Am 22.11.2013 17:15, schrieb John Colvin:
On Friday, 22 November 2013 at 13:36:08 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
I don't have any issue with Java and do like the language, but it has
lost its place if you care about portable code across mobile platforms.
Ironic, much? :p
Sadly yes. There is hope wi
I haven't tried it, but here is an idea to target the JVM:
- use ldc `-output-ll` option to generate LLVM IR.
- use the LLJVM backend to generate some Jasmin assembly code
from the LLVM IR ( as described on
https://github.com/davidar/lljvm)
- link with the LLJVM linker.
This may produce some
On Friday, 22 November 2013 at 13:36:08 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
I don't have any issue with Java and do like the language, but
it has lost its place if you care about portable code across
mobile platforms.
Ironic, much? :p
On Friday, 22 November 2013 at 12:45:19 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-11-22 06:30, Paulo Pinto wrote:
that Google leaves to the developers the effort of
creating the JNI wrappers themselves, instead of providing a
nice C++
API for them.
I guess they want their developers to use Java. Ot
On 2013-11-22 06:30, Paulo Pinto wrote:
that Google leaves to the developers the effort of
creating the JNI wrappers themselves, instead of providing a nice C++
API for them.
I guess they want their developers to use Java. Otherwise they would
have made C++ a first class citizens and not forc
On Friday, 22 November 2013 at 07:48:34 UTC, eles wrote:
On Friday, 22 November 2013 at 05:30:00 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Am 22.11.2013 00:52, schrieb John J:
On 11/21/2013 05:02 PM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Am 21.11.2013 21:25, schrieb inout:
On Thursday, 21 November 2013 at 07:35:01 UTC, Volcz wro
On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 09:44 +0200, Rory McGuire wrote:
[…]
> Nice one, I have to use Java at work, it would be awesome if I didn't have
> to.
> Would be cool if you make it so that the outputs to java are just trasforms
> of the AST that way people could write other types of output such as C.
Just
Surely the main requirements would be gui and networking? Which would be
completely possible.
On 15 Nov 2013 12:05, "John Colvin" wrote:
> On Friday, 15 November 2013 at 08:50:14 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
>
>> On Friday, 15 November 2013 at 07:13:34 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
>>
>>> Hey everyone!
>
On Friday, 15 November 2013 at 08:50:14 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 15 November 2013 at 07:13:34 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan
wrote:
Hey everyone!
I have been experimenting for the past couple of days with an
idea I had, and since I recently made a little progress I
thought I would share some of
On Friday, 15 November 2013 at 07:13:34 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
Hey everyone!
I have been experimenting for the past couple of days with an
idea I had, and since I recently made a little progress I
thought I would share some of what I have been doing with you.
What I have done, in a nutshel
On Friday, 15 November 2013 at 07:30:07 UTC, Timur Gafarov wrote:
Maybe it would be better to compile D directly into JVM/Dalvik
bytecode?
Oh, absolutely. Like I said though, I don't really know that much
about compilers so I decided to go this route. Also, it's
actually been a pretty fun p
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
>
> I can, and would love to go in to more detail about this, but it is
> getting late and this post is already quite long. Maybe I should start a
> blog about my D escapades? Anyways, I would love to hear feedback on this
> idea! Thanks for yo
15.11.2013 10:13, Jeremy DeHaan пишет:
Hey everyone!
I have been experimenting for the past couple of days with an idea I
had, and since I recently made a little progress I thought I would share
some of what I have been doing with you. What I have done, in a
nutshell, is began the process for a
13 matches
Mail list logo
