On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:28:48 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 17:55:13 UTC, karabuta wrote:
How do you see it?


Many variants are on the way.

The current logo is very good and there is value in keeping it. Now if it didn't have this extremely 90s-looking borders, it would be even better.

I've long wished the D and moons were what was considered the logo[1]. The current one has three borders, a drop shadow, and gradients up the wazoo. Anything tacked on beyond the iconic shape should just be done based on context (like using red or white for the logo, a background color, etc.)


Doesn't it look so much better: http://i.imgur.com/QlrbCou.png

Reply via email to