On Thursday, 21 May 2020 at 16:13:57 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:
Hunt Framework is a full stack Web framework based on DLang
language.
Just found this, poking around for a D HTTP server, and I have to
say it looks pretty sweet. Only five reasonable sized
dependencies, recursively, all 1st party.
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 15:45:48 UTC, Dagmar wrote:
D has a GC. If you turn it off you lose dynamic/associative
arrays, classes, probably something else.
This is the outside perception of the way things are.
In reality you can actually disable the GC and still use:
- classes
- associative
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 22:23:57 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
In reality you can actually disable the GC and still use:
- classes
- associative arrays (dplug:core)
- dynamic arrays if you manage their lifetime
Honestly, a guide how to do this would be very helpful. I'm
particularly
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 22:44:51 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 22:23:57 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
In reality you can actually disable the GC and still use:
- classes
- associative arrays (dplug:core)
- dynamic arrays if you manage their lifetime
Honestly, a guide how
On 6/29/20 8:45 AM, Dagmar wrote:
> I am a C++ developer.
I used to be a C++ developer; luckily, I primarily write in D these
days. (I can still code in C++ and will have to do so again soon.)
> I do want to move to a modern language, but there
> is no one that fits my needs.
[...]
> Go is
On Saturday, 27 June 2020 at 15:48:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
How to answer "why will yours succeed, when X, Y, and Z have
failed?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIHfaH9Kffs
Very insightful talk.
Back to C++20 and beyond which Herb Sutter refers to a lot. Is
C++20 a success, or
On Sunday, 28 June 2020 at 21:00:09 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:
To be honest the analysis doesn't quite stack up. Because
compatibility is not the reason for the success of Go, or Rust.
I would say the success of a language depends on many factors:
Think of a reasons of why people are
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 10:31:43 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
On Saturday, 27 June 2020 at 15:48:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
How to answer "why will yours succeed, when X, Y, and Z have
failed?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIHfaH9Kffs
Very insightful talk.
Back to C++20 and beyond
On 6/28/20 8:37 PM, aberba wrote:
On Sunday, 28 June 2020 at 20:26:43 UTC, JN wrote:
What's iopipe and what does it do? How does it compare with std.process?
I my line of words, its what you'd use to stream large files and do
processing on it. Like CSV, video??, Json, and the like. Its high
On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 10:31 +, IGotD- via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
[…]
> Back to C++20 and beyond which Herb Sutter refers to a lot. Is
> C++20 a success, or even C++17? Does anyone know this? Modern C++
> isn't a programming standard so what I've seen is just a mix of
> everything.
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 12:17:57 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 10:31 +, IGotD- via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[…]
Back to C++20 and beyond which Herb Sutter refers to a lot. Is
C++20 a success, or even C++17? Does anyone know this? Modern
C++ isn't a programming
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 12:17:57 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 10:31 +, IGotD- via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Another rant…
…batteries included standard libraries are a thing of the 1990s
and earlier. They are a reflection of pre-Internet thinking.
You got a
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 12:17:57 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Of course C++ is now really a niche language used by those who
still use it and do not move on to more modern languages!
I am a C++ developer. I do want to move to a modern language, but
there is no one that fits my needs.
Rust has
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 15:45:48 UTC, Dagmar wrote:
D has a GC. If you turn it off you lose dynamic/associative
arrays, classes, probably something else.
You just have to construct them with a function instead of with
the built-in `new` operator. (Well, associative array will need a
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 15:44:38 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
[snip]
And that is completely wrong headed.
+1
As much as I'm sympathetic to the arguments for a slim standard
library, the amount of problems I've had in a corporate setting
trying to get libraries installed behind
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 16:47:27 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 15:44:38 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
[snip]
And that is completely wrong headed.
+1
As much as I'm sympathetic to the arguments for a slim standard
library, the amount of problems I've had in a corporate
On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 12:41 +, Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
[…]
>
> Concepts, coroutines, and modules are already in ISO C++20.
Only once the standard is voted in. :-)
Also ranges are in I believe.
> And co-routines are in a much better story than the incompatible
>
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 18:29:54 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 12:41 +, Paulo Pinto via
Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
[…]
Concepts, coroutines, and modules are already in ISO C++20.
Only once the standard is voted in. :-)
Also ranges are in I believe.
And
18 matches
Mail list logo