http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7419
--- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2012-02-02 01:12:07 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Looking at that git commit, if I add back in the following code that was
elided:
3450a3451,3459
#if 1
if (op==TOKconstruct
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5590
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2237
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2356
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3221
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2883
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johnch_a...@hotmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3389
--- Comment #7 from Leandro Lucarella leandro.lucare...@sociomantic.com
2012-02-02 02:51:50 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Thats a wrong comparision because neither -g not -ggdb make the compiler
fake C++ debug information as C. The -gc
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6681
--- Comment #8 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2012-02-02 03:26:11 PST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Ok, I'll take a look at it tomorrow unless you want it. I know there are at
least two places it checks for overlapping union initialization,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7041
--- Comment #1 from Leandro Lucarella leandro.lucare...@sociomantic.com
2012-02-02 04:07:32 PST ---
We already have so many options for deprecation and warnings, I am hard
pressed to agree that adding more will help more than just add
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7044
--- Comment #1 from Leandro Lucarella leandro.lucare...@sociomantic.com
2012-02-02 04:18:56 PST ---
By the way, I don't find the solution elegant at all, but it's the only
solution I could think of. Maybe it would be better to use the same
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3960
Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marco.le...@gmx.de
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7261
SHOO zan77...@nifty.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zan77...@nifty.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7424
Summary: Segfault when trying to call a templated property with
inout.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: ice
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7425
Summary: IFTI does not work with inout methods
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=977
Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@iname.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7355
--- Comment #9 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2012-02-02
12:07:29 PST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
This rule should work satisfactory:
- The compiler is required to resolve inout such that the behavior is as if
there were
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7426
Summary: Inner struct no size yet for forward reference when
using .tupleof inside it.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4044
Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@iname.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7323
--- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-02-02
12:31:54 PST ---
According to
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/learn/Any_working_JSON_library_for_D2_27727.html
this is related or dup of Issue 2962.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7427
Summary: Cannot use templated opAssign when there is a member
whose type has a postblit.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7355
--- Comment #10 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-02-02 13:05:31 PST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
This rule should work satisfactory:
- The compiler is required to resolve inout such that the behavior is as if
there
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4149
--- Comment #16 from d...@dawgfoto.de 2012-02-02 15:44:42 PST ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/687
Based on patch but had to add another change to e2ir.c.
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7428
Summary: regression (DMD 2.058head) ICE on slightly convoluted
setup including closures
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=977
--- Comment #4 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-02-03 12:47:13 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
This happens because the parser scans across the whole initializer to
determine
if it's an expression or an
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4044
--- Comment #4 from Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com 2012-02-02 18:04:25 PST
---
Because it's one that I hit in looking at a set of bugs and opted to get rid
of. As to the others, they'll be delt with opportunistically and depending on
the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5448
--- Comment #3 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-02-03 17:55:30 EST ---
*** Issue 3828 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3971
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
29 matches
Mail list logo
