http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7398
Summary: spell checker should suppress error messages
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375
--- Comment #3 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-30
01:20:02 PST ---
The failure definitely happened between 2.056 and 2.057. Anyone care to run the
git binary diff thing?
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375
--- Comment #4 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-30
02:02:19 PST ---
Auch, I found it. In druntime/src/rt/cast_.d, the addition of a name compare
saying the classes are the same in _d_isbaseof and _d_isbaseof2.
Not sure what
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375
--- Comment #5 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-30
02:04:29 PST ---
The culprit:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/5d21d47b5adda97759d15ec0139c0d5fac646971
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396
--- Comment #8 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2012-01-30 03:09:44 PST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I would suggest the problem is with the way gdc is doing alignment.
align:
means the default alignment that matches the C
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7373
--- Comment #3 from Leandro Lucarella leandro.lucare...@sociomantic.com
2012-01-30 03:11:07 PST ---
Thanks for the fix.
Maybe it would be a good idea to add the test case to the test suite to make
sure this will never break again.
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396
--- Comment #9 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-30
03:19:50 PST ---
This I think is different from how DMC++ treats the align attribute, which is
where the conflict of interest arises.
Which means that dmd should change to
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396
--- Comment #10 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2012-01-30 03:55:12 PST
---
(In reply to comment #9)
This I think is different from how DMC++ treats the align attribute, which is
where the conflict of interest arises.
Which means
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2172
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2563
--- Comment #7 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-01-30 04:33:58 PST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
D1 only now, as of issue 5299 private inheritance is deprecated in D2.
But it hasn't actually _worked_ in D1 for some time, and the spec
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2172
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2563
--- Comment #8 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-01-31 02:29:01 EST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
But it hasn't actually _worked_ in D1 for some time, and the spec has never
actually given its meaning. As such, it would be to the point to
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396
--- Comment #11 from Daniel Green ven...@gmail.com 2012-01-30 08:06:37 PST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
The addition of an align(0) is not the right solution.
Currently,
`align:` becomes`align(8)`. Ambiguous. default alignment or 8 byte?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7399
Summary: Broken import statement in trySemantic() causes silent
compiler error
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7400
Summary: failing local imports not fully gagged in is
expression
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7399
klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7400
klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=926
Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375
d...@dawgfoto.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@dawgfoto.de
--- Comment #7
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375
--- Comment #8 from d...@dawgfoto.de 2012-01-30 10:01:25 PST ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/142
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6720
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|nob...@puremagic.com|clugd...@yahoo.com.au
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375
--- Comment #9 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-01-30 11:12:29 PST ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375
--- Comment #10 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-01-30 11:12:36 PST ---
Commit pushed to dmd-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375
--- Comment #11 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-30
11:17:53 PST ---
I fixed this in the compiler, not the runtime.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396
--- Comment #12 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-30
11:21:01 PST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Currently,
`align:` becomes`align(8)`. Ambiguous. default alignment or 8 byte?
This is the misunderstanding.
align:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=926
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396
--- Comment #13 from Daniel Green ven...@gmail.com 2012-01-30 11:40:30 PST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
(In reply to comment #11)
Currently,
`align:` becomes`align(8)`. Ambiguous. default alignment or 8 byte?
This is the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396
--- Comment #14 from Daniel Green ven...@gmail.com 2012-01-30 12:01:15 PST ---
The statement:
`align:` becomes `align(8)`
in based entirely on how the parser handles the align attribute.
// excerpt from parse.c line 503.
case TOKalign:
{
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396
--- Comment #15 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-30
12:20:04 PST ---
Right, it's a compiler issue. Not a language issue, and no new language
features or syntax are required.
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396
--- Comment #16 from Daniel Green ven...@gmail.com 2012-01-30 12:23:45 PST ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Right, it's a compiler issue. Not a language issue, and no new language
features or syntax are required.
Yes, I agree. My proposal was
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2483
--- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-01-30 12:24:53 PST ---
Commit pushed to dmd-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2483
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7365
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-01-30 12:35:44 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7365
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7365
--- Comment #4 from klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at 2012-01-30 12:48:27 PST
---
Seems to WORKSFORME now as well, not sure when it was fixed or what the problem
was beforeā¦
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7365
klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7401
Summary: Pure contracts Unnecessarily strict
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7401
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7401
--- Comment #2 from Era Scarecrow rtcv...@yahoo.com 2012-01-30 14:55:06 PST
---
(In reply to comment #1)
See also issue 7224 (that asks kind of the opposite)
In his remark, it seems rather silly. Of course it won't raise an exception
when
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7401
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-01-30 15:07:54 PST ---
I think the right solution for this problem is to wait for to!string(int) to
become pure.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7402
Summary: Appending enum string causes type change?
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7397
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch, rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7365
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7365
--- Comment #6 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-01-30 16:31:00 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7404
Summary: std.range.SortedRange.release() property
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7405
Summary: std.algorithm.schwartzSort.release
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7404
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-01-30 17:40:04 PST ---
See also issue 7405
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7258
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396
d...@dawgfoto.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@dawgfoto.de
--- Comment #17
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7402
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid, wrong-code
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5080
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3731
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k.hara...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3759
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4647
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@esperanto.org.ar
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1973
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2553
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ben...@tionex.de
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3969
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4313
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4517
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4545
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4062
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tomeks...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4554
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5178
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5889
--- Comment #13 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-01-31 14:36:09 EST ---
*** Issue 5178 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6458
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #11
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7406
Summary: tuple foreach doesn't work with mixed tuples
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6497
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7407
Summary: Can't implicitly convert char[][] to const(char)[][]
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6564
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6564
--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-30
22:19:30 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
--- x.di ---
enum Length;
That's not generated by the compiler (at least not 2.057, I don't know about
2.058 HEAD). But how
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7407
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6564
--- Comment #3 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-01-31 17:25:22 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
That's not generated by the compiler (at least not 2.057, I don't know about
2.058 HEAD).
It doesn't get generated by the compiler, but you
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6578
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|diagnostic |patch
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7408
Summary: traits compiles fails for built-in properties of
template instances
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6564
--- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-30
22:38:43 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
An enum declaration creates its own type, so in the same kind of places you'd
want to pass around an opaque struct pointer.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7403
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@me.com
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6720
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-01-30 23:22:15 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5796
--- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-01-30 23:22:18 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6706
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6760
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1449
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6760
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||larsi...@igesund.net
---
84 matches
Mail list logo