Hi! Thanks for the feedback, I'll have a go at fixing the
problems. As for IE issues, I only tested it with IE9. As for the
older IE versions, well, developers are the target users of the
documentation. And they are usually tech savvy people so I would
expect that they use reasonably up to
On Wednesday, 11 April 2012 at 16:23:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Generic-Programming-Galore-Using-D
Andrei
Also on HN: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3829871
#1054;#1090;#1083;#1080;#1095;#1085;#1099;#1077;
#1085;#1086;#1074;#1086;#1089;#1090;#1080;!
#1058;#1077;#1084; #1085;#1077; #1084;#1077;#1085;#1077;#1077;,
#1084;#1085;#1086;#1075;#1080;#1077;
#1089;#1086;#1075;#1083;#1072;#1089;#1103;#1090;#1089;#1103;
#1089;#1086; #1084;#1085;#1086;#1081;
Come on, this thread gives us a great excuse!
This was in reply to http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.d.announce/5763 .
I
should probably start use a proper client instead of web-interface for replying
to
these news groups.
dsimcha Wrote:
Interesting, though from looking at your SimplePlot code and browsing the Qwt
website, it looks like Qwt was designed much more as a set of low-level
mechanisms
with the everything must be possible philosophy.
dflplot was designed more with the goal of being as easy to use
When I saw David's announcement this morning, I remembered that he brought up
this topic
sometime ago(about half-year I think) and I promised to have a look at wrapping
Qwt (http://
qwt.sourceforge.net/) as a part of QtD after we make next release. We never
released the next
version of QtD (as
Daniel Keep Wrote:
... skipped
How is that an overreaction? I entirely understand Steve. He did some work and
now because of the licensing crap another person isn't allowed even to be
inspired by Steve's code, although he doesn't mind it at all. That's why he is
frustrated and reluctant to
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
I've managed to build Tango as a dynamic library with DMD on Mac OS X. I
had some problems first but I managed to solve them and everything seems
to work now.
What I had to do to build it as a dynamic library was:
Resolve the undefined symbol _Dmain.
Remove the
Jerry Quinn Wrote:
[also posted to D.gnu]
Hi, folks,
I'm interested in creating a D front end for GCC that would be part of the
GCC codebase. My feeling is that a GDC that is part of GCC distributions
will likely have more life than one that must be updated whenever a new GCC
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Jerry Quinn Wrote:
[also posted to D.gnu]
Hi, folks,
I'm interested in creating a D front end for GCC that would be part of the
GCC codebase. My feeling is that a GDC that is part of GCC distributions
will likely have
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:hj2njd$o1...@digitalmars.com...
Having a solid GDC implementation you can be sure that it will be included
in distributions (Debian had GDC for quite a long time).
had? Is that a typo or did
Matthias Pleh Wrote:
Stephan schrieb:
I dunno if anyone knew this before but i wanted to give my kudos to a
guy that did a lot for the D community by developing the still best
debugger for the D Programming Language Ddbg
(http://ddbg.mainia.de/releases.html)
The question often
Walter Bright Wrote:
Fixes the Tango build breaks.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.055.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.039.zip
And thank's a lot for this release. I was finally able
Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
Fixes the Tango build breaks.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.055.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.039.zip
And thank's
Moritz Warning Wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 10:22:02 -0500, Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
Fixes the Tango build breaks.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.055.zip
http
Walter Bright Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
This patch is no longer relevant. Here is the patch
http://pastebin.com/m1bed188d that fixes compiling QtD with the
current dmd (I also have to apply a patch from #3600). However I
cannot really file a bug as I cannot reduce it to a testcase
Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
This patch is no longer relevant. Here is the patch
http://pastebin.com/m1bed188d that fixes compiling QtD with the
current dmd (I also have to apply a patch from #3600). However I
cannot really file a bug
dsimcha Wrote:
Plotting. I've considered doing this a few times, but I've decided it needs
to be
put off until D2 is stable and the GUI toolkits for it are reasonably stable.
One
layer of instability (D2 itself) is workable, but two layers (D2 and the GUI
libs)
is not.
It would be
dsimcha Wrote:
== Quote from Eldar Insafutdinov (e.insafutdi...@gmail.com)'s article
dsimcha Wrote:
Plotting. I've considered doing this a few times, but I've decided it
needs to be
put off until D2 is stable and the GUI toolkits for it are reasonably
stable. One
layer
Jeremie Pelletier Wrote:
Lutger wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
watching wrote:
what a pityful sate d is in. this probably shows, that you can't use d
for anything serious and by the time you guys are through discussing
things, people will be using something different for good. too
digited Wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
Walter Bright Wrote:
Rainer Schuetze wrote:
Hi,
the problem is related to a change that was probably done to improve
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1170
see my comments there for more details.
I checked into svn a compiler change folding in your patch. Can you
Walter Bright Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Despite the application of #3301 patch that fixed compilation of QtD,
the new release introduces a new regression, that causes the compiler
to hang while compiling it. This release therefore remains broken.
What's the bugilla entry?
I
Robert Jacques Wrote:
On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 04:40:51 -0400, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu
wrote:
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:45:44 -0400, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu
wrote:
Thanks for yet another great release, but.. has anyone else gotten DFL
to compile? (The latest svn of DFL
Tomas Lindquist Olsen Wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Eldar Insadutdinov Wrote:
Another release of QtD is out. This time, it's Linux-only because OPTLINK
refuses to link the project with debug info on Windows (see bug
http
Eldar Insadutdinov Wrote:
Another release of QtD is out. This time, it's Linux-only because OPTLINK
refuses to link the project with debug info on Windows (see bug
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2436). If anybody wants QtD on
Windows, please keep pushing Walter until he does
We faced a bug that module static constructors don't work with cyclic imports.
Currently it's fixed with a dirty hack which is not really acceptable. Is there
any chance for this to be fixed?
Walter Bright Wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
We faced a bug that module static constructors don't work with
cyclic imports. Currently it's fixed with a dirty hack which is not
really acceptable
Walter Bright Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Now we have to make a manual init function called from class
constructors. I understand that allowing static consructors with
cyclic imports will make order of their execution undefined, but this
is acceptable and actually semantically
qtd now works for windows. Here's the binary package
http://qtd.googlecode.com/files/qtd-dmd-tango-win32.zip . It is compiled with
dmd 1.036 and tango from trunk dated November 2008.
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
qtd now works for windows. Here's the binary package
http://qtd.googlecode.com/files/qtd-dmd-tango-win32.zip . It is compiled
with dmd 1.036 and tango from trunk dated November 2008
We found out that while compiling qtd with dmd 1.038 and newer compiler hangs.
ldc is also affected by this issue. which means that this is frontend bug.
testcase is big of course. What are the possible options to solve this issue?
Walter Bright Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Finally we managed to compile qtd for Windows. But at the very last
step when compiling example, optlink crashed with a messagebox
containing X86 registers content. This seems to be a blocker for qtd
working on windows..
What you can do
Finally we managed to compile qtd for Windows. But at the very last step when
compiling example, optlink crashed with a messagebox containing X86 registers
content. This seems to be a blocker for qtd working on windows..
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally we managed to compile qtd for Windows. But at the very last step
when compiling example, optlink crashed with a messagebox containing X86
registers content. This seems
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally we managed to compile qtd for Windows. But at the very last step
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:
This way won't really work because there are dozens of such a functions -
that's for virtual dispatch. I have just solved it by declaring functions
export extern (C) and adding _ prefix to function name when calling
GetProcAddress. So technically
Mike Parker Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
naryl Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:
I'm thinking on putting only C++ part of binding to a dll, while
statically link D part. With Qt 4.5 out under lgpl we can make QtD under
BSD, so this will work.
You mean the Revised BSD License
Don Wrote:
John Reimer wrote:
Hello Eldar,
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Denis Koroskin Wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:59:28 +0300, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
ideage Wrote
naryl Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:
I'm thinking on putting only C++ part of binding to a dll, while statically
link D part. With Qt 4.5 out under lgpl we can make QtD under BSD, so this
will work.
You mean the Revised BSD License I presume?
It's a subject to discuss. I am
Can somebody help me with exporting functions from a DLL? I am defining
functions in C++ like
extern C __declspec(dllexport) void* __qtd_QObject_QObject_QObject(args)
After compiling a DLL with MINGW and producing a lib file for it with implib I
am trying to use them from D.
In D I declare them
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Can somebody help me with exporting functions from a DLL? I am defining
functions in C++ like
extern C __declspec(dllexport) void* __qtd_QObject_QObject_QObject(args)
After compiling
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Can somebody help me with exporting functions from a DLL? I am defining
functions in C++ like
extern C __declspec(dllexport) void* __qtd_QObject_QObject_QObject(args)
After compiling
Max Samukha Wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:48:07 -0500, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Eldar
Denis Koroskin Wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:59:28 +0300, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
ideage Wrote:
Great stuff!
Expect window's version!
So after some time trying to build qtd windows packages I realized that
there are huge issues. I tried first
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Denis Koroskin Wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:59:28 +0300, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
ideage Wrote:
Great stuff!
Expect window's version
ideage Wrote:
Great stuff!
Expect window's version!
So after some time trying to build qtd windows packages I realized that there
are huge issues. I tried first dmd and since I have to link D part of wrapper
with C++ object files produced by mingw - it didnt work and I was told that
grauzone Wrote:
Do I see correctly, that you didn't need to introduce a MOC compiler for
D? And that the Signal and Slots implementation is written in pure D?
Yes. But it is limited. No information, no dynamic invokation, different type
of connections not implemented(but this theoretically
David Ferenczi Wrote:
I'm glad to see this release and the progress of qtd!
Coudl you please provide a link to the tutrial? Many thanks!
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first
implementation of signals and slots(thanks to great people
ideage Wrote:
Great stuff!
Expect window's version!
I will probably do it in couple of weeks. Don't have time now :(
Walter Bright Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
The main issue is that signals and slots and therefore event-handling
in toolkit is not implemented. So it means that it is not really
useful right now. But still we decide that it will be better than
announce that not, to let people know
with the binding itself.
Thank you, best regards.
Eldar Insafutdinov
MOC.
--bb
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
2 month passed since the work on Qt binding started and we got first
results now. There are about 130 classes that work now or I better say
_should_ work now because it requires a lot
56 matches
Mail list logo
