[Issue 4231] Solitary opUnary Postincrement and Postdecrement user defined operators are broken.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4231 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #10 from Don 2010-06-08 00:01

[Issue 4231] Solitary opUnary Postincrement and Postdecrement user defined operators are broken.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4231 --- Comment #11 from Brad Roberts 2010-06-08 00:24:37 PDT --- Hrm.. I haven't studied the side effect code enough. Do you know why Comma:Exp::checkSideEffect isn't just: return e1->checkSideEffect(flag) || e2->checkSideEffect(flag) ie, no c

[Issue 4231] Solitary opUnary Postincrement and Postdecrement user defined operators are broken.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4231 --- Comment #12 from Don 2010-06-08 01:22:02 PDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Hrm.. I haven't studied the side effect code enough. Do you know why > Comma:Exp::checkSideEffect isn't just: > > return e1->checkSideEffect(flag) || e2->checkSi

[Issue 4231] Solitary opUnary Postincrement and Postdecrement user defined operators are broken.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4231 --- Comment #13 from Brad Roberts 2010-06-08 02:07:14 PDT --- Something about that code bugs me, but I'm having trouble deciding exactly what it is. Part of it is that there's redundant work. Move the new code inside the else block? Part of

[Issue 3690] Folding Complex!(Complex!T) to Complex!T

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3690 Lars T. Kyllingstad changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 4293] Wrong line number with @disable

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4293 --- Comment #2 from Jason House 2010-06-08 03:31:12 PDT --- My goal with doing this was to catch uses of the default constructor because in the original use case, it was always a bug. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/use

[Issue 4294] New: Importing std.typecons in two modules while unittesting breaks program

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4294 Summary: Importing std.typecons in two modules while unittesting breaks program Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 4294] Importing std.typecons in two modules while unittesting breaks program

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4294 --- Comment #1 from Simen Kjaeraas 2010-06-08 03:57:39 PDT --- Allow me to rectify a mistake in the original post. "dmd a b -unittest" compiles with no problems. "dmd b a -unittest" is what causes the posted bug. -- Configure issuemail: http

[Issue 4231] Solitary opUnary Postincrement and Postdecrement user defined operators are broken.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4231 --- Comment #14 from Don 2010-06-08 04:13:39 PDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Something about that code bugs me, but I'm having trouble deciding exactly > what > it is. > > Part of it is that there's redundant work. Move the new code insi

[Issue 4274] Better array of inner structs error message

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4274 nfx...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|enhancement |normal --- Comment #5 from nfx...@gm

[Issue 4294] Importing std.typecons in two modules while unittesting breaks program

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4294 Simen Kjaeraas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 4003] The result changes only with the order of source files.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4003 Simen Kjaeraas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simen.kja...@gmail.com --- Comment #1

[Issue 3923] std.algorithm.find is too much hard to understand

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3923 Bill Baxter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wbax...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Bi

[Issue 4003] The result changes only with the order of source files.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4003 Lars T. Kyllingstad changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@kyllingen.net

[Issue 3923] std.algorithm.find is too much hard to understand

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3923 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schvei...@yahoo.com --- Comment

[Issue 3923] std.algorithm.find is too much hard to understand

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3923 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||and...@metalanguage.com --- Comm

[Issue 3441] Snow Leopard: Static constructors do not work

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3441 Sean Kelly changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 3441] Snow Leopard: Static constructors do not work

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3441 --- Comment #1 from Sean Kelly 2010-06-08 10:07:23 PDT --- Verified as fixed against DMD 2.046. I'll look at DMD1x as well to be sure. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving t

[Issue 4295] New: IID_IUnknown symbol undefined in phobos.lib

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4295 Summary: IID_IUnknown symbol undefined in phobos.lib Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: link-failure, rejects-valid

[Issue 4295] IID_IUnknown symbol undefined in phobos.lib

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4295 Rainer Schuetze changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de --- Comment #1 fr

[Issue 4295] IID_IUnknown symbol undefined in phobos.lib

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4295 Trass3r changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||spec --- Comment #2 from Trass3r 2010-06-08

[Issue 4295] IID_IUnknown symbol undefined in phobos.lib

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4295 --- Comment #3 from Trass3r 2010-06-08 11:30:20 PDT --- Just found out that pragma(lib, "uuid") is actually present in std.windows.iunknown! But this one is more or less obsolete. std.c.windows.com contains more functionality and also the ComO

[Issue 4296] New: Reduce parasitic error messages

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4296 Summary: Reduce parasitic error messages Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: diagnostic Severity: enhancement

[Issue 4177] __ctfe can't be used in pure functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4177 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Issue 3428] OSX 10.6.1 Access violation when writing to global variables

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3428 --- Comment #4 from Christopher O'Neill 2010-06-08 12:10:21 PDT --- The original bug report was filed against DMD1, not DMD2. However, I can confirm that this bug is indeed fixed in DMD v1.061. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com

[Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463 --- Comment #12 from Sean Kelly 2010-06-08 12:22:20 PDT --- Yeah, the patch doesn't work any more. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 3806] TypeInfo_Const has member base in object_.d and member next in object.di

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3806 --- Comment #1 from Sean Kelly 2010-06-08 13:08:01 PDT --- There appears to be little consistency with this field for TypeInfo. Some have a "next" member, some have a "base" member, and some have an "m_next" member. I'm afraid I'll break som

[Issue 3779] ["123"][0][$-1] causes __dollar unresolved in compile-time.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3779 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||link-failure, rejects-valid OS/Version|Ma

[Issue 4297] New: Nothrow functions cannot use constant dynamic array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4297 Summary: Nothrow functions cannot use constant dynamic array Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: n

[Issue 4298] New: Constant array translated to unnecessary array literal creation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4298 Summary: Constant array translated to unnecessary array literal creation Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: x86 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: per

[Issue 4298] Constant array translated to unnecessary array literal creation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4298 Shin Fujishiro changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1 from Shin Fujish

[Issue 4003] The result changes only with the order of source files.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4003 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|