On Wednesday, 20 January 2016 at 15:43:16 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas
wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 January 2016 at 14:09:53 UTC, karabuta wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 22:48:52 UTC, Brad Anderson
wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/RSBLFDJ.png
Doesn't it look so much better: http://i.imgur.com/QlrbCou.png
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 22:48:52 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:28:48 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 17:55:13 UTC, karabuta wrote:
I've long wished the D and moons were what was considered the
logo[1]. The current one has three
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 22:48:52 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
Doesn't it look so much better: http://i.imgur.com/QlrbCou.png
+1
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:28:48 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 17:55:13 UTC, karabuta wrote:
How do you see it?
http://amazingws.0fees.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/dlang2.png
Many variants are on the way.
The current logo is very good and there is value
On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 17:55:13 UTC, karabuta wrote:
How do you see it?
http://amazingws.0fees.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/dlang2.png
Many variants are on the way.
The current logo is very good and there is value in keeping it.
Now if it didn't have this extremely 90s-looking
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:01:08 +, Marc Schütz wrote:
> On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 17:55:13 UTC, karabuta wrote:
>> How do you see it?
>>
>> http://amazingws.0fees.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/dlang2.png
>>
>> Many variants are on the way.
>
> This URL redirects me to that Google page:
>
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 22:48:52 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:28:48 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 17:55:13 UTC, karabuta wrote:
How do you see it?
http://amazingws.0fees.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/dlang2.png
Many variants
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 22:48:52 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
Doesn't it look so much better: http://i.imgur.com/QlrbCou.png
It does.
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:28:48 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 17:55:13 UTC, karabuta wrote:
How do you see it?
http://amazingws.0fees.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/dlang2.png
Many variants are on the way.
The current logo is very good and there is value
On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 20:13:07 UTC, anonymous wrote:
It's not been rejected outright. More like put on ice. Or maybe
I'm just not getting the hints :)
Andrei said: "Can we defer any changes to the logo so we don't
get sidetracked in this? Just scale the existing logo to fit
and
On 17.01.2016 18:55, Karabuta wrote:
Ohh! A great design is better seen by a designer. "Iron with steal,
steel with gold, gold with diamond". Always room for improvement.
I don't understand.
On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 17:55:13 UTC, karabuta wrote:
How do you see it?
http://amazingws.0fees.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/dlang2.png
Many variants are on the way.
In all honesty I like the current one better. The binary
background feels gimmicky.
On 16.01.2016 18:55, karabuta wrote:
How do you see it?
http://amazingws.0fees.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/dlang2.png
Many variants are on the way.
Do you intend to propose this for the official logo?
If so, be aware that the logo is a delicate matter. There have been
various proposals
How do you see it?
http://amazingws.0fees.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/dlang2.png
Many variants are on the way.
On 2016-01-16 18:55, karabuta wrote:
How do you see it?
http://amazingws.0fees.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/dlang2.png
Many variants are on the way.
I think any new logo should have a base form, with only two colors,
black and white. This allows for further variations without loosing the
On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 18:15:06 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On 16.01.2016 18:55, karabuta wrote:
[...]
Do you intend to propose this for the official logo?
If so, be aware that the logo is a delicate matter. There have
been various proposals to change it from the current one, and
all
16 matches
Mail list logo
