On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 14:04:25 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/10/20/unit-testing-in-action/
I'm somewhat late to this party but anyway, here is my two
cents on the way Unit testing needs to be tweaked.
One of the values of Unit Testing is Defect
On 2017-10-25 04:15, Walter Bright wrote:
The problem is how to display it in a text file with the original source
code.
An option to output the result in XML or JSON would allow an editor or
IDE more options to display the result, for example, hover on different
expressions to show the
On Tuesday, October 24, 2017 19:15:35 Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On 10/24/2017 3:06 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> > It would be very useful if the compiler could do that automatically.
>
> On 10/24/2017 2:58 PM, qznc wrote:
> > The information is there just not expressed in a
On 10/24/2017 07:15 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/24/2017 3:06 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
It would be very useful if the compiler could do that automatically.
On 10/24/2017 2:58 PM, qznc wrote:
> The information is there just not expressed in a useable way.
The problem is how to display it in
On 10/24/2017 01:51 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 10/23/2017 4:44 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> There would be a separate coverage count for line 3 which would be the
> sum of counts for (api2 == 2) and (api3 == 3).
>
> Generally, if this is inadequate, just split the expression into more
> lines.
On 10/23/2017 4:44 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Saturday, 21 October 2017 at 22:50:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Coverage would give:
1| x = 2;
2| if (x == 1 || x == 2)
I.e. the second line gets an execution count of 2. By contrast,
1| x = 1;
1| if (x == 1 || x == 2)
Interesting
On Monday, 23 October 2017 at 12:38:01 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
"parallel test execution (from it’s name, the main goal of
unit-threaded) was quite problematic with the first test suite
we converted"
I'd love to know what the problems were, especially since it's
possible to run in just one
of using third-party
frameworks.
Blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/10/20/unit-testing-in-action/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/77m8r8/ds_builtin_unit_testing_in_action/
"Only for troubleshooting should you switch to unit-threaded. You
have to be careful, however, to onl
On Saturday, 21 October 2017 at 22:50:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Coverage would give:
1|x = 2;
2|if (x == 1 || x == 2)
I.e. the second line gets an execution count of 2. By contrast,
1|x = 1;
1|if (x == 1 || x == 2)
Interesting point, but would likely fail for more complex
of using third-party
frameworks.
Blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/10/20/unit-testing-in-action/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/77m8r8/ds_builtin_unit_testing_in_action/
Yay! My app - covered is in this post!
That's so cool, when somebody uses your code. Thank you, Mario.
On Saturday, 21 October 2017 at 22:50:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
What's happening here is each of the operands of || are
considered to be separate statements as far as coverage
analysis goes. It becomes clearer if it is reformatted as:
1|x = 2;
1|if (x == 1 ||
1|x == 2)
or:
On 10/21/2017 6:14 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 21:26:35 UTC, qznc wrote:
* coverage is not sufficiently solved. The author suggests to reformat code so
short-circuit evaluations become multiple lines?
If you can use gdc or ldc, branch coverage should be supported out
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 21:26:35 UTC, qznc wrote:
* fluent-asserts is considered the best expectations library.
Syntax is `(x + y).should.equal(42).because("of test
reasons");` and it gives nice output with code snippets.
The code snippets were the prominent feature from the
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 21:26:35 UTC, qznc wrote:
* coverage is not sufficiently solved. The author suggests to
reformat code so short-circuit evaluations become multiple
lines?
If you can use gdc or ldc, branch coverage should be supported
out of the box.
Other tools support regions
of using third-party
frameworks.
Blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/10/20/unit-testing-in-action/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/77m8r8/ds_builtin_unit_testing_in_action/
Thanks for this post. Personally, I have not really hit the pain
points described here, so I learned
/10/20/unit-testing-in-action/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/77m8r8/ds_builtin_unit_testing_in_action/
16 matches
Mail list logo
