Reply to Ary,
(I came to this conclusion when trying to debug the scrapple:units
project).
I'm sorry g OTOH that is a rater pathological cases.
One option that might be doable (I don't know how the inside works so I'm
guessing here) is to have the debug more highlight expression that can
Robert Fraser escribió:
Ary Borenszweig Wrote:
Ary Borenszweig escribió:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtYCFVPfx4M
Bah... I just realized debugging that kind of things might be really
hart to do. Imagine this:
---
char[] something() {
return x *= 3; x += 4;;
}
mixin(int bla(int
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Alexander P�nek alexander.pa...@brainsware.org wrote in message
news:gvlrua$16p...@digitalmars.com...
grauzone wrote:
browsers. What's the big deal everyone have with Javascript?
Look mah, JS and Flash combined in shiny modal windows:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Alexander P�nek alexander.pa...@brainsware.org wrote in message
news:gvm3qh$1ld...@digitalmars.com...
grauzone wrote:
Alexander P�nek wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Alexander P�nek wrote:
Look mah, JS and Flash combined in shiny modal windows:
Reply to Nick,
[sniped rant about why the web sucks]
I'll grant you most of that and I don't care about the rest.
It's ironic that this should come up in the D community because it sounds
a lot like C++ template are to the web like D template are to what the web
should be. That is; the Web
Ary Borenszweig escribió:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtYCFVPfx4M
Bah... I just realized debugging that kind of things might be really
hart to do. Imagine this:
---
char[] something() {
return x *= 3; x += 4;;
}
mixin(int bla(int x) { x *= 2; ~ something ~ return 4; });
void
BCS a...@pathlink.com wrote in message
news:78ccfa2d417fc8cbae8318d2e...@news.digitalmars.com...
Reply to Nick,
[sniped rant about why the web sucks]
I'll grant you most of that and I don't care about the rest.
Cool and Fair enough ;)
It's ironic that this should come up in the D
Alexander Pánek wrote:
grauzone wrote:
browsers. What's the big deal everyone have with Javascript?
It's unnecessary, annoying, slower, and adds security holes.
When using Firefox, I usually use NoScript to block all scripts by
default. Sometimes, some minor things don't work, and I have to
Alexander Pánek wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Alexander Pánek wrote:
grauzone wrote:
browsers. What's the big deal everyone have with Javascript?
It's unnecessary, annoying, slower, and adds security holes.
When using Firefox, I usually use NoScript to block all scripts by
default. Sometimes,
Hello Nick,
I wish you were a higher-up at Epic ;) They seem to have pretty much
the opposite attitude, and I get so worked-up every time I see a quote
from CliffyB or any of the others...
I'm sorry to disappoint, but gaming is the only case where building to the
latest hardware has any
Give me a break. You guys act like it's a fucking affront to your
religion to have to use Flash or Youtube.
Sorry for complaining about the necessity to be forced to install an
annoying, crappy, utterly obnoxious plugin like Flash, that barely adds
functionality to anything, but instead
browsers. What's the big deal everyone have with Javascript?
It's unnecessary, annoying, slower, and adds security holes.
When using Firefox, I usually use NoScript to block all scripts by
default. Sometimes, some minor things don't work, and I have to enable
JS. Now it's really rare to see
Hello Nick,
Yes, yes, yes. This. All of it.
[...]
Anything that can be used for good can be used for ill. Yes, lots of sites
out there are junk, but that would be true no matter what tools were available.
The (long term) solution isn't to reject the tools but to figure out how
to make
grauzone n...@example.net wrote in message
news:gvc6r3$2dm...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote in message
news:gvc4kc$29b...@digitalmars.com...
And, (and here's the real clincher), since I obviously can't enforce
proper design on the web, the one
I'm starting to get the impression that you just have a _really slow
Javascript interpreter_ in your browser. I have no idea what you're
talking about with text input lag. I have never experienced that.
And the Tango API opens in about 2 seconds with JS enabled for me.
What browser are you
Saaa em...@needmail.com wrote in message
news:gvcac0$2k6...@digitalmars.com...
The tango website is the slowest website I know, so I think it is an
exceptionally bad example for showing js being slow as I know a lot of
websites which use loads more of web 2.o stuff and show up in less than a
Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote in message
news:gvcb23$2lg...@digitalmars.com...
Saaa em...@needmail.com wrote in message
news:gvcac0$2k6...@digitalmars.com...
The tango website is the slowest website I know, so I think it is an
exceptionally bad example for showing js being slow as I know
Jarrett Billingsley jarrett.billings...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.165.1243195228.13405.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
I'm starting to get the impression that you just have a _really slow
Javascript interpreter_ in your browser. I have no idea what you're
talking about
Saaa em...@needmail.com wrote in message
news:gvcb0n$2l9...@digitalmars.com...
And then there's FlashBlock, which I *would* absolutely love...except it
*only* works with JS enabled!!! ^$^%^^!!! And frankly, I just don't
have the time to dig into FF extension-writing and do things the way I
Adblock is essential. Most ads have gotten so completely out-of-hand, I
seriously wouldn't even be using the web anymore if it weren't for Adblock.
Definitely. It's also useful for blocking other obnoxious stuff like
emoticons or avatars in those phpBB forums.
IIRC, I think NoScript does let
What browser are you *using*?
Firefox. But I often use Konqueror for serious work (!= entertainment,
wasting time). With Konqueror, some sites become dead slow with Java
Script enabled. Oh, and although Konqueror is a very nice browser,
scripting often causes malfunctions. That all just
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley jarrett.billings...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.165.1243195228.13405.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
I'm starting to get the impression that you just have a _really slow
Javascript
to get a new machine? They're like $12 now.
Where can I buy 12$ computers?
And then there's FlashBlock, which I *would* absolutely love...except it
*only* works with JS enabled!!! ^$^%^^!!! And frankly, I just don't
have the time to dig into FF extension-writing and do things the way I
really want them.
Just use noscript for blocking flash
I don't like the way
My only concern with NoScript is, enabling a site reloads all tabs
containing a script from that site. Oh, and by default, it shows some sort
of GUI animation when loading a site with blocked scripts. But you can
disable it.
As you can disable the reloading ;)
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 5:12 PM, grauzone n...@example.net wrote:
to get a new machine? They're like $12 now.
Where can I buy 12$ computers?
lern2hyperbole.
Some sort of multi-core 64-bit? I
don't care if that's all that the stores are currently trying to sell,
lol
Saaa wrote:
My only concern with NoScript is, enabling a site reloads all tabs
containing a script from that site. Oh, and by default, it shows some sort
of GUI animation when loading a site with blocked scripts. But you can
disable it.
As you can disable the reloading ;)
Thanks.
And going
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 5:12 PM, grauzone n...@example.net wrote:
to get a new machine? They're like $12 now.
Where can I buy 12$ computers?
lern2hyperbole.
Needing brand new PC hardware for using heavy websites is not really
an exaggeration, though. As soon
grauzone wrote:
Needing brand new PC hardware for using heavy websites is not really
an exaggeration, though. As soon as you have several instances of that
website loaded (in different browser windows, tabs, etc.), things are
_definitely_ starting to get no fun, even with an overclocked, 64
Jarrett Billingsley jarrett.billings...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.166.1243199156.13405.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote:
I use Firefox too. My computer isn't even a fire-breathing monster by
today's
Saaa em...@needmail.com wrote in message
news:gvcdpg$2q8...@digitalmars.com...
Some sort of multi-core 64-bit? I
don't care if that's all that the stores are currently trying to sell,
lol
Just trying to anticipate that argument. It's amazing how many times I've
seen people try to argue that
Hello Nick,
Just trying to anticipate that argument. It's amazing how many times
I've seen people try to argue that something isn't worth developing
for just because the stores don't sell them. What matters is what is
people are *using*, not what the stores are selling.
Should they stop
Ary Borenszweig a...@esperanto.org.ar wrote in message
news:gvcehp$2rd...@digitalmars.com...
grauzone escribió:
browsers. What's the big deal everyone have with Javascript?
It's unnecessary, annoying, slower, and adds security holes.
Anything which connects to the internet poses a security
BCS n...@anon.com wrote in message
news:a6268ff64568cbaad2fa3b9...@news.digitalmars.com...
Hello Nick,
Just trying to anticipate that argument. It's amazing how many times
I've seen people try to argue that something isn't worth developing
for just because the stores don't sell them. What
Robert Fraser wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
The only way Flash will die if if at least the following happen:
...
5. Silverlight replaces it (and then we're all doomed).
Then we'd just be exchanging one problem for another (arguably) worse one.
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Daniel Keep daniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:gv6ddk$1ko...@digitalmars.com...
Possessing a burning hatred of Flash isn't going to get everyone else to
stop using it. If that worked, we'd have killed off IE6 years ago.
Either build a better system
Daniel Keep Wrote:
Robert Fraser wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
The only way Flash will die if if at least the following happen:
...
5. Silverlight replaces it (and then we're all doomed).
Then we'd just be exchanging one problem for another (arguably) worse one.
What about JavaFX?
Daniel Keep daniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:gv890t$1rj...@digitalmars.com...
Do anything other than just yell at people for using the best option
available to them and offer nothing in return.
That's just it, it's far from the best option, particularly among a group of
Hello Nick,
what they can do is additionally provide a
non-youtube/flash version. Which should be really [censored] easy since
they had to have already had one in order to upload it to craptube in
the first place.
If they can, yes, but they might not have access to general file hosting
or if
BCS escribió:
Hello Nick,
what they can do is additionally provide a
non-youtube/flash version. Which should be really [censored] easy since
they had to have already had one in order to upload it to craptube in
the first place.
If they can, yes, but they might not have access to general file
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
BCS escribió:
Hello Nick,
what they can do is additionally provide a
non-youtube/flash version. Which should be really [censored] easy since
they had to have already had one in order to upload it to craptube in
the first place.
If they can, yes, but they might not
Hello Nick,
BCS n...@anon.com wrote in message
news:a6268ff63c58cba9bbc96d8...@news.digitalmars.com...
Hello Nick,
what they can do is additionally provide a
non-youtube/flash version. Which should be really [censored] easy
since
they had to have already had one in order to upload it to
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote:
BCS n...@anon.com wrote in message
news:a6268ff63c58cba9bbc96d8...@news.digitalmars.com...
Hello Nick,
what they can do is additionally provide a
non-youtube/flash version. Which should be really [censored] easy since
they had
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtYCFVPfx4M
when is the next release, pretty please? :)
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Ary Borenszweig a...@esperanto.org.ar wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtYCFVPfx4M
Pretty cool feature :)
grauzone n...@example.net wrote in message
news:gv4p44$1jq...@digitalmars.com...
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtYCFVPfx4M
How about posting a link to something everyone can play? Like an actual
video file?
Thank you.
Isn't youtube a video upload site with an
Ary Borenszweig, el 21 de mayo a las 22:22 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella escribió:
BCS, el 22 de mayo a las 00:01 me escribiste:
Reply to Ary,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtYCFVPfx4M
The clunk you just heard is my jaw bouncing on the floor G NICE!
That's what happens when you
BCS wrote:
Reply to Ary,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtYCFVPfx4M
The clunk you just heard is my jaw bouncing on the floor G NICE!
It would be very nice to have such a debugging feature. Too bad it's
hardcoded into a very bug GUI system.
Even if I spent hours configuring Eclipse
It would be very nice to have such a debugging feature. Too bad it's
hardcoded into a very bug GUI system.
I meant to write big, not bug. Talk about Freudian Slips!
grauzone, el 22 de mayo a las 15:41 me escribiste:
Saaa wrote:
grauzone n...@example.net wrote in message
news:gv4p44$1jq...@digitalmars.com...
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtYCFVPfx4M
How about posting a link to something everyone can play? Like an actual
video
Daniel Keep wrote:
grauzone wrote:
BCS wrote:
Reply to Ary,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtYCFVPfx4M
The clunk you just heard is my jaw bouncing on the floor G NICE!
It would be very nice to have such a debugging feature. Too bad it's
hardcoded into a very bug GUI system.
Yes,
Daniel Keep wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Saaa wrote:
grauzone n...@example.net wrote in message
news:gv4p44$1jq...@digitalmars.com...
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtYCFVPfx4M
How about posting a link to something everyone can play? Like an
actual video file?
Thank you.
Yes, heaven forbid Ary spends his time adding and improving features
when he should be building a new editor from the ground up.
That's not what I'm saying. First, he's free to do with his time
whatever he chooses to. Second, I think it'd be better to decouple
debugger and editor. For
grauzone wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
Obviously the large number of people using such sites are trying to
prove you wrong. :P
They just don't know it better. They probably think their PC isn't fast
enough for fullscreen video playback and so on.
Maybe they don't even know what's making
If I could get that in a super fast, light programming editor, I'd use
that instead. But I can't.
Wasn't there an effort somewhere to port eclipse to D ?
Daniel Keep daniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:gv6ddk$1ko...@digitalmars.com...
grauzone wrote:
Saaa wrote:
grauzone n...@example.net wrote in message
news:gv4p44$1jq...@digitalmars.com...
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtYCFVPfx4M
How about posting a
Saaa em...@needmail.com wrote in message
news:gv6qcj$2ck...@digitalmars.com...
If I could get that in a super fast, light programming editor, I'd use
that instead. But I can't.
Wasn't there an effort somewhere to port eclipse to D ?
I have no idea, but that does raise an interesting
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Saaa em...@needmail.com wrote in message
news:gv6qcj$2ck...@digitalmars.com...
If I could get that in a super fast, light programming editor, I'd use
that instead. But I can't.
Wasn't there an effort somewhere to port eclipse to D ?
I have no idea, but that does
Daniel Keep wrote:
The only way Flash will die if if at least the following happen:
...
5. Silverlight replaces it (and then we're all doomed).
On Fri, 22 May 2009 20:26:32 +0200, Saaa wrote:
If I could get that in a super fast, light programming editor, I'd use
that instead. But I can't.
Wasn't there an effort somewhere to port eclipse to D ?
Frank has an interest in having Eclipse ported, but nothing has been
started that I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtYCFVPfx4M
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtYCFVPfx4M
How about posting a link to something everyone can play? Like an actual
video file?
Thank you.
Reply to Ary,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtYCFVPfx4M
The clunk you just heard is my jaw bouncing on the floor G NICE!
Leandro Lucarella escribió:
BCS, el 22 de mayo a las 00:01 me escribiste:
Reply to Ary,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtYCFVPfx4M
The clunk you just heard is my jaw bouncing on the floor G NICE!
That's what happens when you have a turing complete language inside
another!
There is no
Ary Borenszweig Wrote:
grauzone escribió:
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtYCFVPfx4M
How about posting a link to something everyone can play? Like an actual
video file?
Thank you.
Awww, but that made the tauting much better. :-(
66 matches
Mail list logo
