http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4443
--- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-08-04 00:07:00 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
if (!sregs)
sregs = ALLREGS ~rretregs;
c3 = allocreg(sregs,reg,ty);
}
+ //
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4578
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4581
Summary: extern function pointers inside functions
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: link-failure, rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4572
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4519
Richard Webb we...@beardmouse.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4572
--- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-08-04 05:52:31 PDT ---
Thank you for your answer Steven.
then, you must cast your data to a ubyte[]. But void[] can be implicitly cast
to from anything, so void[] wins here.
If you compile
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2529
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4572
--- Comment #7 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2010-08-04
06:02:21 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Thank you for your answer Steven.
then, you must cast your data to a ubyte[]. But void[] can be implicitly
cast
to
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4572
--- Comment #8 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-08-04 08:20:32 PDT ---
Steven Schveighoffer:
Well, I would assume it would return an int[][], which probably would mean
nothing since arrays are pointer/length values, and any pointer/length
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4581
nfx...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nfx...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4572
--- Comment #9 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-08-04 09:23:45 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
any array operation which copies a block to another copies the flags from the
original array block. So the NO_SCAN flag should persist. If it doesn't,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4581
--- Comment #2 from Simen Kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com 2010-08-04 09:20:14
PDT ---
I cannot foresee any instance in which it is wanted that the compiler disregard
the extern declaration, and even if this is the case, there should at least
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4581
--- Comment #3 from Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com 2010-08-04
10:07:30 PDT ---
You can't express intention with extern attribute, because it's ambiguous:
whether it specifies an external function or internal function with specific
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4572
--- Comment #10 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2010-08-04
10:31:17 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #5)
any array operation which copies a block to another copies the flags from
the
original array
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4198
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4582
Summary: distinct field names constraint for std.typecons.Tuple
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: patch
Severity:
16 matches
Mail list logo