[Issue 5314] Wrong error message: struct within immutable member and postblit function

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5314 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2010-12-06 00:21:15 PST --- @nfxjfg This program shows when init, a constructor, the postblit constructor, and opAssign are used: import std.stdio; struct Foo { int a = 7;

[Issue 5094] No implicit conversion with alias property this

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5094 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3659] Too much exegesis on opEquals

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3659 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid, spec

[Issue 5100] -O Degrades performance of loop statements

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5100 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---

[Issue 3971] Syntax semantics for array assigns

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3971 Denis Derman denis.s...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||denis.s...@gmail.com

[Issue 5326] GC -- 99% CPU in gc@gcx@Gcx@mark()

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5326 nfx...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nfx...@gmail.com --- Comment #1

[Issue 5326] GC -- 99% CPU in gc@gcx@Gcx@mark()

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5326 --- Comment #2 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-12-06 02:15:59 PST --- PS: scope doesn't work on arrays. Your example code never explicitly free's the memory. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

[Issue 5294] -O optimization breaks for loop

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5294 --- Comment #5 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-12-06 03:15:42 PST --- Automatic fuzzy testing like this one allows to discover compiler bugs like that:

[Issue 3971] Syntax semantics for array assigns

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3971 Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@iname.com ---

[Issue 5294] -O optimization breaks for loop

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5294 --- Comment #6 from Stephan Dilly s...@extrawurst.org 2010-12-06 03:32:26 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) Automatic fuzzy testing like this kidding me ? I wish it would have been found by any test, it appeared in an actual project. while i

[Issue 5327] New: Immutable correctness is broken

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5327 Summary: Immutable correctness is broken Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 5328] New: The addressof-expression that should be rejected is accepted

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5328 Summary: The addressof-expression that should be rejected is accepted Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords:

[Issue 5328] The addressof-expression that should be rejected is accepted

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5328 nfx...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nfx...@gmail.com

[Issue 3554] Ddoc generates invalid output for documentation comments with non paired parantheses

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3554 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 5294] -O optimization breaks for loop

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5294 --- Comment #7 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-12-06 11:53:27 PST --- Bearophile -- That's an interesting link. Currently, DMD back-end bugs are being found at the rate of about 3 per year. So yes, fuzzy testing of DMC could probably flush

[Issue 1382] memory allocated for arrays in CTFE functions during compilation is not released

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1382 Rob Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandf...@jhu.edu ---

[Issue 2954] [tdpl] Appalling bug in associative arrays (D2 only)

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2954 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5100] -O Degrades performance of loop statements

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5100 --- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2010-12-06 14:51:32 PST --- objdump without -O on Linux: push %ebp mov%esp,%ebp sub$0x4,%esp movl $0x0,-0x4(%ebp) cmpl $0x7fff,-0x4(%ebp) jge1c _Dmain+0x1c addl

[Issue 5278] DMD generates programs that immediately segfault.

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5278 --- Comment #3 from Chad Joan chadj...@gmail.com 2010-12-06 18:12:22 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) Something looks wrong with your 32 bit gcc installation. Notice that gcc is invoking the 64 bit linker. Can you successfully build any 32

[Issue 5278] DMD generates programs that immediately segfault.

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5278 --- Comment #4 from Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com 2010-12-06 18:38:25 PST --- Try gcc -v trivial.c -m32 -o trivial to see which linker is being invoked in the working 32 bit case. Also try gcc -v trivial.c -o trivial -m32 to closer match

[Issue 5278] DMD generates programs that immediately segfault.

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5278 --- Comment #5 from Chad Joan chadj...@gmail.com 2010-12-06 19:35:47 PST --- Alright, here goes: c...@hugin ~/cprojects/ctesting $ gcc -v trivial.c -m32 -o trivial Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/specs Target:

[Issue 5278] DMD generates programs that immediately segfault.

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5278 --- Comment #6 from Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com 2010-12-06 20:05:09 PST --- Does this bug report shed any light, specifically the part about changing the CHOST towards the bottom of the report? (I'm not a gentoo user, just using google

[Issue 5294] -O optimization breaks for loop

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5294 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 5328] The addressof-expression that should be rejected is accepted

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5328 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---

[Issue 5278] DMD generates programs that immediately segfault.

2010-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5278 --- Comment #7 from Chad Joan chadj...@gmail.com 2010-12-06 23:44:30 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) Does this bug report shed any light, specifically the part about changing the CHOST towards the bottom of the report? (I'm not a gentoo