On Tuesday, 3 September 2013 at 10:28:56 UTC, Pavel Kirienko
wrote:
Guys, I decided to stay away from phobos integration at least
until it has some HTTP server out of the box.
Anyway this decision does not make xmlrpc-d less usable. :)
You can try to integrate in Phobos only xmlrpc-d client.
I
Guys, I decided to stay away from phobos integration at least
until it has some HTTP server out of the box.
Anyway this decision does not make xmlrpc-d less usable. :)
02-Sep-2013 20:41, Flamaros пишет:
On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 15:54:12 UTC, Pavel Kirienko wrote:
I don't think a real server is needed here. A simple listen on a port is
sufficient.
Well I don't expect that to pass review :)
--
Dmitry Olshansky
On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 15:54:12 UTC, Pavel Kirienko wrote:
On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 15:37:16 UTC, ilya-stromberg
wrote:
On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 15:12:24 UTC, Pavel Kirienko
wrote:
So, the question is: shall I make a pull request for xmlrpc-d
with no HTTP server included? Is
On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 15:54:12 UTC, Pavel Kirienko wrote:
I know vibe.d, but it does not seem to be going into phobos,
does it?
I don't know, you should contact Sönke Ludwig to find out it.
As I can see, there are a lot of code that could be useful for
Phobos.
On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 15:37:16 UTC, ilya-stromberg wrote:
On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 15:12:24 UTC, Pavel Kirienko
wrote:
So, the question is: shall I make a pull request for xmlrpc-d
with no HTTP server included? Is there anyone who have a solid
HTTP server which is good enough for
On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 15:12:24 UTC, Pavel Kirienko wrote:
So, the question is: shall I make a pull request for xmlrpc-d
with no HTTP server included? Is there anyone who have a solid
HTTP server which is good enough for the standard library? We
could cooperate.
As I know, the Vibe.d
On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 10:31:15 UTC, Flamaros wrote:
I hope you'll made pull requests for an integration to phobos.
I should warn - it won't be easy and is likely to require lot of
work from contributor. Recent trend in Phobos contribution is to
require good integration with existing
On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 14:07:52 UTC, ilya-stromberg wrote:
On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 10:31:15 UTC, Flamaros wrote:
We'll need RPC for our projects, we are interested.
I hope you'll made pull requests for an integration to phobos.
+1
It's really useful project.
Thanks!
To be ho
On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 10:31:15 UTC, Flamaros wrote:
We'll need RPC for our projects, we are interested.
I hope you'll made pull requests for an integration to phobos.
+1
It's really useful project.
On Sunday, 1 September 2013 at 19:50:47 UTC, Pavel Kirienko wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am working on some D-based project that needs to call and
serve XML-RPC procedures with multiple output parameters. Quick
lookaround revealed that:
1. There are no XML-RPC servers implemented in D, or wrapped in
On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 05:53:22 UTC, angel wrote:
Did you look at std.serialization (currently in the review
queue)
? An RPC does need serialization.
Yes I'm aware of std.serialization, but it does not seem to
support XML-RPC data representation.
So I decided to use std.xml, with plan
Did you look at std.serialization (currently in the review queue)
? An RPC does need serialization.
13 matches
Mail list logo
