On Monday, 14 January 2019 at 20:21:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Of possible interest:
https://www.technotification.com/2019/01/most-underrated-programming-languages.html
Because no software can use it.
examples:
1. Docker use golang.
2. Middleware system use java.
3. Shell use python.
On Friday, 18 January 2019 at 01:15:06 UTC, Bill Baxter wrote:
Gotta laugh at Ruby being listed as "Underrated", though.
--bb
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 12:25 PM Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
Of possible interest:
On 1/17/2019 11:31 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
Thanks for the thoughtful and well-written piece.
But there is a counterpoint: symmetry in mathematics is one thing, but symmetry
in human intuition is not. Anytime one is dealing in human interfaces, one runs
into this. I certainly did with
On 1/17/2019 8:06 AM, bpr wrote:
Was that a pre C++11 version of C++, or a more modern one?
pre C++11
Gotta laugh at Ruby being listed as "Underrated", though.
--bb
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 12:25 PM Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> Of possible interest:
>
>
> https://www.technotification.com/2019/01/most-underrated-programming-languages.html
>
On Thursday, 17 January 2019 at 22:44:08 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:20:24PM +, Stefan Koch via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
P.S. There is one caveat: because of how type-functions work
they cannot, you cannot create a non-anonymous symbol inside a
type-function,
Am 17.01.19 um 23:20 schrieb Stefan Koch:
> For 2 years I have pondered this problem, and I did come up with a
> solution.
> It's actually not that hard to have CTFE interact with type-tuples.
> You can pass them as function parameters, or return them if you wish.
> Of course a type-tuple
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:20:24PM +, Stefan Koch via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Thursday, 17 January 2019 at 19:31:24 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
> > Coming back to the D example at the end, I totally agree with the
> > sentiment that D templates, in spite of their significant
> >
On Thursday, 17 January 2019 at 19:31:24 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 06:03:07PM +, Paul Backus via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: [...]
[2]
https://bartoszmilewski.com/2009/10/21/what-does-haskell-have-to-do-with-c/
[...]
Coming back to the D example at the end, I
On Monday, 14 January 2019 at 20:21:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Of possible interest:
https://www.technotification.com/2019/01/most-underrated-programming-languages.html
What's interesting here is the language nim, which perhaps has
some lessons for D.
https://nim-lang.org/
On 1/17/19 2:31 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 06:03:07PM +, Paul Backus via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[...]
[2]
https://bartoszmilewski.com/2009/10/21/what-does-haskell-have-to-do-with-c/
[...]
Haha, seems D did better than C++ in this respect, but not quite at the
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 06:03:07PM +, Paul Backus via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[...]
> [2]
> https://bartoszmilewski.com/2009/10/21/what-does-haskell-have-to-do-with-c/
[...]
Haha, seems D did better than C++ in this respect, but not quite at the
level of Haskell.
The C++ example of a
On Thursday, 17 January 2019 at 16:06:39 UTC, bpr wrote:
On Thursday, 17 January 2019 at 01:59:29 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
Bartosz Milewski is a C++ programmer and a Haskell fan. He
once gave a presentation at NWCPP where he wrote a few lines
of Haskell code. Then, he showed the same code
On Thursday, 17 January 2019 at 01:59:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/16/2019 4:19 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 11:43:19PM +, John Carter via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[...]
Yes, that's one of the outstanding qualities of D, and one
that I was
immensely impressed
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:17:18AM +, Tony via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Sunday, 13 January 2019 at 04:04:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> > One major takeaway is that the bugs/line are the same regardless of
> > the language used. This means that languages that enable more
> >
On Sunday, 13 January 2019 at 04:04:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
One major takeaway is that the bugs/line are the same
regardless of the language used. This means that languages that
enable more expression in fewer lines of code result in fewer
bugs for the same functionality.
Is the data
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 05:59:29PM -0800, Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[...]
> Bartosz Milewski is a C++ programmer and a Haskell fan. He once gave a
> presentation at NWCPP where he wrote a few lines of Haskell code.
> Then, he showed the same code written using C++ template
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
