http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6029
--- Comment #7 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-02-05 00:02:00 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6329
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7370
--- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-02-05 00:41:40 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7426
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #1 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1726
Yao Gomez yao.go...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yao.go...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7440
Summary: ctRegex does not work when using alternatives ('|')
involving a '+' inside non-capturing group ('(?:…)')
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7441
Summary: interface allowes empty statics and replace of statics
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7441
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7442
Summary: ctRegex!`\p{Letter}` uses a lot memory in compilation
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: CTFE
Severity: critical
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7441
--- Comment #3 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-02-05 21:59:42 EST ---
Yes. You can always open an enhancement request, but as C++ supports both
these things it's unlikely they will change. (There may already be an
enhancement request
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6088
--- Comment #5 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-02-05 04:47:19 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
With 2.058 it prints:
object.Error: Stack Overflow
40B9FC
40B873
...
I can't reproduce it, so if someone
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3971
--- Comment #24 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-02-05 05:52:16 PST ---
(In reply to comment #23)
Are all the other cases fixed?
I know this is an old report, but the way cases are presented in the initial
report make it a pain to test.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3971
--- Comment #25 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-02-06 00:55:42 EST ---
Eventually? Why not now?
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7358
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6060
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-02-05 06:50:27 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Could you please clarify what this is asking for that issue 5713 doesn't
cover?
For this program:
void main(string[] args) {
final switch
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6060
--- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-02-05 06:51:23 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
And the documentation doesn't claim the program invalid.
It's a broken design.
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5713
--- Comment #9 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-02-05 06:59:27 PST ---
Turning bugs into enhancement requests is a good way to reduce bug count, but
it doesn't address the problems.
enhancement sounds like something that someone wants to add,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3971
--- Comment #26 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-02-05 07:25:01 PST ---
(In reply to comment #25)
Eventually? Why not now?
Before closing this bug, a new issue needs to be written and opened, of course.
And I can't want to write a new issue
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5713
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3971
--- Comment #27 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-02-05 07:42:38 PST ---
Every O(n) vector operation already requires [].
But there are other less clear-cut situations. If O(n) vector ops require a
[],
then this too has to be a compile-time
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3971
--- Comment #28 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-02-06 02:56:56 EST ---
The problem with this bug report is that there are too many different issues.
Most of those cases you just mentioned deserve their own bug report, and to be
evaluated
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6088
--- Comment #7 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-02-05
09:15:37 PST ---
XP32, 2.057 and 2.058 don't print a stack trace.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7141
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-02-05 09:18:19 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6088
--- Comment #9 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-02-05
10:32:14 PST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
It depends on the version of dbghelp.dll.
From an earlier discussion on the d-runtime mailing list: On XP I have version
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6088
Yao Gomez yao.go...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yao.go...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7444
Summary: Require [] for array copies too
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2381
Yao Gomez yao.go...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yao.go...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7445
Summary: Troubles with array assignment syntax
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3971
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2769
Yao Gomez yao.go...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yao.go...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6088
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2012-02-05 11:50:46
PST ---
What works exactly? Win7 x64: http://i.imgur.com/r2Tl4.png
Where's the stack overflow error?
You are right, my previous tests have been with access violations
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6088
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2012-02-05 11:54:48
PST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Windows 7 user here. It works and prints a nice stack trace when I compile and
run my console program with rdmd, but with a Windows
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4841
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4841
--- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-02-05 12:34:31 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7199
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7199
--- Comment #7 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-02-05
12:38:07 PST ---
Trass3r's example fails:
R1 find(alias pred = a == b, R1, R2)(R1 haystack, R2 needle)
{
return simpleMindedFind!pred(haystack, needle);
}
R1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7199
--- Comment #8 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-02-05
12:48:05 PST ---
A simplified example:
void find(alias pred)()
{
bool hay()
{
return true;
}
}
void index()
{
find!({})();
}
void main()
{
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6472
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-02-05 13:25:54 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6088
--- Comment #13 from Yao Gomez yao.go...@gmail.com 2012-02-05 13:41:20 PST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
(In reply to comment #10)
Windows 7 user here. It works and prints a nice stack trace when I compile
and
run my console program
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3747
Yao Gomez yao.go...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yao.go...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7424
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Segfault when trying to |Segfault when trying to
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5278
--- Comment #29 from Chad Joan chadj...@gmail.com 2012-02-05 14:06:08 PST ---
(In reply to comment #28)
Yeah, it's a limitation that dmd doesn't let you pass flags to gcc. It's a
different bug though.
Have you actually tried to build PIE
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3643
Yao Gomez yao.go...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yao.go...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4520
Yao Gomez yao.go...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3754
Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7446
Summary: [TDPL] Trivial asynchronous file copy example crashes
with OwnerTerminated
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7424
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #2 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7425
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #1 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4538
Yao Gomez yao.go...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yao.go...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7444
timon.g...@gmx.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7199
--- Comment #9 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-02-05 15:56:01 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7199
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5876
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6088
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|regression |minor
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6088
--- Comment #15 from Yao Gomez yao.go...@gmail.com 2012-02-05 16:10:26 PST ---
(In reply to comment #14)
This relies on Windows itself creating a stack overflow structured exception
event, which is then captured by druntime and turned into a
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4538
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-02-05 16:22:10 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5939
--- Comment #9 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-02-05
16:27:10 PST ---
Using null for the frame pointer works in my reduced example, but not in
David's original one - it seg faults at runtime.
Perhaps changing map to make its
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4538
Yao Gomez yao.go...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3960
timon.g...@gmx.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch
--- Comment #18
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7447
Summary: Alias template within struct/class not visible when
struct/class is accessed through an alias
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6088
--- Comment #16 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-02-05 17:43:00 PST ---
(In reply to comment #14)
In other words, it's always behaved erratically, and is not a regression.
I have just done a little binary search, and I've found that up to
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6088
--- Comment #17 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-02-05 17:55:47 PST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
DMD used to give this valuable
information to me until some time ago, and I'd like to have it back.
Please :-) (and sorry for my tone)
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5227
d...@dawgfoto.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@dawgfoto.de
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7261
--- Comment #3 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-02-05
20:11:12 PST ---
This reduces to:
struct AbstractTask {
ubyte taskStatus;
}
struct Task {
AbstractTask base;
alias base this;
void opAssign(Task rhs){ }
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7448
Summary: Documentation on etc.c.sqlite3 and etc.c.zlib left in
a bad state
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7449
Summary: Algebraic's operator[] is incorrect
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4841
David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4608
Yao Gomez yao.go...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yao.go...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4841
--- Comment #7 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-02-05
22:08:20 PST ---
I believe this is the same as bug 5939.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7261
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7261
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-02-05 22:17:01 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7426
--- Comment #3 from kenn...@gmail.com 2012-02-05 23:45:05 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Probably related test case:
struct S {
static if(hasIndirections!(typeof(this))) {}
}
template hasIndirections(T)
{
enum
72 matches
Mail list logo
