On Thursday, 5 December 2019 at 16:14:01 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
And -- mostly out of curiosity -- what are the major
differences compared to other D XML libraries
or my beloved dom.d
On Friday, 6 December 2019 at 08:58:38 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
as they were all related to HTML parsing
Indeed, it is biased toward that use case, but it actually does
quite a few extra things too that I don't market as much (and
takes some extra code to fully enable - like the
I'm gonna drop the link here without further comment:
https://github.com/adamdruppe/d_android
hopefully I've written enough in the repo so anyone who wants to
play with it can... and if not, I need to fix the docs :)
let me know if you find any success or failure playing with it.
On Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 20:56:54 UTC, Dennis wrote:
I was surprised by him mentioning that as well. I'm glad it
stayed too, since I actually use them.
Indeed, me too. And they are definitely still there and I'd be
quite sad if they disappeared.
On Friday, 25 October 2019 at 21:53:05 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
We use iOS. If somebody were willing to do the work of
bringing LDC up to date and maintaining it maybe we could
support the work, or at least contribute to it.
I have a bunch of patches I was working on a few weekends ago.
On Wednesday, 27 November 2019 at 14:35:53 UTC, Ernesto
Castellotti wrote:
I wrote a page in the wiki for basic information on how to use
D on AVR 8-bit, using LLVM and LDC.
Nice! We should compile this option into upstream ldc so the
binaries just work too for maximum convenience.
In short use `in(false)` when you `override` a function to
inherit the contract, unless you explicitly want to expand the
input - which you shouldn't do when implementing an interface!
Wrote about it in more details here:
http://dpldocs.info/this-week-in-d/Blog.Posted_2019_12_02.html
i think
On Thursday, 28 November 2019 at 13:10:44 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
This is the done already by reggae. Unfortunately, since every
D module is effectively a header, the number of files that need
to be recompiled is usually large, despite the fact that for
most changes the recompilation isn't
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 23:46:31 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Oooh very nice!! That's wonderful to hear. So you're saying
LDC out-of-the-box can cross-compile from Linux to Windows
directly? How to do this? I'm *very* interested!
ldc2 -mtriple=x86_64-pc-windows-msvc
though you will
On Sunday, 6 October 2019 at 07:18:37 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Speaking of performance, I was intrigued by the Reddit response
noting that Rust can go one better by eliminating the error
path at compile time:
D can eliminate error paths at compile time too, e.g. static
assert -
On Thursday, 19 December 2019 at 11:48:21 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
I wonder whether D could be enhanced in future to make the CRTP
idiom a little bit nicer:
It is also possible to do a mixin for most the same result.
But yeah if the language were to change there's some fun things.
The two I
On Wednesday, 18 December 2019 at 12:29:17 UTC, kinke wrote:
The android-ldc wrapper is already ~160 lines, and AFAICT, it's
a rather cumbersome alternative to simply setting up ldc2.conf
appropriately.
tbh I didn't even know there was a such thing as ldc2.conf.
This indeed might be better
On Wednesday, 18 December 2019 at 15:53:14 UTC, kinke wrote:
Heh, it looks like the Wiki page
Yeah, I found the wiki pages just generally didn't actually work
when I tried them; prolly outdated.
But your example there is simpler than I thought it would be. I'm
gonna try using this
On Tuesday, 17 December 2019 at 18:29:32 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Runtime initialization is now working, and you can create a
Java VM
I now have this tested and working on Windows and Linux.
- Method overloading;
This is fixed in the newest commit too.
```D
import arsd.jni;
final class
On Monday, 24 February 2020 at 19:35:16 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Having the compiler lower string interpolation to some hidden
template is - AST macros. We're not doing AST macros.
This is untrue.
Hidden user-defined semantics are not for D.
We are NOT calling for this.
What, exactly,
On Monday, 24 February 2020 at 20:55:16 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
and proposed a lowering to:
> i"your hex data is ${%02x}someByte"
>
> (_d_interpolated_string!("your hex data is ",
> _d_interpolated_format_spec("%02x"))(), someByte)
Do you understand that `_d_interpolated_string` and
On Monday, 24 February 2020 at 21:41:22 UTC, aliak wrote:
Does that mean no betterC support if it's in druntime?
It would actually still work there because there is no actual
code to link, just a compile-time definition to look up.
For example, the name `string` itself is a druntime
On Wednesday, 26 February 2020 at 12:18:07 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
But to be thrice fair, Adam/Steven's proposal would work with
the minor extension `f(i"hello $a".format)`/`f(i"hello
$a".to!string)`, in keeping with the trend of GC use requiring
explicit opt-in.
Actually, thanks to the
On Wednesday, 26 February 2020 at 09:57:58 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
Requiring the compiler to use a specific template that is not
specified by the user has no place in a language specification
(and therefore no place in a proposed language change).
I think more naturally in D code rather
On Saturday, 29 February 2020 at 00:57:54 UTC, aliak wrote:
Also another note, this tuple expansion should really not be
called string interpolation, since it does not result in a
string :/ It's more string expansion really.
Yeah, me and Steven agreed on this too in the other thread, and I
On Thursday, 27 February 2020 at 00:21:36 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
So would DIP1027.
We know. It is *almost* there, the format string idea is a good
one. But DIP1027 had a fatal flaw: it made type safety impossible.
One small change - wrapping the format string in a new type while
keeping
On Thursday, 27 February 2020 at 09:34:23 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/26/2020 7:41 AM, Arine wrote:
Yah, what's unwanted about that?
[snip]
You're arguing against a strawman. The other poster's comment was
showing a likely problem with the (rejected) dip 1027, that our
new proposal
On Thursday, 27 February 2020 at 14:32:29 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
2. Have the new type implicitly convert to printf-style args. I
think this is what Adam is proposing. While nice to have, I
don't think it's necessary.
You can read my document for more detail
On Thursday, 27 February 2020 at 14:47:55 UTC, SealabJaster wrote:
At that point, it begs the question of why even bother having
string interpolation.
I encourage you to read my document too:
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/186
It addresses all these concerns. Walter's proposal is dead.
On Tuesday, 25 February 2020 at 13:39:40 UTC, Aliak wrote:
I should’ve been more specific I was wondering if the same
could be achieved without a introducing a new aggregate type!
Well, compiler magic, possibly with more @attributes. But that
gets far messier than a simple struct, so we
On Tuesday, 25 February 2020 at 09:36:25 UTC, aliak wrote:
This may have already been answered in the other threads, but I
was just wondering if anyone managed to propose a way to avoid
this scenario with DIP1027?
Yes, that is the key impetus of our amendment, which I also wrote
up on a gist
On Thursday, 27 February 2020 at 17:41:12 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
auto s = new_type!(
"hi ", spec(null), ", you are visitor ", spec("%2d")
)(name, count);
I.e. the referenced arguments are passed to the constructor of
new_type.
Right, that actually is what my old
On Wednesday, 26 February 2020 at 15:41:48 UTC, Arine wrote:
Yah, what's unwanted about that?
To follow up on this, I expect a reply will be "the user ought to
know how the feature works". This isn't a realistic expectation.
This is why I put in my little narrative in the new DIP, though
On Monday, 24 February 2020 at 16:22:22 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Thanks for the detailed write-up, there are a lot of good
things here.
We talked about this in the other thread, too.
I doubt the one template here will be a big deal. My experience
is templates get bad when we use them in loops
On Monday, 27 January 2020 at 14:16:47 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/01/27/d-for-data-science-calling-r-from-d/
"D [...] interoperability with C (in many cases as simple as
adding an #include directive to import a C header file), "
like it is simple... but it isn't a
is this part of what you're doing with cgi.d this week?!
On Sunday, 23 February 2020 at 18:57:55 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
As the DIP author, Walter also rejected the suggestion to go
with an implementation that resolves to a library template. He
sees that as equivalent to AST macros, a feature which he has
previously rejected.
How is `foo!str,
On Sunday, 23 February 2020 at 16:22:46 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The decision was primarily influenced by the lack of consensus
over the implementation and the syntax demonstrated in the two
review threads.
That's not true, we had consensus minus one - the community
rallied around just one
On Wednesday, 8 January 2020 at 12:10:15 UTC, Chris wrote:
1. How does it fare performance wise with JNI? In the Android
docs they advise you not to use the JNI bridge very often as it
very costly.
I don't know. I don't even have a plan to actually test it at
this point.
Worth remembering
On Wednesday, 8 January 2020 at 14:23:49 UTC, Chris wrote:
Btw, how will D for Android handle multi-threading / coroutines?
So again I haven't actually tested, but based on the
implementation right now you can have D threads and Java threads,
but they shouldn't mix. I think I can fix that
On Thursday, 2 January 2020 at 20:26:05 UTC, visitor wrote:
i see you updated everything ! wow !! :))
yea, the setup program should now download the runtime binaries
for you and set up ldc2.conf fairly automatically (I haven't
tested on Windows yet though and of course it will static assert
On Wednesday, 18 December 2019 at 15:53:14 UTC, kinke wrote:
Heh, it looks like the Wiki page
(https://wiki.dlang.org/Cross-compiling_with_LDC - I've added
an exemplary Android section there as well, using `-gcc` to
specify the NDK's preconfigured clang) needs some overhaul then
if not even
On Wednesday, 1 January 2020 at 12:44:30 UTC, visitor wrote:
i managed to run the test app on my phone via Android Studio :))
Nice! I just realized that I forgot to commit some of the files
so cool that you got it working despite me :)
On Wednesday, 1 January 2020 at 17:12:01 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
A question that comes to mind with respect to your JNI work: Is
this specific to Android, or could we use it, for instance, as
a way to call Java functions from R, where we use D as a bridge
to simplify things?
That should be
On Wednesday, 1 January 2020 at 17:16:19 UTC, visitor wrote:
so to reply : i fortunately had a bit of (very recent)
understanding about D/Android setup and stumbling upon the link
crash without main() i figured that the main() hack was part of
the missing files ... i went, like that, by guess
On Wednesday, 1 January 2020 at 17:35:28 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
bindings generator
oh one thing I forgot to mention on this is that right now it
generates interfaces, but doesn't list them; each class is just
class Foo : IJavaObject {}
instead of
class foo : ActualParent, IWhateverElse
On Sunday, 5 January 2020 at 03:56:37 UTC, visitor wrote:
Not a single line of java!
so i got kinda excited for creating a class 100% in D as well,
but.
https://developer.android.com/training/articles/perf-jni.html
"DefineClass is not implemented. Android does not use Java
bytecodes
On Monday, 6 January 2020 at 17:18:46 UTC, visitor wrote:
hum ... indeed most of the native samples in android are using
java helper classes
Yeah, the NativeActivity is I think the only one that doesn't
(and that's just because Google provides a pre-built helper java
class).
But I'm
On Monday, 6 January 2020 at 17:40:47 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
I haven't tried, but:
https://github.com/linkedin/dexmaker
Yes, indeed, that is a possibility. I might work on this...
honestly probably after several months given the length of my to
do list right now.
On Friday, 10 April 2020 at 17:18:05 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Repro [2] is gone... Does anyone has an idea where the code
could be accessed?
I also maintain a copy of it:
https://github.com/adamdruppe/arsd/blob/master/svg.d
minimal dox http://dpldocs.info/experimental-docs/arsd.svg.html
On Friday, 10 April 2020 at 17:54:16 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
I'am/was confused because I don't understand how "NanoVega.SVG"
fits into the picture. Is it a 2nd SVG parser? Is it using
svg.d? Why have two?
NanoVega.SVG IS svg.d. They're different names for the same
thing. My copy renames
I try to write something on this once a week, though longer posts
like this tend to be less common (and some weeks, like last week,
I post nothing at all...), but I rarely post here since I don't
want to be super spammy.
However a reminder here my D blog is still active and if you use
my
On Wednesday, 18 March 2020 at 21:24:55 UTC, ketmar wrote:
tbh, i didn't really tested stb much (if at all).
I stole your code in my repo and use it with simpleaudio... i
haven't used it super extensively (nor is it in my dub file btw)
but what I have done with it works beautifully fine.
Let's do a little online thing instead! We could do a chat room,
livestream, blog, you know stuff like that.
On Tuesday, 24 March 2020 at 23:23:53 UTC, norm wrote:
When I try to access the documentation for dietpc I get the
error below.
There is no API documentation, but the github readme has some:
https://github.com/schveiguy/dietpc
On Tuesday, 24 March 2020 at 23:33:21 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Hm... I didn't create any DDOC documentation, all the docs are
in the readme. It's an application.
yeah. you might just change teh documentation thing in the
code.dlang.org "manage this package" screen to link back to your
On Friday, 22 May 2020 at 01:22:19 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
3. Wrap the call to massage_data() with:
() @trusted { massage_data(parameters); } ();
The correct solution is to encapsulate the C functions as-needed
with a higher level API - and this is somewhat commonly done
already and -
On Friday, 22 May 2020 at 13:57:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The DIP review process is not intended for community approval
or rejection of DIPs. It's not a democratic voting process.
The community needs to unite and fix this. It is an ineffectual
process that leads to worse results for the
On Sunday, 24 May 2020 at 08:55:32 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I can't see a practical difference between:
@safe extern (C) void whatevs(parameters);
@trusted extern (C) void whatevs(parameters);
Both require that whatevs() provide a safe interface.
Remember that D has reflection. If we ever
On Thursday, 21 May 2020 at 16:14:02 UTC, Seb wrote:
Why we can't we have a technical board where the community can
vote in experts and potentially companies could even buy a seat
for $$$ which would mean a lot more for them than the current
very vague sponsorship options.
ditto, I think we
On Wednesday, 2 September 2020 at 18:42:25 UTC, starcanopy wrote:
But if you do create an ad-hoc service, I'd very much use it if
you didn't necessitate registration with an email.
So I think some kind of user account is useful and I figure I'll
require them... but it will be just a random
On Friday, 4 September 2020 at 17:47:39 UTC, James Lu wrote:
And there's a Facebook? Seriously?
A random user set it up and tries to push it but there's not much
activity.
And Slack?
That's more used by like dconf coordinators.
The places new people come on for chat is just the irc and
On Monday, 31 August 2020 at 08:36:09 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
So send me your <= 5-minute videos describing your talks, folks!
There's basically zero chance of me doing this part specifically.
But on the other hand, between my self-loathing and
procrastination, I probably won't record a talk
On Wednesday, 2 September 2020 at 07:38:01 UTC, JN wrote:
One thing I always feel this forum is missing is a section for
work in progress projects, even if they never end up anywhere.
Yeah, I often want a place to just gab. I kinda do in my blog,
but that's more often something that is more
On Wednesday, 2 September 2020 at 13:31:25 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
I could write that in a few hours.
I went ahead and did it:
https://dwidder.arsdnet.net/
might move later but eh the basics work i think.
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 at 08:33:35 UTC, aberba wrote:
Now I really want to sew your D web workflow and stack in use
at DConf Online. Don't say no!!
Yeah, I did tell the dconf people I'd do a livestream thing if
they need me, but I was thinking about making an Asteroids clone
or
On Sunday, 18 October 2020 at 22:40:53 UTC, aberba wrote:
Not sure what to do with the .7z file without manual tinkering.
You can simply unzip it and use it directly.
That's the best way to use most D compilers actually, then any
versions can live side by side without affecting each other.
On Monday, 19 October 2020 at 14:20:02 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
Are we looking at the same instructions?
ah i mixed it up with
https://dlang.org/dmd-linux.html#installation in my brain without
clicking the link :(
sorry my bad those are ok.
On Monday, 19 October 2020 at 13:43:14 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
I'm not suggesting that this fills the need of newbies, but
there is this: https://dlang.org/install.html.
Nobody should ever follow those terrible instructions, they leave
you so fragile in the event of future updates, takes
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 10:08:24 UTC, tchaloupka wrote:
* new RAW tests in C to utilize epoll and io_uring (using
liburing) event loops - so we have some ground base we can
compare against
I fixed some buffering issues in cgi.d and, if you have the right
concurrency level that
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 18:44:06 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
What time is it and what's the chat link?
A bunch of us coming and going at all hours, decent group on now.
https://meet.jit.si/Dlang2020SeptemberBeerConf
password: -preview=in
I fixed my event loop last night so I'll prolly release that at
some point after a lil more testing, it fixes my keep-alive
numbers... but harms the others so I wanna see if I can maintain
those too.
On Friday, 29 May 2020 at 21:18:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
The idea is the simple, general rule that:
There's already exceptions to that.
public public void foo() {}
is an error, whereas
public:
public void foo() {}
is not.
Having a simple, general rule with maybe a less favorable
On Saturday, 30 May 2020 at 20:14:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 5/30/20 4:02 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
module foo; @safe:
Again, not the same. Read the full thread that you quoted above.
And even aside from inference, it doesn't actually work for most
the attributes.
@safe
On Friday, 22 May 2020 at 16:39:42 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
Fortunately, the above point can be more easily fixed by making
`free` @system
With the o/b system `free` might actually work out OK
On Friday, 22 May 2020 at 17:07:37 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
And so I was convinced that everything being @safe is actually
ok, especially because in real life, most C/C++ APIs aren't
going to secretly corrupt your code.
I wrote up a thing about this earlier then deleted it because I
didn't
With my lib, the -version=embedded_httpd_threads build should
give more consistent results in tests like this.
The process pool it uses by default in a dub build is more crash
resilient, but does have a habit of dropping excessive concurrent
connections. This forces them to retry which
http://webassembly.arsdnet.net/
tetris.d source here:
http://dpldocs.info/this-week-in-d/Blog.Posted_2020_08_03.html#tetris-in-d
web assembly source and explanation here:
http://dpldocs.info/this-week-in-d/Blog.Posted_2020_08_10.html
Short version: BARE MINIMUM druntime port to webassembly
On Monday, 10 August 2020 at 16:24:02 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Bug report: the score doesn't increase for me when I complete a
line ;)
The reason for that is actually explained in the article; has to
do with webassembly not blocking on eventLoop and the program was
written with the
On Monday, 10 August 2020 at 21:30:53 UTC, matheus wrote:
By the way you should post on reddit (/r/programming) if you
haven't already.
I don't really do reddit. I sometimes troll in the comments but
it isn't a site I care for.
That said if you or someone else wanted to and post the link,
On Tuesday, 11 August 2020 at 13:22:02 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
The blog post says it is space bar. Tripped me up too.
Yeah, I learned yesterday that there's a whole other PC tetris
world I had no clue about.
I only ever played the Nintendo/ELORG version on the NES. On
that, dpad is left, down,
On Tuesday, 11 August 2020 at 04:10:10 UTC, starcanopy wrote:
This is really cool. This idea, especially, titillates me:
That's actually easy enough to do I just went ahead and made it.
so behold:
http://webassembly.arsdnet.net/
and the source is pushed up to github, with just a little bit
On Thursday, 2 July 2020 at 17:19:31 UTC, claptrap wrote:
and adrdoc? i think and they put everything onto its own page.
Yeah, I find it is generally easier to read, search, and link
this way. It does have an overview page for anything though you
can skim through.
Even a good tutorial on
On Tuesday, 7 July 2020 at 07:49:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Businesses will not want to commit to a balkanized project.
It's been ages since I worked on a software project for a
business that didn't have many random third (and fourth and fifth
and sixth and seventh.) party
On Tuesday, 7 July 2020 at 13:01:10 UTC, 9il wrote:
This would be good advertising for DFL, haha.
I don't know what you mean...
On Tuesday, 7 July 2020 at 13:00:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Doing that these days would be silly. You can depend on a
specific version of a repository without problems.
I always have problems when trying to do that. git submodules
bring pretty consistent pain in my experience.
But
On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 at 12:00:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
D Language Foundation finance updates
Please note that the bit here saying to search a third party
website is insufficient, IRS regulations state that the
foundation must provide the address on the world wide web and
that there
On Friday, 26 June 2020 at 08:36:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I wouldn't be so sure. See the "Anti-Voting Manipulation"
section here:
you telling us to vote in a specific way is already gaming the
system.
stop trying to manipulate their idiotic algorithm and just focus
on delivering value to
On Friday, 26 June 2020 at 14:02:14 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
But if you do want to vote, I'd like your vote to count.
I've seen no evidence that this strategy actually works. Appears
totally random if a D post sticks around or not. And in a great
many of these posts, people complain that they
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 15:45:48 UTC, Dagmar wrote:
D has a GC. If you turn it off you lose dynamic/associative
arrays, classes, probably something else.
You just have to construct them with a function instead of with
the built-in `new` operator. (Well, associative array will need a
On Saturday, 25 July 2020 at 11:12:16 UTC, aberba wrote:
Oop! Chaining the writeln too could have increased the wow
factor. I didn't see that.
oh I hate it when people do that though, it just looks off to me
at that point.
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 15:06:07 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
hostile ad hominem tone
[...]
deliberate attempt to fracture.
tu quoque.
Let's not assume any motives here. I wouldn't call it "official"
either (and indeed, the title on facebook doesn't include that
word) but no
I aim to write a weekly blog about D, often just summarizing some
recent changes to my libraries or sometimes a random rant (at
times very loosely related), but I don't always keep up.
Usually when I miss a couple weeks, I just post the
auto-generated forum index and move on. But in November,
On Tuesday, 15 December 2020 at 10:04:42 UTC, tchaloupka wrote:
But if these benchmarks helps Adam to make some incremental
improvements it's a plus and many of that can be pretty low
hanging fruit.
Yeah, I think the biggest benefit to changing this around is to
just avoid creating
On Tuesday, 15 December 2020 at 00:32:42 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
It may not be the fastest web module in the D world
It actually does quite well, see:
https://github.com/tchaloupka/httpbench (from the same OP here :)
)
The header parser is nothing special, but since header parsing is
a
On Monday, 14 December 2020 at 21:59:02 UTC, tchaloupka wrote:
* arsd's cgi.d - I haven't expected it to be so much slower
than vibe-d parser, it's almost 3 times slower, but on the
other hand it's super simple idiomatic D (again doesn't check
or allow what RFC says it should and many tests
On Saturday, 16 January 2021 at 16:28:34 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
Do you guys usually have some agenda or is it just drink n talk
about D?
The only agenda is MILKCONF
or beerconf for people who aren't me
People can gab about whatever comes to mind.
On Saturday, 2 January 2021 at 05:43:48 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
Still, why not source code on Github?
Is this really any different? Do you actually audit the source?
simpledisplay is 17,000 lines. How much of that code is pure
evil? Part of my twisted desire to burn the entire universe
On Friday, 14 May 2021 at 17:38:54 UTC, Danny Arends wrote:
Hmm, things gotta have a license, why not GPL would CC0 be
better? is attribution and sharing code so weird ?
GPL is a perfectly fine license. If people don't want to use it
because of that, their loss, not your problem.
On Thursday, 27 May 2021 at 20:42:11 UTC, M.M. wrote:
I assume that you, Adam and Steven, hold the new (YAI)DIP in
high regards. Is that right?
Yeah, there's a few small tweaks I'd make (I opened an issue on
the repo with them), but I'm pretty happy with it and simplifying
the goals like it
On Sunday, 14 March 2021 at 18:25:51 UTC, starcanopy wrote:
int foo() { return 1; }
int foo() => 1;
I'm concerned that this feature will be in purgatory if its
author becomes busy or forgets about it. (Barring another
individual assuming proprietorship.)
I wrote the implementation for that
On Friday, 26 February 2021 at 18:06:45 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Whose tomorrow? :) For some reason I need exact times for this.
Is it all weekend hours anywhere on the world or specific UTC
times?
The way it works is usually one person gets on at some random
point typically around the
Many of you know I've been around D for a long time now and
picked up a lot of random tricks over the years, so it isn't
every day I learn about a new old feature in the language's basic
syntax.
Would you like to know more?
http://dpldocs.info/this-week-in-d/Blog.Posted_2021_02_15.html
I
On Thursday, 18 February 2021 at 07:28:27 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
I came across anonymous classes by reading your minigui codes,
such as [1] some time ago. I did not read anything about them
except your sources. Good reading, thanks.
Yeah, I sometimes see them on lists of features to be
On Thursday, 18 February 2021 at 22:37:06 UTC, superbomba wrote:
Once I start reading, I can't stop! :)
Better be careful, there's about 250 entries now so you could
waste away trying to read it all! (About 145 in twid's first
iteration and now about 115 in the second iteration. Of course
401 - 500 of 568 matches
Mail list logo
