote: Congratulations to Timon Gehr. Not only was his "Static foreach" DIP accept

Re: DIP 1010--Static foreach--Accepted

2017-07-17 Thread via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 17 July 2017 at 12:38:27 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 7/16/17 1:04 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 7/16/17 9:10 AM, Mike Parker wrote: Congratulations to Timon Gehr. Not only was his "Static foreach" DIP accepted, it picked up a good deal of praise from Walter & Andrei. I

Re: DIP 1010--Static foreach--Accepted

2017-07-17 Thread Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 17 July 2017 at 12:38:27 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 7/16/17 1:04 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 7/16/17 9:10 AM, Mike Parker wrote: Congratulations to Timon Gehr. Not only was his "Static foreach" DIP accepted, it picked up a good deal of praise from Walter & Andrei. I

Re: DIP 1010--Static foreach--Accepted

2017-07-17 Thread Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 7/16/17 9:10 AM, Mike Parker wrote: Congratulations to Timon Gehr. Not only was his "Static foreach" DIP accepted, it picked up a good deal of praise from Walter & Andrei. I've added my summary to the Review section of the DIP, but I'll quote it here in full: "This DIP was accepted by the

Re: DIP 1010--Static foreach--Accepted

2017-07-17 Thread Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 7/16/17 1:04 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 7/16/17 9:10 AM, Mike Parker wrote: Congratulations to Timon Gehr. Not only was his "Static foreach" DIP accepted, it picked up a good deal of praise from Walter & Andrei. Indeed. Kudos to Timon (and thanks Mike for driving the process). This

Re: DIP 1010--Static foreach--Accepted

2017-07-16 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 7/16/17 9:10 AM, Mike Parker wrote: Congratulations to Timon Gehr. Not only was his "Static foreach" DIP accepted, it picked up a good deal of praise from Walter & Andrei. Indeed. Kudos to Timon (and thanks Mike for driving the process). This is a well done DIP that many others could draw i

DIP 1010--Static foreach--Accepted

2017-07-16 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
Congratulations to Timon Gehr. Not only was his "Static foreach" DIP accepted, it picked up a good deal of praise from Walter & Andrei. I've added my summary to the Review section of the DIP, but I'll quote it here in full: "This DIP was accepted by the language authors. Both Proposal 1 and P