Re: OT: Flash (Was: Re: Taunting)

2009-05-23 Thread Daniel Keep
Robert Fraser wrote: Daniel Keep wrote: The only way Flash will die if if at least the following happen: ... 5. Silverlight replaces it (and then we're all doomed). Then we'd just be exchanging one problem for another (arguably) worse one.

Re: Taunting

2009-05-23 Thread Daniel Keep
Nick Sabalausky wrote: Daniel Keep daniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote in message news:gv6ddk$1ko...@digitalmars.com... Possessing a burning hatred of Flash isn't going to get everyone else to stop using it. If that worked, we'd have killed off IE6 years ago. Either build a better system

Re: OT: Flash (Was: Re: Taunting)

2009-05-23 Thread naryl
Daniel Keep Wrote: Robert Fraser wrote: Daniel Keep wrote: The only way Flash will die if if at least the following happen: ... 5. Silverlight replaces it (and then we're all doomed). Then we'd just be exchanging one problem for another (arguably) worse one. What about JavaFX?

Re: Taunting

2009-05-23 Thread Nick Sabalausky
Daniel Keep daniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote in message news:gv890t$1rj...@digitalmars.com... Do anything other than just yell at people for using the best option available to them and offer nothing in return. That's just it, it's far from the best option, particularly among a group of

Re: Taunting

2009-05-23 Thread BCS
Hello Nick, what they can do is additionally provide a non-youtube/flash version. Which should be really [censored] easy since they had to have already had one in order to upload it to craptube in the first place. If they can, yes, but they might not have access to general file hosting or if

OT: Flash and Javascript (Was: Taunting)

2009-05-23 Thread Ary Borenszweig
BCS escribió: Hello Nick, what they can do is additionally provide a non-youtube/flash version. Which should be really [censored] easy since they had to have already had one in order to upload it to craptube in the first place. If they can, yes, but they might not have access to general file

Re: OT: Flash and Javascript (Was: Taunting)

2009-05-23 Thread Charles Hixson
Ary Borenszweig wrote: BCS escribió: Hello Nick, what they can do is additionally provide a non-youtube/flash version. Which should be really [censored] easy since they had to have already had one in order to upload it to craptube in the first place. If they can, yes, but they might not

Re: Taunting

2009-05-23 Thread BCS
Hello Nick, BCS n...@anon.com wrote in message news:a6268ff63c58cba9bbc96d8...@news.digitalmars.com... Hello Nick, what they can do is additionally provide a non-youtube/flash version. Which should be really [censored] easy since they had to have already had one in order to upload it to

Re: Taunting

2009-05-23 Thread Jarrett Billingsley
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote: BCS n...@anon.com wrote in message news:a6268ff63c58cba9bbc96d8...@news.digitalmars.com... Hello Nick, what they can do is additionally provide a non-youtube/flash version. Which should be really [censored] easy since they had

Serialization for D part 2

2009-05-23 Thread BCS
It turned out that the first pass was easy. No unexpected problems. However I noticed a few more things I'm going to have to deal with at some point. http://arrayboundserror.blogspot.com/2009/05/serialization-for-d-part-2-of-n.html Again, please comment! (here or there, doesn't matter, I think