On 8.3.2010 7:54, Walter Bright wrote:
Lots of meat and potatoes here, and a cookie! (spelling checker for
error messages)
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.057.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
In 2.041 it has to be written like this:
real x = 1.2;
real[4][4] M2 = [
[1, 0, 0, x],
[0, 1, 0, x],
[0, 0, 1, x],
[0, 0, 0, cast(real)1]
];
I have seen something different, using dmd 2.041 on Windows. Here are few cases
of code followed by the error messages
Steven Schveighoffer, el 8 de marzo a las 14:57 me escribiste:
Tell me how you would parse the following text serialization string
for a string[]:
hello world how are you
What if it was a string[][]?
Compare that to:
[hello world, [how are, you]]
What about [1, 2]?
That is almost
Sorry for the delayed answer.
Andrei Alexandrescu:
In wake of printing multi-dimensional arrays, I agree that start and end
delimiters should be present by default. If delimiters are present, it only
makes sense to make the array look like a D array, so the , becomes an
acceptable
On 10/03/10 11:06, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Philippe Sigaudphilippe.sig...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.119.1268166534.4461.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
enableStomping?
placeUnderFoot?
greekWedding?
Steven Schveighoffer at Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:23:51 -0500 wrote:
SS On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:12:24 -0500, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
Tell me how you would parse the following text serialization string for a
string[]:
hello world how are you
What
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
* shrinkToFit(T[] arr): This one is a bit tricky and technically unsafe.
It reduces the size of the allocated length to fit the length of the
array. The allocated length is the length that the runtime assumes is
being used of the memory block. This is
Robert Jacques wrote:
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:42:54 -0500, Philippe Sigaud
philippe.sig...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 14:22, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.comwrote:
The shrinkToFit name is not my favorite, anyone care to submit a better
name? minimize is out because it
On 2010-03-09 09:09:51 +0100, Alexander Suhoverhov
alexan...@suhoverhov.selfip.net said:
Steven Schveighoffer at Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:23:51 -0500 wrote:
SS On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:12:24 -0500, bearophile
bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
Tell me how you would parse
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:52:25 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Printing values with spaces between them is entirely fine for e.g. all
numbers.
You know what, you are right. Why should phobos cater to people wanting
to print something as arcane as a
On 09/03/10 09:12, Walter Bright wrote:
obj2asm tells the tale. (obj2asm is an incredibly useful tool, I don't
know why nobody uses it.)
Maybe a minor quibble, but obj2asm is really slow. If I'm going to
disassemble something, I am never going to reach for obj2asm:
`ds` is a dmdscript
On 9-mar-10, at 13:00, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:09:51 -0500, Alexander Suhoverhov alexan...@suhoverhov.selfip.net
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer at Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:23:51 -0500 wrote:
SS On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:12:24 -0500, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:54:12 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.041.zip
Great, thanks :)
BTW on this page:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/operatoroverloading.html
The 'Index Operator Overloading' link text at the top
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:10:10 -0500, biozic bio...@free.fr wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
* shrinkToFit(T[] arr): This one is a bit tricky and technically
unsafe.
It reduces the size of the allocated length to fit the length of the
array. The allocated length is the length that the
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:09:51 -0500, Alexander Suhoverhov
alexan...@suhoverhov.selfip.net wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer at Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:23:51 -0500 wrote:
SS On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:12:24 -0500, bearophile
bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
Tell me how you
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:23:07 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I want to focus more on the fact that you are declaring the data after
the slice as being no longer used.
kind of assumeUnique ...
assumeNoArrayReference ?
On 03/09/2010 05:53 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:52:25 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Printing values with spaces between them is entirely fine for e.g. all
numbers.
You know what, you are right. Why should phobos cater to people
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
On 03/09/2010 05:53 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:52:25 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Printing values with spaces between them is entirely fine for e.g. all
numbers.
You know what, you are right. Why should
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:33:01 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
In wake of printing multi-dimensional arrays, I agree that start and end
delimiters should be present by default. If delimiters are present, it
only makes sense to make the array look like a D
Michal Minich wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:23:07 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I want to focus more on the fact that you are declaring the data after
the slice as being no longer used.
kind of assumeUnique ...
assumeNoArrayReference ?
I like that. Or assumeNoMemoryAliasing. It
Lutger:
Or assumeNoMemoryAliasing. It should be clear that it is a
potentially very unsafe function.
This is getting there :-)
Bye,
bearophile
Bernard Helyer wrote:
On 09/03/10 09:12, Walter Bright wrote:
obj2asm tells the tale. (obj2asm is an incredibly useful tool, I don't
know why nobody uses it.)
Maybe a minor quibble, but obj2asm is really slow. If I'm going to
disassemble something, I am never going to reach for obj2asm:
On 9-mar-10, at 18:56, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:33:01 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org
wrote:
In wake of printing multi-dimensional arrays, I agree that start
and end delimiters should be present by default. If delimiters are
present, it
On 2010-03-09 20:15:44 +0100, Fawzi Mohamed fa...@gmx.ch said:
[...]
some html spam
sorry about that...
On 10/03/10 07:54, Walter Bright wrote:
Hmm, I never noticed it being slow at all. I wonder what's going on.
Obviously, I can't tell from here, but I can tell you what my system
says obliquely.
It spends that minute at 100% CPU, and about 100 megs resident (which it
allocates quickly,
On 10/03/10 08:57, Bernard Helyer wrote:
On 10/03/10 07:54, Walter Bright wrote:
Hmm, I never noticed it being slow at all. I wonder what's going on.
Obviously, I can't tell from here, but I can tell you what my system
says obliquely.
It spends that minute at 100% CPU, and about 100 megs
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:54:11 -0500, David Gileadi f...@bar.com wrote:
On 3/9/2010 12:44 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:36:41 -0500, Michal Minich
michal.min...@gmail.com wrote:
assumeNoArrayReference does not express that there can be references to
the original array
Bernard Helyer wrote:
On 10/03/10 08:57, Bernard Helyer wrote:
On 10/03/10 07:54, Walter Bright wrote:
Hmm, I never noticed it being slow at all. I wonder what's going on.
Obviously, I can't tell from here, but I can tell you what my system
says obliquely.
It spends that minute at 100%
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:29, grauzone n...@example.net wrote:
Many of these names (including shrinkToFit) suggest that memory usage is
reduced by freeing the left over memory after the array. This is not true:
the function just enables stomping of the memory past the slice passed to
the
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:54:11 -0500, David Gileadi f...@bar.com wrote:
On 3/9/2010 12:44 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:36:41 -0500, Michal Minich
michal.min...@gmail.com wrote:
assumeNoArrayReference does not express that there can be
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:29:04 -0500, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:54:11 -0500, David Gileadi f...@bar.com wrote:
As long as we're bikeshedding, maybe assumeUnreferencedAfter?
This is exactly the semantic meaning we are going for. I'd like
Philippe Sigaud philippe.sig...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.119.1268166534.4461.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:29, grauzone n...@example.net wrote:
Many of these names (including shrinkToFit) suggest that memory usage is
reduced by freeing the
Thanks! A pleasant surprise to see interface contracts.
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Lots of meat and potatoes here, and a cookie! (spelling checker for
error messages)
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.057.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Lots of meat and potatoes here, and a cookie! (spelling checker for
error messages)
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.057.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
Walter Bright wrote:
Lots of meat and potatoes here, and a cookie! (spelling checker for
error messages)
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.057.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.041.zip
Thanks
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 09:54:12 +0300, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Lots of meat and potatoes here, and a cookie! (spelling checker for
error messages)
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.057.zip
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:45:21 -0500, Lars T. Kyllingstad
pub...@kyllingen.nospamnet wrote:
Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Lots of meat and potatoes here, and a cookie! (spelling checker for
error messages)
Walter Bright wrote:
Lots of meat and potatoes here, and a cookie! (spelling checker for
error messages)
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.057.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.041.zip
Thanks
Walter Bright Wrote:
Lots of meat and potatoes here, and a cookie! (spelling checker for
error messages)
Thank you for the cookie too :-)
I will need some more time to try all the new things.
In the meantime I have already two small questions:
1) What does Implemented attributes for
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Lots of meat and potatoes here, and a cookie! (spelling checker for
error messages)
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.057.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
The Html of the change logs seems a bit wrong, the latest version now is at the
top, and in the 2.0 changelog the Bugs Fixed are divided in two different
horizontal alignments.
Ary Borenszweig:
And isn't it better for the spellchecker to show the closest match using
levenshtein distance instead of just distance 1?
Walter is an engineer, and follows the KISS principle, he likes to use the
simpler thing that can possibly work (especially in the first version of
Ary Borenszweig:
I'm normally interested to enter the if branch if x is not null and it
has an interesting value. For example, if I implement a String class I
would implement it as not being empty. But I think the biggest problem
is making a different semantic for this to structs and
bearophile wrote:
Ary Borenszweig:
I'm normally interested to enter the if branch if x is not null and it
has an interesting value. For example, if I implement a String class I
would implement it as not being empty. But I think the biggest problem
is making a different semantic for this to
Is there a better way to use the new operator overloading than string mixins?
Also the following code strangely yields:
dsfml\system\vector2.d(47): Error: variable
dsfml.system.vector2.Vector2!(float).Vector2.op only parameters or foreach
declarations can be ref
/// element-wise operations, +,
__traits allMembers and and derivedMembers now return a tuple of strings
rather
than an array of strings. Enclose __traits in [ ] to make array literal. This
makes it
possible for foreach statements to iterate at compile time over it.
How exciting!
On 3/8/10, Trass3r u...@known.com wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Lots of meat and potatoes here, and a cookie! (spelling checker for
error messages)
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.057.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.041.zip
Thanks
Walter Bright wrote:
Lots of meat and potatoes here, and a cookie! (spelling checker for
error messages)
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.057.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.041.zip
Thanks
Andrei Alexandrescu:
$(LI std.conv: changed the default array formatting from [a, b, c] to
a b c)
That's a regression!!!
(And I think in the past it was [a,b,c] instead of [a, b, c], because it's
better to save some screen space, it costs a lot!).
Bye,
bearophile
Walter Bright wrote:
Lots of meat and potatoes here, and a cookie! (spelling checker for
error messages)
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.057.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.041.zip
Thanks
bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
$(LI std.conv: changed the default array formatting from [a, b, c] to
a b c)
That's a regression!!!
(And I think in the past it was [a,b,c] instead of [a, b, c], because it's
better to save some screen space, it costs a lot!).
Sorry, this stays. The
If you compile a program like this:
double[100_000] arr;
void main() {}
With dmd you produce a binary about 1 MB in size, because doubles in D are not
filled with zero.
So for n-D arrays bigger than a certain amount of memory, can DMD compile that
code with a zero initialization plus filling
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:27:36 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
$(LI std.conv: changed the default array formatting from [a, b, c]
to a b c)
That's a regression!!!
(And I think in the past it was [a,b,c] instead of [a,
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Sorry, this stays.
Then I'm not going to use the Phobos printing in all my future D2 programs. As
I was not using it in D1. I'm not going to change idea on this.
(e.g. the comma may be a decimal point in some languages, so is [1,2] in a
German locale an array of double
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:27:36 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
$(LI std.conv: changed the default array formatting from [a, b,
c] to a b c)
That's a regression!!!
(And I think in the past
bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Sorry, this stays.
Then I'm not going to use the Phobos printing in all my future D2
programs. As I was not using it in D1. I'm not going to change idea
on this.
(e.g. the comma may be a decimal point in some languages, so is
[1,2] in a German locale
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:27:36 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
$(LI std.conv: changed the default array formatting from [a, b,
c] to a b c)
That's a regression!!!
(And I think in the past
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:49:33 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Sorry, this stays.
Then I'm not going to use the Phobos printing in all my future D2
programs. As I was not using it in D1. I'm not going to change idea
on
bearophile wrote:
While this hangs my compiler, I don't know why:
double[100_000] arr = 0.0;
static this() {
arr[] = typeof(arr[0]).init;
}
void main() {}
Well, it didn't hang, it just took a while. I found the problem.
Steven Schveighoffer:
Tell me how you would parse the following text serialization string for a
string[]:
hello world how are you
What if it was a string[][]?
Compare that to:
[hello world, [how are, you]]
You are missing something:
[hello world, [how are, you]]
:-)
(And yes,
bearophile wrote:
Note: this produces the same very large binary, I don't know why:
double[100_000] arr = void;
static this() {
arr[] = typeof(arr[0]).init;
}
void main() {}
obj2asm tells the tale. (obj2asm is an incredibly useful tool, I don't
know why nobody uses it.)
Don wrote:
Bug 1914 Array initialisation from const array yields memory trample
was fixed, in D2 only. Can we get this into D1 as well?
The problem is I don't think it's the right fix, and I haven't spent the
time figuring it out yet.
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Your choice of leading/trailing symbols and of separators makes 'to'
friendlier for printing e.g. debug strings. My choice makes it a
primitive for text serialization. I'm not 100% sure which is the more
frequent use and therefore which is the most appropriate as a
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:12:24 -0500, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
Tell me how you would parse the following text serialization string for
a
string[]:
hello world how are you
What if it was a string[][]?
Compare that to:
[hello world, [how are, you]]
Steven Schveighoffer:
For completely unambiguous, yes. But still, I find often that quotes are
more noise than they are worth when just doing simple printouts. What we
want is the most useful default.
Quotes add a bit of noise, but I prefer to tell apart the cases of two strings
from
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:49:33 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Sorry, this stays.
Then I'm not going to use the Phobos printing in all my future D2
programs. As I was not using it in D1. I'm
I think this bug has been squished as well. Both test cases now compile
fine.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3694
Walter Bright wrote:
Lots of meat and potatoes here, and a cookie! (spelling checker for
error messages)
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 14:22, Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.comwrote:
The shrinkToFit name is not my favorite, anyone care to submit a better
name? minimize is out because it has connotations of math already.
minCapacity
minimizeCapacity
shrinkCapacity
shrink (just shrink)
2) What's the best way to translate this to the new operator regime?
T foo(T)(T s) if (__traits(hasMember, T, opAdd)) {
return s + s;
}
I have not found a good solution yet. This solution looks buggy (also because
fixed-sized arrays have a buggy .init):
import std.stdio: writeln;
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:56:14 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:49:33 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Sorry, this stays.
Then I'm
On 08/03/10 22:03, bearophile wrote:
2) What's the best way to translate this to the new operator regime?
T foo(T)(T s) if (__traits(hasMember, T, opAdd)) {
return s + s;
}
I have not found a good solution yet. This solution looks buggy (also because
fixed-sized arrays have a buggy
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:56:14 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:49:33 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 08/03/10 22:03, bearophile wrote:
2) What's the best way to translate this to the new operator regime?
T foo(T)(T s) if (__traits(hasMember, T, opAdd)) {
return s + s;
}
I have not found a good solution yet. This solution looks buggy (also
because fixed-sized
Robert Clipsham:
Untested, will the following do what you need?
T foo(T)(T s) if (__traits(compiles, {return s + s;})) {
return s + s;
}
Seems like you may as well test if you can add what you're passed rather
than the initial value for the type.
Oh, nice, I didn't
But now I don't know what's happening, because that trait correctly returns
false, but the compiler generates a compile error at line 14 still. I think
there's a new bug.
I have added a bug:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3903
Bye,
bearophile
Andrei Alexandrescu:
What I usually do is:
T foo(T)(T s) if (is(typeof(s + s))) {
}
Nice, thank you, I'll use that.
(That solution too presents the bug 3903)
Bye,
bearophile
Andrei Alexandrescu:
I'll also point out that AAs have a default policy that is much more
reasonable.
I guess that should be changed too :o).
-.-
Bye,
bearophile
On 08/03/10 22:53, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
What I usually do is:
T foo(T)(T s) if (is(typeof(s + s))) {
}
Andrei
That's far nicer, I keep forgetting about is(typeof()), thanks :)
writeln(typeid(typeof(a.init))); // prints: int
?! You mean typeof(a) != typeof((typeof(a)).init) ?!
Ugh... I thought (int[2]).init was [0,0] and in general (T[n]).init was
[(T.init) n times]
writeln(foo(a)); // test.d(14): Error: Array operation s + s not
implemented
}
But now
Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 08/03/10 22:53, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
What I usually do is:
T foo(T)(T s) if (is(typeof(s + s))) {
}
Andrei
That's far nicer, I keep forgetting about is(typeof()), thanks :)
It'll be hard to forget once TDPL will be out there, the idiom is
present in
Philippe Sigaud:
writeln(typeid(typeof(a.init))); // prints: int
?! You mean typeof(a) != typeof((typeof(a)).init) ?!
Ugh... I thought (int[2]).init was [0,0] and in general (T[n]).init was
[(T.init) n times]
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
Bye,
bearophile
On 08/03/10 23:35, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Man I can't wait for that book to be out.
I suspect you're not the only one, I was filled with excitement when I
saw the expected delivery date become earlier a few days ago, I'm
eagerly awaiting it so I can start playing with D2 properly rather
To try the new operators I have created this helper that works:
auto operators(string[] items...) {
struct Bunch {
string[] items;
bool opBinaryRight(string s:in)(string item) {
foreach (el; items)
if (el == item)
return true;
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:42:54 -0500, Philippe Sigaud
philippe.sig...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 14:22, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.comwrote:
The shrinkToFit name is not my favorite, anyone care to submit a better
name? minimize is out because it has connotations of
Lots of meat and potatoes here, and a cookie! (spelling checker for
error messages)
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.057.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.041.zip
Thanks to the many people who
86 matches
Mail list logo
