On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 22:48:52 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:28:48 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 17:55:13 UTC, karabuta wrote:
I've long wished the D and moons were what was considered the
logo. The current one has three borders, a drop shadow, and
gradients up the wazoo. Anything tacked on beyond the iconic
shape should just be done based on context (like using red or
white for the logo, a background color, etc.)
Doesn't it look so much better: http://i.imgur.com/QlrbCou.png
Waw!! I never new the thing at the top was a moon when I was
doing my version :) Is that a moon on the "D" and Mars below the
D? :) I now get it.
I agree it should be simple. You cannot embroid the depth and
shadow in the current logo.