On 17 Aug 2016 04:00, "Mike via Digitalmars-d-announce" <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 at 01:42:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>
>>> Can you please clarify the current implementation `scope`, and what
DIP1000
>>> proposes to change with respect to the
On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 at 01:42:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Can you please clarify the current implementation `scope`, and
what DIP1000
proposes to change with respect to the current implementation?
It just adds to the existing compiler implementation of
'scope'. It has nothing to do
On 8/16/2016 6:01 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:01:05AM +, Chris Wright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:55:40 +, Dicebot wrote:
You need to add one more level of indirection for things to start
going complicated.
On 8/16/2016 5:31 PM, Mike wrote:
On Monday, 15 August 2016 at 04:58:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/14/2016 9:56 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Does that actually work in D2?
Yes.
Can you please clarify the current implementation `scope`, and what DIP1000
proposes to change with
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:01:05AM +, Chris Wright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:55:40 +, Dicebot wrote:
> > You need to add one more level of indirection for things to start
> > going complicated.
>
> Presumably scope is transitive, so things shouldn't get
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:55:40 +, Dicebot wrote:
> You need to add one more level of indirection for things to start going
> complicated.
Presumably scope is transitive, so things shouldn't get horribly complex.
On Monday, 15 August 2016 at 04:58:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/14/2016 9:56 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Does that actually work in D2?
Yes.
Can you please clarify the current implementation `scope`, and
what DIP1000 proposes to change with respect to the current
On 8/16/2016 11:25 AM, Meta wrote:
What about this?
struct Rnd
{
int* state;
}
void test()
{
scope rnd = new Rnd();
Rnd rnd2 = *rnd;
saveGlobalState(rnd2);
}
'state' is set to null by 'new Rnd()', and so no pointers escape.
On 16 Aug 2016 20:45, "Alexandru Ermicioi via Digitalmars-d-announce" <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 at 14:25:10 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>>
>> On 2016-08-16 11:41, Alexandru Ermicioi wrote:
>>
>>> https://github.com/aermicioi/aedi
>>
>>
>> If you
On 16 Aug 2016 21:01, "Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce" <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 at 18:55:40 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 at 18:25:42 UTC, Meta wrote:
>>>
>>> What about this?
>>>
>>> struct Rnd
>>> {
>>> int*
On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 at 18:55:40 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 at 18:25:42 UTC, Meta wrote:
What about this?
struct Rnd
{
int* state;
}
void test()
{
scope rnd = new Rnd();
Rnd rnd2 = *rnd;
saveGlobalState(rnd2);
}
Same as far as I understand, because
On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 at 18:25:42 UTC, Meta wrote:
What about this?
struct Rnd
{
int* state;
}
void test()
{
scope rnd = new Rnd();
Rnd rnd2 = *rnd;
saveGlobalState(rnd2);
}
Same as far as I understand, because "from a lifetime analysis
viewpoint, a struct is
On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 at 14:25:10 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-08-16 11:41, Alexandru Ermicioi wrote:
https://github.com/aermicioi/aedi
If you use:
```d
```
For the code block you'll get syntax highlighting for D.
Thx, for info. Didn't know about such syntax. I'll update it
On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 at 16:34:05 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On 08/16/2016 07:26 PM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
What happens in that case ?
void test() {
scope rnd = new Rnd; // reference semantic and stack allocated
Rnd rnd2;
rnd2 = rnd;
On 08/16/2016 07:26 PM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
> What happens in that case ?
>
> void test() {
> scope rnd = new Rnd; // reference semantic and stack allocated
> Rnd rnd2;
> rnd2 = rnd;
> some_sneaky_function_that_saves_global_state(rnd);
> }
>
> or is that not even possible ? (sorry
On Monday, 15 August 2016 at 21:25:22 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/15/2016 6:54 AM, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
okay nice, so that code would not compile but code such as:
void test() {
scope rnd = new Rnd; // reference semantic and stack allocated
auto rnd2 = rnd;
On 2016-08-16 11:41, Alexandru Ermicioi wrote:
https://github.com/aermicioi/aedi
If you use:
```d
```
For the code block you'll get syntax highlighting for D.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Good day.
I'd like to show my library aedi (v0.0.1), which implements
dependency injection pattern.
They key features of aedi are:
1) Simple api through which a container can be configured with
objects.
2) Ability to extend the library with custom logic required by
your code.
3) Ability to
18 matches
Mail list logo
