On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 20:39:10 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/27/2014 12:53 PM, Dicebot wrote:
http://youtu.be/TNvUIWFy02I
Ack, need to work on my posture :-(
I just got a chance to watch this, and one thing that I found
more unsettling than your posture was your assertion that
On Thursday, 5 June 2014 at 12:46:24 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I don't know, but the only language I've used with no static
types that made me comfortable was Common Lisp. That was a long
time ago, but I think it was the ease of manually testing the
code in a REPL that did it. Obviously today
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 18:52:53 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 18:12:10 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
And no, it doesn't matter how the current frontend implements
it, because you can argue next to any decisions this way.
When issues like this come up the spec is
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 23:07:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Some of the inconsistencies you mentioned and Brian mentioned
in his talk are actually the result of consistencies.
I know this is a bit of a difficult thing to wrap one's head
around, but having something be mathematically
