http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3581
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5671
Summary: CTFE string concat problem
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5671
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5672
Summary: Internal error: ..\ztc\cod2.c 461
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2788
Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrmoc...@gmx.de
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5672
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5673
Summary: Add lookahead and forgetful matching support std.regex
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5673
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2011-03-01
07:49:21 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=925)
Patch for regex.d, all but lookbehind
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5169
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2011-03-01
07:52:03 PST ---
For a more full feature request for regex and a patch for it:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5673
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5674
Summary: AssertError in std.regex
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4543
--- Comment #9 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2011-03-01 08:35:31 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=926)
Fix issue4543 segv
Bump.
Patch to prevent ICE from occurring, but doesn't stop the forward reference
error.
--
Configure
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5675
Summary: e2ir assertion on AALiteral call expression
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4543
--- Comment #10 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2011-03-01 10:50:34 PST
---
And have no testsuite regressions on Linux as a result of the patch.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5676
Summary: Evaluating nested std.typecons.tuple calls at compile
time crashes DMD
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5677
Summary: Calling Socket.select with a timeval hangs using -m64
on linux
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3581
Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3581
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2011-03-01 12:49:09
PST ---
Thinking about it again, I might have missed the point completely. I don't have
TDPL handy right now, but IIRC it allowed overriding the private functions in
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3581
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2011-03-01 14:48:17
PST ---
They can't be kept apart as long as you can't specify whether a function is
virtual or not. In C++, a member function is not virtual unless you mark it as
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5678
Summary: new enum struct re-allocated at compile time
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3581
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir thecybersha...@gmail.com 2011-03-01 15:37:06 PST
---
(In reply to comment #7)
They can't be kept apart as long as you can't specify whether a function is
virtual or not.
What do you mean? Isn't that exactly what
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3581
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2011-03-01 16:08:37
PST ---
Final says that a function can't be overridden. That doesn't necessarily make
it non-virtual. For instance, if that function is already overriding another
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3581
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir thecybersha...@gmail.com 2011-03-01 16:25:18
PST ---
Can protected replace private in all intended usage of virtual private
functions? If so, has it been considered to simply forbid virtual private
functions (with
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3581
--- Comment #11 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-03-01 16:56:18 PST ---
Regardless of this, the patch is still valid (if a function isn't virtual, you
shouldn't be allowed to mark it as override). The question of whether private
means
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5672
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE(cod2.c): if ((long 1) |ICE(cod2.c): incorrect
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4322
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4329
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5482
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4033
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5524
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3581
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2011-03-01 17:35:58
PST ---
True. The problem is that dmd doesn't generally complain about invalid
attributes. And so this case is included. The patch does fix this one instance
of
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4542
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2011-03-01 17:40:31
PST ---
I'm going to chime in on this to say that I definitely recant what I said
previously on this. I do _not_ think that TDPL is correct in this case. After
having
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5679
Summary: Type aliasing this from an access function defined
in base class confuses the compiler about the type of
objects
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
32 matches
Mail list logo