http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024
Summary: Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what
is still supported?
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
S
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com
--- Comm
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6000
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6021
David Simcha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dsim...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #1 from D
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6018
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Crapuchettes 2011-05-17
09:18:52 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=978)
DMD2 -v output
I just tried to create a simple test case, but couldn't get it to break. I am
including the output from DMD with -v. As you ca
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024
--- Comment #4 from Walter Bright 2011-05-17
12:12:48 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> It looks like the RtlCaptureContext call can be replaced with some simple
> assembler. All it needs is the contents of the EIP, EBP and ESP registers.
>
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Panteleev 2011-05-17
12:21:10 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > It looks like the RtlCaptureContext call can be replaced with some simple
> > assembler. All it needs is the contents of
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan M Davis 2011-05-17 12:55:58
PDT ---
None of the Windows system function calls that std.datetime uses existed prior
to Win2K Pro. So, if you use SysTime with either LocalTime (which is the
default) or a WindowsTimeZ
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Panteleev 2011-05-17
13:02:52 PDT ---
Jonathan,
A while ago Microsoft updated the "minimum supported Windows version" fields in
MSDN to only go back as far as Windows 2000. Thus, do not rely on that
information be
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan M Davis 2011-05-17 13:12:57
PDT ---
Well, all I have to go on is the documentation, and it says Win2K pro. I have
no idea if any of them work prior to that, and if they don't, then there's no
way to get that code t
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024
--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Panteleev 2011-05-17
13:18:21 PDT ---
Jonathan,
After quickly patching out RtlCaptureContext, I checked and std.datetime
unittests start just fine on Windows 98. However, the unit tests fail. The
first failure is
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6025
Summary: Fiber does not rethrow exceptions
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5845
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
Summary|[CTFE] "
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
--- Comment #3 from Don 2011-05-17 14:22:02 PDT ---
The bug reported in comment 1 is bug 5845, which is a different bug.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6026
Summary: DLL example needs update due to missing
core.dll_helper
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6019
--- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic 2011-05-17
15:29:33 PDT ---
Ok, I think I have found a very simple test case:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9218759/dll_bugs.zip
The only difference between the two projects is that the one which does an
import t
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6019
--- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic 2011-05-17
15:49:02 PDT ---
Freakin' hell.
Ok so I've ran it down to blaming the header generation.
Here's an example with a hand-generated .di header file versus automatically
generated .di file. The hand
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5845
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-05-17 16:03:23 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is not useful as a benchmark.
Do you want to tell me why?
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6019
Rainer Schuetze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de
--- Comment #5 fr
21 matches
Mail list logo
